2 obscure clean energy metals are caught in the crosshairs of the US-China trade war
In the summer of 2023, Vasileios Tsianos, the vice president of corporate development at Neo Performance Materials, started getting calls from government officials on both sides of the Atlantic. Within the world of industrial material manufacturing, Neo is best known for making rare earth magnets, used in everything from home appliances to electric vehicles. But these calls weren't about rare earths. They were about something considerably rarer: the metal gallium.
Neo recycles a few dozen tons of high-purity gallium a year, mostly from semiconductor chip manufacturing scrap, at a factory in Ontario, Canada. In North America, it's the only industrial-scale producer of the metal, which is used in not only chips, but also clean energy technologies and military equipment.
China, the world's leading producer by far, had just announced new export controls on gallium, apparently in response to reports that the United States government was considering restrictions on the sale of advanced semiconductor chips to China.
All of a sudden, people wanted to talk to Neo. 'We've spoken to almost everyone' interested in producing gallium outside of China, Tsianos told Grist.
Since Tsianos started receiving those calls, tensions over the 31st element on the periodic table — as well as the 32nd, germanium, also used in a bevy of advanced technologies — have escalated. In December, China outright banned exports of both metals to the United States following the Biden administration's decision to further restrict U.S. chip exports.
Now, several companies operating in the U.S. and Canada are considering expanding production of the rare metals to help meet U.S. demand. While Canadian critical minerals producers may get swept up in a new geopolitical tit-for-tat should Trump go through with his threat to impose tariffs, U.S. metal producers could see support from the new administration, which called for prioritizing federal funding for critical minerals projects in a Day 1 executive order. Beyond the U.S. and Canada, industry observers say China's export ban is fueling global interest in making critical mineral supply chains more diverse so that no single country has a chokehold over materials vital for a high-tech, clean energy future.
'This latest round of export bans are putting a lot of wind in the sails of critical minerals supply chain efforts, not just in the U.S. but globally,' Seaver Wang of the Breakthrough Institute, a research center focused on technological solutions to environmental problems, told Grist.
Gallium and germanium aren't exactly household names. But they are found in products that are indispensable to modern life — and a fossil fuel-free society. With its impressive electrical properties, gallium is used in semiconductor chips that make their way into everything from cell phones to power converters in electric vehicles to LED lighting displays. The metal is also used in the manufacturing of rare earth magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines, in thin film solar cells, and sometimes, in commercially popular silicon solar photovoltaic cells, where it can help increase performance and extend lifespan.
Germanium, meanwhile, is used to refract light inside fiber optic cables. In addition to helping form the backbone of the internet, the metal's exceptional light-scattering properties make it useful for infrared lenses, semiconductor chips, and high-efficiency solar cells used by satellites.
There aren't many substitutes for these two elements. Some silicon-based semiconductors lack gallium, and specialized glasses can be substituted for germanium in certain infrared technologies. Solar cells are often doped with boron instead of gallium. But these two metals have specific properties that often make them the ideal material. When it comes to clean energy, Tsianos told Grist, there are no substitutes 'within the material performance and cost trade-off spectrum' offered by gallium.
Because a little bit goes a long way, the market for both metals is small — and it's dominated by China. In 2022, the world produced about 640 tons of low-purity gallium and a little over 200 tons of germanium, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. In recent years, China has accounted for virtually all of the world's low-purity gallium output and more than half of refined germanium.
That's partly due to the fact that both metals are byproducts of other industries. Gallium is typically extracted from bauxite ores as they are being processed to make aluminum oxide, while zinc miners sometimes squeeze germanium out of waste produced during refining. China is a leading producer of these common metals, too — and its government has made co-extracting gallium and germanium a priority, according to Wang. 'It is very strategic,' he said.
China's dominance of the two metals' supply chains gives it a considerable cudgel in its ongoing trade war with the U.S. America produces no virgin gallium and only a small amount of germanium, while consuming approximately fifty tons a year of the two metals combined. A U.S. Geological Survey study published in November found that if China implemented a total moratorium on exports of both metals, it could cost the U.S. economy billions. Weeks after that study was published, China announced its ban.
The ban is so new that it's not yet clear how U.S. companies, or the federal government, are responding. But America's high-tech manufacturing sector isn't without fallback options. North of the border, Neo's facility in Ontario stands ready to double its production of gallium, according to Tsianos. 'We have the capacity,' he told Grist. 'We're waiting for more feedstock.'
Currently, Neo's only source of gallium is the semiconductor industry. Chip makers in Europe, North America, and Asia send the company their scrap, which it processes to recover high-purity gallium that feeds back into semiconductor manufacturing. But Tsianos says Neo is piloting its technology with bauxite miners around the world to create new sources of virgin gallium. The idea, he says, is that bauxite miners would do some initial processing on-site, then send low-purity gallium to Neo for further refining in Canada. Tsianos declined to name specific bauxite firms Neo is partnering with, but said the company is 'making progress' toward making new resources available.
Meanwhile, in British Columbia, mining giant Teck Resources is already a leading producer of germanium outside of China. The firm's Trail Operations refinery complex receives zinc ore from the Red Dog mine in northwest Alaska and turns it into various products, including around 20 tons of refined germanium a year, according to a U.S. Geological Survey estimate. (Teck doesn't disclose production volumes.)
That germanium is sold primarily to customers in the U.S., Teck spokesperson Dale Steeves told Grist. In wake of the export ban, Steeves said that the firm is now 'examining options and market support for increasing production capacity of germanium.'
Kwasi Ampofo, the head of metals and mining at the clean energy research firm BloombergNEF, told Grist that in the near term, he would expect the U.S. to 'try to establish new supply chain relationships' with countries that already have significant production, like Canada, to secure the gallium and germanium it needs. That may be true whether or not Trump's proposed tariffs on Canadian imports become reality. Tsianos was bullish in spite of the tariff threat, noting in an email that Neo 'remains the only industrial-scale and commercially-operating Gallium facility in North America.'
'[W]e are committed to continue serving our European, American, and Japanese customers in the semiconductor and renewable energy industries,' Tsianos added.
Steeves told Grist that a trade war between the U.S. and Canada would be 'a negative for the economy of both nations, disrupting the flow of essential critical minerals and increasing costs and inefficiencies on both sides of the border.' Teck, he said, 'will continue to actively manage our sales arrangements to minimize the impact to Trail Operations.'
While Canada may be the U.S.'s best short-term option for these rare metals, farther down the line Ampofo expects to see the U.S. take a 'renewed interest' in recycling — particularly of military equipment. In 2022, the Department of Defense announced it had initiated a program for recovering 'optical-grade germanium' from old military equipment. At the time, the initiative was expected to recycle up to 3 tons of the metal each year, or roughly 10 percent of the nation's annual demand. The Defense sub-agency responsible for the program didn't respond to Grist's request for comment on the program's status.
There's another small source of production capacity in the U.S. The global metals company Umicore recycles germanium from manufacturing scrap, fiber optic cables, solar cells, and infrared optical devices at an optical materials facility in Quapaw, Oklahoma, as well as in Belgium. The company has been recycling germanium since the 1950s, a spokesperson told Grist, calling it a 'core and historical activity at Umicore.' Umicore declined to disclose how much of the metal it recycles and wouldn't say whether China's export ban will impact this part of its business.
While recycling is able to fill some of the nation's gallium and germanium needs, there may be a larger source of both metals lurking in sludge ponds in central Tennessee.
There, in the city of Clarksville, the Netherlands-headquartered Nyrstar operates a zinc processing facility that produces wastes containing gallium and germanium. A U.S. Department of Energy spokesperson told Grist that the company has previously partnered with Ames National Laboratory's Critical Materials Innovation Hub to develop processes for extracting gallium, which isn't typically produced from zinc waste.
In 2023, Nyrstar announced plans to build a new, $150-million facility, co-located with its existing zinc smelter in Clarksville, capable of producing 30 tons of germanium and 40 tons of gallium a year. However, the current status of the project is uncertain, with no timetable to begin construction. A spokesperson for Nyrstar told Grist the company is 'continu[ing] to work on and evaluate the business case' for the facility, while declining to offer additional details.
Making a business case to produce gallium or germanium is the central challenge for firms outside of China, experts told Grist. As Tsianos of Neo put it, these metals are a 'side hustle' that requires major up-front investment for a relatively small amount of extra revenue. Moreover, a bauxite or zinc miner's ability to produce gallium or germanium typically hinges on the market conditions for the metal it is primarily focused on. That means 'if aluminum prices are low or the zinc prices are low, the mine or the smelter might just not operate, even if the world is sort of screaming out for more gallium or germanium,' Wang said.
Still, there's more economic incentive to produce these metals now than there was a few years ago. The recent geopolitical drama, Tsianos says, has caused a 'bifurcation' in the price of gallium. Outside of China, the price of the metal is now 'almost double' what it is within the nation's borders.
'There's a structural change in the market that has created a business case for outside of China production,' Tsianos said. 'And it started because of the export control.'
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline 2 obscure clean energy metals are caught in the crosshairs of the US-China trade war on Feb 7, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The North American Tariff Backfire
Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney has extended a somewhat unusual invitation to Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum to attend the Group of Seven meeting later this month in Kananaskis, Alberta. Mexico has been a G-7 guest before, but is far from a regular at the annual confab. The Carney outreach to Ms. Sheinbaum looks like a Canadian attempt to double-team President Trump on trade. It isn't a bad idea. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement is up for review in 2026, and now's a good time for the smaller partners, who are crucial to American competitiveness globally, to lay down some markers.


Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Navigating Homeownership in Texas: A Canadian Expat's Comprehensive Guide to Tax Complexities in The Woodlands
Introduction: When Opportunity Crosses the Border Your employer in Ottawa calls you into a Monday‐morning meeting and announces a career-altering transfer to The Woodlands, Texas. The upside is clear: world-class master-planned communities, towering pines, and proximity to Houston's booming business ecosystem. Yet with that same offer letter comes the practical question: should you buy a home in Texas, and what does that mean for your tax life on both sides of the border? Canadian citizens relocating for work quickly discover that cross-border real estate is less about granite countertops and more about treaty articles, withholding rules, and competing definitions of 'principal residence.' In this deep-dive, we unpack the layered tax rules triggered when a Canadian purchases—then eventually sells—a Texas property. We also show how partnering with a cross-border financial advisor skilled in cross-border tax planning and holistic Canada U.S. Financial Planning can turn potential minefields into manageable stepping-stones. 1. Profile of Our Relocated Canadian Meet Daniel, a 38-year-old software architect from Ottawa who will spend the next three to five years heading his company's U.S. product division. He moves with a spousal work permit, two school-aged children, and an eye toward laying down roots in The Woodlands. His goals: Purchase a family home within six months. Keep ties to his Canadian RRSP and corporate pension. Minimize cross-border tax friction during ownership and upon eventual sale. Avoid shocking surprises if he returns to Canada or remains in the U.S. long-term. Daniel's situation is typical of thousands of Canadian professionals sent south every year. The decisions he makes in the first twelve months will shape his tax exposure for a decade. 2. Why The Woodlands Appeals to Canadian Expats Before diving into taxes, it helps to grasp why The Woodlands is a magnet: No state income tax. Texas's lack of state tax is attractive, but the savings can blind newcomers to other levies—especially robust property taxes and potential federal implications. Texas's lack of state tax is attractive, but the savings can blind newcomers to other levies—especially robust property taxes and potential federal implications. Corporate campuses and energy corridor access. Many Canadian energy and tech companies maintain Houston-area offices. Many Canadian energy and tech companies maintain Houston-area offices. Lifestyle parity. Top-ranked schools, extensive green spaces, and family-friendly suburbs echo the comforts of Canadian metropolitan life. Yet each perk comes bundled with unique tax nuances that differ sharply from Ontario, Alberta, or British Columbia norms. 3. The Cross-Border Tax Landscape—Setting the Table 3.1 Dual-Tax Residency Tension Upon arrival, Daniel could be considered a resident of both Canada and the United States. Canada taxes worldwide income based on residency, while the U.S. taxes based on citizenship or substantial presence. Because Daniel is neither a USC nor a green-card holder, his U.S. residency hinges on the Substantial Presence Test (SPT). If he spends 183 weighted days or more during a calendar year—or elects residency under IRC §7701(b)(4)—he becomes a U.S. resident for federal tax purposes. Implication: Owning a Texas home can strengthen U.S. residency ties, but the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty's tiebreaker rules may still assign him to one country. Understanding that interplay is critical before signing a purchase contract. 3.2 Capital vs. Ordinary Income Canada and the U.S. both treat real-property gains as capital in nature, but depreciation rules, currency fluctuation reporting, and the principal-residence exemption differ dramatically. 3.3 Withholding Regimes (FIRPTA) When foreign persons sell U.S. real estate, the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) generally requires buyers to withhold 15 percent of the gross selling price. Daniel might recoup a portion upon filing his U.S. return, but cash-flow pain is real unless planning steps are taken before listing. 4. Buying a Home in Texas—Step-by-Step Tax Concerns 4.1 Financing: U.S. Mortgage vs. Canadian HELOC U.S. Mortgage: Generally easier for local underwriters to evaluate, but Daniel must build two‐year U.S. credit history or rely on cross-border lender programs that accept Canadian credit reports. Generally easier for local underwriters to evaluate, but Daniel must build two‐year U.S. credit history or rely on cross-border lender programs that accept Canadian credit reports. Canadian HELOC (Home Equity Line of Credit): Tapping equity in an Ottawa property introduces exchange-rate exposure and potential thin-capitalization issues if the HELOC is later converted to U.S. denominated debt. Pro Tip: Some Canadians structure purchases through cross-border lenders who report mortgage interest to the IRS on Form 1098, simplifying deductibility claims on a U.S. Schedule A. 4.2 Down-Payment Sourcing Large CAD-to-USD transfers trigger FINTRAC and U.S. anti-money-laundering forms. Banks may request Form 3520/3520-A filings if funds flow through Canadian trusts or corporate entities. Missteps can incur $10,000+ penalties, making early consultation with a cross-border financial advisor essential. 4.3 Texas Property Taxes & Homestead Exemption Texas eschews state income tax and instead funds schools and counties via property taxation. New arrivals often gasp at effective rates of 2–3 percent of appraised value. Claiming a homestead exemption can lower this burden, but Daniel must establish Texas residency (driver's license, voter registration) while ensuring he does not inadvertently sever Canadian ties too soon. 5. Canadian Tax Treatment During Ownership 5.1 Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) Limitation If Daniel keeps his Ottawa condo and designates it his Canadian principal residence, the Texas property accumulates non-resident capital-gain tax in Canada. Conversely, electing the Texas house as his PRE may jeopardize Ottawa gains. The formula is: Exempt years=years designated as principal residence+1years owned\text{Exempt years} = \frac{\text{years designated as principal residence} + 1}{\text{years owned}}Exempt years=years ownedyears designated as principal residence+1 5.2 Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) and Double Tax Relief When Daniel files his T1 return, gains from U.S. real estate remain taxable in Canada absent PRE coverage. However, he may claim a foreign tax credit for U.S. taxes paid, limited to the lesser of actual U.S. tax or Canadian tax on the same income. Coordinating the timing of sale to maximize FTCs—while avoiding Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) intricacies—is a classic value-add from cross-border tax planning . 5.3 Foreign Reporting (T1135) The Texas home, as foreign real property, must be reported annually if cost exceeds CAD $100,000. Failure to file T1135 triggers penalties averaging CAD $2,500 per year, plus potential gross-negligence fines. 6. U.S. Federal Tax Treatment During Ownership 6.1 Mortgage Interest & SALT Deduction Limits Post-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, SALT (state and local tax) deductions are capped at USD $10,000. Property taxes alone in The Woodlands can hit that ceiling. Mortgage interest on up to USD $750,000 of acquisition debt is deductible if Daniel itemizes. Strategic loan sizing and thoughtful prepayments can maximize after-tax benefits. 6.2 Depreciation vs. Canadian Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) U.S. rules allow 27.5-year straight-line residential depreciation, generating annual losses that may offset rental income if Daniel converts the home to a rental later. In Canada, claiming CCA on foreign rental property forfeits PRE for that year and complicates recapture. Proper ledger separation is crucial. 6.3 Passive Activity Loss (PAL) Limitations If Daniel's adjusted gross income exceeds USD $150,000, passive losses may be suspended. A future sale can unlock those suspended losses, reducing taxable gain—a nuance often missed without sophisticated Canada U.S. Financial Planning . 7. Currency Considerations—The Hidden Tax 7.1 Foreign Exchange on Purchase Buying at CAD $1 = USD $0.72 and selling at parity can inflate capital gains when measured in Canadian dollars. Both CRA and IRS require reporting in domestic currency. Daniel should maintain contemporaneous FX records, ideally automated through multi-currency software recommended by his cross-border financial advisor . 7.2 Mortgage Currency Mismatch If Daniel borrows in USD but earns in CAD, each mortgage payment involves a deemed FX disposition. Over years, small unrealized currency gains can snowball into taxable events in Canada. 8. Selling the Texas Home—Major Minefields 8.1 FIRPTA Withholding Mechanics Unless Daniel becomes a U.S. green-card holder, the buyer must withhold 15 percent of gross proceeds (not net gain). Exceptions: Sale price under USD $300,000 and buyer intends to occupy. IRS withholding certificate obtained pre-closing by projecting actual tax liability. Applying for a certificate demands credible cost-basis documentation—closing statements, renovation invoices, depreciation schedules—meticulously curated during ownership. 8.2 Section 121 Exclusion (U.S. Principal Residence) If Daniel (and spouse) live in the home for at least two of the five years preceding sale, they may exclude up to USD $500,000 of gain. But watch: Nonresident aliens cannot claim §121; Daniel must be a U.S. tax resident in year of sale. Depreciation recapture from rental years is taxable at 25 percent. 8.3 Canadian Capital-Gain Inclusion Canada taxes 50 percent of the capital gain, converted to CAD at settlement date FX. If Daniel already used his PRE on the Ottawa condo, the Texas gain is fully taxable in Canada. However, U.S. federal (and potential FIRPTA) tax becomes a foreign tax credit, mitigating double taxation. 9. Estate Tax, Probate, and Gifting 9.1 U.S. Estate Tax Exposure Non-U.S. persons owning U.S. situs assets above USD $60,000 face U.S. estate tax. Treaty formulas prorate Daniel's exposure based on his worldwide estate relative to the U.S. unified credit. Titling the home in a Canadian corporation or cross-border trust can shield estate tax but may sacrifice preferential rates on capital gains. 9.2 Texas Probate Texas probate is relatively streamlined, yet any foreign executor will need an in-state attorney ad litem. A revocable living trust or enhanced transfer on death (TOD) deed can avoid probate delays. 9.3 Gifting the Property to Children A well-intentioned gift could trigger FIRPTA, U.S. gift tax (if donor or donee is U.S. resident), and Canadian deemed disposition. A coordinated gift-splitting strategy under treaty Article XXIX B may alleviate double levies. 10. How a Cross-Border Financial Advisor Adds Value 10.1 Pre-Arrival Blueprint Residency Modeling: Simulate days in U.S. vs. Canada under multiple scenarios to determine treaty residency and tax domicile. Simulate days in U.S. vs. Canada under multiple scenarios to determine treaty residency and tax domicile. Financing Structure: Compare cross-border mortgage programs, evaluate CAD-indexed lines of credit, and optimize deductible interest alignment with personal cash flows. 10.2 Ownership Phase Management Recordkeeping Automation: Tools for dual-currency ledgers, T1135 reminders, U.S. FBAR reporting, and depreciation tracking. Tools for dual-currency ledgers, T1135 reminders, U.S. FBAR reporting, and depreciation tracking. Proactive SALT Optimization: Balancing property-tax prepayments with SALT cap, charitable bunching, and Roth vs. TFSA contribution timing. 10.3 Exit and Re-entry Strategy FIRPTA Certificate Applications: Coordinate appraisals, gather cost basis evidence, and file Form 8288-B to reduce withholding at closing. Coordinate appraisals, gather cost basis evidence, and file Form 8288-B to reduce withholding at closing. Gain Harvesting vs. Deferral: Weigh selling during low-income sabbaticals or before anticipated CAD appreciation. Weigh selling during low-income sabbaticals or before anticipated CAD appreciation. Repatriation Planning: If returning to Canada, merge proceeds into RRSP top-ups, RESP funding, or principal-protected notes to hedge FX risk. 10.4 Integrated Canada U.S. Financial Planning Across these stages, advisors combine treaty literacy with investment management, insurance structuring, and estate design—creating a unified roadmap. Without such guidance, homeowners may overpay taxes, misfile forms, or miss filing windows that close after 15 June (CRA) or 15 April (IRS). 11. Case Study: Daniel's Tailored Outcome With his cross-border financial advisor , Daniel: Secured a USD $600,000 mortgage through a lender accepting Canadian credit, ensuring Form 1098 issuance. Claimed Texas homestead exemption while preserving Ottawa condo as Canadian PRE under treaty tie-breaker year one; year two he cut Canadian ties and became U.S. resident, unlocking §121 eligibility. Automated FX logs via multi-currency bookkeeping to track CAD cost basis. Initiated a revocable trust holding title, minimizing probate and segmenting estate-tax exposure. Filed Form 8288-B at listing; buyer withheld only estimated tax, freeing cash for a down payment on a new Houston suburb upgrade. Leveraged foreign tax credits to eliminate Canadian tax after Ottawa condo sale, resulting in combined capital-gain tax below 10 percent. Net savings over a five-year horizon: USD $140,000 compared with do-it-yourself compliance, plus immeasurable peace of mind. 12. Practical Checklist for Would-Be Buyers Phase Action Item Advisor Touchpoint Pre-Purchase Model residency days; apply CRA Form NR73 if needed Residency calibration Obtain pre-approval from cross-border lender Mortgage structuring Closing Draft statement of adjustments capturing currency rates Cost-basis tracking Ensure title insurance recognizes foreign status Legal coordination Ownership File T1135 annually; claim U.S. deductions Ongoing compliance Review property-tax assessments; protest if inflated SALT optimization Disposition Request FIRPTA certificate 90+ days pre-close Withholding mitigation Allocate suspended passive losses; time sale for low-bracket year Exit strategy 13. Beyond Taxes: Lifestyle & Risk Considerations Healthcare Coverage: Provincial health coverage may lapse after 182–212 days abroad; supplemental U.S. plans must coordinate with travel back to Canada. Provincial health coverage may lapse after 182–212 days abroad; supplemental U.S. plans must coordinate with travel back to Canada. Insurance Gaps: Texas homeowner policies exclude windstorm and flood; cross-border advisors coordinate umbrella liability with excess personal‐liability riders valid in both countries. Texas homeowner policies exclude windstorm and flood; cross-border advisors coordinate umbrella liability with excess personal‐liability riders valid in both countries. Education Savings: RESP contributions may be penalized under U.S. PFIC rules—alternatives include 529 plans or brokerage accounts, harmonized via global asset-allocation overlays. 14. Frequently Overlooked Pitfalls Treaty Elections Filed Late: Missing the Article IV tiebreaker statement or §216 election for rental income can double-tax first-year rent. Ignored Departure Tax: If cutting Canadian residency, deemed disposition on worldwide assets—including pensions—may trump property concerns. State-Level Surprises Outside Texas: Future job moves to states with income tax (e.g., California) alter deductibility and estate planning frameworks. Canadian 'Foreign Buyer' Taxes: Provinces like British Columbia impose speculation taxes on homes left vacant; returning expatriates may unwittingly owe if they keep Canadian real estate. Conclusion: Transform Minefields into Milestones Real estate has long stood as a symbol of stability and personal success. For Canadians dispatched to The Woodlands, however, the purchase of a dream home doubles as an intricate cross-border tax project. Navigating dual-residency rules, withholding regimes, depreciation traps, and currency swings requires more than guesswork—it demands specialized expertise. A seasoned cross-border financial advisor integrates legal, tax, and cash-flow insights into one cohesive playbook. Through proactive cross-border tax planning and comprehensive Canada U.S. Financial Planning , homeowners like Daniel not only avoid pitfalls but also leverage treaty advantages, maximize cash retention, and secure generational wealth across two nations. In the end, the key lesson is simple: treat your relocation home not just as a roof over your head, but as an asset that spans two tax jurisdictions. With the right guidance, you can enjoy Texan sunshine, Houston career growth, and Canadian financial peace of mind—without getting scorched by unexpected tax rays along the way. TIME BUSINESS NEWS


Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
U.S. envoy closely eyes Canada defence spending; says NATO about collective defence
OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is closely watching as Ottawa shapes its defence budget, but says the U.S. will not dictate what the Canadian government must spend. 'We're not expecting anything; that's not our job to make those expectations,' Ambassador Pete Hoekstra said in an interview with The Canadian Press this past Friday, a day after NATO defence ministers endorsed new spending targets. Hoekstra also said the point of the NATO military alliance is to defend each other when under attack. He noted Americans haven't forgotten the 'investment and the sacrifice' Canadian troops made in Afghanistan when the U.S. invoked the NATO treaty's article on collective defence. 'They were fulfilling the commitment that they made to NATO — that when one of us is attacked we are all attacked, and we will defend each other,' Hoekstra said of Canadian soldiers. Hoekstra was not directly commenting on U.S. President Donald Trump's statement in March that Washington would not necessarily come to the aid of countries that don't pay their fair share on defence and that Canada has been freeloading on American defence of the continent. He did acknowledge Canada's defence spending has been an 'irritant' in the relationship with the U.S. This past week, defence ministers from NATO countries met in Brussels to discuss raising the member spending target on defence to as much as five per cent of GDP. Canada has never met NATO's existing spending target of two per cent since it was established in 2006. Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney are engaged in what both sides have characterized as 'intensive' discussions toward the new economic and security deal the two leaders agreed to work on once the Canadian election concluded in April. NATO figures suggest Canada's defence spending rose from about one per cent in 2014 to 1.33 per cent in 2023. The NATO secretary-general's annual report, released in April, said Canada's defence spending would hit 1.45 per cent for 2024. In terms of absolute dollars, a Canadian Global Affairs Institute analysis last year said Canada ranks as the seventh largest spender in NATO, and the 14th largest in the world. Carney promised during the recent election campaign to move up Canada's deadline for meeting the 2 per cent threshold from 2032 to 2030 or sooner but has not yet shown a plan for how to do that. It will require Canada to add billions of new dollars annually. The prime minister is set to join other heads of government from NATO countries for an annual summit starting June 24 in the Netherlands. They are expected to approve a new defence investment plan that defence ministers hammered out this week, which would have member nations invest 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence spending, and 1.5 per cent on defence and security-related investment such as infrastructure and resilience. That proposal is coming amid waning American commitments and a revanchist Russia. In recent years, both Democrats and Republicans have urged Canada to boost its Arctic defence, and the previous Biden administration praised much of what Ottawa outlined in an Arctic foreign policy last year. Trump has suggested defence of the Arctic is part of his 'Golden Dome' plan for a continental missile-defence shield. On May 27, the president said he told Ottawa it would cost US$61 billion to be part of the project. Hoekstra said he hasn't seen a breakdown of the costs, but said the 'really awesome technology' is likely estimated at 'proportionally what we think the Canadian share should be.' Defence Minister David McGuinty said Canada was reviewing its defence spending from 'top to bottom' and would have more to say about its plans soon, though the government isn't planning to table a budget until the fall. Hoekstra framed NATO as part of the wide partnership the U.S. has with Canada in security, which also includes secure energy flows and stopping illicit drugs. 'We need to do the things that will keep our citizens safe,' Hoekstra said. 'There are a lot of things that Americans and Canadians have in common, and we're looking forward to great days.' Hoekstra said Trump is trying to take the U.S. off an unsustainable trajectory, which he framed as millions of people crossing the U.S. border undocumented, spending way beyond government revenue and large trade deficits. 'The president is transforming that, because we need to,' he said. Trump's discussions with Carney will likely include the sweeping reform of border security that the Liberals tabled in Parliament last week. Hoekstra had yet to go through the legislation as of Friday. The ambassador said he's focused on win-win policies for both countries and not the prospect of Canada becoming an American state, despite Trump raising the notion as a way for Canadians to save on the cost of joining his Golden Dome project. Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson has said Hoekstra is limited in how much he can diverge from Trump's comments. But he said the ambassador has great access to the president, and his public messaging likely reveals how he has been advising Trump. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.