logo
Senate set to tackle Trump megabill but vote uncertain: Live updates

Senate set to tackle Trump megabill but vote uncertain: Live updates

"We'll find out," Thune said of the final vote anticipated June 29.
If successful, the House would have to vote on the Senate changes in order to reach Trump's desk by his self-imposed deadline of July 4. The Senate has trimmed the House version from about 1,100 pages to 940 - and still faces votes on what are expected to be dozens of amendments.
The success of Trump's domestic agenda for tax cuts and border security hangs in the balance. Republican approval of the spending blueprint would allow a majority of the 100-member Senate to approve all of Trump's priorities included in it through legislation later in the year, rather than needing 60 votes to overcome a filibuster for each measure.
Here's what we know about the legislative package:
What is in the bill?
The largest provisions in the legislation would extend expiring tax cuts and create a few new ones, and a dramatic increasing in spending on border security.
The heart of the legislation would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts which are set to expire at end of the year. Republicans have said defeat of the measure would lead to a $4 trillion tax hike over the next decade.
New tax deductions Trump campaigned on would apply to tips for employees such as waiters through 2028 and for overtime pay. The Senate capped the deduction at $25,000 and weakened the break for individuals with income above $150,000.
For border security, the bill would increase funding about $150 billion for the Department of Homeland Security. The bill authorizes $45 billion for new detention centers as Trump ramps up arrests and $27 billion for a mass deportation campaign.
A crucial provision would increase the amount the country can borrow by $5 trillion. The country's debt is already approaching $37 trillion and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned the current limit on borrowing will be reached in August.
Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican holdout on the bill, said he wouldn't vote for the bill unless the debt limit gets a separate vote. But Republican leaders want to keep the unpopular vote within the overall package. -Bart Jansen
What's not in the Senate version of the bill?
Republican support in the Senate waned after Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled several significant provisions would have to be removed to avoid a filibuster.
Republicans removed provisions to curb environmental regulations; restrict federal judges' powers; bulk up immigration enforcement; and cut funding from a consumer protection agency.
MacDonough also ruled against provisions that aimed to reduce Medicaid spending on health care programs for undocumented immigrants. -Bart Jansen
What does Trump say about the Senate version of the bill?
The Trump administration "strongly supports" the Senate version of the bill, in a White House Office of Management and Budget statement June 28.
The statement isn't intended to favor the Senate version over the House version on any particular provision, but to signal Trump would sign it if approved by Congress. The two-page statement highlighted provisions for tax cuts, border security, energy and defense.
"President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal," the statement said. -Bart Jansen

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation
The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation

It's an irony that the minerals needed to save the planet may help destroy it. Rare earth elements, the mineral backbones of wind turbines and electric vehicles, are now the prize in a geopolitical arms race. The trade agreement between Washington and Beijing restores rare earth shipments from China to the US, which had been suspended in retaliation against Donald Trump's tariffs. Behind the bluster, there has been a realisation in Washington that these are critical inputs for the US. They are needed not just by American icons such as Ford and Boeing but for its fighter jets, missile guidance systems and satellite communications. This understanding suggests that Washington will scale back some of its countermeasures once Beijing resumes delivery of rare earths. The paradox is that to reduce its dependence on China, the US must depend on Beijing a little longer. This is not yet decoupling; it's deferment. That, however, may not last. Mr Trump has signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals, which encourages the faster granting of permits for mining and processing projects. He eyes Ukraine and Greenland's subterranean riches to break dependence on China. The west became so reliant on a single geopolitical rival for such materials – materials it once extracted and refined domestically before shuttering operations – due to cost and environmental concerns. China, for its part, has come to dominate global rare earth processing. It has used that market power before – notably against Japan in 2010. It's hard not to think that it was strategic complacency that led to the west relying so heavily on China for key minerals. This month's Nato summit has seen the west push to reindustrialise via rearming itself. This is also reawakening long-dormant extractive ambitions in the global north. Canada, flush with critical mineral deposits, says its planned mining resurgence will be a new foundation for alliance solidarity. This month the EU called for strategic reserves of rare earths 'to prevent supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail from China' – highlighting their importance not just for electric vehicles but for defence and aerospace industries. 'Resilience' means digging deeper at home and controlling extraction abroad. The same minerals we need for net zero are being justified in terms of zero-sum rivalry. It is uncomfortable that 'green growth' and militarism have merged into a single policy frame, collapsing the distinction between ecological transition and arms buildup. A magnet for an electric car is also a magnet for a hypersonic missile. And meanwhile, the human and ecological toll continues to rise – largely out of sight and out of sync with the idea of environmental sustainability. A Guardian dispatch last week from Baotou, China's rare earth capital, found evidence of toxic ponds, poisoned soil and demolished 'cancer villages' – the hidden cost of our digital and electric age. Framing this as an inconvenient necessity risks repeating past mistakes. For mineral-rich nations, the surge in global demand brings opportunity. But as a UN report this year noted, without strong institutions and safeguards, it risks a familiar fate: corruption, conflict and environmental ruin. Today's scramble for critical minerals must not see the promises of responsible sourcing give way to a familiar logic – extract first, moralise later.

‘Bombs went through like butter' Trump declares as he rips critics who claim US attacks didn't destroy Iran nuke sites
‘Bombs went through like butter' Trump declares as he rips critics who claim US attacks didn't destroy Iran nuke sites

Scottish Sun

time42 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

‘Bombs went through like butter' Trump declares as he rips critics who claim US attacks didn't destroy Iran nuke sites

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites "like absolute butter". The proud president has been on a week long victory lap since he dropped 12 30,000lb bunker busting bombs on Tehran. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Donald Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites 'like absolute butter' Credit: Fox 7 The Fordow plant before and after the the US bombed the site Credit: Reuters 7 The moment the missile hit the earth in the test footage 7 The US joined Israel on decimating Iran's key nuclear facilities on June 21. Trump hailed the strikes at the time and said they obliterated their targets as planned despite some claiming the hits were less successful than first thought. Three sites were reportedly hit including the main target - the Fordlow nuke plant. Tehran has admitted since that Operation Midnight Hammer and the joint Israeli attacks did cause "excessive and serious" damage. read more in Donald Trump WARPED CROWD 'Death to America' chants ring out at funeral for Iran top brass killed in war Speaking this morning with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures, Trump said the bombs easily performed as expected. He explained: "The bomb went through it, like it was butter, like it was absolute butter. "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time." Trump also hit out again as those who had tried to say his strikes have only set back Iran's nuclear development program a few months rather than years. A leaked Defense Intelligence Agency report first casted doubt on President Trump's "obliterated" claim. The report, published by CNN and The New York Times, claimed they did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability by any genuine means. White House fuming over top secret leak on Iran nuke site bombing as Don attends key summit Others had speculated online that Iran had been trying to remove the enriched uranium from the base so they could rebuild their operations once the US left. The preliminary report even stated that Iran had managed to shift much of the uranium safely out - a claim Trump and US officials vehemently deny. Responding to those claims, a defiant Trump said: "A lot of people have said, well, 'do you think they're going to start again?' "I said, the last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition, in shape." The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites. The attacks helped to end the war, according to Trump, with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight afterwards. Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86, claimed victory over Israel and America despite his country being hammered for almost two weeks. The supreme leader ludicrously claimed Iran had almost crushed Israel and the government in Tel Aviv was on the verge of collapse. That's despite the IDF controlling the skies over Tehran, assassinating dozens of top generals and nuclear scientists, and destroying dozens of valuable missile batteries in just 12 days of fighting. Even with a ceasefire being agreed upon, Trump made it clear he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed. He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels. It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war. The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day. 7 Trump sat in the Situation Room of the White House a day before the US strikes Credit: AFP 7 Trump had posted this Truth shortly after launching the strikes Credit: Truth Social

Republican Senator Mullin says babies born in US should be deported if parents are
Republican Senator Mullin says babies born in US should be deported if parents are

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Republican Senator Mullin says babies born in US should be deported if parents are

June 29 (Reuters) - Republican U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin said on Sunday he believes babies born in the United States to immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported alongside their parents if the adults are removed. Mullin's comments on NBC's "Meet the Press" came in response to questions about a U.S. Supreme Courtdecision on Friday that paved the way for President Donald Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship to go into effect soon in some states. The court's ruling did not address the legality of Trump's order, which would upend the historic practice of granting U.S. citizenship to anyone born in the country regardless of their parents' immigration status. NBC's Kristen Welker asked Mullin what should happen to babies born in the United States whose parents are deported, given that the children are U.S. citizens under current law. "Well, they should go where their parents are," said Mullin, of Oklahoma. "Why wouldn't you send a child with their parents? I mean, why would you want to separate them?" Friday's court decision caused confusion among immigrants and advocates, who scrambled to understand the practical effects if birthright citizenship applies to babies born in some states but not in others.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store