Aldermen confirm Mayor Brandon Johnson's ally to the City Council
In a 32-11 vote, City Council members voted to approve Cook County Commissioner Anthony Quezada as alderman of the 35th Ward after his predecessor, Carlos Ramirez-Rosa, resigned last month to lead the Chicago Park District. Quezada's confirmation marks Johnson's first mayoral appointment to the council.
Johnson's appointment was briefly challenged by aldermen who opposed Quezada because of his decade-old social media post using a racial slur. Most Black aldermen speaking ahead of the confirmation vote signaled their willingness to forgive Quezada after he apologized.
However, mayoral critic Ald. David Moore, 17th, used a colorful analogy to argue Quezada's first apology saying 'I regret having written it' was insincere.
'If I was to have an opportunity to have an affair with Beyonce, and Jay-Z catch me and shoot me in my behind,' Moore said, there's a difference between him saying, 'I regret being in that hotel room with Beyonce,' versus 'I'm sorry for sleeping for Beyonce.'
Before the full vote, the Rules Committee meeting began with little pushback as members advanced Quezada's appointment to represent Logan Square and other Northwest Side neighborhoods. The vote is typically a formality where council members rubber stamp the mayor's selection, announced last week.
Quezada delivered an opening statement promising a collaborative 'cool temper' amid the 'vitriol that we're seeing across all different spectrums and levels of government.'
Then the meeting went off the rails, as Johnson opponents challenged Quezada's committee assignments that mirrored Ramirez-Rosa's and said it's unfair for a new alderman to benefit from the same privileges of seniority his predecessor got. Those assignments include the powerful Zoning, Budget, Finance and Housing committees.
Downtown Ald. Brendan Reilly kicked off the protestations. Rules chair Ald. Michelle Harris, 8th, swatted them away by noting she was also an appointee — by Mayor Richard M. Daley in 2006 — and inherited the plum committee assignments enjoyed by her predecessor, Todd Stroger.
Then 9th Ward Ald. Anthony Beale demanded a roll call for himself to be added to the Budget Committee. In a sign the mayor's allies did not have the votes to block that motion, Harris instead added Beale's request to the ordinance containing Quezada's assignments.
Beale told reporters his demand was only fair given he is the second-most senior member of City Council. The move to add Beale to Budget must still receive a full floor vote.
'That is not how it is supposed to be done,' Beale said, lamenting that a proposed council reorganization a group of aldermen attempted before Johnson took office did not succeed. 'We wouldn't be sitting there having this problem today if this council would finally stand up and do the job that we were elected to do.'
Quezada has said he will seek a full term in 2027, when he will join the rest of the council on the ballot. He will benefit from an incumbency advantage, to the chagrin of other 35th Ward hopefuls who have said the selection committee's process was 'anti-democratic,' though recent aldermanic appointees have found ties to unpopular mayors troublesome come election time.
The son of a father who immigrated to the U.S. without legal permission, Quezada is familiar with ward politics: his first experience in elected office came in 2015 as an intern for former 1st Ward Ald. Proco 'Joe' Moreno.
He quit the gig over what he said was Moreno's too-cozy relationship with real estate developers, he previously told the Tribune. After meeting Ramirez-Rosa during U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign, Quezada went on to work in the 35th Ward office on constituent services from the summer of 2016 until 2022.
That year, Quezada won a seat on the Cook County Board, becoming the county's first openly gay Latino commissioner, defeating incumbent Democrat Luis Arroyo Jr. in a five-way 2022 primary to represent the county's 8th District, which stretches across the city's Northwest Side.
Quezada won 54% of the 35th Ward vote in that election and went on to become a Johnson ally during their brief overlap on the County Board. While there, he helped pass the county's paid leave ordinance and worked to ensure the county public defender could provide legal representation to undocumented people in immigration court.
Quezada's successor on the County Board will be chosen by Democratic committeepeople that span his district. Ramirez-Rosa, whose ward makes up the biggest portion of the district, will carry the largest weighted vote and chair the selection committee. Ald. Ruth Cruz, the committeeperson for the 30th Ward, carries the next largest chunk, followed by Ald. Jesse Fuentes in the 26th Ward.
The entire County Board is up for reelection in 2026.
Ramirez-Rosa, a three-term alderman with an outsized influence among his fellow progressives, left his council seat after Johnson tapped him to lead the Park District following a public vow to reset his administration with friendlier faces midway through his term.
Shortly after, the superintendent-in-waiting all but endorsed his former ward office staffer to replace him on the City Council.
Monday's mini-rebellion came a week after another dispute over committee assignments blew up between the Johnson administration and three members of the Progressive Caucus.
Aldermen Maria Hadden, Andre Vasquez and Matt Martin sent two letters warning the Johnson administration against what they claimed were plans to strip each of them of their council committee chairmanships. On Monday, Hadden said Johnson deputy Kennedy Bartley has since reassured her those plans are not on the table.
Hadden said as of Monday morning the mayor had still not reached out about the snafu before she took a swipe: 'There's a lot of stuff that Chicagoans are counting on us to do, and we're not necessarily seeing the mayor do it. That means we're as a co-equal branch of government going to have to step up and do some things City Council may not have traditionally done.
For her part, Bartley told reporters Monday that 'many of those items that are on the mayor's platform are also in alignment with those three alderpeople' but declined to elaborate on the 'interpersonal rumors and drama' last week.
'What got back to them was a rumor. I don't care to drag out a rumor any further,' Bartley said. 'I look forward to working alongside them to make sure that we are passing bold, progressive, frankly life-saving initiatives.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Justice Department said to consider probe of Fed's Lisa Cook
The Department of Justice is potentially launching an investigation into Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud, according to a letter seen by Bloomberg News. The notification comes only a day after President Donald Trump pushed for her resignation from the central bank. In the letter, senior DOJ official Ed Martin urged Fed Chair Powell to remove Cook from her Board of Governors post. 'At this time, I encourage you to remove Ms. Cook from your Board,' Martin wrote in the letter, per Bloomberg. 'Do it today before it is too late!" Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing and Finance Agency, sent a criminal referral on Wednesday to the DOJ, alleging that Cook had been misleading in her mortgage applications for a pair of residential properties in Georgia and Michigan. Following the referral, President Trump was blunt in pushing for her resignation. "Cook must resign, now!!!" he said in a short social media post . The White House and Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Cook, for her part, is digging in. 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she said in a statement provided by a Fed spokesperson on Wednesday. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' Pulte's referral letter — first posted on social media — described mortgage documents it had obtained about Cook, alleging she had "falsified bank documents and property records to obtain more favorable loan terms." Over the course of a month in 2021, Cook obtained primary residence mortgages on two properties in Michigan and Georgia, declaring both to be her main residence. Trump recently had an opportunity to imprint his stamp on the central bank after the early resignation of former Fed Governor Adriana Kugler. That allowed him to name White House aide Stephen Miran to the slot, at least for now. He must still be confirmed by the Senate. Another opening in the Board of Governors would pave the way for the president to install a second pick who's receptive to his constant demand for lower interest rates. Still, Trump's ability to fire a Senate-confirmed appointee is extremely limited. Only the Fed chair can theoretically remove a sitting governor for cause, usually defined as conducting "malfeasance in office" or "neglect of duty" in the position. Cook was nominated by former President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate in a May 2022 party-line vote. She is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's Board of Governors, a seven-member group that takes frequent votes on monetary policy and helps regulate the financial sector. Her current term expires in 2038.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Supreme Court says Trump may cancel DEI-related health research grants
WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court said Thursday the Trump administration may cancel hundreds of health research grants that involve diversity, equity and inclusion or gender identity. The justices granted an emergency appeal from President Trump's lawyers and set aside a Boston's judge order that blocked the canceling of $783 million in research grants. The justices split 5-4. Chief Justice John G. Roberts joined the court's three liberals in dissent and said the district judge had not overstepped his authority. The court's conservative majority has repeatedly sided with the administration and against federal judges in disputes over spending and staffing at federal agencies. In the latest case, the majority agreed that Trump and his appointees may decide on how to spend health research funds allocated by Congress. Upon taking office in January, Trump issued an executive order 'ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and preferencing.' A few weeks later, the acting director of the National Institutes of Health said the agency would no longer fund 'low-value and off-mission research programs, including but not limited to studies based on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and gender identity.' More than 1,700 grants were canceled. Trump's lawyers told the court NIH had terminated grants to study 'Buddhism and HIV stigma in Thailand'; 'intersectional, multilevel and multidimensional structural racism for English- and Spanish-speaking populations'; and 'anti-racist healing in nature to protect telomeres of transitional age BIPOC [Black, Indigenous, and People of Color] for health equity.' California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and his counterparts from 15 Democratic-led states had sued to halt what they called an 'unprecedented disruption to ongoing research.' They were joined by groups of researchers and public health advocates. The state attorneys said their public universities were using grant money for 'projects investigating heart disease, HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol and substance abuse, mental-health issues, and countless other health conditions.' They said NIH had terminated a grant for a University of California study examining how inflammation, insulin resistance, and physical activity affect Alzheimer's disease in Black women, a group with higher rates and a more aggressive profile of the disease. Also terminated they said was a University of Hawaiʻi study that aimed to identify genetic and biological risk factors for colorectal cancer among Native Hawaiians, a population with increased incidence and mortality rates of that disease. In June, the Democratic state attorneys won a ruling from U.S. District Judge William G. Young, a Reagan appointee. He said the sudden halt to research grants violated a federal procedural law because it was 'arbitrary' and poorly explained. He said Trump had required agencies 'to focus on eradicating anything that it labels as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion ('DEI'), an undefined enemy.' He said he had tried and failed to get a clear definition of DEI and what it entailed. When the 1st Circuit Court refused to lift the judge's order, Trump's Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court in late July. He noted the justices in April had set aside a similar decision from a Boston-based judge who blocked the new administration's canceling of education grants. The solicitor general argued that Trump's order rescinded an executive order from President Biden in 2021 that mandated 'an ambitious whole-of-government equity agenda' and instructed federal agencies to 'allocate resources to address the historic failure to invest sufficiently, justly, and equally in underserved communities.' He said the new administration decided these DEI-related grants 'do nothing to expand our knowledge of living systems, provide low returns on investment, and ultimately do not enhance health, lengthen life, or reduce illness.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
State reps push for safeguard against Trump deploying military to Michigan cities
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump announced a 'crime emergency' in Washington D.C. He then militarized the D.C. police department and deployed hundreds of National Guard soldiers, sparking protests, public safety concerns and legal challenges. As Trump threatens similar actions in other Democratic-led cities, some Michigan lawmakers are pushing for legislative safeguards to prevent a similar situation from happening here. 'The federalization and deployment of National Guard troops into L.A. and Washington D.C. represents an unprecedented abuse of executive power,' Michigan House Rep. Laurie Pohutsky, D-Livonia, said at a news conference on Thursday, Aug. 21. 'As elected leaders, we cannot allow these actions to go unchecked.' State Rep. Tyrone Carter, D-Detroit, and Kyle Zawacki, the Legislative Director for the ACLU of Michigan, joined Pohutsky at the news conference to introduce House Bill 4796. The bill sets out to 'reaffirm state sovereignty' by requiring permission from Michigan's governor before the military can be deployed in the state. While the bill does not expand or limit any existing powers, said Pohutsky, it does enable state courts to litigate the issue, rather than relying on federal courts to determine the legality of the President's actions. 'This bill […] reiterates federal law into state law, giving our state and our courts one more avenue to push back on the President's unlawful and, arguably, unconstitutional actions, should he attempt to deploy troops in Michigan,' said Pohutsky. Rep. Carter, a former lieutenant with the Wayne County Sheriff's Office, warned that the deployment of troops to American cities 'will not bring public safety.' 'Good policing is about protecting the civilians we serve, not treating them like enemies on the battlefield — that's the role of the military,' said Carter. When asked if she thought it was a realistic concern that troops would be sent to Michigan cities, Pohutsky cited reporting from the Washington Post and The Guardian that the Trump administration has already signaled its 'plans to expand these actions' across the country. 'I think that it's important to supply that safeguard whether it's an acute threat to Michigan or not,' Pohutsky said. She also said she worries that similar policies to the ones in Washington could be 'weaponized' in cities like Ann Arbor that have been vocal about their opposition to many of the current presidential administration's actions. In addition, Pohutsky said she has 'very serious concerns' for Detroit, a city that Trump has repeatedly criticized in public comments, and whose population is 74% Black. 'Based on the cities that [Trump] has targeted and the areas that he is choosing to have occupied, I absolutely think that race is playing a role,' Pohutsky said. 'Which again creates some concern about areas of our state that may be unjustly targeted using these policies.' Throughout the news conference, all three speakers described the President's deployment of troops as 'authoritarian,' with Zawacki warning that it was another step down a dangerous path, and Pohutsky calling on her father's experience as a soldier in WWII to warn constituents to pay attention to history. 'We keep saying 'unprecedented,' and in a way it is because it's unprecedented here. But worldwide, it is not unprecedented,' said Pohutsky. 'It's very, very frightening.' Violent crime rates in both Washington D.C. and Detroit are currently the lowest they've been in decades. In 2024, the city of Detroit reported a 19% decline in homicides. Earlier this week, however, Detroit Mayor Duggan sparked controversy over an interview with CNN in which he partially credited the Trump administration for helping Detroit's violent crime reduction. Pohutsky acknowledged the limits of the legislation, saying that preventing the Trump administration from 'engaging unlawfully is not reality.' However, she ended by emphasizing her goal is to give state courts the power to litigate and fight back against such actions. The bill must be approved with a majority vote in both the Michigan House and Senate and then signed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer before it can become law. Pohutsky said that while she doesn't expect the bill to move out of the House or for the Speaker of the House, Rep. Matt Hall, R–Richland Township, to put the bill up for a vote, she does see it as an important first step towards raising awareness on the issue and a 'long term goal' to pass the legislation in the future. Aurora Sousanis is a politics intern at the Detroit Free Press. You can contact her at asousanis@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Legislation aims to stop Trump deploying military to Michigan cities
