Midlothian 20mph objectors told extra minute on the road 'won't kill them'
Objectors to a new 20mph speed limit across towns in Midlothian have been told an extra minute on their journeys 'won't kill them' by councillors.
Midlothian Council's SNP administration cabinet was asked to consider nine objections to plans to introduce the reduced speed on urban streets.
And they had little sympathy for those who complained it would make their journeys longer.
Councillor Connor McManus said he had looked over the speed limit plans, which were originally approved by elected members two years ago, and could not see an issue with it.
He said: "There was an expression in the comments that it would take longer to get places. I noted people saying that travelling through Penicuik would take a substantially more amount of time.
"I have run the numbers and I am no mathematician but to get from Mauricewood to Lidl, which is the longest stretch in Penicuik which is in my ward, was three minutes without any traffic light stops. It is now going to be four minutes.
"I am pretty sure a minute will not kill anyone."
Council leader Kelly Parry agreed with his comments adding: "It won't kill you to take an extra minute to get there but speeding can and does kill."
Objectors had claimed reducing the speed in towns could fuel road rage and put children at risk.
One protester said the 'utopian' idea would create the impression roads are safe for children to play on and fail to teach them safety.
However Councillor McManus said roads would not be playgrounds adding "there is no need to drive fast on urban streets."
Councillor Ellen Scott also welcomed the reduced speeding saying recent monitoring of vehicles travelling through her local ward area of Gorebridge had produced some 'horrendous' findings.
She said: "There are roads where children are crossing, so if it takes a few extra minutes so be it."
Among comments from objectors, who described the project as a waste of money which could be spent upgrading the road surfaces had been claims Midlothian Council's 'Tarminator' pothole machine, which was bought by the local authority two years ago, was now being used by neighbouring Scottish Borders Council.
However council officers took the opportunity to address the allegations, which had been circulating on social media.
Derek Oliver, chief officer Place, told the meeting: "I can confirm our Pothole Pro is not being used by Scottish Borders Council. They have their own one. There are only three Scottish local authorities who own their own Pothole Pro, Midlothian, Scottish Borders and Highland Councils."
There was anger after 20mph signs were installed across towns in the county while the public consultation into introducing the new rules was being carried out.
At today's cabinet meeting the report put before councillors asked them to 'consider the objections' made and 'determine whether or not the Order
should be made and implemented, as advertised'.
However Councillor Parry said that the decision to implement the speed reduction had already been taken by elected members two years previously.
She said: "Just to make it clear to anyone watching council has already passed this policy unanimously, we are simply hear to consider the objections which we have now considered and we can move on."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
22 minutes ago
- The National
Holyrood is a glorified council firmly under Westminster's thumb
On August 12, the second Community Council Convention on the Impact of Major Energy Infrastructure took place in Inverness. It was attended by more than 60 community councils representing more than 80,000 people all over the Highlands. Eleven MSPs and MPs from all political parties took part and signed a communique to 'value local democracy' and to try and secure urgent debates in Holyrood and Westminster. READ MORE: Coul Links plans in doubt as new report calls for 'outright rejection' Tor Klein from the Skye Windfarm Information Group was shocked to learn from the politicians that 'there is no plan, there never was a plan, there's no current plan and they [the Scottish Government] are not working on a plan.' It's not shocking because there's no direct democracy in Scotland. Holyrood is a glorified, highly centralised council firmly under Westminster's thumb. It calls itself a government but has none of the powers of a real government. The important stuff is managed for us by a bunch of people down in London who don't give a toss about Scotland. Westminster's decision to privatise Scotland's energy resources and control energy policy mean we have no say over nor receive any benefit from one of our greatest natural assets. It's why our land is blighted and we're forced to live with the perversity of paying some of the highest energy bills in the failing UK. READ MORE: Why I'm walking the West Highland Way for the 100th time Our glorified council is content to stay in its devolved playpen pretending to be a government. Once, Scottish politicians at least made the right noises. On January 26, 2012, Holyrood passed a motion acknowledging 'the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of government best suited to their needs.' On July 4, 2018, Westminster followed suit. Politicians will act for the people only when the people force them to. If all the millions of angry citizens and groups in Scotland today demanded their right to self-determination, we'd be well on our way out of this cesspool of a union. We need the tools of decentralised direct democracy – referendums and popular initiatives – to force the politicians to listen to us. That's why PE2135, to incorporate the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights into Scots law, is vital. Please sign and share it to invert the power pyramid and put the Scottish people where they belong – back on top. Leah Gunn Barrett Edinburgh READ MORE: Highland community councillors are angry, united and very vocal WITH the UK Government's costly military spending plans revealed, including new nuclear submarines (while some of the old ones lie rusting), radioactive incidents can and do happen at Faslane. Furthermore Britain is to buy from America aircraft that can carry nuclear bombs. These deadly military items are apparently for Nato, but still require US permission. It is ridiculous that we have to pay to house these weapons over which we have little control! READ MORE: MoD claims Faslane radioactive leak 'posed no risk to public' We are now remembering that in August 1945 America dropped atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, killing around 200,000 people. However today's nuclear hydrogen power presents even a greater danger to humanity and all life on earth, especially with world leaders like Trump and Putin in charge. In truth, Westminster cash has always been available for nuclear weapons, with less or none for the poor, disadvantaged and disabled. In this post-imperial false super power status, the UK's supposedly independent nuclear deterrent remains a hugely expensive joke. A fully independent Scotland would remove all weapons of mass destruction from Faslane and the huge cash saving would be channelled into the NHS and other public services. Grant Frazer Newtonmore AS I sat in the pub watching Putin arriving in Alaska on TV, it was clear who was the boss. Trump appeared to approach Putin, as he got off the plane, with a submissive display towards him. Many assume he is Trump's real boss, not the MAGA movement or the Republican Party. Putin looked to be in control of the situation, with Trump displaying deference to the Russian on his arrival on US territory. Trump almost genuflected before the visitor. READ MORE: Europe speaks with Donald Trump after Ukraine ceasefire talks From what I saw, Ukrainians should be worried. Not only them but other Europeans. Trump appears to bow the knee to Russia without reference to the USA'S supposed allies in Europe. Most European governments seem aware of Putin's attempt to resurrect the Czarist empire apart from one, the UK Government, whose foreign policy seems to be to ingratiate itself to Trump, regardless of the outcome elsewhere. Its deference to the US mirrors Trump's deference to Russia. Drew Reid Falkirk
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender
For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons, with the news first reported by Sunday Times Scotland. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Gender-critical campaigners sue SNP ministers for defying trans ruling
Gender-critical campaigners are suing SNP ministers for defying the Supreme Court ruling over the definition of a woman. For Women Scotland said it had 'little choice but to initiate further legal action' after the Scottish Government failed to issue updated policies on access to female-only safe spaces. Formal proceedings have started in the effort to quash guidance for schools that states pupils should be able to use the lavatories and changing facilities they 'feel most comfortable with'. It also allows biological boys to compete against girls in school sports if they say they identify as female, The Sunday Times reported. In addition, the campaign group's legal action is targeting rules in Scottish prisons, which allow biologically male prisoners to be housed in women's jails in certain circumstances. A trans woman can be imprisoned in a female jail if they have not hurt or threatened women or girls and there is no basis to suppose they pose an unacceptable risk. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session in Edinburgh seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. The Supreme Court ruled trans women are not women for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, with the definition based on biological sex. Some public bodies, including the Scottish Parliament and Police Scotland, have issued updated guidance banning trans people from using single-sex toilets and changing rooms. John Swinney, the First Minister, said the rest of the public sector should await guidance on implementing the ruling from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before acting. But interim guidance has been issued by the equalities watchdog stating that access to single-sex facilities in workplaces and public services should be based on biological sex. The EHRC has also told the Scottish Government it did not need to delay, noting that the law was already set out in the Supreme Court's 'very readable' ruling and this was 'effective immediately'. For Women Scotland warned Joe Griffin, the SNP administration's most senior civil servant, in June that it reserved 'the right to take further action if the Scottish Government continues to fail to uphold the law'. In a new statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' The National Library of Scotland (NLS) has also been warned it faces legal action after removing a gender-critical book from a major exhibition commemorating its centenary. Human rights charity Sex Matters has written to the NLS warning that it could face thousands of claims for excluding The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht from its Dear Library display. Maya Forstater, the charity's chief executive, argued represented unlawful discrimination and harassment under the Equality Act 2010, which protects gender-critical beliefs. It emerged last week that the book, a collection of essays by feminists including JK Rowling, who had fought against Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-ID laws, had been selected for the exhibition. But Amina Shah, Scotland's national librarian and the NLS chief executive, decided to remove the book from the exhibition after coming under pressure from the library's LGBT+ staff network, who called it 'hate speech'. The NLS said the book would still be available to read in the library. A spokesman said: 'We will examine the contents of the letter and will respond in due course.'
