
Christchurch police shooting: How are officers trained to respond when they're threatened?
The officer who shot and killed a woman brandishing a hunting knife will have had a split second to react in a "frightening" scenario, a former top police negotiator says.
On Wednesday night, the Christchurch officer first shot and critically injured a man who was carrying a hunting knife and chasing his partner from their Bryndwr home.
They then shot and killed the woman when she picked up the knife and threatened officers.
Police figures showed 55 people had been shot dead by an officer between 1916 and the end of the last year - and just one of those who died was a woman.
Lance Burdett, who led negotiations with Jan Molenaar during the 2009 Napier siege, said officers were trained to use the most effective, least lethal method when they're threatened by someone with a weapon.
"So, you start off with, can a baton be used? Can a taser be used? And then if that's not available, a firearm," he said.
"But when you're in the heat of the moment like that, and particularly if they're in close proximity... you don't have time to get your weapon out, the necessary one that's available."
Officers had to make split second decisions to keep themselves and others safe, said Burdett.
They are trained to shoot at the "centre mass" because it's the largest part of the body - but unfortunately, that is where vital organs are, he said.
"I hear people saying 'why couldn't you shoot them in the leg?'. Well, you try, when somebody's running at you.
"This is not the movies, this is real life and it's frightening."
A hunting knife is a large, dangerous weapon that can do serious harm, Burdett said.
He said a taser or pepper spray might work against a person with a knife but they required distance and time, which an officer didn't necessarily have in such a volatile and rapidly evolving situation.
"When people are highly emotional or on drugs or perhaps in some way mentally disaffected, these things don't work. Neither does communication... because they're not [using] the logic part of their brain they don't receive information the way it would normally be.
"People will be shouting and running around and there'll be a lot happening and you're expected to make a split second decision when things are really, really dynamic." Police and independent watchdog investigate
Police and the Independent Police Conduct Authority are both investigating.
The officer's decision to shoot would form a "large part" of the investigation, said Canterbury District Commander Superintendent Tony Hill.
Burdett said within a few days, that officer would be formally interviewed "like any other person" as part of a criminal investigation.
"You're given the Bill of Rights, you have the right to have a lawyer with you, and they will go through and interview exactly the same as any other person that's in that situation," he said.
The officer would also be supported by police and the union, Burdett said.
The Police Association President Chris Cahill declined to comment. How events unfolded
Police were called to the Clyde Rd property in Bryndwr, Christchurch about 11pm on Wednesday after a person known to the couple called police to say the man was armed with a knife and threatening to hurt himself and his partner.
When officers arrived, the woman ran out of the house, followed by the man with a hunting knife.
"Police believed the woman was in risk of imminent serious harm, and fired a single shot, which hit the man," Commander Superintendent Hill said.
An officer approached the man to provide first aid, he said.
"The woman has picked up the knife and began to threaten officers, despite an appeal for her to put down the weapon, she has advanced on police, brandishing the knife.
"A second shot was fired, hitting the woman."
Officers immediately provided medical assistance, but she died at the scene, Hill said.
A nearby resident told RNZ the couple were "always fighting", while their church pastor said the community had been devastated by the incident.
The injured man was in a stable condition in Christchurch Hospital.
The police cordons at the scene were lifted on Thursday night. Police minister's response
Police Minister Mark Mitchell says the officers involved in Wednesday night's fatal shooting have his full support.
Mitchell called it 'the worst case scenario for any police officer'.
Speaking to Chris Lynch Media , he said the incident was 'an incredibly tragic situation' and that both the officers and the families of those involved were under immense strain.
'No police officer ever asks to be put in that position,' he said. 'It is extremely stressful on them and their families, and support has been wrapped around them straight away. My condolences and thoughts go to the family and friends of the man currently receiving medical treatment, and of course, to those mourning the tragic loss of the woman who died. There are no winners in this situation, he told Chris Lynch Media .
Mitchell would not comment on the specific details of the Clyde Road shooting but said New Zealand police were 'world-class' and received 'world-class training' to deal with thousands of complex incidents every day. 'We should be extremely proud of them,' he said.
Mitchell said the IPCA has 'the resources, the independence, and the experience' to conduct a thorough investigation.
"They have been doing this for decades, they know how to handle these matters sensitively and properly."
Mitchell urged the public not to speculate on what took place.
"We should all wait for the findings of the investigation before making judgments,' he said.
"They (police) are doing an outstanding job making your communities safer. If you see a police officer, give them a friendly word of encouragement, because right now they will be feeling it."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has announced protesting outside someone's home will become an offence. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government's ban on protesting outside someone's home will rebalance the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, a law professor says. But another academic has questioned whether a new law is necessary, and says police may struggle to enforce it. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced on Friday protesting outside someone's home would become an offence, punishable with a fine or jail time. While it would apply to all residences, Goldsmith said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other officials. Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis said current laws around protests only related to public settings. "Protests that take place outside someone's home really do intrude into a sort of domestic sphere where people usually feel they should be able to exist unperturbed and unthreatened," he said. "So this particular change in the law will help to restrike that balance." Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Geddis said the change would plug a legal gap highlighted by a Supreme Court ruling nearly two decades ago. The 2007 case, Brooker v Police, involved a man who was convicted of disorderly behaviour for standing outside a police officer's house playing the guitar and singing protest songs against her, he said. But the Supreme Court found his behaviour was not disorderly. "The Supreme Court said that disorderly behaviour only applies to the public consequences of your behaviour, how that affects the public place. "And just because it's intruding into someone's private home, that's not a consideration as to whether the protest is covered by disorderly behaviour," he said. It meant the balance between people's rights within their home and people's rights to protest in public was "out of whack", Geddis said. One of the judges noted the court's finding could lead to more protests outside people's homes, and Parliament would need to consider that at some point, he said. "It turns out he was right." Victoria University law professor Steven Price said police may find it hard to enforce the new law. Goldsmith said it would be tightly targeted and prohibit "unreasonable disruptions", but Price said the independent police watchdog's review of policing protests found officers struggled to make a call on that. "What the IPCA had to say about that ... is that police have trouble on the ground having to make fine distinctions about what's an unreasonable disruption and what's not, and that seems a fair point to make," he said. "But on the face of [Goldsmith's] press release, it doesn't really solve the problem." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Dunedin councillor Jim O'Malley quits as committee chair over hostile work environment
Jim O'Malley. Photo: RNZ / Ian Telfer A Dunedin councillor has resigned from chairing a committee because of what he describes as a hostile work environment. In his resignation letter, councillor Jim O'Malley said he does not feel safe as the chair of the hearings committee as he feels targeted by the chief executive. He said he has doubts about the council's commitment to follow due process and natural justice. He is also calling for an investigation into behaviour of the chief executive and the processes for different hearings including the local alcohol policy. The Dunedin City Council has been contacted for comment. More to come...

RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
Protesting at people's private homes to be outlawed
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Protesting outside someone's home is set to be made an offence, with the government introducing new legislation carrying fines or jail sentences if people target private residences. While it will apply to all residences, the justice minister said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other public officials. Paul Goldsmith said the right to protest was valued, and would remain that way. "The public's ability to demonstrate is a cornerstone of our free and democratic society. It is a key way for citizens to express themselves and engage in political activity." However, he said the right to privacy was also valued. "Everyone in New Zealand, and their families, should be able to expect peace and privacy in their own home, no matter what their daytime job is," he said. "Unreasonable intrusions into people's privacy are simply unacceptable." The law will only apply to demonstrations directed at a person in their home, and will consider factors like the time of day, duration, the demonstrators' actions, noise levels and distance to the premises. It will carry a maximum penalty of three months in jail or a fine up to $2000. The ability to protest is protected under the Bill of Rights Act, and would not change. But Goldsmith said all rights were subject to reasonable limitations, and this change was considered reasonable. Earlier this year, The Post reported Goldsmith was in discussions with Parliament's Speaker on legislative changes to protect MPs' safety. Parliamentary Service and Parliament's internal security services have been working with the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet since the end of last year on the issue. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.