logo
Auckland War Memorial Museum closed after asbestos discovery

Auckland War Memorial Museum closed after asbestos discovery

RNZ News09-05-2025
Auckland War Memorial Museum.
Photo:
RNZ / Nick Monro
Auckland War Memorial Museum says specialists will be working to remove asbestos dust this weekend after its discovery during renewal work.
It has closed its doors to the public for the entire weekend.
The dust was found in Te Marae Ātea Māori Court and the Pacific galleries during heritage work investigations. More was found in the Grand Foyer after subsequent swab testing.
"Given the Grand Foyer is a primary evacuation route, its closure means the museum must establish alternative evacuation procedures," the museum said in a statement.
"Buildings of the museum's age commonly contain historic building materials that include asbestos. As the building nears 100 years of age, there are several necessary heritage works underway to enable us to preserve it for future generations. It is through the preliminary investigations into these works that the asbestos was discovered.
While the building is closed, the museum said it would review its fire evacuation procedures.
"Museum facilities will continue to be monitored by essential security and facilities management staff."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Broken pump forces Hamilton firefighters to withdraw from house fire
Broken pump forces Hamilton firefighters to withdraw from house fire

RNZ News

time28 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Broken pump forces Hamilton firefighters to withdraw from house fire

The professional firefighters' union says crews are under-resourced, but their employer says they're trained to cope. Photo: RNZ / Tracy Neal A "catastrophic failure" to a fire truck responding to a Hamilton fire highlights how under-resourced firefighters are, the New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union (NZPFU) says. But Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ) says issues like this can and do occur and crews are trained and highly skilled to cope. Six fire crews responded to a garage fire in Flagstaff late Thursday night. On arrival they were met with a fully involved house fire. Hamilton local secretary for the NZPFU Jay Culhane said that while in the middle of fighting the fire, Te Rapa's pumping appliance lost the ability to pump water. "There was a catastrophic failure of the pump, so they lost water pressure to the firefighters, both to the internal and external firefighting crew," Culhane said. The crew inside the house had to withdraw from the building and the external firefighters had to move away. "The biggest problem is a fire doubles in size every thirty-seconds so the delay in operations ... you are going to lose more property and suffer more damage." Pumping operations were quickly swapped over to the Chartwell pump truck which began pumping water to continue fighting the fire. There were no reports of injuries to the firefighters. However, Culhane said more incidents like this were happening and poor planning and under-resourcing were to blame. "You can service an old truck as much as you want but they are still going to have issues," he said. A FENZ spokesperson said it had a fleet of around 1300 firefighting trucks. "Our firefighting trucks are well maintained, safe, certified, and legally compliant. We have a strict schedule for regular maintenance and repairs. "We typically spend more than $20 million each financial year on new firefighting trucks and other vehicles. In 2023/24 we spent $26 million, in 2024/25 we spent $20 million, and in 2025/26 we will spend $29 million." The spokesperson said since FENZ was established in 2017, it had purchased 317 new firefighting trucks. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?
Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Can a partner claim part of my house if we never lived together?

RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to I recently separated and managed to buy the house and own it myself with a mortgage ... I have been seeing someone that I don't plan to live with. So my question is if you have a relationship with someone for a length of time that you don't live with or share bills with do I need to protect myself with a prenuptial agreement? When does the relationship need to have documentation of what I own and never want to share? People normally think of relationship property issues arising when a couple lives together but you can sometimes be captured even if you're living apart. Victoria University law professor Nicola Peart said this question came down to whether a relationship would qualify as 'de facto' . She pointed to the Property Relationships Act, which sets out a definition of a de facto relationship. But she said none of the criteria were essential to decide that someone was in such a relationships. The act says that the things taken into account include the nature of the relationship, the extent of common residence, whether you have a sexual relationship, the amount of financial interdependence between the parties, the ownership and use of property, the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life, the performance of household duties and the public aspects of the relationship, as well as the care of children. So it's possible you could tick off those factors while still maintaining separate homes. "Not living in the same house or not sharing finances does not exclude the possibility that a de facto relationship exists. If in doubt, contract out to preserve separate property ," Peart said. My partner of 11yrs received his inheritance last September. Just wondering if I'm entitled to any of it ... we split up just five weeks ago due to an argument. It sort of depends what he did with it when he received it. If it went into a joint bank account you both contribute to and pay bills from, or into a mortgage on your family home, for example, then it's likely to have become relationship property and you would be entitled to a share of it. But if he has kept it separate, you might not be. This would be a good thing to talk to a lawyer about as you work through your separation agreements. If property investors are making a loss, can't they still get something back on taxes? Through a rebate scheme? I thought I heard something about that. It used to be the case that property investors who made a loss on their rental investments could offset that against their other sources of income, such as the salary and wages they received from their job. That would reduce the tax they paid and sometimes meant they got a tax refund at the end of the year. That ended when "residential loss ring fencing" rules were introduced in 2019. "Broadly, these rules quarantine any losses from residential property so they can only be offset against profits from residential property, either carried forward to a future year or offset against other properties in a portfolio. There are some minor exceptions to these rules, for example for property which is or will be taxed on sale, and a property that is also a person's main home," said Robyn Walker, a tax partner at Deloitte. What you might have heard about recently is the reintroduction of interest deductibility. From 2021, investors' ability to include interest payments in their calculation of property profits was phased out. That's returned now, which will usually reduce their tax bills. Walker said another thing you might be thinking of is the Investment Boost policy. "This allows a 20 percent deduction for the cost of new assets which are used for business purposes on or after 22 May 2025. There are some restrictions on this as it does not apply to residential property or improvements to residential property. This restriction covers the building itself, it's possible that Investment Boost can apply to other assets which are included in a residential property but are not part of the property itself - separately identifiable chattels like a fridge. Again, any deductions available under the Investment Boost are also subject to the ring fencing rules." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store