logo
SC proposes panel to manage Banke Bihari temple till HC decides on UP ordinance

SC proposes panel to manage Banke Bihari temple till HC decides on UP ordinance

Time of India12 hours ago
.
New Delhi: Supreme Court on Monday proposed an interim committee, headed by a retired high court judge and comprising the district collector and Goswamis (pujaris), for management of Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan till Allahabad HC decides the validity of UP govt's ordinance for all-round development of the temple area to provide facilities to pilgrims.
A bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked additional solicitor general K M Nataraj to seek state govt's response by Tuesday morning, when it will take up a batch of petitions that have questioned the manner in which state govt, prompted by an SC order, had come out with a temple development project proposed to be implemented at a cost of Rs 500 crore.
The Goswamis, through senior advocate Shyam Divan, said taking over of the temple through an ordinance was extraordinary as the issue was not before constitutional courts, which were only dealing with alleged mismanagement of Guriraj temple.
In the guise of better management of temples in the 'Braj area', the SC passed an order without even hearing temple Goswamis, which prompted the state to issue the ordinance, they said.
The bench agreed that such an order without hearing the Goswamis could not have been passed. However, the Justice Kant-led bench said, "It is only for development of the temple and its surroundings. The state's intention does not appear to siphon out temple funds but to spend it on providing facilities to pilgrims."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Andrea Bergs Auto schockiert die ganze Welt, Beweis in Fotos!
Weight Loss Groove
Undo
Divan said Banke Bihari temple was a private temple and any law brought about by govt or any order passed by courts could not have been without hearing the Goswamis, who have been managing it for centuries.
The bench saw a point in Divan's argument and said, "The state cannot be seen coming to the court in a clandestine manner and getting an order set aside in a case which had nothing to do with Banke Bihari temple. We will set aside that part of the order, set up an interim committee to manage the temple and permit the HC to decide the legality of the ordinance."
However, the bench was in favour of development around the temple to provide space for parking and places to stay for pilgrims with all facilities. "Religious tourism is assuming great importance. It can also be a big revenue earner and help in job creation. But there has to be adequate facilities to handle pilgrims," it said.
The interim committee may also have to induct representatives of Archaeological Survey of India as well as independent architects proficient in ancient building restoration to protect the temple, the bench said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold prices firm above Rs 1 lakh mark, hover near all-time highs ahead of RBI MPC outcome. What to expect?
Gold prices firm above Rs 1 lakh mark, hover near all-time highs ahead of RBI MPC outcome. What to expect?

Economic Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Gold prices firm above Rs 1 lakh mark, hover near all-time highs ahead of RBI MPC outcome. What to expect?

Ahead of the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) outcome on Wednesday, precious metals were trading firmly. On the MCX, gold October futures were slightly lower by Rs 113 or 0.11% at Rs 1,01,091 per 10 grams, while silver September futures were marginally higher by Rs 115 or 0.10% at Rs 1,12,351 per kg. ADVERTISEMENT On Monday, both gold and silver settled on a positive note in domestic and international markets. The gold October futures contract closed at Rs 1,01,204 per 10 grams, up 1.45%, while the silver September contract ended at Rs 1,12,236 per kg, gaining 1.79%. Gold and silver extended their gains during a highly volatile session, as downbeat U.S. job data increased the likelihood of a Federal Reserve rate cut in its September meeting. The dollar index and U.S. 10-year bond yields continued to decline, further supporting precious metal prices. As of today, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) was hovering near the 98.94 mark, down 0.16 or 0.16%.'Gold and silver also gained amid the U.S. President's threat to impose higher trade tariffs on India over Russian oil imports. The rupee slipped to a 5-1/2 month low against the U.S. dollar, supporting gold and silver prices in the domestic market,' said Manoj Kumar Jain of Prithvifinmart Commodity Research.'Gold is trading near its long-term resistance of $3,454 per troy ounce. If prices sustain above this level on a closing basis, further strength could be seen in upcoming sessions,' he added. ADVERTISEMENT Jain expects gold and silver prices to remain volatile this week due to U.S. tariff concerns and fluctuations in the dollar index. How to Trade Gold? Manoj Kumar Jain suggested the following key technical levels for trading on MCX: ADVERTISEMENT - Gold: Support at Rs 1,00,100-99,650 | Resistance at Rs 1,01,555-1,02,200- Silver: Support at Rs 1,11,650-1,11,100 | Resistance at Rs 1,13,000-1,14,200- Strategy: Jain recommends buying silver above Rs 1,12,000 with a stop loss of Rs 1,11,100 for a target of Rs 1,14,000. ADVERTISEMENT Gold price today in Delhi 22 carat: Rs 57,792 per 8 grams24 carat: Rs 61,656 per 8 grams Gold price today in Mumbai 22 carat: Rs 56,672 per 8 grams ADVERTISEMENT 24 carat: Rs 60,424 per 8 grams Gold price today in Chennai 22 carat: Rs 56,912 per 8 grams 24 carat: Rs 60,600 per 8 grams Gold price today in Hyderabad 22 carat: Rs 56,792 per 8 grams 24 carat: Rs 60,552 per 8 grams (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times) (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)

Judges don't decide who is ‘true Indian', says Priyanka Vadra after SC rebukes Rahul Gandhi
Judges don't decide who is ‘true Indian', says Priyanka Vadra after SC rebukes Rahul Gandhi

Scroll.in

time13 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Judges don't decide who is ‘true Indian', says Priyanka Vadra after SC rebukes Rahul Gandhi

Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday defended her brother Rahul Gandhi a day after the Supreme Court criticised his remarks on alleged Chinese incursions, saying that it is not for judges to decide who a 'true Indian' is, PTI reported. On Monday, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih told Rahul Gandhi that a 'true Indian' would not make remarks such as the ones he did about China allegedly having intruded into Indian territory. The court asked the Opposition leader how he had verified his claims, and said that he should have made the comments in Parliament, rather than on social media. Commenting on the court's observations, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said: 'With due respect to the honourable judges, they do not decide who a true Indian is. It is the duty of the Opposition leader to question the government.' Vadra also said that Rahul Gandhi would never speak against the Army, and that he holds it in the highest respect, PTI reported. 'This is a misinterpretation,' she said, in an apparent reference to a defamation case filed against Rahul Gandhi for the remarks. VIDEO | Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi (@priyankagandhi) reacts to Supreme Court's observation on Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi. 'With due respect to the honourable judges, they do not decide who a true Indian is. It is the duty of the Opposition Leader to question the government.… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) August 5, 2025 In a similar vein, Trinamool Congress MP Saket Gokhale said that it was very dangerous for Supreme Court judges to question whether someone was a true Indian. 'NOTHING in the Constitution gives the SC the power to hand out certificates for being a true Indian',' Gokhale said. 'We are ALL equal under law.' The Trinamool Congress member said that it was the prerogative of an MP to decide whether to make statements in Parliament or outside. 'As long as it's within the law, no court has the right to tell MPs whether they should say something inside the House or outside,' he said on social media. It is VERY dangerous when the Supreme Court uses language like 'are you a true Indian?' Questioning the govt does not make someone 'not a true Indian'. It is a fundamental DUTY of the political opposition. NOTHING in the Constitution gives the SC the power to hand out… — Saket Gokhale MP (@SaketGokhale) August 5, 2025 The Supreme Court on Monday made the comments about Rahul Gandhi while hearing his petition seeking that defamation proceedings filed against him be quashed. Even as the court rebuked the Congress leader for his remarks, it stayed the proceedings for three weeks. The case pertains to comments made by Gandhi on December 16, 2022, about a clash between the Indian and Chinese soldiers along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang. Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation, had filed a defamation complaint against Gandhi. His lawyer claimed that the Congress leader's statements were derogatory and defamed the Indian Army. refused to quash the proceedings in May.

Does India need to decriminalise teenage relationships?
Does India need to decriminalise teenage relationships?

The Hindu

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Does India need to decriminalise teenage relationships?

Senior advocate Indira Jaising, in a written submission to the Supreme Court recently, saidthat consesual sex between teenagers aged 16 to 18 must not be criminalised. Why is this a hot button issue? Under the Pocso or Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, any sexual relationship under the age of 18 is a crime, as those below 18 are considered children, and therefore consent does not matter. This is not a new issue: child rights activists and court in India too, have for years now highlighted the fact that a chunk of cases filed under the Pocso Act are of consensual teenage romantic relationships and elopements and that navigating the criminal judicial system in India can wreak havoc on young lives. The government however has maintained its stand that the age of consent cannot be lowered, that doing this, would erode child protection and child marriage laws and polices. Is there a case for decriminalising consensual teenage relationships? Is it fair to punish young persons for their romances? How is consent defined and regulated? How can India protect its children from marriage, abuses and crime while also allowing them freedom to choose their partners when they want to? Guest: Swagata Raha, legal researcher on child protection Host: Zubeda Hamid Edited by Sharmada venkatasubramanian Listen to more In Focus podcasts:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store