logo
Keir Starmer will fight Corbyn's new party by copying Emmanuel Macron

Keir Starmer will fight Corbyn's new party by copying Emmanuel Macron

Independent26-07-2025
It is easy to mock the new party launched in a struggle between its joint figureheads, but that is no reason to pass up the chance. It takes a special skill for one figurehead (Zarah Sultana) to announce the founding of a new party only for the other figurehead (Jeremy Corbyn) to deny, a day later, that it had happened (' discussions are ongoing ').
Then, when Corbyn, three weeks later, announced that it was indeed ' time for a new kind of political party ', which appeared to be called Your Party because that was the name of the website, Sultana snapped on social media: ' It's not called Your Party!'
It turned out that Your Party was a placeholder name and the real name will be decided democratically at the inaugural conference, details TBC.
Mockery is always useful, because it reminds us how incapable the Corbynite tendency usually is at organising anything more complicated than a split. But it cannot be the whole story, because we know two other things.
One is that there is a big pool of potential support for soft Corbynism, if it can suppress the doctrinaire Marxism, the disdain for Britain and the accusation of antisemitism (denied by Corbyn, of course) that is never far from the surface.
The other is that Corbyn's allies showed that they could, briefly, run a competent general election campaign when they came close to unseating Theresa May in 2017.
So the Not-Your-Party could be a force to be reckoned with. According to some opinion polls, it would take most support away from the Green Party, but it would also siphon votes away from Labour. It is all very well Peter Kyle, the science secretary, describing his former leader as ' not a serious politician ', but Labour has to take the threat from the new party seriously.
It is doing so. Keir Starmer has been criticised – not least by Sultana – for copying Farage and thereby pushing Labour voters who are repelled by Reform in her direction. But I think this is to get Starmer's strategy the wrong way round. He knows that part of Labour's electoral coalition is repelled by Farage, but he wants to use that force of magnetic repulsion to try to keep hold of those voters, not to drive them away.
This is what might be called the 'Emmanuel Macron' strategy. Macron twice fought off a threat from Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the French equivalent of Corbyn-Sultana, by becoming the leading candidate against Marine Le Pen, the anti-immigration candidate of the party formerly known as the Front National.
In 2017, and again in 2022, Macron came top in a divided field (winning just 24 per cent and 28 per cent of the vote) in the first round, forcing voters to choose between him, a centrist with roots in the Socialist Party, and Le Pen, regarded with horror by polite French opinion. Each time, he won the run-off vote comfortably.
By running against Le Pen, Macron was able to unite a coalition stretching from Mélenchon through Macron's former socialists to the remnants of the establishment conservatives.
Starmer wants to fight the next general election as, in effect, a presidential run-off contest between him and Farage. He knows that the threat of Farage as prime minister is his most powerful weapon.
Presenting the election as a contest between Starmer and Farage is the best way of squeezing not just the Corbyn-Sultana vote, but the Green Party vote and even that of the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives.
The one point on which apologists for the Corbyn-Sultana party become evasive is when they are asked if they would be helping to let Farage in. That is the irresistible logic of the first-past-the-post voting system, but they have to try to deny it to keep their dream alive.
Most longstanding Corbynites understand this very well. That is why Corbyn was so reluctant to launch the new party, which some of his acolytes were keen to do the moment he won his Islington North constituency as an independent last year. He knows that the only reason he nearly succeeded in 2017 was that his supporters had taken over the Labour Party.
An outfit outside the party, on the other hand, will quickly discover that support for Gaza and anti-capitalism, however wide, is not deep. If Farage's popularity holds up, the next election will be decided in seats that are contested between Labour and Reform; in those seats, a vote for the new party will be a vote for Farage.
It will be time, as Macron said in France, for all good people to rally to the cause of defeating anti-immigrant authoritarianism. That is a message that could work for Starmer here with voters otherwise tempted to vote Tory, Lib Dem, Green – and with voters attracted to whatever the Corbyn-Sultana party ends up being called.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warwickshire PCC wants new guidance after 'cover-up' claims
Warwickshire PCC wants new guidance after 'cover-up' claims

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Warwickshire PCC wants new guidance after 'cover-up' claims

A Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) has pressed the Home Secretary for an urgent update on what information forces should give to the public after allegations that authorities tried to cover up alleged offences by asylum comes after two men reported to be Afghan asylum seekers were charged following alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in PCC Philip Seccombe is calling for fresh national guidance to be issued after police were accused of withholding their immigration status."It is very easy to criticise and suggest that the balance of disclosure hasn't been correct, but it is much harder to take these decisions on the ground," the PCC said. "Like all forces, Warwickshire Police finds itself in a difficult position of trying to carefully balance the legal safeguards which protect the integrity of the judicial process, while maintaining public order and simultaneously ensuring that public confidence is maintained through transparency and honesty."Currently police forces are in an invidious position when deciding what can and should be disclosed in sensitive cases, given that the national guidance is silent on both the ethnicity and immigration status of suspects."Two men have appeared in court charged in connection with the rape of the 12-year-old girl in Mulakhil faces two rape charges, while Mohammad Kabir is accused of kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl aged under County Council leader George Finch accused Warwickshire Police and the Home Office of covering up their immigration status. On Wednesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said police should reveal more information about suspects, and that guidance to police was already being looked she added it was an "operational decision" for forces and the Crown Prosecution Service over what information to said: "However, we do think that the guidance needs to change, the College of Policing is already looking at this, and Home Office officials are working with the College of Policing."The Nuneaton case has led to fresh pressure on police over the information they make Southport atrocity committed by Axel Rudakubana in July last year was marked by a focus on the suspect's ethnicity and immigration status, with false rumours spreading online that he was a Muslim asylum seeker, fuelling riots after the added: "It is imperative that police forces have revised guidance as soon as possible, so everyone has the clarity needed on what information will be released, when it will be released and by whom, for any incidents going forward." Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in
Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in

The Guardian

time26 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Bank of England likely to cut interest rates today as new Trump tariffs kick in

Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:51.000Z Title: Dozens more countries face higher taxes on exports to US as new Trump tariffs come into effect Content: Dozens of countries face higher taxes on their exports to the US now that Donald Trump's latest wave of country-specific tariffs has come into force. The sweeping 'reciprocal' levies announced by the White House a week ago – just before a previous 1 August deadline was due to elapse – were in place as of a minute past midnight Washington time on Thursday. Key details of Trump's latest tariffs include: The rates range from 41% on Syria, 40% on Laos and Myanmar and 39% on Switzerland to 10% for the UK. The levies will be on top of the usual tariffs applying to US-bound goods. Brazil's 'reciprocal' rate is 10%, for example, but its total levy is 50% after Trump added a 40% levy over the prosecution of ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. India's 25% tariff rate could rise to a total of 50% after Trump imposed an additional charge for buying oil from Russia. The European Union is the only US trading partner where its baseline rate – set at 15% after a framework deal – will include previous tariffs. It means, for example, cheeses that are normally hit with import duties of 14.9% will be taxed at 15% and not 29.9%. Trump first unveiled the raft of country-specific rates on 2 April, which he called 'liberation day', claiming the world had long been ripping off the US. On Wednesday, meanwhile, Trump said he would impose a 100% tariff on computer chips – likely raising the cost of electronics and household goods – but that US-produced chips would be exempt. Update: Date: 2025-08-07T06:17:14.000Z Title: Introduction: Bank of England interest rate decision today Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. With the UK economy looking weak, but inflation rumbling away, and a trade war raging, these are tricky times to be a central banker. And at noon today, the Bank of England will reveal whether its policymakers have decided to lower borrowing costs, or leave them unchanged – and, significantly, whether they all agreed on the decision! The City is widely expecting a quarter-point cut in interest rates, to bring Bank rate down from 4.25% to 4%. Some of the nine members of the BoE's monetary policy committee may push for a deeper cut, fearing that rising unemployment and weakening economic activity is flashing the alarm. On the other side of the table, though, hawkish MPC members may point to inflation - which rose to 3.6% in June - as a reason to leave rates on hold. Guillermo Felices, global investment strategist at PGIM Fixed Income, says a 25 basis point (quarter-point) cut is 'almost a done deal', adding: We expect a further 50bps of rate cuts over the 3 following meetings, as the Monetary Policy Committee begins to put more weight on the weak labour market. There are MPC members that already see a greater urgency to cut rates, as indicated by the 6-3 vote split to hold at the last meeting. The Bank also has to weigh up the impact of Donald Trump's trade war. The UK's trade deal with the US means the direct impact from tariffs is relatively limited, but there is the global situation to consider too. Earlier this morning, the latest wave of country-specific tariffs came into force, a week after Trump announced them. Switzerland failed to reach a last-minute deal to lower its rate from 39%. Swiss president Karin Keller-Sutter reportedly left Washington empty-handed last night, following a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 7am BST: Halifax house price index for July Noon BST: Bank of England interest rate decision 12.30pm BST: Bank of England press conference 1.30pm BST: US weekly jobless report

The EU could win the trade war with the US
The EU could win the trade war with the US

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

The EU could win the trade war with the US

LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - The U.S.-EU trade deal has been heavily criticised as a capitulation by the bloc. But if you dive into the agreement details, the European Union is likely not only to suffer less than the U.S. but may even see its economy benefit from the new global tariff regime. The EU on July 28 came to an agreement with the U.S. that set base levies on EU goods at 15%, below the 30% rate U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened, through still much higher than tariffs were before the trade war began. Many analysts and journalists alike are adamant that the trade deal the EU struck was a big win for the U.S. and a major loss for the EU. Even French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou seems to think so. The main thrust of the argument is that the EU should have been strong enough to inflict measurable pain on the U.S. but instead made lots of promises without getting much in return. Plus, some European leaders are concerned that their exporters will suffer from lower U.S. demand in the short term. Allow me to disagree and state that, as it stands today, the EU is winning the trade war. First, let us compare the EU trade deal with the agreement that one of Europe's major competitors, Japan, struck with the U.S. just five days earlier. Both countries were hit with a baseline tariff rate of 15%, and both made much-derided promises to boost investment in the U.S. While Europe's total pledge is larger in nominal terms, it only represents around 7% of the EU's GDP compared to over 13% for Japan. The numbers clearly suggest the EU got a better deal than Japan, even without accounting for the fact that Japanese businesses depend more on exports to the U.S. than their EU counterparts. Moreover, neither the EU's promised $600 billion investments in the U.S. nor the purchase of $750 billion in energy commodities is arguably a real concession. Over the last three years, EU businesses have invested some $605 billion in the U.S., so investing another $600 billion in the next three years would likely have happened regardless. And as Reuters Open Interest columnist Clyde Russell explained, it is delusional to think the U.S. can deliver $750 billion in energy commodities to the EU in the next three years. On top of this, modelled projections of the impact of the tariffs on the U.S. and other countries suggest that, based on the announced tariff levels, the U.S. will suffer more than the EU both in terms of GDP and inflation. Over the next 12 months, my model – which is a global trade model that considers the dynamic relationships between trade, growth, inflation, and foreign exchange rates – forecasts a 1 percentage point (pp) increase in U.S. inflation and a 0.4 pp decline in GDP growth. The Yale Budget model, opens new tab anticipates a similar hit to GDP, but it anticipates a larger 1.8 pp boost to inflation. Meanwhile, my model indicates that in the next 12 months, the impact on EU inflation and growth should both be in the order of 0.2 pp to 0.3 pp. In short, the EU appears set to suffer less from the new tariff regime than the U.S. in the next year. And in the medium term, the EU could very well be a net winner from this new trade environment, as new supply chains are established in response to the higher global tariff environment. In fact, my model indicates that, based on the tariffs currently announced, the EU's GDP could actually increase by around 0.1 pp compared to a no-tariff scenario. Why? Because China and several other economies like India, Brazil and possibly Switzerland face much higher tariffs than the EU, which could allow EU exporters to gain market share from these international competitors. After all, U.S. businesses and consumers who cannot replace imported goods with domestically produced ones will seek to find the cheapest possible imported good. And while Chinese imports tend to be cheaper than those from Europe, they will now come with much higher tariffs, eroding China's price advantage. Some recent economic data releases suggest these model forecasts could be onto something. Consider new manufacturing orders in recent PMI surveys. In the U.S. they crashed in April after rising in the first quarter due to businesses front-running tariffs, and they continue to hover well below the crucial 50-point mark denoting expansion and contraction. Meanwhile, in the EU, this indicator has accelerated and remains well above the levels seen in the U.S. Where does that leave us? Sentiment in the EU following the trade deal appears to have become too negative, while investors simultaneously appear too complacent about America's economic prospects. This sounds like where we were at the beginning of the year, right before Europe started outperforming. (The views expressed here are those of Joachim Klement, an investment strategist at Panmure Liberum, the UK's largest independent investment bank). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store