logo
The ‘Idaho way': Republicans want to eliminate voters' power to legalize weed

The ‘Idaho way': Republicans want to eliminate voters' power to legalize weed

Yahoo19-03-2025

In our Reality Check stories, Idaho Statesman journalists seek to hold the powerful accountable and find answers to critical questions in our community. Read more. Story idea? Tips@idahostatesman.com.
A measure on next year's ballot could finally accomplish what Idaho lawmakers have tried to do for years: block voters from legalizing pot in the state.
Idaho voters next year will decide whether to approve a measure that would add to the state constitution that only the Legislature has the power to legalize marijuana, narcotics or psychoactive drugs, making it impossible for a citizen-led initiative to allow the drugs in the state.
Senate Republican leaders celebrated after they passed House Joint Resolution 4, which places the measure on the 2026 general election ballot, and said it would protect Idaho's future and reflect the moral values held by the state's residents.
'By placing this constitutional amendment on the ballot, the Legislature is ensuring that decisions regarding drug legalization remain in the hands of the elected representatives best equipped to assess the ongoing and evolving threats posed by drug proliferation,' they said in a statement.
The legislation is a culmination of legislators' dislike of both recent initiatives and weed, amid a growing number of states that have legalized the drug. Every state that borders Idaho has legalized pot in some form, with the exception of Wyoming. Most states have allowed recreational use, while Utah only allows medical marijuana.
'That takes the initiative process out of legalizing drugs,' Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa, who cosponsored the bill, told a House committee in February. 'Only the Legislature will have the power.'
Idaho lawmakers have a history of pushing back on citizen-led initiatives.
Legislators this year passed a bill that puts more stringent requirements on qualifying for the Medicaid expansion program that the state's voters overwhelmingly supported in 2018. The Legislature also fought in court an unsuccessful ballot initiative last year that would have created open primaries and a ranked choice voting system in Idaho. State lawmakers have fought initiatives even back in 1994, when legislators repealed a law approved by voters on term limits, according to The New York Times.
House Joint Resolution 4 was just one of several measures lawmakers have taken in the past few years to limit initiatives. This year one of the bills introduced would allow the governor to veto successful initiatives, though that bill never made it to the floor for a vote.
Direct democracy tools like the initiative are there in case the Legislature becomes a 'block' against something the people want, said Stephanie Witt, Boise State University professor in the school of public service. Though initiatives have most recently been associated with liberal groups, conservatives have also used the process in the past, Witt told the Statesman.
'Giving up that power is giving away a lot of power,' Witt said. 'The tool can be used by people from everywhere on the political spectrum.'
House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, said the bill would be 'stripping the power of the people.'
'It should not be our job to stop them from doing so,' Rubel said on the House floor. 'That just doesn't feel like an appropriate role for us as supposed representatives of the people.'
Jeremy Kitzhaber, a retired U.S. Air Force sergeant who has been battling cancer, has helped craft medical marijuana bills that were introduced in Idaho for years, but has yet to garner enough support. Kitzhaber has told lawmakers about the need for alternative medication for patients like him dependent on opioids.
Kitzhaber said he's not someone who wants to get high. He just wants to be comfortable.
'My thing on that is, it's our right as citizens to try and put a ballot initiative together,' Kitzhaber told the Statesman. Many in the Legislature 'are worried that if the people put a citizens initiative together, and it makes it on the ballot, what we have right now is nothing, and that would give us something.'
For years, Idaho lawmakers have stated their intense opposition to pot and said a permanent prohibition would simply reflect Idaho values. Skaug called the addiction, sale and production of illegal drugs 'one of the most evil things we deal with.'
Efforts to get an initiative to legalize medical marijuana legalization on the ballot have failed every election cycle since 2012, according to the Secretary of State's Office. But more than two-thirds of residents support legalizing medical marijuana, according to a poll commissioned by the Statesman.
It also hasn't stopped Idahoans from using weed. In Ontario, Oregon, along the Idaho border less than an hour's drive from Boise, the city hit $100 million in dispensary sales in 2023, according to Portland Monthly. Idahoans are a major client base for the city's booming marijuana industry, the Statesman previously reported.
In their efforts to combat marijuana use, lawmakers have put out several proposals for new laws — including one, House Bill 271, to block the advertisement of illegal products. And Gov. Brad Little signed a bill into law to create a $300 mandatory minimum fine for marijuana possession, higher than almost every other misdemeanor, according to previous Statesman reporting.
It's also not the first time Idaho lawmakers have tried to ban marijuana legislation in the state constitution. Republicans in 2021 introduced a joint resolution that would have put a measure on ballot asking voters to place a ban on drugs in the state constitution, according to previous Statesman reporting. That resolution failed.
The proposed amendment to appear on the ballot next year adds to a section in the state constitution that already cedes full control of liquor sales in Idaho. Back in 1933, legislators put forth a resolution that asked voters to give the Legislature the 'full power and authority to permit, control and regulate or prohibit,' intoxicating liquors. Idaho voters approved it with over 61% of the vote, according to Ballotpedia.
Rep. Josh Wheeler, R-Ammon, during debate on the floor said this year's legislation reflects the state's 'standing as a bastion against illegal drugs.'
'This is a clear example of doing something the Idaho way,' Wheeler said.
Idaho lawmakers look to 'go on offense' to limit possible drug legalization initiatives
Idaho imposes new minimum fine for low-level marijuana possession — likely steepest in US

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take job with conservative nonprofit
Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take job with conservative nonprofit

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take job with conservative nonprofit

Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen, a Monument Republican, listens to opening day proceedings on the first day of the 2025 session of the Colorado Legislature on Jan. 8, 2025, at the Colorado Capitol. (Lindsey Toomer/Colorado Newsline) Senate Minority Paul Lundeen announced Monday that he is resigning from the Legislature to join the leadership of a conservative nonprofit. His resignation is effective immediately. 'Serving Colorado has been an honor and blessing,' the Monument Republican said in a statement. 'I am grateful to the people of Senate District 9 for the opportunity to fight for policies that empower individuals, protect our communities, and promote prosperity. As I transition to a national platform, I am eager to continue advocating for personal freedom, economic opportunity, and common-sense conservative values.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX He will lead the American Excellence Foundation, an organization that awards grants to advance conservative public policy. Lundeen served as a state representative from 2015 to 2018 and as a senator since 2019. He is term-limited and could not seek re-election in 2026. Before his time in the Legislature, he served on the State Board of Education, including as chair for two years. He worked on an array of education-related policies while in office. The Senate Republican caucus will meet on Thursday evening to select a new minority leader. A vacancy committee of Republicans from Senate District 9 will also need to meet to select a replacement for Lundeen. In a statement, Gov. Jared Polis thanked Lundeen for his public service. 'Paul has always found ways to work across the aisle, and do what is best for the people he has served,' the Democrat wrote. 'We've often found common ground on the issues that matter most to Coloradans, like education, public safety and growing our economy. Senator Lundeen has spent decades in public service, in addition to his time leading small businesses, and his presence and leadership will be missed at the Capitol.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty
Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty

Oklahoma's top prosecutor said Monday that the state intends to pursue a new murder trial against Richard Glossip but without the death penalty after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated his capital conviction in a rare victory for a death row prisoner. State Attorney General Gentner Drummond's decision to retry Glossip, 62, on a first-degree murder charge came out of a status conference hearing. Drummond said in a news release that the evidence still implicates Glossip in the 1997 murder of Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. Glossip, a motel manager working for Van Treese, has maintained his innocence while on death row for almost three decades. While Drummond, a Republican, has not agreed with Glossip's innocence claims, he was supportive of the Supreme Court's ruling in February, when the majority of justices agreed, as Drummond put it, that "it is now an undeniable fact that he did not receive a fair trial." Drummond said Monday that he would ensure Glossip now receives an impartial trial. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond said in a statement. "After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction." Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, a Democrat, had previously indicated that Glossip would not be eligible for the death penalty now if he were to be retried. Drummond said he would seek a life sentence for Glossip at his next trial. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he added. The continuation of the state's prosecution against Glossip resumes a twisting case that saw him dodge death several times with nine separate execution dates that had to be postponed. Various courts delayed the executions as he appealed, while state corrections officials also came under scrutiny a decade ago for botched execution attempts. But Glossip's case had been championed in recent years by a bipartisan group of Oklahoma legislators after an independent report they commissioned in 2022 found that "no reasonable jury hearing the complete record would convict Glossip of first-degree murder." The report centered on the state's primary witness, Justin Sneed, who had confirmed to the report's investigators that he had discussions with multiple family members about "recanting" his testimony over an 11-year period. Investigators also said the district attorney's case file included documentation describing how the state provided Sneed information "so he could conform his testimony to match the evidence" from other witnesses. Glossip's original 1998 conviction was overturned in 2001, when a state appeals court found that the evidence against him was weak. But the state took him to trial again, and a second jury found him guilty in 2004. At Glossip's trial, Sneed, a motel handyman, admitted that he had killed Van Treese, but said that it was at Glossip's direction and that he had been promised $10,000. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed received a life sentence while Glossip was given the death penalty. Prosecutors said Glossip orchestrated the plot because he was embezzling from the motel and feared being fired. The Supreme Court on Monday tossed out Glossip's capital conviction in a 5-3 ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate, presumably because he was involved in the case when he was on a federal appeals court that includes Oklahoma. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority's ruling that prosecutors "knew Sneed's statements were false" and that "because Sneed's testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip's guilt of capital murder, the jury's assessment of Sneed's credibility was necessarily determinative here." "Hence, there is a reasonable likelihood that correcting Sneed's testimony would have affected the judgment of the jury," she added. After the Supreme Court's decision, Glossip was moved off death row, but was held without bail in the Oklahoma County Detention Center on a first-degree murder charge. A next court date in Glossip's case is scheduled for June 17. Glossip's attorney, Don Knight, did not immediately comment about the prosecutors' decision, but he welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling in February that spared his longtime client from the death chamber. "He had nine execution dates, three last meals, and obviously, to finally get relief has been huge for him," Knight said, "and he's thrilled beyond words." This article was originally published on

State Legislature Acts To ‘Make Texas Healthy Again'
State Legislature Acts To ‘Make Texas Healthy Again'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Legislature Acts To ‘Make Texas Healthy Again'

Under Senate Bill 25, which awaits Gov. Greg Abbott's signature, Texas could become one of the first states to mandate warning labels on foods containing artificial dyes and specific chemicals. The bill, dubbed the Make Texas Healthy Again Act, requires labels on products containing one or more of some 40-plus additives, such as Blue 1, Red 40, Yellow 5, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and titanium dioxide. The label would state: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.' The warning label must be prominent, readable, and would apply to products packaged after January 1, 2027. A loophole allows producers using existing packaging through 2036 to avoid the requirement. The bill also invalidates state labeling rules if federal regulations supersede them. 'Texas can really lead here. … These bills represent a Texas way that prioritizes transparency, prioritizes good education and prioritizes incentive change,' Calley Means, a top adviser to U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said during a Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing. Beyond labeling, SB 25 increases physical activity requirements for middle school students from four to six semesters of 30-minute daily sessions and mandates nutrition education for undergraduates, developed by a seven-member Texas Nutrition Advisory Committee appointed by the governor by December 31, 2025. The committee would include experts in metabolic health, a licensed physician, a Texas Department of Agriculture representative, and others. In addition, doctors and nurses must complete continuing education on nutrition to maintain their licenses. 'This sweeping legislation is not just another bill. It's a call to action — one that so many Texans and Americans are realizing — that something is wrong and that something needs to change in our food industry and in our sedentary lifestyle,' Sen. Lois Kolkhorst (R-Brenham), the bill's sponsor, told The Texas Tribune. The bill garnered bipartisan support, with 10 Senate Democrats and three House Democrats sponsoring or co-sponsoring. 'This is about the MAHA parents and the crunchy granola parents coming together to say, 'We are sick and tired of being sick and tired,'' said Rep. Lacey Hull (R-Houston) before the House passed the bill on May 25. Food industry groups, including Walmart, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, General Mills, and Frito-Lay, opposed the labeling, warning in a letter that it 'could destabilize local and regional economies.' Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (D-San Antonio) expressed concern that 'the cost of food will continue to rise,' the Tribune reported. Kolkhorst countered in February that 'the market will adjust.' Supporters, like the Episcopal Health Foundation, see health benefits. 'The amount of money and time we're spending treating diabetes as opposed to preventing it is huge, especially in Texas,' said Brian Sasser, the foundation's chief communications officer, per the Tribune. Andy Keller of the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute added, 'In a world that pretends the brain is not part of the body, this bill will put tools in the hands of children, parents and teachers to begin truly addressing emotional health and wellbeing.' The bill aligns with federal Make America Healthy Again initiatives, with Kolkhorst noting Kennedy's personal call urging its passage. 'As in so many cases, we're not waiting on Washington,' said Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) in February. 'Texas will act.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store