logo
‘We are called fascists because we believe lesbian events have a right to be women-only'

‘We are called fascists because we believe lesbian events have a right to be women-only'

Telegraph18-04-2025

'There used to be loads of venues in London for lesbians,' says Lyndsay, a 30-year-old investment banker. Note that the bank she works for has been shortlisted for one of the growing number of equality and diversity awards – yet she, as a lesbian, doesn't feel safe.
'Unless lesbians go out of our way to say we believe that trans women are literal women,' Lyndsay says, 'the assumption is that we are transphobic bigots, and our reputations are trashed.'
'Please just use my first name,' she says, 'because if I am identified as being in any way gender critical, trans activists will never leave me alone.'
We meet at Sapphic Central, a spacious pub in central Balham, south-west London, which hosts a lesbian night once a month. The popular evening is always packed, with a DJ in the basement. Rickety stairs lead up to an outdoor space, lined with empty beer barrels, where half of the women congregate to smoke and chat.
In 2022, I founded The Lesbian Project (co-directed by former philosophy professor Kathleen Stock), to focus on the needs of same-sex attracted females as distinct from gay men and gender identity. We, alongside other interested parties, are currently awaiting a decision from the Supreme Court as to whether it is legal for lesbians to assemble in groups of more than 25 at a public venue.
Over the past decade and more, extreme trans activism has influenced our major institutions, from charities to universities – even our legal system. And as a result of the mantra 'trans women are women', alongside 'no debate', lesbian dating has been driven underground.
But on Wednesday, judges sitting in the Supreme Court ruled that a man claiming to be a woman, even if he has a Gender Recognition Certificate, cannot claim to be legally a lesbian. This means that trans women (biological men) cannot demand entry to a lesbian-only event or venue. And if a space or service is designated as women-only, such as a lesbian bar, a person who was born male but identifies as a woman does not have a right to use that space.
The ruling is a huge relief, as although venues might still choose not to host lesbian-only events, they will be able to cite this ruling to trans activists who put pressure on them to cancel. The Lesbian Project officially intervened in the case, brought by For Women Scotland. In our submission, we argued that men being able to identify as women, and therefore as lesbians, created a 'chilling effect', because it prevents us from having events free from men.
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, the biggest threat posed to lesbians gathering at a publicised social event was that of thuggish, straight men, boozed up on cheap lager and angry that some women rejected their charms. But today, the danger is from social justice warriors, intoxicated on rigorousness, and an insistence that men claiming to be women can also be lesbians and should not be excluded.
'Every single tactic we use to meet in person, trans activists have done their best to spoil it,' says Lucy, (who does not wish to use her second name). Lucy, 44, a former firefighter who attended the Grenfell disaster, has now retrained as a family law barrister. 'They purposely stand in our way. And in recent years, it has got worse.'
In 2020, Lucy was thrown off Hinge, the popular dating app, for stating that she was only interested in meeting biological women. Hinge disagreed – within 24 hours, she was permanently suspended, saying that she was banned for 'breaching their guidelines'. In response, Lucy took the story to the media.
When I contacted Hinge for a right of reply, they said: 'We understand that dating is personal. Users are encouraged to show up as their most authentic selves, and are welcome to share their beliefs, values, and preferences on Hinge. What we do not tolerate is hate speech or harassment.
'This includes making false reports against any user for reasons around their sexuality, relationship preferences, and (actual or perceived) gender identity.'
A lack of lesbian-only spaces
There is one dating app specifically for lesbians: it's called Her, and Lucy had already given it a try. But she encountered a new problem. 'Every other profile is a man claiming to be a woman, and presenting themselves as ultra sexualised.'
It was on Tinder that Lucy eventually met her girlfriend, but even there 'you are getting a ton of profiles that are meant to be female-seeking-female where it is just men pretending to be females'.
She feels that there needs to be a major step change in the way these apps are run. 'The apps need to be policed so that men are identified early on, when they attempt to join. There is good facial recognition software being used in other countries.'
Lucy recalls the early days, in the late Nineties, when she first came to London. 'It was magical. On Lewisham High Road, where I lived, there were three lesbian bars.'
Twenty years ago there were dozens of lesbian-only bars across London, and several in towns and cities elsewhere in Britain. Today, aside from the odd pop-up evening, there are virtually none that are exclusively for lesbians.
For seven years Jenny Watson, 33, a former town planner, ran twice monthly women-only speed-dating events at the College Arms in Bloomsbury, central London, often attracting more than a hundred women. But in an abrupt turn of events, in July 2023, a new general manager John Mason was appointed, who had a very different view of what should constitute a night out for lesbians.
As Mason, the incoming general manager of the College Arms wrote in the 'London against transphobia' WhatsApp group, set up to oppose the women-only gig, 'I want their bookings cancelled'. He continued with: 'F---ing f---ers if they are using my new pub they are f---ing gone terfy a--holes.'
After identifying himself as 'non-binary' and stating that he has a 16-year-old 'trans child', he continued: 'In a worst case scenario where I'm told I have to honour those bookings, I'll be in the market for a bunch of trans flags to redecorate the basement with… Just to reiterate and when I run any dating s--t... for lesbians, it'll be defined as anyone who identifies as a lesbian... Trans or cis.'
Directly before posting in this group, he said to Watson, 'I'm not making part of my venue exclusive where certain people can't attend'. When she asked him whether, in principle, he would agree to the venue hosting a female lesbian-only event, he responded: 'Not if it's during open trade.' No notice was given to Watson, and she was forced to cancel the next advertised evening. She contacted a lawyer from solicitor firm Doyle Clayton who sent a formal legal letter on her behalf to the venue, arguing that what they had done was discrimination under the Equality Act. The company that owned the venue at the time, Stonegate, reversed the cancellation on paper – but the venue had become 'toxic' said Watson, and she was too scared to continue the event, knowing it was under the radar of trans activists.
'These events were community lifelines,' says Watson. 'It wasn't just dating – it was safety, connection, and joy. No one gave lesbians space like that, so I built it. Now I'm building it again – but this time, no one gets to pull the plug.'
Austin Whelan, the CEO of Whelan Pubs told me by email that, 'We would like to clarify that we took over the business in August 2024 and have no involvement with any events or matters from previous years. As a result, we are unable to provide a statement regarding past occurrences'.
These activist groups are mainly nascent and face this same struggle to find venues. One group, Queer Nerds for Anti-Fascism, talked about infiltrating Watson's events, presenting this as a perfectly legitimate strand of anti-fascist activism.
'They say we are fascists because we believe lesbian events have a right to be women-only,' says Watson.
Since then she has been hard at work on her latest project, L Community, a unique online platform that acts as a meeting place for lesbians, both virtually and in person. L Community events are word-of-mouth only, and kept off social media. 'It's the only way, because they [trans activists] just turn up.'
She realised that relying on the venues formerly used wasn't going to work, because trans activists would always try to close them down. Watson is very clear about one thing: 'I want the cornerstone to be physical spaces and women interacting in person, not just online.'
Kelly Frost, an artist, aged 49, is another lesbian who has learnt from bitter experience that running a women-only night at a so-called LGBTQ+ venue is unlikely to end well. Heated campaigns against such 'transphobic' and 'trans-exclusionary' practices are quickly initiated, and venue owners, managers and even bar staff, inundated with threats and complaints – and fearful of losing their livelihoods, tend to cave in to the pressure.
This is what happened to Frost, who had been successfully running regular 'Shabby She' events at the Bridge House in Penge for eight years. In February 2023 she announced that Shabby She would be strictly for 'biological women' only. Frost's decision was because the presence of trans-identified men had been intrusive, and had been causing women to self-exclude. These events offer much-needed relief to lesbians. 'Women come to us and say, 'oh my God, it's so great to find a women-only space',' says Frost.
But very soon after announcing that the group (which had previously tolerated the presence of the occasional trans woman) would henceforth be for women only, she was informed by Scott, the publican, that complaints were coming in. 'The complaints made to the pub were that we were 'transphobic' 'exclusionary' and 'making trans women unsafe', says Frost. At first, the staff told Frost that she needn't worry because they were such long-standing, valued customers. But 24 hours after the first complaint, they were thrown out – on the basis that their event was 'too risky'.
'We had a strong feeling that we would lose the venue and so, whilst we were gutted and worried if and how we could bounce back, at the same time, there was relief. The lie that men were welcome at Shabby She was over,' says Frost.
Frost has had to find an alternative venue and start over, though 'we've never got numbers anywhere near what we had'. She is reluctant to make public the name of the venue, in case it is similarly targeted.
This time Frost decided to 'go underground', to not advertise except by word-of-mouth, and book the space as if it was a personal get-together.
A staff member from Bridge House, who refused to give his name, told me how management made the decision to cancel the arrangement with Frost and cited a notice on social media she had posted, announcing the strict women-only policy.
'The fact it was sent around to all the people who were in the group and it made it quite clear in it that she wasn't interested in having trans ladies in the group,' he said. 'We are an all-inclusive business, and everyone is welcome. Because, sorry, no offence, but we're paying the rent, we're paying the wages.'
'Lesbians are nothing if not brave'
LGB Alliance (LGBA) is a charity providing support, advice, information and social events to people who are same-sex attracted. It currently has 36 LGBA Friends' Groups, with most (not all) very much lesbian-dominated, and the vast majority lesbian-led – possibly because gay men have not lost their spaces in the same way. LGBA has (unjustly) been described as 'anti-trans' by PinkNews, and a 'hate group' by Guardian hard-Left columnist Owen Jones, and the lawyer Jolyon Maugham.
La Camionera on Broadway Market in Hackney, east London, is a very publicly 'trans-inclusive' bar; its name means 'female truck driver' or 'butch lesbian' in Spanish. It has a different feel than a women-only space exclusively for lesbians as it has to cope with men sporting earrings, lipstick and a penis. At least here, there is an openness – and perhaps it doesn't feel that different from the old days, when we could bring gay men as guests, and often a drag queen or two would show up.
Alex, the co-owner of La Camionera is transgender, and uses male pronouns. He tells me, when I ask how he feels about the fact that some lesbians are upset at losing women-only space: 'We've said, 'anyone can come', but it's more than 99 per cent of the time just women in there. When we first opened, we got a lot of people commenting on us being, are you trans friendly? Are you bisexual friendly? I didn't really feel the need to confirm all that.'
'By calling the bar a lesbian bar, everyone's 'oh yeah, being a lesbian is cool'. And the default should be that we don't have to extrapolate massively on these terms.'
'In some ways we have gone backwards,' admits Lucy. 'But we are not giving up. We will keep opening and running lesbian events, whatever trans activists throw at us, and however hard they try to shut them down. Lesbians are nothing if not brave.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now

The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - disagreed with that decision. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now --before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by Sotomayor. In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding on "the personal affairs of millions of Americans" in a fishing expedition that's based on little more than suspicion." Hollander limited DOGE's access to the information while the courts assess the legality of the Trump administration's actions. The administration argued the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE staffers as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms rather than as employees trying to modernize the agency's technology and root out waste - as DOGE officials said they intended to do. "District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court in an emergency appeal. DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government. Musk has falsely claimed that millions of Americans who are deceased are still receiving Social Security checks. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA after DOGE began digging into personal data. They told the Supreme Court justices they shouldn't intervene because the administration hadn't shown an emergency need to access data beyond what the district judge allowed. In addition to overseeing Social Security benefits for retirees and disabled people, the Social Security Administration helps administer programs run by other agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration's request to block the district judge's order. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, said the government hadn't shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be "fiercely protected." DOGE's mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, which is the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote.

Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says
Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says

Daily Mail​

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trans lobby groups 'lied for years' that anyone self identifying as a different gender could access women's' toilets, equality chief says

Transgender people were misled about their rights to female only spaces by lobby groups, according to a senior member of an equality watchdog has said. In April a Supreme Court ruling confirmed the terms woman and sex in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. Akua Reindorf, a barrister who is one of eight commissioners at the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), said trans people had been deceived about their rights were. Speaking in a personal capacity during a debate about the recent ruling, she said there must be a 'period of correction' to acknowledge women's right to women-only spaces. The decision made it legal for trans people to be banned from women-only sports teams, and from using bathrooms and changing rooms for the gender they lived as. These terms were later supported by interim non-statutory advice given by the EHRC last April. When an audience member at the debate raised fears about the recent Supreme Court ruling and how it could strip away trans peoples rights, barrister and panellist, Naomi Cunningham said: 'It can't be helped, I'm afraid.' In agreement with her fellow panellist, Ms Reindorf said she believed trans lobbyists were at faults for the misunderstanding. 'Unfortunately, young people and trans people have been lied to over many years about what their rights are,' she said. 'It's like Naomi said – I just can't say it in a more diplomatic way than that. They have been lied to, and there has to be a period of correction, because other people have rights' She claimed it boiled down to the law prior to the Supreme Court ruling being misunderstood due to groups contending trans people who self-identified should be treated as their preferred gender. However, this was only the case for the those who had obtained a gender recognition certificate (GRC). The barrister said the amalgamation of different rights made the Equality Act nonviable from a personal capacity. 'The catalyst for many to catch up, belatedly, with the fact that the law never permitted self-ID in the first place,' she said. As such, the feeling of a loss of right of trans people was due to an overwhelming product of 'misinformation' perpetrated by 'lobby group and activists'. Author JK Rowling backed the barrister's recent comments, saying lobby groups lied 'about what the law said'.' However, the head of gender justice at Amnesty International UK, Chiara Capraro, hit back Ms Reindorf's comments. She said: 'The EHRC has the duty to uphold the rights of everyone, including all with protected characteristics. We are concerned that it is failing to do so and is unhelpfully pitting the rights of women and trans people against each other.' A spokesman for the EHRC told The Guardian: 'Akua Reindorf KC spoke at this event in a personal capacity. This was made clear at the event and in the video recording published online. 'As Britain's equality regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission upholds and enforces the Equality Act 2010 to ensure everyone is treated fairly, consistent with the Act. 'Our board come from all walks of life and bring with them a breadth of skills and experience. This helps us take impartial decisions, which are always based on evidence and the law.'

Trans people have been lied to on legal rights, says equalities chief
Trans people have been lied to on legal rights, says equalities chief

Daily Mail​

time8 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trans people have been lied to on legal rights, says equalities chief

Transgender people must accept a 'period of correction' over their rights after the Supreme Court ruling on gender because they have been 'lied to' about their legal status for years, an equalities chief says. Akua Reindorf, who is drafting guidance on how to treat trans people following April's ruling on the definition of a woman, added that the blame lay with their lobbyists. Ms Reindorf, a barrister and one of eight commissioners on the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), made her remarks in a personal capacity during a debate hosted by the London School of Economics. She said: 'Unfortunately, young people and trans people have been lied to over many years about what their rights are.' The EHRC has been given the task of developing new guidelines on transgender people for public buildings such as cafes, schools and hospitals, after the Supreme Court ruled transgender women are not legally women. Shortly after the ruling the EHRC released interim guidance advising: 'Trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities.' Ms Reindorf's words came as the NHS Confederation, which represents hospital trusts, scrapped its old guidance allowing transgender patients to use the toilets of the sex they identify with. A spokesman for the NHS Confederation said their old guidance is now 'dated' and requires updating to align with the Supreme Court ruling. The two developments will be seen as a major blow to transgender activists, who have been petitioning for public organisations such as the NHS to ignore the court's decision. The Girl Guides and Refuge, the largest domestic abuse charity for women, have both said they have no intention in changing their policy on allowing trans women to use their female facilities. Ms Reindorf described their approach as ridiculous, arguing it amounted to a 'huge farce'. She said transgender people 'have been lied to and there has to be a period of correction'. She added: 'The fact is that, until now, trans people without Gender Recognition Certificates, were being grievously misled about their legal rights. 'The correction of self-ID policies and practices will inevitably feel like a loss of rights for trans people. 'This unfortunate position is overwhelmingly a product of the misinformation which was systematically disseminated over a long period by lobby groups and activists.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store