logo
Congress Isn't Stepping Up to Regulate AI. Where Does That Leave Us Now?

Congress Isn't Stepping Up to Regulate AI. Where Does That Leave Us Now?

CNET6 days ago
When you turn on the faucet, you expect the water that comes out to be clean. When you go to the bank, you expect your money will still be there. When you go to the doctor, you expect they will keep your medical information private. Those expectations exist because there are rules to protect you. But when a technology arises almost overnight, the problems come first. The rules, you'd hope, would follow.
Right now, there's no technology with more hype and attention than artificial intelligence. Since ChatGPT burst on to the scene in 2022, generative AI has crept into nearly every corner of our lives. AI boosters say it's transformative, comparing it to the birth of the internet or the industrial revolution in its potential to reshape society. The nature of work itself will be transformed. Scientific discovery will accelerate beyond our wildest dreams. All this from a technology that right now, is mostly just kind of good at writing a paragraph.
The concerns about AI? They're legion. There are questions of privacy and security. There's concerns about how AI impacts the climate and the environment. There's the problem of hallucination -- that AI will completely make stuff up, with tremendous potential for misinformation. There are liability concerns: Who is responsible for the actions of an AI, or an autonomous system running off of one? Then there are the already numerous lawsuits around copyright infringement related to training data. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)
Those are just today's worries. Some argue that a potential artificial intelligence smarter than humans could pose a massive, existential threat to humanity.
What to do about AI is an international debate. In Europe, the EU AI Act, which is currently being phased in, imposes guidelines on AI-based systems based on their risk to individual privacy and safety. In the US, meanwhile, Congress recently proposed barring states from enforcing their own rules around AI for a decade, without a national framework in place, until backing off during last-minute negotiations around the big tax and spending bill.
"I think in the end, there is a balance here between enjoying the innovation of AI and mitigating the risks that come with AI," Alon Yamin, CEO of Copyleaks, which runs an AI-powered system for detecting AI-generated writing, told me. "If you're going too far in one end, you will lose something. The situation now is that we're very far to the direction of no regulation at all."
Here's a look at some of the issues raised around AI, how regulations might or might not address them and what it all means for you.
Watch this: $90 Billion AI Investments, MLB Robot Umpires and More | Tech Today
03:07
Different approaches, with an ocean in between
Listen to the debates in Congress about how to regulate artificial intelligence, and a refrain quickly becomes apparent: AI companies and many US politicians don't want anything like the rules that exist in Europe.
The EU AI Act has become shorthand for a strict regulatory structure around AI. In brief, it requires companies to ensure their technology is safe, transparent and responsible. It sorts AI technologies into categories based on the level of risk. The highest-risk categories are either prohibited entirely (things like social scoring or manipulative technologies) or heavily restricted (things like biometrics and tools for hiring and law enforcement). Lower-risk technologies, like most of the work done by large language models we're familiar with (ChatGPT, etc.), are subject to less scrutiny but still must meet certain transparency and privacy requirements.
A key feature of the EU's standards and those in other places, like the United Kingdom, is transparency about the use of AI.
"What these things are fundamentally saying is, we're not trying to block the use of AI but giving consumers the right to opt into it or not or even to know it's even there," said Ben Colman, CEO of the identity verification company Reality Defender.
During a May hearing on AI regulation in the US Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, Sen. Ted Cruz referred to the EU's standards as "stifling" and "heavy-handed." Cruz, a Texas Republican, specifically objected to any kind of prior approval for AI technologies. He asked OpenAI CEO Sam Altman what effect similar rules would have on the industry in the US, and Altman said it would be "disastrous."
Earlier this month, Meta said it wouldn't sign the EU's Code of Practice for general-purpose AI, which is intended to provide a framework to help AI companies follow the regulations of the EU AI Act. In a post on LinkedIn, Joel Kaplan, Meta's chief global affairs officer, called it an "over-reach" that "will throttle the development and deployment of frontier AI models in Europe."
"Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI," Kaplan said.
But regulations focused on high-risk systems like those used in hiring, health care and law enforcement might miss some of the more subtle ways AI can affect our lives. Think about the spread of AI-generated slop on social media or the creation of realistic-looking videos for political misinformation. Those are also social media issues, and the battle over regulation to minimize the harms with that technology may illuminate what could happen with AI.
Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts
Lessons from social media
After a South by Southwest panel in March on regulating AI, I asked Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig, long a vocal observer of tech's problems, what worried him most about AI. His response: "AI totally screwing up in the context of social media and making it so we have no coherence in our understanding of national politics."
Social media has long been fraught with harmful social implications. The spread of misinformation and erosion of trust in the last decade or so are largely results of the growth of these networks. Generative AI, which can reinforce biases and produce believable but false content with ease, now poses those same problems. On top of those parallels, some of the companies and key figures in AI come straight from the world of social media technology, like Meta and Elon Musk's X.
"We're seeing a lot of the same repeats of social media fights, of privacy fights where companies do whatever they want and do a sort of vague gesture of doing something about it," said Ben Winters, director of AI and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America.
There are some key differences between those fights and the ones around AI, Winters said. One is that lawmakers and regulators are familiar with the mistakes associated with social media and want to avoid repeating them. "I think we're ahead of the curve in terms of response, but one thing that I really hope we can see at the federal level is a willingness to put some basic requirements on these companies," he said.
At the May Senate committee hearing, OpenAI's Altman said he's also wary of repeating past mistakes. "We're trying to learn the lessons of the previous generation," he said. "That's kind of the way it goes. People make mistakes and you do it better next time."
What kinds of AI regulations are we talking about?
In my conversations with artificial intelligence experts and observers, some themes have emerged regarding the rules and regulations that could be implemented. They boil down, in the short term, to questions about the role of AI in impactful decision-making, misinformation, copyright and accountability. Other concerns, like the threat of "superintelligence" or the loss of jobs, also exist, although those are far more complicated.
High-risk systems
This is where the EU AI Act and many other international laws around artificial intelligence focus. In the US, it's also at the center of Colorado's AI law, which passed in 2024 and will be effective in 2026. The idea is that when AI tools are used to make important decisions, about things employment, health care or insurance, they are used in a way that minimizes discrimination and errors and maximizes transparency and accountability.
AI and other predictive technologies can be used in a lot of different ways, whether by governments for programs like child protective services or by private entities for advertising and tracking, Anjana Susarla, a professor at Michigan State University, told me recently.
"The question becomes, is this something where we need to monitor the risks of privacy, the risks of consumer profiling, should we monitor any kind of consumer harms or liabilities?" she said.
Misinformation
Gen AI has a well-documented history of making stuff up. And that's if you're using it in good faith. It can also be used to produce deepfakes -- realistic-looking images and video intended to manipulate people into believing something untrue, changing the behavior of voters and undermining democracy.
"Social media is the main instrument now for disinformation and hate speech," said Shalom Lappin, a professor of computational linguistics at Queen Mary University of London and author of the new book Understanding the Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Between Catastrophe and Utopia. "AI is a major factor because much of this content is coming from artificial agents."
Lies and rumors have spread since the dawn of communication, but generative AI tools like video and image generators can produce fabricated evidence more convincing than any past counterfeit, at tremendous speed and very little cost. On the internet today, too often you cannot, and should not, believe your own eyes.
It can be hard for people to see just how easy it is to fake something -- and just how convincing those fakes can be. Colman, with Reality Defender, said seeing the possible problem is believing. "When we show somebody a good or a bad deepfake of them, they have that 'a-ha' moment of, 'wow, this is happening, it can happen to me,'" he said.
Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, points to a poster during a July 2025 hearing on artificial intelligence model training and copyright infringement.Copyright
There are two copyright issues when it comes to generative AI. The first is the most well-documented: Did AI companies violate copyright laws by using vast amounts of information available on the internet and elsewhere without permission or compensation? That issue is working itself out in the courts, with mixed results so far, and will likely take much longer before something all-encompassing comes out of it.
"They've essentially used everything that's available. It's not only text, it's images, photographs, charts, sound, audio files," Lappin said. "The copyright violations are huge."
But what about the copyright of content created by AI tools? Is it owned by the person who prompted it or by the company that produced the language model? What if the model produces content that copies or plagiarizes existing content without credit, or violates copyrights?
Accountability
The second copyright issue gets at the problem of accountability: What happens when an AI does something wrong, violates a law or hurts somebody?
On the content front, social media companies have long been protected behind a US legal standard, known colloquially as Section 230, that says they aren't responsible for what their users do. But that's a harder test for AI companies, because the user isn't the one creating this content, the company's language model is, Winters said.
Then there are actual, material harms that can come from the interactions people have with AI. A prominent example of this is mental health, where people using AI characters and chatbots as therapists have received bad advice, the kind that could cost a human provider their license or worse, the kind that resulted in self-harm or worse outcomes for the person involved. The issue is magnified even more when it comes to children, who likely have even less understanding of how they should treat what an AI says.
Who should regulate AI?
The question of whose job it is to regulate AI was at the heart of the congressional debate over the moratorium on state laws and rules. In that discussion, the question was whether, in the US, companies should have to navigate one set of rules passed by Congress or 50 or more sets of regulations implemented by the states.
AI companies and business groups said the creation of a "patchwork" of laws would hinder development. In a June letter to Senate leaders, Consumer Technology Association CEO and Vice Chair Gary Shapiro pointed to more than 1,000 state bills that had been introduced regarding AI in 2025 so far.
"This isn't regulation -- it's chaos," he wrote.
But those bill introductions haven't turned into an avalanche of laws on the books. "Despite the amount of interest from policymakers at the state level, there haven't been a ton of AI-specific laws passed in the United States," said Cobun Zweifel-Keegan, managing director, DC, for the privacy trade group IAPP.
States can experiment with new approaches. California can try one thing, Colorado another and Texas something entirely different. An approach that works will spread to other states and could lead to rules that protect consumers without stifling businesses.
But other experts say in the 21st century, companies with the size and scope of those pushing artificial intelligence can only truly be regulated at the international level. Lappin said he believes an appropriate venue is international trade agreements, which could keep companies from hiding some services in certain countries and having customers circumvent protections with VPNs.
"Because these are international rather than national concerns, it seems to me that without international constraints, the regulation will not be effective," Lappin said.
What about superintelligence?
So far, we've mostly focused on the impact of the tech that is available today. But the biggest boosters of AI are always talking about how much smarter the next model will be and how soon we'll get technology that exceeds human intelligence.
Yes, that worries some folks. And they think regulation is important to ensure AI doesn't view that explanation from Morpheus in The Matrix as an instruction manual for world domination. The Future of Life Institute has suggested a government agency with a view into the development of the most advanced AI models. And maybe an off switch, said Jason Van Beek, FLI's chief government affairs officer. "You theoretically would not be able to control them at some point, so just trying to make sure there's some technology that would allow these systems to be turned off if there's some evidence of a loss of control of the situation," he told me.
Other experts were more skeptical that "artificial general intelligence" or superintelligence or anything like that was on the horizon. A survey earlier this year of AI experts found three-quarters doubted current large language models would scale up to AGI.
"You're getting a lot of hype over general intelligence and stuff like that, superintelligent agents taking over, and I don't see a solid scientific or engineering basis for those fears," Lappin said.
The fact is, human beings don't need to wait for a genius-level robot to pose an existential threat. We're more than capable of that ourselves.
Should regulators worry about job losses?
One of those more immediate threats is the possibility that AI will cause mass layoffs as large numbers of jobs are replaced by AI or otherwise made redundant. That poses significant social challenges, especially in the United States, where many fundamentals of life, like health care, are still tied to having a job.
Van Beek said FLI has suggested the US Department of Labor start keeping track of AI-related job losses. "That's certainly a major concern about whether these frontier technologies are going to be taking over huge swaths of industries in terms of jobs or those kinds of things and affecting the economy in very, very deep ways," he said.
There have been major technological innovations that have caused massive displacement or replacement of workers before. Think of the Industrial Revolution or the dawn of the computer age. But those often happened over decades or generations. AI could throw the economy into chaos over a matter of years, Lappin said. The Industrial Revolution also put industries out of work at varying times, but AI could hit every industry at once. "The direction is toward much, much more widespread automation across a very broad domain or range of professions," he said. "And the faster that happens, the much more disruptive that will become."
What matters most? Transparency and privacy
The first step, as with laws already passed in the EU, California and Colorado, is to provide some sort of visibility into how AI systems work and how they're being used. For you, the consumer, the citizen, the person just trying to exist in the world, that transparency means you have a sense of how AI is being used when you interact with it. This could be transparency into how models operate and what went into training them. It could be understanding how models are being used to do things like decide who a company hires and fires.
Right now, that doesn't really exist, and it definitely doesn't exist in a way that's easy for a person to understand. Winters suggested a system similar to that used by financial institutions to evaluate whether someone can get loans -- the credit report. You have the right to inspect your credit report, see what has been said about you and ensure it's right. "You have this number that is impactful about you; therefore, you have transparency and can seek corrections," he said.
The other centerpiece of most proposals right now is privacy -- protecting people against unauthorized recreations of themselves in AI, guarding against exploitation of personal information and identity. While some existing, technology-neutral privacy laws should be able to protect consumers, policymakers need to keep an eye on the changing ways AI is used to ensure they're still doing the job.
"It has to be some kind of balance," Susarla said. "We don't want to stop innovation, but on the other hand we also need to recognize that there can be real consequences."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Veralto Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results
Veralto Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Veralto Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

WALTHAM, Mass., July 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Veralto (NYSE: VLTO) (the "Company"), a global leader in essential water and product quality solutions dedicated to Safeguarding the World's Most Vital Resources™ announced results for the second quarter ended July 4, 2025. Key Second Quarter 2025 Results Sales increased 6.4% year-over-year to $1,371 million, with non-GAAP core sales growth of 4.8% Operating profit margin was 22.8% and non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin was 23.7% Net earnings were $222 million, or $0.89 per diluted common share Non-GAAP, adjusted net earnings were $232 million, or $0.93 per diluted common share Operating cash flow was $339 million and non-GAAP free cash flow was $323 million "We delivered a strong second quarter led by outstanding commercial execution and steady, broad-based customer demand. Our rigorous application of the Veralto Enterprise System continued to support global growth and operating discipline, while also helping mitigate impacts from changes in global trade policies," said Jennifer L. Honeycutt, President and Chief Executive Officer. "Through the first half, we grew core sales mid-single-digits, expanded adjusted operating profit margins and delivered double-digit adjusted earnings per share growth. These results are a testament to the focused efforts of our global team, our durable business model and secular growth drivers across our end markets," "Based on our first half performance, stable demand across our end markets and our current assessment of macro-economic conditions, we raised our full year core sales growth and adjusted earnings per share guidance. Veralto's financial position remains strong, and we continue to be prudent in evaluating capital allocation opportunities to fuel long-term shareholder value," concluded Honeycutt. 2025 Guidance The Company provides forecasted sales only on a non-GAAP basis because of the difficulty in estimating the other components of GAAP sales, such as currency translation, acquisitions, and divestitures. The guidance below includes the Company's current assessment of the macro-economic environment, including tariffs and the Company's actions to mitigate adverse financial impacts. For the third quarter of 2025, Veralto anticipates that non-GAAP core sales will grow mid-single-digits year-over-year with adjusted diluted earnings per share in the range of $0.91 to $0.95 per share. For the full year 2025, the Company raised its adjusted earnings per share guidance range to $3.72 to $3.80 per share, up from its prior guidance range of $3.60 to $3.70 per share. The Company also increased its full year core sales growth assumption to mid-single-digits, up from its prior assumption of low-to-mid-single-digits. The Company maintained its expectation for full year adjusted operating profit margin expansion in the range of flat to +50 basis points year-over-year and for its free cash flow conversion in the range of 90% to 100%. Conference Call and Webcast Information Veralto will discuss its second quarter results and financial guidance for 2025 during its quarterly investor conference call tomorrow starting at 8:30 a.m. (ET). Access to the call, webcast and an accompanying slide presentation will be available on the "Investors" section of Veralto's website, under the subheading "News & Events" and additional materials will be posted to the same section of Veralto's website. A replay of the webcast will be available in the same section of Veralto's website shortly after the conclusion of the call and will remain available until the next quarterly earnings call. The conference call can be accessed by dialing +1 (800) 343-4136 (U.S.) or +1 (203) 518-9843 (INTL) (Conference ID: VLTO2Q25). A replay of the conference call will be available shortly after the conclusion of the call and until August 7, 2025. You can access the replay dial-in information on the "Investors" section of Veralto's website under the subheading "News & Events." ABOUT VERALTO With annual sales of over $5 billion, Veralto is a global leader in essential technology solutions with a proven track record of solving some of the most complex challenges we face as a society. Our industry-leading companies with globally recognized brands help billions of people around the world access clean water, safe food and trusted essential goods. Headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts, our global team of nearly 17,000 associates is committed to making an enduring positive impact on our world and united by a powerful purpose: Safeguarding the World's Most Vital Resources™. NON-GAAP MEASURES AND SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS In addition to the financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), this earnings release also contains non-GAAP financial measures. Calculations of these measures, the reasons why we believe these measures provide useful information to investors, a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, as applicable, and other information relating to these non-GAAP measures are included in the supplemental reconciliation schedule attached. In addition, this earnings release, the slide presentation accompanying the related earnings call, non-GAAP reconciliations and a note containing details of historical and anticipated, future financial performance have been posted to the "Investors" section of Veralto's website ( under the subheading "Quarterly Earnings." FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this release, including statements regarding the Company's third quarter and full year 2025 financial performance and guidance, the Company's differentiation and positioning to continue delivering sustainable, long-term shareholder value and any other statements regarding events or developments that we believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements other than historical factual information are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding: projections of revenue, expenses, profit, profit margins, asset values, pricing, tax rates, tax provisions, cash flows, pension and benefit obligations and funding requirements, Veralto's liquidity position or other projected financial measures; Veralto's management's plans and strategies for future operations, including statements relating to anticipated operating performance, customer demand, cost reductions, restructuring activities, new product and service developments, competitive strengths or market position, acquisitions and the integration thereof, divestitures, spin-offs, split-offs, initial public offerings, other securities offerings or other distributions, strategic opportunities, stock repurchases, dividends and executive compensation; growth, declines and other trends in markets Veralto sells into, including the impact of changes to global trade policies, restrictions on imports, related countermeasures and reciprocal tariffs; future new or modified laws, regulations, accounting pronouncements or public policy changes; regulatory approvals and the timing and conditionality thereof; outstanding claims, legal proceedings, tax audits and assessments and other contingent liabilities; future foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; results of operations and/or financial condition; general economic and capital markets conditions; the anticipated timing of any of the foregoing; assumptions underlying any of the foregoing; and any other statements that address events or developments that Veralto intends or believes will or may occur in the future. Additional information regarding the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements is available in our SEC filings. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this release and except to the extent required by applicable law, the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events and developments or otherwise. VERALTO CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS ($ and shares in millions, except per share amounts) (unaudited) ‌Three-Month Period EndedSix-Month Period EndedJuly 4, 2025June 28, 2024July 4, 2025June 28, 2024 Sales $ 1,371$ 1,288$ 2,703$ 2,534 Cost of sales (549)(514)(1,076)(1,013) Gross profit 8227741,6271,521 Operating costs:Selling, general and administrative expenses (442)(414)(861)(808) Research and development expenses (67)(61)(131)(121) Operating profit 313299635592 Nonoperating income (expense):Other income (expense), net —1(6)(14) Interest expense, net (28)(30)(55)(58) Earnings before income taxes 285270574520 Income taxes (63)(67)(127)(133) Net earnings $ 222$ 203$ 447$ 387 Net earnings per common share:Basic $ 0.89$ 0.82$ 1.80$ 1.57 Diluted $ 0.89$ 0.81$ 1.79$ 1.55 Average common stock and common equivalent shares outstanding:Basic 248.2247.2248.0247.1 Diluted 249.9249.3250.0249.1This information is presented for reference only. VERALTO CORPORATION RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES ‌ Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures ‌ ($ in millions) ‌Three-Month Period Ended July 4, 2025SalesOperatingprofitOperatingprofit marginNet earnings forcalculation ofdiluted netearnings percommon shareDiluted netearnings percommonshare Reported (GAAP) $ 1,371$ 31322.8 %$ 222$ 0.89 Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets A —90.790.04 Other items B —30.230.01 Tax effect of the above adjustments C ———(2)(0.01) Adjusted (Non-GAAP) $ 1,371$ 32523.7 %$ 232$ 0.93 ‌Three-Month Period Ended June 28, 2024SalesOperatingprofitOperatingprofit marginNet earnings forcalculation ofdiluted netearnings percommon shareDiluted netearnings percommon share Reported (GAAP) $ 1,288$ 29923.2 %$ 203$ 0.81 Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets A —100.8100.04 Tax effect of the above adjustments C ———(3)(0.01) Discrete tax adjustments D ———30.01 Adjusted (Non-GAAP) $ 1,288$ 30924.0 %$ 213$ 0.85 VERALTO CORPORATIONRECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESNotes to Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures($ in millions) A Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets in the following historical periods (only the pretax amounts set forth below are reflected in the amortization line item above):Three-Month Period EndedJuly 4, 2025June 28, 2024 Pretax $ 9$ 10 After-tax 77 B Costs incurred in the three-month period ended July 4, 2025 related to certain strategic initiatives ($3 million pretax and after-tax as reported in this line item). C This line item reflects the aggregate tax effect of all nontax adjustments reflected in the preceding line items of the table. In addition, the footnotes above indicate the after-tax amount of each individual adjustment item. Veralto estimates the tax effect of each adjustment item by applying Veralto's overall estimated effective tax rate to the pretax amount, unless the nature of the item and/or the tax jurisdiction in which the item has been recorded requires application of a specific tax rate or tax treatment, in which case the tax effect of such item is estimated by applying such specific tax rate or tax treatment. D Discrete tax matters relate to changes in estimates associated with prior period uncertain tax positions, audit settlements and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. VERALTO CORPORATIONRECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESSales Growth by Segment, Core Sales Growth by Segment % Change Three-Month Period Ended July 4, 2025 2024 PeriodSegmentsTotal CompanyWater QualityProduct Qualityand Innovation Total sales growth (GAAP) 6.4 %6.2 %6.8 % Impact of:Acquisitions/divestitures (0.1) %(0.1) %— % Currency exchange rates (1.5) %(1.1) %(2.2) % Core sales growth (non-GAAP) 4.8 %5.0 %4.6 % VERALTO CORPORATIONRECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES Forecasted Core Sales Growth, Adjusted Operating Profit Margin, Adjusted Diluted Net Earnings per Share and Free Cash Flow to Net Earnings Conversion Ratio The Company provides forecasted sales only on a non-GAAP basis because of the difficulty in estimating the other components of GAAP revenue, such as currency translation, acquisitions and divested product lines. Additionally, we do not reconcile adjusted operating profit margin (or components thereof), adjusted diluted earnings per share or free cash flow to net earnings conversion ratio to the comparable GAAP measures because of the difficulty in estimating the other unknown components such as investment gains and losses, impairments and separation costs, which would be reflected in any forecasted GAAP operating profit, forecasted diluted earnings per share or forecasted net earnings ratio.% Change Three-MonthPeriod Ending October 3,2025 vs. Comparable 2024Period Core sales growth (non-GAAP) +Mid-single-digitsThree-Month Period EndingOctober 3, 2025 Adjusted Diluted Net Earnings per Share (non-GAAP) $0.91 to $0.95% Change Year EndingDecember 31, 2025 2024 Period Core sales growth (non-GAAP) +Mid-single-digitsYear Ending December 31, 2025 Adjusted Operating Profit Margin (non-GAAP) flat to +50 basis points Adjusted Diluted Net Earnings per Share (non-GAAP) $3.72 to $3.80 Free cash flow to net earnings conversion ratio (non-GAAP) 90% to 100% VERALTO CORPORATIONRECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESCash Flow and Free Cash Flow($ in millions) Three-Month Period EndedJuly 4, 2025June 28, 2024Year-over-YearChange Total Cash Flows:Net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP) $ 339$ 251 Total cash used in investing activities (GAAP) $ (40)$ (11) Total cash used in financing activities (GAAP) $ (15)$ (13) Free Cash Flow:Total cash provided by operating activities (GAAP) $ 339$ 251 ~ 35.0 % Less: payments for additions to property, plant & equipment (capital expenditures) (GAAP) (16)(11) Free cash flow (non-GAAP) $ 323$ 240 ~ 34.5 %We define free cash flow as operating cash flows, less payments for additions to property, plant and equipment ("capital expenditures") plus the proceeds from sales of plant, property and equipment ("capital disposals"). Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Measures Each of the non-GAAP measures set forth above should be considered in addition to, and not as a replacement for or superior to, the comparable GAAP measure, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors by offering additional ways of viewing Veralto Corporation's ("Veralto" or the "Company") results that, when reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measure, help our investors: with respect to the profitability-related non-GAAP measures, understand the long-term profitability trends of our business and compare our profitability to prior and future periods and to our peers; with respect to core sales and related sales measures, identify underlying growth trends in our business and compare our sales performance with prior and future periods and to our peers; and with respect to free cash flow and related cash flow measures (the "FCF Measure"), understand Veralto's ability to generate cash without external financings, strengthen its balance sheet, invest in its business and grow its business through acquisitions and other strategic opportunities (although a limitation of free cash flow is that it does not take into account the Company's non-discretionary expenditures, and as a result the entire free cash flow amount is not necessarily available for discretionary expenditures). Management uses these non-GAAP measures to measure the Company's operating and financial performance. The items excluded from the non-GAAP measures set forth above have been excluded for the following reasons: Amortization of Intangible Assets: We exclude the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets because the amount and timing of such charges are significantly impacted by the timing, size, number and nature of the acquisitions we consummate. While we have a history of significant acquisition activity, we do not acquire businesses on a predictable cycle, and the amount of an acquisition's purchase price allocated to intangible assets and related amortization term are unique to each acquisition and can vary significantly from acquisition to acquisition. Exclusion of this amortization expense facilitates more consistent comparisons of operating results over time between our newly acquired and long-held businesses, and with both acquisitive and non-acquisitive peer companies. We believe however that it is important for investors to understand that such intangible assets contribute to sales generation and that intangible asset amortization related to past acquisitions will recur in future periods until such intangible assets have been fully amortized. Restructuring Charges: We exclude costs incurred pursuant to discrete restructuring plans that are fundamentally different (in terms of the size, strategic nature and planning requirements, as well as the inconsistent frequency, of such plans) from the ongoing productivity improvements that result from application of the Veralto Enterprise System. Because these restructuring plans are incremental to the core activities that arise in the ordinary course of our business and we believe are not indicative of Veralto's ongoing operating costs in a given period, we exclude these costs to facilitate a more consistent comparison of operating results over time. Other Adjustments: With respect to the other items excluded from the profitability-related non-GAAP measures, we exclude these items because they are of a nature and/or size that occur with inconsistent frequency, occur for reasons that may be unrelated to Veralto's commercial performance during the period and/or we believe that such items may obscure underlying business trends and make comparisons of long-term performance difficult. With respect to core operating profit margin changes, in addition to the explanation set forth in the bullets above relating to "restructuring charges" and "other adjustments", we exclude the impact of businesses owned for less than one year (or disposed of during such period and not treated as discontinued operations) because the timing, size, number and nature of such transactions can vary significantly from period to period and may obscure underlying business trends and make comparisons of long-term performance difficult. With respect to core sales related measures, (1) we exclude the impact of currency translation because it is not under management's control, is subject to volatility and can obscure underlying business trends, and (2) we exclude the effect of acquisitions and divested product lines because the timing, size, number and nature of such transactions can vary significantly from period-to-period and between us and our peers, which we believe may obscure underlying business trends and make comparisons of long-term performance difficult. With respect to the FCF Measure, we exclude payments for additions to property, plant and equipment (net of the proceeds from capital disposals) to demonstrate the amount of operating cash flow for the period that remains after accounting for the Company's capital expenditure requirements. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Veralto

Simpson Manufacturing: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
Simpson Manufacturing: Q2 Earnings Snapshot

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Simpson Manufacturing: Q2 Earnings Snapshot

PLEASANTON, Calif. (AP) — PLEASANTON, Calif. (AP) — Simpson Manufacturing Co. (SSD) on Monday reported net income of $103.5 million in its second quarter. The Pleasanton, California-based company said it had net income of $2.47 per share. The building materials company posted revenue of $631.1 million in the period. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights ( using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on SSD at

Central Garden & Pet to Announce Q3 Fiscal 2025 Financial Results
Central Garden & Pet to Announce Q3 Fiscal 2025 Financial Results

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Central Garden & Pet to Announce Q3 Fiscal 2025 Financial Results

WALNUT CREEK, Calif., July 28, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Central Garden & Pet Company (NASDAQ: CENT) (NASDAQ: CENTA) ("Central"), a market leader in the pet and garden industries, will release its fiscal 2025 third quarter results for the period ending June 28, 2025, after market close on Wednesday, August 6, 2025. On the same day, Central will host a conference call at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (1:30 p.m. Pacific Time), led by CEO Niko Lahanas and CFO Brad Smith, to review these results and to provide a business update. A live webcast, replay and related materials will be available at To join by phone, please dial +1 (201) 689-8345 for both domestic and international participants. About Central Garden & Pet Central Garden & Pet Company (NASDAQ: CENT) (NASDAQ: CENTA) understands home is central to life and has proudly nurtured happy and healthy homes for over 45 years. With fiscal 2024 net sales of $3.2 billion, Central is on a mission to lead the future of the pet and garden industries. The Company's innovative and trusted products are dedicated to helping lawns grow greener, gardens bloom bigger, pets live healthier, and communities grow stronger. Central is home to a leading portfolio of more than 65 high-quality brands including Amdro®, Aqueon®, Cadet®, C&S®, Farnam®, Ferry-Morse®, Four Paws®, Kaytee®, Nylabone® and Pennington®, strong manufacturing and distribution capabilities, and a passionate, entrepreneurial growth culture. Central is based in Walnut Creek, California, with over 6,000 employees primarily across North America. Visit to learn more. View source version on Contacts Investor & Media Contact Friederike EdelmannVP of Investor Relations & Corporate Sustainabilityfedelmann@ | (925) 412 6726 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store