&w=3840&q=100)
Trouble for Bumrah? Gambhir, BCCI reportedly planning to crack down on 'culture of picking and choosing games'
India pacer Jasprit Bumrah and head coach Gautam Gambhir at a training session ahead of the fifth Test against England at The Oval. AP
Amid the euphoria over Team India's epic six-run victory at The Oval that helped them level the five-Test series against England 2-2, head coach Gautam Gambhir and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) are quietly working on the road ahead. They are also reportedly planning to continue their crackdown against superstar culture within the team, something that Gambhir has been particularly vocal against over the years.
With the BCCI having already taken action against certain individuals traveling privately and limiting the amount of time family members can spend with a player on a tour, Gambhir as well as the BCCI have set their sights on another aspect of the perceived superstar culture – picking and choosing matches in the name of workload management.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'There have been discussions and the message will be sent across to the centrally-contracted players, especially those who are all format regulars that this culture of picking and choosing games won't be entertained in near future,' a senior BCCI official privy to current happenings told news agency PTI on conditions of anonymity.
'It doesn't mean that workload management will be thrown out of the window but a more objective approach is expected in near future. Obviously, fast bowlers' workload needs to be managed but it can't be accepted that in the name of workload management, people will miss crucial matches.'
Spotlight on Bumrah after workload drama in England?
The reported development isn't great news for Bumrah, who looked somewhat off-colour by his own lofty standards even as he finished the fourth-highest wicket-taker with 14 wickets in three matches, including two five-fors.
That the pace spearhead sat out of two matches – the second Test at Edgbaston as well as the series finale at The Oval – apparently has not gone down too well with the head coach as well as the board.
This despite the fact that it was excessive workload during the two-and-a-half month tour of Australia, where he finished as the leading wicket-taker by a fair distance, that resulted in a back injury and sidelined him for nearly four months. Given his stature as the best bowler across formats in the current generation, the Indian team had been advised to be careful with his workload.
Also Read | Gavaskar compares workload debate to jawans at border, drops ODI captaincy hint
However, the fact that pace colleague Mohammed Siraj played all five Tests this summer without experiencing a drop in intensity at any given point and finished as the leading wicket-taker (23) has further led to questions over Bumrah and concerns over his workload.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Critics also cited examples of Indian wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant and England captain Ben Stokes playing despite nursing injuries.
Additionally, what has also worked against Bumrah in this series is the fact that he did not have any role to play in either of India's victories. While the Shubman Gill-led visitors won both games that the 31-year-old missed, they lost two and drew one in the games that he played, leading to a perception that the team isn't as dependent on him anymore.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Inside BCCI's RTI Escape: How Indias Richest Sports Body Avoided Public Scrutiny In New Sports Bill
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has once again displayed its political and financial clout, dodging a long-looming inclusion under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. In a significant development that is already stirring debate across the sports fraternity, the Union Sports Ministry has amended the National Sports Governance Bill to exempt BCCI from being classified as a "public authority" — a title that would have opened it to public scrutiny. The earlier draft of the Sports Bill tabled in Parliament on July 23 had explicitly included all National Sports Federations (NSFs) within the scope of the RTI Act, 2005. It aimed to enforce accountability across Indian sport by mandating transparency in decision-making, team selections, fund usage, and governance. However, a key clause — 'a recognised sports organisation shall be considered a public authority under the Right to Information Act' — has now been quietly omitted. The revised version of the Bill specifies that only bodies 'receiving grants or financial assistance from the Central or State Government' will be considered public authorities under RTI, effectively sparing the BCCI, which is financially self-reliant and does not receive direct government funding. Why BCCI Was Let Off the Hook Sources within the Sports Ministry clarified that the amendment was necessary to remove legal grey areas and prevent the Bill from facing potential litigation. 'The amended clause defines public authority as an entity relying on government funds or assistance. This ensures compliance with the RTI Act,' a senior ministry official told The Indian Express. The exemption appears tailored to the BCCI's long-standing argument — that its operations are entirely independent of government subsidies, and hence it should not be forced into transparency obligations meant for publicly funded bodies. Despite this, watchdogs argue that the BCCI has enjoyed indirect government benefits such as tax exemptions, land grants, and access to public infrastructure. Olympic Push Forces BCCI's Partial Compliance While BCCI may have dodged the RTI net, it isn't walking away entirely unscathed. The amended Sports Bill still mandates that the BCCI must register as a National Sports Federation (NSF) — a pre-condition for India's ambition to include cricket in the 2036 Olympics, where India is bidding to be host. This compliance will bring new obligations: the formation of an Ethics Commission, Athletes Committee, and implementation of the Safe Sports policy, among others. Moreover, any instance of government assistance — including use of stadiums, security, or land — would open a window for scrutiny under the RTI Act, albeit limited to those specific interactions. Expert Opinions: Transparency vs Autonomy The move has reignited discussions around sports governance and accountability. Legal experts and former officials cite the Supreme Court's 2016 RM Lodha Committee recommendations and the Law Commission's 275th report in 2018, both of which endorsed the inclusion of BCCI under RTI due to its public function and historical government benefits. Critics argue that while financial independence is a valid point, the BCCI's monopolistic control over cricket in India — a sport followed by over a billion people — necessitates transparency. 'You can't be a private body when it suits you and a public institution when it benefits you,' noted a senior legal analyst.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Like Bumrah, Siraj's workload needs care to avoid injury: RP Singh
Mohammed Siraj is in the same league as premier pacer Jasprit Bumrah and it is important to manage his workload carefully to keep him injury-free, said former Indian fast bowler RP Singh. Siraj bowled 185.3 overs in the recently-concluded five-match Test series in England and finished as the highest wicket-taker with 23 wickets, emerging as the most utilised bowler in the series. The 31-year-old from Hyderabad claimed nine wickets, including a five-wicket haul in the second innings of the fifth Test, playing a key role in India's six-run victory that helped the visitors level the series 2-2. Workload management will be crucial to prevent Siraj from getting injured in the future," Singh said in an interview with PTI-Bhasha. "Fast bowlers are at higher risk of injury when they play too many matches in a short time. His workload should be managed just like we did with Bumrah." Citing Jasprit Bumrah's example, Singh said: "It's because of better workload management, Bumrah bowled brilliantly in both ODI and T20 World Cups. "Siraj is also in the same league. To protect him from injuries, we need to seriously focus on his workload, sooner or later." Singh, who played 82 matches for India including 14 Tests, praised Siraj for his lion-hearted performance during the England tour. Siraj was the only bowler who played all five Tests and bowled with full energy and intensity in each match," said Singh, a JioHotstar' Cricket expert. "The last ball of the series, which bowled out the batsman, was one of his top five fastest deliveries in the series. Siraj delivered a 143 kmph yorker to clean up Gus Atkinson and seal India's win in the fifth Test. It was the fifth-fastest ball he bowled in the series. "This shows that he never lacked effort. He focused on bowling with the right line and length and contributed beyond expectations for the team. His fitness and rhythm were excellent throughout, Singh said. Having bowled largely under Bumrah's leadership until now, Siraj carved his own identity during the England series. Singh noted that even Bumrah's success has been supported by Siraj. "Just like batsmen need partnerships, bowlers also prefer bowling in pairs. Bumrah tends to take more wickets and his unique action troubles batters more," the former left-arm bowler said. "Siraj's role is to build pressure from his end, and he does that very well. Their partnership has been special and delivered great performances. When Bumrah is not in the team, Siraj automatically becomes our lead fast bowler." On the debate over Bumrah featuring in only three matches on the England tour due to workload management, Singh said: "That was already planned. The good thing about Bumrah is that whenever he's in the team, he gives you wickets. "Captains always expect breakthroughs from him. He usually bowls more than others in any match he plays." Singh also praised skipper Shubman Gill, who led from the front with 754 runs in the series. No one thought India would come back and level the series 2-2. Gill was impressive as captain. He made good decisions and his personal performance was outstanding. "When a captain performs well in his role, it positively influences his decision-making." The series also saw moments of grit as injured players had to bat to save matches. Rishabh Pant came out to bat in Manchester despite a fractured leg, while England's Chris Woakes batted with his left arm in a sling after suffering a shoulder fracture. Singh said in such situations, teams should be allowed like-for-like injury replacements. In my opinion, there should be a neutral doctor or physio during every match who decides the severity of a player's injury and whether the player is fit to play. If not, the team should be allowed to bring in a replacement of similar ability, he said. Kuldeep Yadav and Arshdeep Singh did not feature in any of the Tests, and Singh attributed this to the team management's preference for all-rounders. There's no doubt that every player wants to be in the playing XI. From the first match of the series, India decided to strengthen the batting. To deepen the batting lineup, the team preferred all-rounders. That's why Kuldeep didn't get to play," he said. If the team had prioritized bowling strength, then Kuldeep would have played. Washington Sundar partially filled the spin bowler role. But I believe there were two or three pitches where Kuldeep could have been very effective. But these things happen in cricket, if not today, then there will be opportunities in the future.
Business Standard
25 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chappell takes dig at England's Bazball: 'Reckless isn't positive cricket'
"Positive cricket doesn't mean reckless cricket," said Australian great Greg Chappell, lambasting England's 'Bazball' philosophy during the high-intensity drawn Test series against India. In his column for 'ESPNCricinfo', Chappell, while lavishing praise on the young Indian team for being fearless, criticised the Englishmen, particularly Harry Brook, for failing to read situations which required perseverance instead of flashy strokeplay. "England's own journey in this series presents a cautionary subplot - one embodied by the brilliant but mercurial Harry Brook, whose virtues I have extolled publicly before," Chappell, a former India head coach, said. "He has time, range, confidence, and that rare gift of making batting look effortless. But cricket, particularly Test cricket, is not just about shot-making. It's about judgement. About recognising when the moment demands attack - and when it demands restraint," he added. England were 301/3 in pursuit of 374 when the 26-year-old Brook's dismissal triggered a collapse on the fourth day of the fifth Test in London that the home side lost by six runs on Monday. With that result, India tied the series at 2-2. "Brook's dismissal at The Oval, with the game finely poised, was symptomatic of the conundrum that is facing the England setup. The "Bazball" philosophy - of fearless, attacking cricket - has revitalised their Test side. But it cannot become an excuse to avoid doing the hard yards. "...all England needed was for one batter to hold his nerve. To absorb pressure. Brook went for the glory shot - and perished," he pointed out. "There's nothing wrong with positivity. But positive cricket doesn't mean reckless cricket. It means confident, calculated risk-taking." Chappell said a more restrained approach in challenging match situations would help Brook establish himself as a worthy successor to Joe Root, England's most prolific run-getter. "Brook is emerging, and he will learn. But to become the match-winner England need, he must embrace the grind along with the glamour. Root didn't become England's most prolific batter by always playing pretty strokes. "He earned it with grit. Brook will need to do the same if he is to fulfil his vast potential," he said. Giving his overall assessment of the series, Chappell said the showdown will be long remembered for not just the result but also the "theatre" it created. The two teams engaged in on-field verbal altercations during the hard-fought contests, all of which lasted five days. There were also gladiatorial displays by the likes of Rishabh Pant and Chris Woakes who took the field despite serious injuries to help their respective team's cause. "The subplots. The redefinition of roles. Both sides were tested -- physically, tactically, emotionally. "But it was India who emerged as moral victors. They won clarity. Identity. Purpose," he said.
