New research challenges 50-50 myth: Biological sex of children may not always be random
A new study is turning our understanding of biological sex determination on its head. Long taught in biology class as a 50-50 genetic lottery between X and Y chromosomes, the sex of a child may not be entirely random. According to new findings published in Science Advances on July 18, individual families may have skewed odds toward consistently having either boys or girls — and age, genetics, and environmental factors may be involved.
Led by epidemiologist Dr. Jorge Chavarro of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the study analyzed data from the historic Nurses' Health Study , one of the largest and longest-running fertility databases in the world. Examining more than 58,000 pregnancies between 1956 and 2015, researchers looked at patterns of sibling sex within families, maternal age, and genetic data.
While the broader population showed the expected close-to-even split between male and female births, something surprising appeared at the family level: some couples appeared more likely to have children of the same sex — and not by random chance.Approximately one in three families in the study had children all of the same sex — all boys or all girls — a figure notably higher than simple probability theory would predict, especially in families with three or more kids.The researchers developed a statistical model suggesting that each couple might have their own "unique probability" of producing a child of one sex or the other. While this individual bias remains balanced out when looking at large populations, it could significantly affect outcomes within families. 'It's not that boys or girls are more common overall, but that the odds may not actually be 50-50 for everyone,' said Dr. Chavarro.
The effect appeared even stronger in women who had their first child later in life. This suggests possible biological shifts over time, potentially influencing which type of sperm — X-carrying (girl) or Y-carrying (boy) — is more likely to fertilize the egg.As women age, for example, vaginal pH and cervical mucus composition change, potentially favoring sperm carrying specific chromosomes. X sperm tend to be larger and more resilient, possibly giving them a better chance at success in slightly more acidic environments, which can develop later in life.
The study also uncovered two genetic loci that may be linked to the likelihood of having children of the same sex. However, these genes do not appear to be directly involved in known reproductive pathways — their role is mysterious and not yet fully understood.
'These are just initial hints,' Chavarro explained. 'They point to a potential genetic influence on sex bias, but don't yet explain the mechanism.' This finding opens new doors for genetic and evolutionary biologists to explore how heritable factors may interact with environmental and physiological variables to influence offspring sex.The findings, while intriguing, are not without controversy. Australian psychologist and behavioral geneticist Dr. Brendan Zietsch remains skeptical.Zietsch previously worked on a large Swedish study analyzing millions of birth records, which found no evidence of consistent sex patterns within families. He believes that the U.S.-based cohort (95% white, mostly nurses and health professionals) may not be representative enough to make broader claims.This study could reshape how we understand fundamental reproductive biology. For couples puzzled by having multiple same-sex children — and others praying for variety — the research may provide both insight and assurance. While conception still carries an element of chance, it may not be as random as previously believed.It also raises huge questions for future research: Could IVF or fertility treatments one day account for these biological skews? Could genetics or maternal physiology be guided to increase the chances of balancing the family tree?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Study estimates over 9% of world's lands at high risk of animal-to-human infections
New Delhi: Over nine per cent of the world's land area is at "high" or "very high" risk of a zoonotic outbreak -- triggered when an infection spreads from an animal to a human or vice versa, such as the Covid pandemic, according to a study. Findings published in the journal Science Advances also estimate 3 per cent of the global population to be living in extremely risky areas, and about a fifth in medium-risk areas. Researchers, including those from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) Scientific Development Programmes Unit in Italy, analysed location-specific information from the 'Global Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Network' dataset and the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of diseases prioritised according to their potential for causing an epidemic or a pandemic. Covid, Ebola, coronavirus-related MERS and SARS, and Nipah are among the most prioritised infections in the WHO's list. The team's analysis suggests that conditions driven by climate change -- higher temperatures and rainfall, and water shortage -- elevate the risk of zoonosis, or 'spillover events'. The study "presents a global risk map and an epidemic risk index that combines countries' specific risk with their capacities for preparing and responding to zoonotic threats (excluding SARS-CoV-2)." "Our results indicate that 9.3 per cent of the global land surface is at high (6.3 per cent) or very high (three per cent) risk," the authors wrote. They also estimated about 7 per cent of Asia's and 5 per cent of Africa's land area to be at high and very high risk of outbreak, following Latin America (27 per cent) and Oceania (18.6 per cent). Overall, the authors found that climate-related changes to the environment substantially drove a region's vulnerability to the risk of a spillover event. They wrote, "This underscores the need for continued monitoring and the integration of climate adaptation and mitigation efforts into public health planning." "Translating these risk estimates into an epidemic risk index allows for the identification of high-risk areas and supports policymakers in improving response capacities, allocating resources effectively, and fostering international collaboration to address global health threats ," the team said. A study by the Indian Council of Medical Research found that over 8 per cent of outbreaks reported between 2018 and 2023 under the country's infectious disease surveillance system were zoonotic. Of a total of 6,948 outbreaks analysed, 583 (8.3 per cent) were spread to humans from animals. Outbreaks were also found to consistently peak during June, July, and August. The findings were published in The Lancet Regional Southeast Asia journal in May this year.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
COVID-19 May Trigger Alzheimer's-Like Protein Buildup In Brain And Eyes, Study Finds
New research suggests that COVID-19 can lead to protein build-up similar to that seen in Alzheimer's patients, not just in the brain but also in the eyes. Elevated amyloid beta levels were found in the retinal tissue of people who had COVID-19, similar to Alzheimer's-like retinal conditions. Notably, Amyloid beta buildup is associated with Alzheimer's disease. Researchers analysed two proteins, neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The NRP1 protein may serve as an entry point for viruses into human eyes and brains. Researchers found that introducing an NRP1 inhibitor countered the amyloid beta increase caused by COVID-19's spike protein. The study, led by Yale University and published in Science Advances, sheds light on COVID-19 brain fog, which was a commonly reported symptom following infection. The researchers believe that amyloid beta may act as a bodyguard for the brain, indicating underlying danger. "There is growing evidence linking COVID-19 and brain fog, a commonly reported symptom following infection," senior author Brian Hafler, ophthalmologist at Yale School of Medicine, said as quoted by Science Alert. "While the mechanisms of brain fog after COVID-19 are not fully understood, scientists have found that SARS-CoV-2 can induce amyloid beta accumulation in the central nervous system." The research team is conducting clinical studies to determine if COVID-19 increases the long-term risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, to explore NRP1 inhibitors as potential therapeutics. The involvement of NRP1 in amyloid beta aggregation provides a specific molecular target for future investigation. Other viruses may trigger similar amyloid beta buildups, as there's a need for further research. This study contributes to understanding the complex relationship between COVID-19 and neurological health. "Our study showed that exposure to SARS-CoV-2, in particular spike protein, can lead to the formation of amyloid beta aggregates in both human retinal tissue and retinal organoids," Hafler says.
Economic Times
7 days ago
- Economic Times
New research challenges 50-50 myth: Biological sex of children may not always be random
Biological sex of children may not always be random A new study is turning our understanding of biological sex determination on its head. Long taught in biology class as a 50-50 genetic lottery between X and Y chromosomes, the sex of a child may not be entirely random. According to new findings published in Science Advances on July 18, individual families may have skewed odds toward consistently having either boys or girls — and age, genetics, and environmental factors may be involved. Led by epidemiologist Dr. Jorge Chavarro of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the study analyzed data from the historic Nurses' Health Study , one of the largest and longest-running fertility databases in the world. Examining more than 58,000 pregnancies between 1956 and 2015, researchers looked at patterns of sibling sex within families, maternal age, and genetic data. While the broader population showed the expected close-to-even split between male and female births, something surprising appeared at the family level: some couples appeared more likely to have children of the same sex — and not by random one in three families in the study had children all of the same sex — all boys or all girls — a figure notably higher than simple probability theory would predict, especially in families with three or more researchers developed a statistical model suggesting that each couple might have their own "unique probability" of producing a child of one sex or the other. While this individual bias remains balanced out when looking at large populations, it could significantly affect outcomes within families. 'It's not that boys or girls are more common overall, but that the odds may not actually be 50-50 for everyone,' said Dr. Chavarro. The effect appeared even stronger in women who had their first child later in life. This suggests possible biological shifts over time, potentially influencing which type of sperm — X-carrying (girl) or Y-carrying (boy) — is more likely to fertilize the women age, for example, vaginal pH and cervical mucus composition change, potentially favoring sperm carrying specific chromosomes. X sperm tend to be larger and more resilient, possibly giving them a better chance at success in slightly more acidic environments, which can develop later in life. The study also uncovered two genetic loci that may be linked to the likelihood of having children of the same sex. However, these genes do not appear to be directly involved in known reproductive pathways — their role is mysterious and not yet fully understood. 'These are just initial hints,' Chavarro explained. 'They point to a potential genetic influence on sex bias, but don't yet explain the mechanism.' This finding opens new doors for genetic and evolutionary biologists to explore how heritable factors may interact with environmental and physiological variables to influence offspring findings, while intriguing, are not without controversy. Australian psychologist and behavioral geneticist Dr. Brendan Zietsch remains previously worked on a large Swedish study analyzing millions of birth records, which found no evidence of consistent sex patterns within families. He believes that the U.S.-based cohort (95% white, mostly nurses and health professionals) may not be representative enough to make broader study could reshape how we understand fundamental reproductive biology. For couples puzzled by having multiple same-sex children — and others praying for variety — the research may provide both insight and assurance. While conception still carries an element of chance, it may not be as random as previously also raises huge questions for future research: Could IVF or fertility treatments one day account for these biological skews? Could genetics or maternal physiology be guided to increase the chances of balancing the family tree?
