Sydney academic discovers BOUNTY on his head worth $38,000 via WhatsApp
Dr Feng Chongyi, who is an associate professor in China Studies at University of Technology, Sydney, is one of 19 overseas activists targeted in arrest warrants issued by Hong Kong police.
Slapped with a bounty of HK$200,000 (AU$38,000), he has dismissed the latest charges against him as absurd.
Hong Kong has seen its pro-democracy movement crushed in recent years under the weight of increasingly draconian laws supported by the Chinese government.
The recent warrant relates to Dr Feng's involvement in the 'Hong Kong Parliament', a self-declared pro-democracy body based outside the city.
Authorities have accused the organisation of attempting to form a 'shadow legislature' and 'pursuing the ideal of Hong Kong people ruling Hong Kong'.
They've called the group's activities subversive and in breach of sweeping national security laws imposed by the Beijing government in 2020.
'This action shows the world the brutality of the Chinese communist regime,' Dr Feng told ABC News, adding that he found out he was wanted on the messaging service WhatsApp.
Born in mainland China, Dr Feng has advocated for democratic reform in Hong Kong and was previously detained and interrogated by Chinese authorities in 2017.
'(This warrant) also reminds the world that Hong Kong has been completely controlled by China,' he said.
'The autonomy is gone, basic liberties protected by law (are) gone, they've completely destroyed a beautiful city, it's so sad.'
Dr Feng said he was not overly concerned by the warrant, given he has no plans to return to Hong Kong or mainland China: 'I do not take it as a big deal.'
Authorities say the wanted individuals either helped organise or took part in the Hong Kong Parliament's unofficial election.
The campaign saw 18 candidates from Australia, the UK, US, Canada, Taiwan and Thailand win more than 15,000 online votes.
Police have offered the bounty of HK$200,000 for information leading to the arrest of 15 individuals.
Meanwhile, they are offering HK$1million (AU$194,000) for four people who were previously issued warrants: Elmer Yuen, Victor Ho, Johnny Fok and Tony Choi.
Dr Feng faces a $38,000 bounty which he discovered via WhatsApp
The police warned that anyone assisting or supporting the group, including via the internet, could face prosecution under national security laws.
In a statement, they urged the accused to 'turn back before it's too late' and 'surrender themselves in Hong Kong.'
Dr Feng, a close friend of jailed Australian writer Yang Hengjun, said he joined the organising committee out of solidarity.
'I have many friends in Hong Kong who want democracy,' he said.
The crackdown has triggered widespread condemnation from Australian politicians across parliament.
'Australia has consistently expressed strong objections to the broad and extraterritorial application of Hong Kong's national security law,' Foreign Minister Penny Wong posted on social media on Saturday.
'Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy.'
Shadow Foreign Minister Michaelia Cash said the Coalition held 'serious concerns' over the targeting of pro-democracy activists abroad.
'We fundamentally believe in free speech,' she said.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who is currently visiting Sydney, also labelled the move 'totally, totally unacceptable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chinese students at UK universities being 'pressured to spy on classmates', think tank report warns
Chinese students are being pressured to 'spy on classmates' by officials back home, a new report claims. The UK-China Transparency (UKCT) think tank suggested the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is monitoring discussions on British campuses via students. It is thought the move is intended to suppress discourse on issues which are sensitive to the Chinese government. UKCT researchers questioned 50 academics working in the Chinese studies field and found many were concerned about the influence of Beijing. One lecturer said their Chinese students had 'confided' that they had been asked to spy on campus events by Chinese police. Another scholar said they were told by Chinese students that 'surveillance is omnipresent' and that they are 'interviewed by officials' when they return to China. The report also claimed Chinese government officials had warned lecturers to avoid discussing certain topics in their classes. It comes days after a new law came into force placing more responsibility on universities to uphold academic freedom and free speech. However, UKCT said some universities are reluctant to address the issue of Chinese interference because of their financial reliance on Chinese student fees. The report alleged that some Chinese academics involved in sensitive research had been denied visas by the Chinese government. Meanwhile others said family members back in China had been harassed or threatened because of their work in the UK. These sensitive topics included the alleged ethnic cleansing in China's Xinjiang region, the outbreak of Covid or the rise of Chinese technology companies, according to the report. Some academics reported intimidation by visiting scholars or other Chinese officials, as well as by staff at Confucius Institutes. These are partnership organisations operating at several UK universities, working with institutions in China. They promote Chinese culture and language on UK campuses, but have been criticised over alleged ties to the CCP. A Chinese Embassy spokesman said the country had always adhered to its policy of not interfering with other countries' internal affairs. They told the BBC the report was 'groundless and absurd', adding that China respects freedom of speech in the UK and elsewhere. A spokesman for Universities UK, which represents 141 institutions, said: 'Anyone working or studying at our universities should know that their rights to personal and academic freedom are protected when they are on British soil.' Skills Minister Jacqui Smith said any attempt by a foreign state to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK 'will not be tolerated'. She said academic freedom was 'non-negotiable in our world-leading institutions', adding that the implementation of the new legislation made that 'explicitly clear'.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stella Rimington: The spy who brought MI5 out of the shadows
In the summer of 1967 Stella Rimington, the bored wife of a junior diplomat in New Delhi, was approached by another British official with a proposition: would she be interested in 'helping out' in his office? The author of the request was 'a baronet and a bachelor' best-known among staff at the British high commission for his 'excellent Sunday curry lunches' and for 'driving round Delhi in a snazzy old Jaguar'. He was also the senior liaison officer for MI5 – the British security service – in the Indian capital, and when the diplomat's wife accepted his offer of employment it was to mark her entry into the shadowy world of intelligence. It was a curiously low-key start for a remarkable 29-year career marked by a series of 'firsts' – culminating in her appointment as the UK's first woman spymaster. In that time she found herself pitted against Russian espionage agents and IRA terrorists as well as, more controversially, domestic 'subversives' including the leaders of the 1984 miners' strike. Dubbed the 'housewife superspy' when she became the first female director general of MI5 – and the first to be named publicly – she did much to bring the service out of the shadows and explain its role to the public. While she struggled with the publicity – she was forced to move out when the press discovered where she lived – she nevertheless appeared delighted when she was credited as the model for Judi Dench's M in the James Bond movies. The greater openness she inaugurated went too far for some when, after leaving, in another first, she became the first former director general to publish her memoir. In retirement she took on a number of non-executive directorships – including for Marks & Spencer, using her surveillance skills to eavesdrop on customers to pick up what they were saying about the company's products. She also drew on her experiences to forge a successful second career as a thriller writer, with a series of novels about the fictional MI5 officer Liz Carlyle. Stella Whitehouse was born on May 13 1935 in South Norwood, a comfortable middle class suburb in south London, the second of two children. Following the outbreak of the Second World War, they moved first to Wallasey and then to Barrow-in-Furness, where her father had taken a job at a steel works. Both towns were hit hard in the Blitz and the nightly bombing raids left her with an acute fear of being trapped in confined spaces that was to last well into adulthood. Only with the end of the war was she able to resume proper schooling, first at the local Croslands Covent School and then at Nottingham High School for Girls after the family moved to the Midlands. After excelling academically, she won a place to read English at Edinburgh University, where in her final year she became friendly again with her future husband, John Rimington, whom she had first met in Nottingham. Following her degree, she took a course in archive administration at Liverpool University, followed by jobs first at the County Record Office in Worcester and then the India Office Library in London. That came to an end in 1965, when her husband, whom she had married two years earlier, was offered a posting as first secretary (economic) in New Delhi and the couple sailed for India. The routine of life as a diplomatic wife soon began to pall, so she jumped at the opportunity of work with MI5, even though it turned out to be mostly clerical and 'not particularly exciting'. Nevertheless, on their return to London in 1969, she decided to seek a permanent job with the service, initially as 'something to keep me interested and amused' until she started a family. The organisation she joined she soon found was a 'land of eccentrics' peopled largely by war veterans and ex-colonial service officers, with a heavy drinking culture. The 'two well-bred ladies of a certain age' who were entrusted with her training would each day at noon produce a pair of glasses and a bottle of sherry for a 'rather elegant pre-lunch drink'. It was also a service with a 'strict sex discrimination' policy with women confined to administrative and support roles while the frontline work – such as recruiting and running agents – was for men only. Her early assignments including helping to identify potential communist infiltrators in rural Sussex and working on the newly formed Northern Ireland desk set up in response to the start of the Troubles. After becoming pregnant with the first of her two daughters, Sophie, she found her determination to return to work after the child was born was met with 'incomprehension' within the service. She was not particularly enthusiastic herself, but needed the money, although matters improved when she was given the chance to work on the 'main enemy' – the Soviet Union. The defections of the Cambridge spies – Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean – still cast a long shadow over the intelligence community, fuelled in part by the conspiracy theories of MI5 officer Peter Wright who was convinced there was another Russian mole within the organisation. Mrs Rimington was tasked with re-interviewing John Cairncross – later identified as the so-called 'fifth man' in the group – who had made a partial confession to spying in the 1960s, but failed to extract any new leads from him. Nevertheless, her persistence paid off when she finally persuaded her bosses to make her a full MI5 officer, after complaining that male graduates recruited straight from university were being brought in over her head. A further breakthrough followed when it was agreed she could train as an agent-runner, the view having long been taken that potential informants would be unwilling to talk to a woman. In her memoir she recalled the difficulties of juggling her new role, which frequently involved going under cover, with bringing up a young family. On one occasion she received a call from a nanny to say her younger daughter had been taken to hospital with convulsions just as she was preparing for a crucial rendezvous with a potential defector. In the event she managed to make it to the meet, after first checking in at the hospital, but had to borrow money from the would-be defector to pay for all the taxis involved. 'Whether the apparent scarcity of funds available to British intelligence influenced his decision or not, I don't know,' she wrote. 'But he did eventually decide not to make the jump across.' Nevertheless, her career was by this stage firmly on an upward trajectory and in 1983 she was appointed an assistant director – the first woman to hold the post – with responsibility for counter-subversion. Initially, she thought it was something of a backwater but that quickly changed with the advent of the miners' strike the following year. She later recalled 'agonising' over whether it was legitimate for MI5 to monitor Arthur Scargill and other union leaders – finally concluding that they should as Mr Scargill had declared his aim was to bring down the government of Margaret Thatcher. When MI5's involvement became known it nevertheless proved highly controversial, leading to claims it had engaged in a 'dirty tricks' campaign against the miners, which Mrs Rimington always denied. Promotion, to director of counter-espionage, saw her embroiled in further controversy when Peter Wright – by now retired and thoroughly embittered – published his notorious Spycatcher memoir. It included his now long-discredited theory that former director general Roger Hollis had been a Russian spy as well as a startling claim that a group of MI5 officers – himself among them – had tried to bring down Labour prime minister Harold Wilson. Although Wright later withdrew the allegations, his description of how MI5 had 'bugged and burgled' their way across London led to demands that the service should be brought more firmly under ministerial control with its surveillance powers set on a statutory footing. At first Mrs Rimington was reluctant, producing an internal policy paper arguing against legislation, but after accepting that change was inevitable she became an enthusiastic proponent, sitting on a joint working group with the Home Office which drew up the landmark Security Service Act. By now both the service she had first joined in the 1960s and the threats it faced were very different. With the end of the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union, in 1991 she led a three-strong delegation to Moscow in an extraordinary attempt to establish friendly relations with their erstwhile adversaries in the KGB. Despite a warm welcome, with a visit to the Bolshoi Ballet and with much champagne flowing, when she suggested to the Russians they might cut back their espionage in the UK as a prelude to greater co-operation on issues such as counter-terrorism, the idea was dismissed as 'ridiculous'. Any disappointment was short-lived. On her return to London she was greeted with news that she was to be the next director general, despite not having been interviewed for the post, or even asked whether she wanted it. Furthermore, John Major's government had decided that now the service was on a statutory footing, thanks to the legislation she helped draw up, her appointment should be announced publicly – the first time any British intelligence chief had been openly identified. The announcement – in a brief, two-line statement with no accompanying photograph – caused a media sensation, not least because she was the first woman to head any of the agencies, for which she was ill-prepared. Her elder daughter, Sophie, was away at university and only learned the news from the television, while their home was soon surrounded by journalists. In the absence of any official photograph, a blurry snatch shot taken some years earlier was widely circulated, before photographers finally managed to capture a rather unflattering image of her leaving the house. Amid all the furore, it soon became apparent that she could not carry on living there, and she was forced to move into secure accommodation with her younger daughter (she had separated from her husband some years earlier). Despite such an inauspicious start, Mrs Rimington used her time as director general to bring gradually bring the service out of the shadows, dispelling some of the myths and misconceptions built up around it. In 1993, MI5 published a short booklet which, for the first time, put some facts into the public domain, while she appeared alongside then home secretary Michael Howard in an official photocall to launch it. A further step towards greater openness followed when, despite much official hand-wringing, she was given permission to deliver the prestigious BBC Dimbleby lecture on the role of the security services in a democracy. She was made a dame in the 1996 New Year's Honours list. Her heightened public profile led to sniping in Whitehall that 'Stella likes the limelight' – a perception only enhanced when, five years after her retirement in 1996, she chose to publish her memoir, to the fury of many of her former colleagues. Such criticisms did not stop her speaking out in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the US 'war on terror' to warn that draconian new laws simply played into the hands of the terrorists by spreading fear and alarm. Alongside her post-MI5 writing and business commitments she even found time to chair the judging panel for the Man Booker Prize for literature, although her comment that they were looking for 'readability' found her once again in the firing line from critics who accused her of 'dumbing down' the award. During the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020, she reconciled with her husband, moving in together during lockdown. 'It's a good recipe for marriage, I'd say,' she said. 'Split up, live separately, and return to it later.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump: will 'substantially' raise tariffs on goods from India over Russian oil purchases
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its purchases of Russian oil. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA." He did not elaborate on what the tariff would be. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump last week said he would impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India and added that the world's fifth-largest economy would also face an unspecified penalty but gave no details. Over the weekend, two Indian government sources told Reuters that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats. The sources did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
