logo
Australia won't be 'cheer squad' for Hamas: PM

Australia won't be 'cheer squad' for Hamas: PM

9 News2 days ago
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The PM faced accusations of emboldening Hamas after it released a statement thanking Australia for its historic move to recognise Palestinian statehood this week. Albanese today reiterated that a two-state solution between Palestine and Israel would not involve Hamas. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he won't be a 'cheer squad' for Hamas. (Alex Ellinghausen) "I won't be a cheer squad for Hamas and for its statements," Albanese told media in Brisbane. "We need to isolate Hamas, but we do need to find a way forward. There's 147 countries that have already recognised Palestine. "A range of countries in the West, like-minded countries – the United Kingdom, Germany, Malta, Italy are making statements – and some of those countries like the United Kingdom, France and Canada have made it clear that they want to see a path forward of a two-state solution." Albanese said Hamas was using Australia's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood to promulgate its "propaganda". He described Hamas' statement as a "warning" to media to be careful. "Hamas will engage in propaganda because what is happening is the international community are united about isolating Hamas, about supporting a peaceful way forward," he added. Hamas senior leader Hassan Yousef yesterday said the group welcomed Australia's decision. "This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination," Yousef said in a statement. "We call on all countries, especially those that believe in freedom and human dignity, to follow Australia's example." Hamas fighters take up a position ahead of handing over four bodies to the Red Cross in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, in February. (AP) The PM said on Monday that the listed terrorist organisation would be isolated in any Palestinian government. He said the move was predicated on a number of conditions, including demilitarisation, free and fair elections, and ensuring Hamas plays no role in the state. "Hamas will be excluded from the process, we've made that very clear," Albanese said during his announcement. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said she believed the conditions of Palestinian recognition would make it nearly "impossible" for lasting piece. She claimed Hamas had labelled Albanese a "hero" for his Palestine announcement. "It doesn't bring about a two-state solution, it doesn't make the world a safer place," Ley told Today . "The question now is for the prime minister to say, if you have made this conditional, and you keep saying you have, whereas it looks to me to be completely unconditional, what are you going to do now, especially now that Hamas has hailed you as a hero." Albanese responded to Ley's criticism and said the opposition leader had previously backed Palestinian statehood. "She said she supported Palestinian statehood, too quote her, because it will give heart to the ordinary people of the West Bank in Gaza," the PM said. CONTACT US
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli minister threatens Palestinian prisoner during jail visit
Israeli minister threatens Palestinian prisoner during jail visit

Sky News AU

time9 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Israeli minister threatens Palestinian prisoner during jail visit

Israel's national security minister has been criticised after a video posted on social media showed him confronting a prominent Palestinian prisoner in jail. It's believed Itamar Ben-Gvir, an outspoken member of Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet, entered the solitary confinement cell of Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti. This comes as Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has announced plans to build more than 3,000 new homes in the West Bank, which he says will bury any idea of a Palestinian state.

7NEWS The Issue: Why Trump's latest veiled threat could spell trouble for the pride of Australia
7NEWS The Issue: Why Trump's latest veiled threat could spell trouble for the pride of Australia

7NEWS

time39 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

7NEWS The Issue: Why Trump's latest veiled threat could spell trouble for the pride of Australia

It was a telling measure of the value Australians put in the country's 77-year-old Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. In mid March, as the Albanese government looked for an issue to give it impetus for a soon-to-be-called election, it turned to the PBS; loved in Australia - and loathed by Pharmaceutical makers abroad - for delivering medicines at little more than one quarter the cost paid by Americans. Prime Minister Albanese announced, if reelected, he'd reduce the scheme's cap on prescriptions, from $31.60 to just $25. Opposition leader Peter Dutton immediately backed the plan. 'We support affordable medicines,' he told radio 2GB. On complaints from US pharmaceutical companies about the PBS, the Prime Minister seized on the chance for a fight. The PBS, he said was 'a monument to the fairness at the heart of Australian life and we don't negotiate our values.' The PBS is political gold. Supporting it is a 'no brainer' for a federal politician. Yet, five months on that threat from the US, has only intensified and it may yet test Australia's love for the scheme. For President Donald Trump, high prescription drug costs in America have become a cause. Loading content... Last month, the White House announced the President had written to 17 drug company CEOs demanding guarantees 'they will not offer other developed nations better prices for new drugs than prices offered in the United States.' According to a Trump White House fact sheet, 'Americans are subsidising drug-manufacturer profits and foreign health systems.' The statement did not mention Australia's PBS, but if the White House staff had wanted an example, it would have been an obvious candidate. 'The PBS is a cornerstone of our Medicare system' according to Medicines Australia CEO, Liz de Somer, though that's where her applause for the scheme ends. Medicines Australia is the industry body representing many of the same pharmaceutical giants now targeted by the Trump White House. According to Liz de Somer 'we're lagging behind other countries in the time it takes to make new medicines available on the PBS.' 'We are now taking an average of 466 days for a new innovative medicine to be listed on the PBS, and that's after it's already been deemed safe and effective by the Therapeutic Goods Administration.' 'We know these drugs are safe, we know they're effective, but the government has not yet decided to purchase them and make them subsidised for patients. They take too long.' Medicines Australia wants the 466 days average drug listing time, reduced dramatically - to just sixty days. That would likely mean dramatically reducing the time taken by the government and companies to negotiate a price for their medicines. The end result could easily be a bigger bill for the Australian taxpayer. Currently, the PBS costs about $14 billion a year to run. Of course, there is a human cost to delaying approval for medicines. Medicines Australia points to the 'many, many cancer medicines that are not available for patients' in Australia. According to Liz de Somer: 'We are getting one in four innovations listed on our PBS at the moment. That's not good enough.' 'We know that people are waiting for these medicines. We know that they can see they're available in other countries, and they don't understand why they're not made available here.' There is an obvious profit motive for pharmaceutical companies in getting listed sooner and selling their product more quickly, but delays in the system have a human cost. The Albanese government is currently considering recommendations to reform the scheme including measures designed to speed the process.

Melania Trump writes private letter to Vladimir Putin
Melania Trump writes private letter to Vladimir Putin

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Melania Trump writes private letter to Vladimir Putin

Trump revealed earlier this year that his wife had been influential in pushing him to secure peace in Ukraine. 'My conversations with him [Putin] are always very pleasant. I say, isn't that a very lovely conversation? And then the missiles go off that night,' Trump said at the White House last month. 'I go home, I tell the first lady: 'I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said: 'Really? Another city was just hit.'' The Slovenian-born first lady, who grew up in the former Yugoslavia, has been supportive of Ukraine since Putin launched his invasion in 2022. Shortly after the war started, she called on her social media followers to donate to the Red Cross and said it was 'heartbreaking and horrific to see innocent people suffering'. Ukrainians and some US Republicans have praised her for seemingly influencing Trump to push Putin for peace. 'Well, I'm glad that the president has pivoted on Ukraine,' Don Bacon, a Republican congressman, said in an interview after the president threatened to impose secondary sanctions on Russia last month. 'I think we owe Melania some thanks here. Even the president said that his wife reminds him every day that Russia is bombing Ukrainian cities every night,' he continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store