
NATO learns as Ukraine's 'creativity' changes battlefield
"What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse -- and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago," French Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview.
"Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity."
Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed.
"It was a real coup."
"We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning," the navy commander said.
"We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated."
'Must act quickly'
Faced with the Russian threat, NATO this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow.
But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping NATO and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years.
"Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly," Vandier said.
The admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said NATO needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack.
"When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter," he said.
"That's what should prevent war -- making the adversary think: "Tomorrow morning, I won't win."
NATO countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month.
That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware.
But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems?
"No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment," Vandier said.
"However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it."
Officials say that over 70 percent of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones.
But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent.
"Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10-meter-long (33-foot-long) drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools," Vandier said.
"If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs."
Integrating new technologies
The admiral, who works out of NATO's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was "integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine".
NATO and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its neighbour.
Artificial Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield.
"All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities," Vandier said.
"It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155-millimeter (six-inch) shell."
This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which NATO aims to expand by at least 30 percent over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros (dollars).
Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was "substantial" it was "fully realistic".
"Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
No, this video does not show a NATO strike on Moscow
A video circulating widely on social media claims to show NATO forces striking Moscow at night, in what users have described as an "escalation" and an attempt by the Western alliance to start a "nuclear war". Users claim, without evidence, that the strike occurred earlier this month, on the eve of the 2 June peace talks between Ukrainian and Russian delegations in the Turkish capital of Istanbul. Known US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones shared the false claim on his X account, garnering more than 2 million views. "NATO is openly trying to start a nuclear war with Russia. Moscow is under attack again. The night before the peace talks," Jones wrote. Euroverify detected the unfounded allegations spreading on Facebook, TikTok and X in at least five European languages. We used a reverse image search to identify the origin of the video, and found that it has been available since December 2023. A closer analysis found that it shows an attack by Ukraine's air forces on a Russian warship known as Novocherkassk in the port of Feodosia in Crimea, which Russia occupied and unilaterally annexed in 2014. One person was killed in that attack and several others injured, according to media reports. The footage corresponds to Euronews' reporting of that event on 26 December 2023. The misrepresentation of the video comes amid increasing disinformation about Russia's war in Ukraine. Targeted disinformation operations aimed at undermining the credibility of the NATO Alliance are also on the rise. NATO troops have not directly engaged in any military activity as part of Russia's war in Ukraine, but do supply Ukrainian armed forces with military equipment and arms, including long-range missiles. At least two people were killed and 60 wounded in Kharkiv after Russian forces launched a large-scale drone attack across Ukraine overnight Wednesday, Ukrainian officials said. 'Seventeen strikes by enemy UAVs were carried out within just 10 minutes in two districts of the city this night,' Kharkiv's Mayor Igor Terekhov said. More than 15 apartments were on fire in a five-storey building and several houses were hit. 'There may be people trapped under the rubble," Terekhov added. The strikes caused widespread destruction in the Slobidskyi and Osnovianskyi districts of Kharkiv, hitting apartment buildings, private homes, playgrounds, industrial sites and public transport. 'Those are ordinary sites of peaceful life — those that should never be targeted,' Terekhov wrote on Telegram, as Kharkiv regional head Oleh Syniehubov said that nine children aged between 2 and 15 were among the injured. Emergency crews, municipal workers and volunteers worked through the night to extinguish fires, rescue residents from burning homes, and restore gas, electricity and water services to the area. Images from the scene published by Ukraine's Emergency Service on Telegram showed burning apartments, shattered windows and firefighters battling the blaze. Ukraine's Air Forces said Russia attacked Ukraine overnight on Wednesday with 85 Shahed-type drones and decoy UAVs, which targeted the northeastern city and other areas. Air defence systems managed to neutralise 49 drones, intercepting 40 and jamming nine more with electronic warfare. Separately, the death toll from a wave of Russian strikes Tuesday morning on Kyiv and Odesa rose to at least three and another 13 wounded after Moscow attacked the areas with drones and missiles. A maternity ward and residential buildings were among civilian targets hit, according to Odesa's regional head Oleh Kiper. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy voiced frustration about the lack of response from the US and other countries over the recent escalation of Russian attacks, including a record 419 Russian drones which were launched at Ukraine on Monday night. "Russian missile and Shahed strikes drown out the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace," the Ukrainian leader posted on X on Tuesday morning. For yet another night, instead of a ceasefire, there were massive strikes with Shahed drones, cruise and ballistic missiles." Zelenskyy said 250 of the drones were Shaheds, and two of the seven missiles were of 'North Korean production'.


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Three killed in Kharkiv in latest Russian drone attacks on Ukraine
At least two people were killed and 60 wounded in Kharkiv after Russian forces launched a large-scale drone attack across Ukraine overnight Wednesday, Ukrainian officials said. 'Seventeen strikes by enemy UAVs were carried out within just 10 minutes in two districts of the city this night,' Kharkiv's Mayor Igor Terekhov said. More than 15 apartments were on fire in a five-storey building and several houses were hit. 'There may be people trapped under the rubble," Terekhov added. The strikes caused widespread destruction in the Slobidskyi and Osnovianskyi districts of Kharkiv, hitting apartment buildings, private homes, playgrounds, industrial sites and public transport. 'Those are ordinary sites of peaceful life — those that should never be targeted,' Terekhov wrote on Telegram, as Kharkiv regional head Oleh Syniehubov said that nine children aged between 2 and 15 were among the injured. Emergency crews, municipal workers and volunteers worked through the night to extinguish fires, rescue residents from burning homes, and restore gas, electricity and water services to the area. Images from the scene published by Ukraine's Emergency Service on Telegram showed burning apartments, shattered windows and firefighters battling the blaze. Ukraine's Air Forces said Russia attacked Ukraine overnight on Wednesday with 85 Shahed-type drones and decoy UAVs, which targeted the northeastern city and other areas. Air defence systems managed to neutralise 49 drones, intercepting 40 and jamming nine more with electronic warfare. Separately, the death toll from a wave of Russian strikes Tuesday morning on Kyiv and Odesa rose to at least three and another 13 wounded after Moscow attacked the areas with drones and missiles. A maternity ward and residential buildings were among civilian targets hit, according to Odesa's regional head Oleh Kiper. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy voiced frustration about the lack of response from the US and other countries over the recent escalation of Russian attacks, including a record 419 Russian drones which were launched at Ukraine on Monday night. "Russian missile and Shahed strikes drown out the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace," the Ukrainian leader posted on X on Tuesday morning. For yet another night, instead of a ceasefire, there were massive strikes with Shahed drones, cruise and ballistic missiles." Zelenskyy said 250 of the drones were Shaheds, and two of the seven missiles were of 'North Korean production'. After receiving historic support for the High Seas Treaty at the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said on Tuesday that its entry into force is "within sight". The treaty, which provides a legal framework for establishing marine protected areas and regulating activities on the high seas, gained momentum on Monday. However, its implementation is not yet guaranteed. Guterres urged all remaining nations to ratify the pact quickly to make it legally binding. During his address, he highlighted significant opposition to the treaty's goals. "There is a tipping point approaching, beyond which recovery may become impossible. And let us be clear. Powerful interests are pushing us towards the brink," Guterres stated. "We are facing a hard battle against a clear enemy. Its name is greed. Greed that sows doubt, denies science, distorts truths, rewards corruption, and destroys life for profit." If it comes into force, the treaty would be the first legally binding international agreement to protect biodiversity on the high seas, which cover nearly two-thirds of the world's oceans. It is considered vital to counter overfishing, end plastic pollution, regulate seabed mining, and meet the global '30 by 30' conservation goal, which aims to protect 30 per cent of the planet's oceans by 2030. Stressing the urgency, Guterres also reminded delegates that climate change goals cannot be ignored. "Last year, for the first time, the annual global temperature was 1.5 degrees Celsius hotter than pre-industrial times. Scientists are clear that that does not mean that the long-term global temperature rise limit of 1.5 degrees is out of reach," he said. "It means we need to fight harder. And the ocean depends on it, and so do we." Eighteen countries ratified the treaty on Monday, bringing the total to 49, just 11 short of the 60 needed for the ocean agreement to enter into force. The surge in support adds momentum to what could become a historic shift in how the world governs the open ocean.


Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: Give up the search for loopholes - French bureaucracy always wins
To egregiously butcher William Goldman's classic line - 'There are no French admin loopholes, Highness, anyone who says differently is selling something'. France's complex admin means that foreign residents and future arrivals are often left looking for shortcuts, easy options and loopholes - an entirely understandable reaction when you consider the bureaucratic pain that France enjoys inflicting on its inhabitants. It's also a famously high tax country, which means that plenty of people are on the lookout for, shall we say, more forgiving tax arrangements. This one is perhaps less understandable - especially if it comes in the next breath after raptures of delight over France's excellent public services - but it's always going to be human nature to try. The thing is - there really are very few genuine loopholes when it comes to French residency and taxes, especially when it comes to non-EU nationals who come within the visa/residency card system. Advertisement Sure, you might think you've found a loophole - but these almost always end up causing you more problems down the line, especially if your goal is to make France your home. When it comes to people who just want to be here for a couple of years there is a little more wriggle room - but for those who intend to stay in France and will therefore eventually be seeking long-term residency and perhaps even citizenship, trying to exploit a loophole is almost always going to cause you further administrative pain in the future. In my experience the people who genuinely set out to cheat the French system are few and far between - a much more common scenario is people who have simply been given bad advice about a shortcut or loophole that they could take advantage of. At The Local we often get emails from readers who are experiencing problems with French systems - and the people stuck in the worst tangles are almost always those who have at one point been given bad advice. Here are some examples; The 80-year-old lady who had been breezily assured that there was no need for her to do a tax declaration in France, and is now living in fear of fines from the tax office for having failed to make the required annual déclaration des revenus . The British second-home owner who had been advised to get a post-Brexit carte de séjour as a way to 'cheat' the 90 day rule and now finds themselves required to make a French tax declaration and re-register their cars. The American tech worker who had been advised to get the 'more straightforward' visitor visa and then simply swap it for a working visa once they arrived and now finds themselves unable to work for months on end while the request to switch statuses is considered, rejected and appealed. Because France is a popular destination to move to, attracting all groups from retirees to young families, students to workers, a whole industry has grown up around giving advice on navigating the French immigration and tax system. Advertisement There's an entire sector of 'relocation experts', 'hand-holders' or 'concierge services' which specialise in helping foreigners to move to France. Many of these services are great and offer sound advice and insight based on experience with French systems. The good ones should also explain future ramifications of your decisions. However, some give wildly differing advice and it's not always easy to know who is right and who to trust. There's no doubt some of these services can be very helpful when it comes to finding a place to live and setting up services like utilities - I used one when I first moved and they were worth every centime in helping to navigate the notoriously tricky Paris rental market. However, if emails from readers are anything to go by, there also seems to be an increasing trend of these services offering legal advice on issues such as residency, visas and tax status. Advertisement While many are very knowledgeable and diligent with their guidance, the reality is this sector is completely unregulated - meaning that you have absolutely no comeback if you are given incorrect advice. More importantly, you will be then one then left struggling to deal with your irregular residency or tax status while the hand-holder has banked the cheque and moved on. Take this one email we received from an American reader who wanted to warn others of the "pain and damage" one expat visa adviser caused them. He said: "We contacted a well-known expat who is regarded as an expert in visa related issues in France. "We paid them €5,000 to organise a passport talent visa. At first, all was fine, but they soon stopped responding to our emails. To make matters worse, they barely did any work for us. "It turned out that there are dozens of fellow expats in the same position." Advertisement So what can people do? The standard advice is to talk to a lawyer for anything related to residency, and an accountant for tax advice. But even here there are caveats - first you need to ensure that your expert is qualified and registered in both France and your home country, and that they specialise in advising expats/immigrants. Second is that you need to speak to both - a lawyer will undoubtedly give you good advice about visas, but will that leave you with tax problems? The lawyer might not flag that up, because its not their area of expertise, but that doesn't mean there won't be problems. And vice versa, your accountant's advice might be perfectly sound when it comes to tax but it might screw up your residency. It's also well worth speaking to several experts, especially if your personal situation is complicated or you're trying to do something slightly out of the usual run of things. When it comes to tricky issues like remote work while on a visitor visa , different lawyers will tell you different things. It's tempting to go with the one who tells you what you want to hear, but it's a better idea in the long run to get several viewpoints on a situation. Even though you do have more recourse if you get bad advice from a lawyer or accountant , it's ultimately you who will have to deal with any ensuing problems with French admin. If you find yourself in breach of the rules, saying 'my lawyer said it would be OK' is unfortunately no defence at all. Remember also that getting your French visa is only the first step - ask questions about what happens next; will you be able to renew it or obtain your carte de séjour easily? Will you be able to get long-term residency one day? What will your plans mean for your tax status? Will your chosen path make it difficult for you to get French citizenship one day? The French residency card and tax systems are designed to be used by individuals; beware of anyone suggesting that you will need a lawyer or accountant for every renewal/annual tax declaration - they're either just trawling for business or they're setting up a residency or tax status so complicated that you'll be forced to pay for professional advice for every dealing with French admin. And above all, remember the old saying - "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is". If there truly were a quick and easy shortcut to long-term French residency with no taxes, then everyone would be using it - we're not handing over a third of our monthly income and spending hours in a queue at the préfecture because we find this a fun hobby. It's because we have learned the greater truths - French admin always wins; there are no loopholes; liberté, égalité, bureaucratié . You can find more information on all things residency and tax related in our Moving to France section. Feel free to share your experiences in the comments section below