No deviation from framework: SOEs can frame own procurement rules: PPRA Board
According to sources, during a recent meeting of the PPRA Board, the Managing Director (MD) of PPRA presented the agenda and briefed the Board that, in line with Section 17(2) of the SOEs Act, 2023, various SOEs had submitted independent procurement policies for review, requesting feedback.
The matter was brought before the PPRA Board during its 92nd meeting on February 20, 2025. The Board decided to seek legal guidance from the Ministry of Law and Justice to determine whether Section 17(2) of the SOEs Act, 2023, holds precedence over the PPRA Ordinance, 2002, which is a specialized law on public procurement.
ATIR Islamabad orders transfer of tax appeals involving SOEs to ADRC
Following the Board's decision, PPRA referred the matter to the Ministry of Law and Justice on March 11, 2025. In its response, dated March 21, 2025, the Ministry clarified that SOEs are authorized to create their own procurement policies, subject to the approval of the Federal Government. Furthermore, SOEs are only required to adhere to the PPRA Ordinance, 2002, to the extent specified by the Federal Government—effectively limiting the Ordinance's applicability in such cases.
The Ministry further elaborated that while the PPRA Ordinance, 2002, governs public procurement as a special law, the SOEs Act, 2023, is also a special law but specifically tailored to SOEs. According to established legal principles upheld by the Supreme Court in 2017 SCMR 1218, when two special laws conflict, the later-enacted statute prevails. Therefore, Section 17(2) of the SOEs Act, 2023, overrides the PPRA Ordinance, 2002.
In light of this clarification, the MD of PPRA stated that while SOEs are permitted to maintain independent procurement policies, the PPRA—as a regulatory authority—should still monitor these policies to ensure compliance with their respective frameworks. He proposed that before reviewing such policies, the PPRA should require SOEs to clearly indicate which provisions of the PPRA framework they will follow, and where they intend to introduce deviations or new clauses, accompanied by appropriate justification.
The MD suggested that the PPRA review SOE procurement policies based on the following parameters: (i) compliance with Core Principles; (ii) extent of deviation; (iii) new policy provisions; (iv) official declaration as SOE; (v) scope of procurement policy; (vi) maintenance and regulatory mechanism; (vii) third-party evaluation and grievance redressal; and) (viii) CIPS certification.
According to sources, one of the Board members opined that since the Ministry of Law and Justice has rendered its interpretation after examining the legal provisions of SOE Act and PPRA Ordinance that an SOE may develop its own procurement policies with approval of the Federal government, PPRA only need to point out the deviations from PPRA framework and offer comments where necessary. Moreover, there is no justification for PPRA to act as regulator of such SOEs whose procurements are not made in conformity with PPRA framework.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FBR delays Finance Act steps, eases importers declarations
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has delayed implementation of a budgetary measure of Finance Act 2025 till July 30, 2025, which has given an option to facilitate importers to file goods declarations (GDs) prior to berthing of vessels or cross-over of vehicles at land borders. In this regard, the FBR has issued an SRO.1360(I)/2025 here on Tuesday. According to the SRO.1360(I)/2025, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 79 of the Customs Act 1969, the FBR has notified that the option to pay duty, taxes and other charges on completion of assessment for the goods declaration filed prior to berthing of vessel or cross over event of vehicles shall be effective from July 30, 2025. FASTER system: FBR eases cap for deferred ST refunds Under the Finance Act 2025, the importers have been provided option to file goods declarations (GDs) without prior payment of duties and taxes if GDs are filed before berthing of vessel or cross-over of vehicle at land borders. The facility shall be available from such date as notified by the Board. The Chief Collector of Customs, Appraisement (South), Karachi has been directed to ensure the implementation of the change in WeBOC, FBR directed Appraisement Chief Collector. The existing Explanation in section 79 has been substituted. As per the new explanation, the assessment of goods declarations filed at the dry ports may be undertaken in such a manner at such places as may be prescribed by the Board, the FBR added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Yarn, grey cloth, raw cotton removed from EFS purview
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has excluded cotton yarn, grey cloth and raw cotton from the purview of the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) and would now be charged at the standard rate of 18 percent sales tax at the import stage. Under SRO.1359(I)/2025 issued by the FBR on Tuesday, these three items have been excluded from zero-rating facility under the EFS scheme and therefore cotton yarn, grey cloth and raw cotton now chargeable under standard rate regime of sales tax. The FBR has issued an SRO 1359(I)/2025 to propose amendments in the Export Facilitation Scheme on Tuesday. Details revealed that there was a major issue pending between the spinning mills and exporters since last one year. Last year, local supply of 'yarn' was excluded from the EFS facility and sales tax was imposed on local supply of yarn. They argued that the imported yarn was subjected to exemption, but no exemption on local supplies. ST, duty exemptions on imported cotton, yarn being withdrawn, Aurangzeb tells NA Resultantly, people switched to imported Yarn which disturbed the working and business of local spinning mills. Local sales of 'Yarn' were also affected due to switching over to imported 'Yarn'. Now, after chargeability of 18 percent sales tax on the import of yarn, grey cloth and raw cotton, the importers would be required to seek sales tax refunds. There is confusion in the new SRO that whether 'micro fabrics' is subjected to sales tax or not under the revised EFS scheme, sales tax expert added. According to the SRO.1359(I)/2025, under the revised EFS, the 'insurance guarantee' means a guarantee issued by an insurance company duly notified by the Board, having Pakistan Credit Rating Agency rating of AA++, on such format and conditions as prescribed by the Board. The revised scheme said that the import of compressor scrap and motor scrap shall be allowed for copper content only. The raw cotton, cotton yarn and grey cloth falling under the respective headings of Pakistan Customs Tariff shall be excluded from the scope of EFS. Provided that import consignments of raw cotton, cotton yarn and grey cloth with bills of lading issued within ten days of the issuance of this notification shall he allowed under this scheme. 'Till the notification of the format of insurance guarantee by the Board, the EFS users shall be required to submit bank guarantee, wherever applicable', SRO 1359(I)/2025 said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
FASTER system: FBR eases cap for deferred ST refunds
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has relaxed upper capping limit up to 10 percent of the export value for processing of deferred sales tax refunds of exporters (excluding five export orientated sectors) under the 'FASTER' system. In this regard, the FBR has issued instructions to the field formations on processing of deferred refunds under the 'FASTER' system. Under the new instructions, the FBR has relaxed refund processing limit of exporters other than five export sectors upto 10 percent. FASTER-based: Refund processing limit be raised to 12pc, PBC urges FBR According to the FBR's instructions, in pursuance of SRO 1507(I)/2024, the Board vide CRE-35 has determined lower capping for processing of refunds of exporters (other than five export-oriented sectors) at the rate of 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent and 8 percent of export value for processing through FASTER on the basis of their finished products. Further, for processing of deferred Sales Tax refunds of Exporters (other than five export-oriented sectors) the Board has decided to fix upper capping up to 10% of export value (including the lower capping) or the amount of valid input tax actually consumed in exports, whichever is lower as uniform policy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
