Rwanda agrees to take deportees from the US after migrant deal with UK collapsed
Ms Makolo did not provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out.
The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back.
Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade Yolande Makolo
The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally and are 'the worst of the worst'.
Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum.
Under that proposed deal, their claims would have been processed in Rwanda and, if successful, they would have stayed there.
The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over.
Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants.
The Trump administration has come under scrutiny for the African countries it has entered into secretive deals with to take deportees. It sent eight men from South Sudan, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan in early July after a US Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for their deportations.
They were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in Djibouti as the legal battle over their deportations played out.
South Sudan, which is tipping towards civil war, has declined to say where the men are being held or what their fate is.
The US also deported five men who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos to the southern African kingdom of Eswatini, where the government said they will be held in solitary confinement in prison for an undetermined period of time.
A human rights lawyer in Eswatini said the men are being denied access to legal representation there and has taken authorities to court. Eswatini is Africa's last absolute monarchy. The king rules over government and political parties are effectively banned.
Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US.
Rwanda, a country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed more than 800,000 people in 1994. It has promoted itself under long-time President Paul Kagame as an example of stability and development, but human rights groups allege there are also deadly crackdowns on any perceived dissent against Mr Kagame, who has been president for 25 years.
This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration Political analyst Gonzaga Muganwa
Government spokesperson Ms Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because 'our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation'.
'Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade,' she said.
There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees.
Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said 'appeasing President Trump pays'.
'This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Labour minister for homelessness ‘threw out tenants then hiked rent by £700 a month' ahead of law change to BAN doing it
One tenant dubbed the ordeal 'an absolute joke' SEEING RED Labour minister for homelessness 'threw out tenants then hiked rent by £700 a month' ahead of law change to BAN doing it Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A LABOUR homelessness minister evicted four tenants from her townhouse before upping the monthly rent by £700. Rushanara Ali threw out the people living at her east London property and later re-listed it for hundreds more, as reported by The i Paper. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Rushanara Ali evicted four tenants from her townhouse before upping the monthly rent by £700 Credit: Alamy 2 The landlord MP, who owns two rental properties, is known for her fight against private renters 'being exploited' Credit: Alamy According to the news outlet, the Labour MP previously rented the four-bedroom townhouse out for £3,300 a month. But new tenants were forced to fork out an eye-watering £4,000 a month for the home - a stone's throw away from Olympic Park. The landlord MP, who owns two rental properties, is known for her fight against private renters "being exploited" and championed reform against "unreasonable rent increases". In fact, Labour's Renters' Rights Bill will ban landlords who are trying to sell their property from relisting it for higher rent less than six months after tenants move out. The new law is expected to come into force next year. Conservative shadow Housing Secretary, James Cleverly, said the allegations against Ms Ali 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and that she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. Laura Jackson was one of the four people who rented from Ms Ali. The self-employed restaurant owner was told in November she had four months to leave. Ms Jackson, 33, told The i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion'. The property was managed on Ali's behalf by two lettings agencies, Jack Barclay Estates and Avenue Lettings. Watch as housing minister reveals new plans to protect tenants They told tenants they'd be charged nearly a staggering £2,400 for the house to be repainted and professionally cleaned. But landlords are not allowed to charge tenants for professional cleaning under the Tenant Fees Act 2019. Ms Jackson dubbed the "exploitative" charges "ridiculous and unfair". However, they were dropped when the firms were told the landlord was a Labour MP. It is understood Ms Ali was told of the fees and cancelled them. Ben Twomey, the chief executive of Generation Rent, said: 'These allegations are shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters. 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour.' A source close to Ms Ali told The i Paper her tenants were told their tenancy would not be renewed. They were reportedly offered a rolling contract before the house went up for sale. The townhouse was only relisted for rent after she did not find a buyer, said the insider. A spokesperson for Ms Ali said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The property is on sale for £894,990, reduced from £914,995 listed last November. It comes as The Renters' Reform Bill is expected to come into force next year. The far-reaching bill will ban Section 21, also known as "no fault" evictions, as well as prevent landlords from increasing rents to deliberately squeeze hard-up renters out of their homes. The delay to the ban on Section 21 notices, as first reported by The Financial Times, is the first in a string of push backs. A host of other changes are included in the legislation including ensuring possession grounds are fair to both parties. This will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable". Providing stronger protections against backdoor eviction will also be enforced. This will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out. A new Private Rented Sector Landlord will be introduced to the Ombudsman, meaning renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord. Tenants are also set to receive strengthened rights to request a pet in the property - a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably. Meanwhile Awaab's Law is due to be applied to the sector to clear legal expectations about the time frames within which landlords in the private rented sector have to take action to make homes safe where they contain serious hazards.
South Wales Argus
22 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
The Deputy Prime Minister, who as Housing Secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why areas of its plans for the sprawling new embassy site in central London are blacked out. China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil. Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead. This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also Housing Secretary (Peter Byrne/PA) In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out. The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided. It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9. Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email. It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application. Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal. However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application. Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule. The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary. Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant. 'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country. 'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
The Sun
33 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour minister for homelessness ‘threw out tenants then hiked rent by £700 a month' ahead of law change to BAN doing it
A LABOUR homelessness minister evicted four tenants from her townhouse before upping the monthly rent by £700. Rushanara Ali threw out the people living at her east London property and later re-listed it for hundreds more, as reported by The i Paper. 2 2 According to the news outlet, the Labour MP previously rented the four-bedroom townhouse out for £3,300 a month. But new tenants were forced to fork out an eye-watering £4,000 a month for the home - a stone's throw away from Olympic Park. The landlord MP, who owns two rental properties, is known for her fight against private renters"being exploited" and championed reform against "unreasonable rent increases". In fact, Labour's Renters' Rights Bill will ban landlords who are trying to sell their property from relisting it for higher rent less than six months after tenants move out. The new law is expected to come into force next year. Conservative shadow Housing Secretary, James Cleverly, said the allegations against Ms Ali 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and that she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. Laura Jackson was one of the four people who rented from Ms Ali. The self-employed restaurant owner was told in November she had four months to leave. Ms Jackson, 33, told The i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion'. The property was managed on Ali's behalf by two lettings agencies, Jack Barclay Estates and Avenue Lettings. Watch as housing minister reveals new plans to protect tenants They told tenants they'd be charged nearly a staggering £2,400 for the house to be repainted and professionally cleaned. But landlords are not allowed to charge tenants for professional cleaning under the Tenant Fees Act 2019. Ms Jackson dubbed the "exploitative" charges "ridiculous and unfair". However, they were dropped when the firms were told the landlord was a Labour MP. It is understood Ms Ali was told of the fees and cancelled them. Ben Twomey, the chief executive of Generation Rent, said: 'These allegations are shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters. 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour.' A source close to Ms Ali told The i Paper her tenants were told their tenancy would not be renewed. They were reportedly offered a rolling contract before the house went up for sale. The townhouse was only relisted for rent after she did not find a buyer, said the insider. A spokesperson for Ms Ali said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The property is on sale for £894,990, reduced from £914,995 listed last November. It comes as The Renters' Reform Bill is expected to come into force next year. The far-reaching bill will ban Section 21, also known as "no fault" evictions, as well as prevent landlords from increasing rents to deliberately squeeze hard-up renters out of their homes. The delay to the ban on Section 21 notices, as first reported by The Financial Times, is the first in a string of push backs. A host of other changes are included in the legislation including ensuring possession grounds are fair to both parties. This will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable". Providing stronger protections against backdoor eviction will also be enforced. This will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out. A new Private Rented Sector Landlord will be introduced to the Ombudsman, meaning renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord. Tenants are also set to receive strengthened rights to request a pet in the property - a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably. Meanwhile Awaab's Law is due to be applied to the sector to clear legal expectations about the time frames within which landlords in the private rented sector have to take action to make homes safe where they contain serious hazards.
