A resurgence of faith among men is changing the religious gender gap
Growing up, Ginn's family bounced between Baptist, evangelical and nondenominational churches. At 16, after losing his uncle to suicide, Ginn experienced a spiritual crisis. He distanced himself from organized religion and focused on his career and hobbies, but eventually, he could no longer deny the growing emptiness and questions about life's purpose and meaning. During his 'wandering years,' he explored neo-paganism and the occult, but none of these paths felt satisfying.
'I wanted to know what life is beyond endless consumerism,' said Ginn, an account manager at a tech company. 'In the modern age, stuff is constantly being delivered to our door, but life should be more than just what I'm paying money to consume. So I think that's the big thing — people are looking for something authentic.'
For Ginn, Eastern Orthodoxy provided an action-oriented approach to faith, one that emphasized discipline, fasting and spiritual growth. 'There is this element of the call to action of going and living a holy life and participating in the energies of God that really draws men in,' he told me.
Ginn's story is part of a larger trend.
While women have historically been more religious than men, there is evidence this pattern is eroding. In the past several years, more men have been turning to faith, while more women have been disaffiliating from religion.
Although women still report higher levels of religious affiliation, belief and practice than men, the gender gap in religiousness has been narrowing, according to the 2023-2024 Religious Landscape Study, conducted by the Pew Research Center, which surveyed about 37,000 Americans. For instance, in 2007, the percentage of women who reported praying daily was 17 points higher than men, but Pew found that this gap has narrowed to 13 points.
The shrinking gap is especially evident among younger generations. Among the oldest respondents (74 and older), women pray daily at a rate 20 points higher than men, whereas among the youngest adults (18-24), the difference is much smaller — 30% of women and 26% of men pray daily. And while the gender gap in religiosity is shrinking, young Christian men and women are increasingly divided on social and political issues, according to the report.
Despite these shifts, the study notes that 'there are still no birth cohorts in which men are significantly more religious than women. ' In every age group, women are at least as religious as men, and in many birth cohorts, women are significantly more religious than men,' the report says.
Ginn, as well as many others, noted that a crisis of what it means to be a man in the modern era may be why men are increasingly joining communities of faith. 'With rising housing costs, you can't just get the American dream that used to be sold,' he told me. 'The economic uncertainty and the broken promises of the social contract that Americans believed in is causing men, in particular young men, to look for something different.'
Scholars have observed for decades that women are generally more religious than men, with research dating back to the 1930s, according to Pew. However, it wasn't until the 1980s that academics began investigating why this gender gap exists. A cluster of theories have emerged, explaining the divide in terms of nature vs. nurture. For instance, nature-based theories suggest that biological factors such as hormones, genetics and physical predispositions contribute to women's greater religiosity. Nurture-based theories emphasize social and environmental factors, according to Pew.
Ryan Cragun, professor of sociology at the University of Tampa, explained that particularly during the Cold War, adopting a nonreligious or atheist identity carried social risks. During the Cold War, when religion and especially Christianity was strongly associated with patriotism and national identity, identifying as atheist or nonreligious meant risking social status and being perceived as un-American. Because well-educated white men faced fewer social and economic consequences, they were more willing to openly identify as atheists, he said.
Atheist women often chose to identify as 'spiritual but not religious' to avoid potential social stigma, even if they were not spiritual, according to a 2017 paper by Penny Edgell, a professor at the University of Minnesota, and her colleagues. This dynamic shaped the historical trend of nonreligious identification being more common among men, Cragun said.
Women who favored traditional roles in the family — clashing with the norms of the broader society — found affirmation of their values in more traditional churches, Cragun explained, which may partly explain higher religiosity among women. But this, too, has been changing. 'Women are getting educated in higher numbers, they're not finding validation for the values that they hold in religion, so they're leaving in higher numbers than men are,' Cragun said.
For similar reasons, men have turned to traditional churches recently, in part because these institutions affirm more conventional roles and a traditional vision of masculinity. 'A lot of men today feel marginalized, they feel emasculated, they feel like they have lost power and privilege in society,' said Cragun. This aligns with broader cultural shifts, such as discussions around 'toxic masculinity' and 'the masculinity crisis.'
But despite similar religious practices, young Christian men and women are increasingly divided on social and political issues. This divide is not due to differences in faith but rather broader cultural and social influences, according to Daniel Cox, director of the Survey Center on American Life, who wrote about the gender gap between Christian men and women.
Over the past decade, young Christian women have become more supportive of abortion rights, while young men have grown less supportive of LGBTQ issues, widening the ideological divide. Young Christian women are more progressive, with 61% supporting abortion rights (compared to 48% of men) and 75% believing homosexuality should be accepted (versus 49% of men), according to Pew. Women are also more likely to favor a larger government providing public services.
What seems likely, Cox wrote, 'is that young Christians are being exposed to the same cultural divides afflicting secular young people.' Even when attending the same church, the social context for young men and women differs significantly: Young Christian women are more likely to have close friends who identify as LGBTQ, which influences their views on policies related to these issues, he wrote.
Declining marriage rates also reduce opportunities for cross-gender understanding. While shared religious experiences may help bridge the gap, they are unlikely to completely erase it, Cox wrote. 'It's not the only way to counteract the social and technological forces pushing men and women apart, but it's a good place to start.'
A survey of Orthodox churches around the country found that in 2022, parishes around the country saw a 78% increase in converts compared to pre-pandemic numbers.
In some faith traditions in the U.S., men make up a larger proportion of the membership. For example, in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, men make up 52% and women 47%, which is a subtle reversal from the last Religious Landscape Study study in 2014, in which men and women breakdown fell at 46% and 54% respectively.
Among Orthodox Christians too, men comprise a larger group at 61%.
The Rev. Jonathan Ivanoff, archpriest at St. John the Theologian Orthodox Church on Long Island also observed an uptick in membership in his parish — between 20 and 30 converts in the past two to three years, which is a significant increase for a small congregation like his. 'Many of us theorized that Covid caused a lot of people to confront their own mortality and their relationship to God and fragileness of life and caused a lot of people to question those things and find meaning in life because of that,' Ivanoff told me.
Some young men in his parish have come from the Catholic Church, often after a stint of disaffiliation, he said. Others have atheist backgrounds. 'Coming to Orthodoxy, for many young men, is a rejection of nihilistic attitudes they had been facing,' Ivanoff said. 'It's coming to something that has depth, a foundation on which they could stand on, tradition and unapologetic commitment to truth.'
On a Monday evening in January, four men sat around a long table in a room with a crucifix on the wall, discussing a medieval devotional classic, 'The Imitation of Christ.' They were part of St. Joseph's men's group which meets at St. Paul's Parish, a Catholic church located near Harvard University. The men meet every week, discussing theological readings.(I learned the about the group, because my son attends the parish school and sings in the church choir.)
Going chapter by chapter, the men talked about freedom, selflessness and fasting, chiming in with references to writings by theologian David Bentley Hart and J.R.R. Tolkien.
The group started with the goal of helping men become better role models and Christian disciples, and to better understand how to navigate 'spiritual battles' in the world, Sung min Cho, a 24-year-old animator who leads the group, told me. He typically attends a Korean American Catholic church close to his home, but attends St. Paul's for special services.
'It's not just a glorified book club but also a way for us, old and new, to increase in fellowship, because, as it's written, it's not good for men to be alone,' said Cho, who described himself a 'cradle Catholic' who went through a period of disaffiliation. 'We're meant to be in a community, not just by ourselves.' St. Paul's Church has also seen an influx of converts in the past three years, the parish priest told me; many among them are men.
Among Cho's peers, there is lack of confidence in what truth and courage mean today, he told me. 'Modernity is always changing,' Cho said. 'You're like a mercenary — you don't know what you want the next day and the day after that.'
Ginn echoes this sentiment. Much of modern American Christianity, Ginn argues, has lost this depth, whereas consumerist symbols of faith — like curated social media aesthetics — are prioritized over worship of God. In Eastern Orthodoxy, Ginn said he found a more 'masculine' approach to faith. He contrasted the Orthodox chants with some Protestant worship songs, which to him seem overly emotional or romanticized, making it hard for him to relate to the spiritual experience. 'It makes me a little uncomfortable,' Ginn said.
A proliferation of podcasts on religion and theological questions has opened up more avenues for seeking answers to a wide range of theological questions. For Orthodoxy, there is an abundance of podcasts online, according to Ivanoff, whose own podcast 'The Transfigured Life' soared to 8,000 subscribers recently. 'There is a rebuttal to the rebuttal — there is a kind of ping-pong theology going back and forth and people have the opportunity to hear us in a crowded podcasting world,' said Ivanoff. 'That has been huge in helping people who are searching for something to search for us as an option, which may not have existed 10 years ago.'
With the rise of artificial intelligence and amid online interactions, what's real is getting harder to discern, Cho told me. 'Christianity, and religion as a whole offers the truth that there is more than just what we see,' he said. 'There is more to your soul than what's cost affective.'
Ginn is open about his Eastern Orthodox faith at work, but without being pushy. He follows fasting guidelines, prays before meals and has even displayed religious icons at his desk. Ginn and other young male converts he knows are reclaiming their religious identity, rather than downplaying their Christian faith.
'In my case, I feel that I shouldn't have to hide my faith,' Ginn said. 'For a lot of us converts, we want to live the faith out as much as possible.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are we in a crisis of rudeness?
It's a question, a lingering suspicion that has bedeviled nearly every generation: Are the kids these days getting more rude, more brash, more grossly unapologetic? 'We have stories of Emily dealing with this question, we have stories of our grandmother dealing with this question,' says Lizzie Post, the great-great-granddaughter of etiquette maven Emily Post and co-president of the Emily Post Institute. 'Five generations gives us the length of time to prove this one out that we really do constantly look back at times nostalgically and say that they were more polite.' Society certainly seems to think we've collectively gotten more rude. According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, nearly half of the country believes people's behavior is more impolite than before the pandemic. Enter any public space and you're bound to encounter someone having a phone call on speaker, fellow passengers mixing up egg salad on a plane, or students leaving class unannounced. These incidents inevitably become flashpoints of heated debate online. Unchecked incivility has wide-reaching consequences. Bearing witness to behavior that you find rude, whether face-to-face or electronically, leads to worse mood and decreased cognitive performance. When someone is rude to you, you may become defensive and less likely to cooperate — no one wants to spend time and energy interacting with a jerk. Impoliteness is actually contagious, spreading from one person to another: When you experience something impolite, you're more likely to spot other supposedly rude behavior and act impolitely yourself. 'Are we ruder? I don't know, but I know we're less aware of each other, we do not pay as much attention to our impact on one another.' Lizzie Post Post can't say for sure whether our current culture is more impolite than generations' past, but she does believe we're living through a crisis of attention that can lead to disrespectful behaviors. Perpetually distracted and always looking at screens, we've become accustomed to switching topics mid-conversation or checking email over dinner. And that's just how we treat the people we know. We hardly consider the comfort of strangers when playing a YouTube video sans headphones on a crowded bus. 'Are we ruder?' Post says. 'I don't know, but I know we're less aware of each other, we do not pay as much attention to our impact on one another, and we have more ways to be annoying to each other or rude or dismissive than we've ever had before.' There may also be bigger factors underlying our supposed epidemic of rudeness. Christine Porath, a professor at the UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School and the author of Mastering Civility: A Manifesto for the Workplace, conducted a global survey in 2022 of 2,000 people who either had customer-facing jobs or observed those who did. Porath found that 73 percent of respondents said it wasn't unusual for customers to behave badly, compared to 61 percent who said the same in her 2012 survey. 'The number one reason that I found for people being rude is feeling stressed or overwhelmed,' Porath says. 'If you think about the last few years, Covid in particular, contributed to this, but plenty of other stressors, the uncertainty…a lot of negativity that we're taking in in society, a lot of people angrier or on edge or frustrated.' What is rude? 'Rude,' of course, can mean many things to as many people. Some may not bat an eye when students leave class unannounced, others see it as a breach of the social code. But, as Post notes, your definition of what's 'rude' is shaped by personal experience and preference. According to Post, you might label an action as rude if it has offended, disrespected, or made you uncomfortable. Jennifer Loh, a management and human resources professor at the University of Canberra in Australia, classifies 'rude' as an action, behavior, or comment meant to convey disrespect that also violates a social norm. When you expect to be treated one way and others fail to meet that standard, you might consider it impolite. These breaches can be direct or indirect, says Amy Irwin, a senior lecturer in the School of Psychology at the University of Aberdeen. Overly critiquing a friend's performance at an open mic may be construed as directly rude. Staring at your phone while someone attempts to converse with you is a passive form of incivility. There's also an element of ambiguity at play, Irwin says, since you never really know if a colleague purposely ignored you when you greeted them (rude) or if they simply didn't see you (can be forgiven). But is it rude? Lizzie Post, the co-president of the Emily Post Institute, offers some clarity on oft-devisive behaviors. Is it rude to talk on the phone in public? 'On a speaker phone? Yes. If you have a captive audience, in a space someone can't get away from, elevators, small rooms, a waiting room, these are spaces where you really shouldn't be on the phone at all.' Is it rude to text someone late at night? 'No. We have control over our devices to decide when we're going to allow notifications to bother us or not, that means it's on us to put those in place. Given time zones, I wouldn't begrudge someone. But think about your audience.' Is it rude to email a professor on the weekend? 'No, but you shouldn't expect a response.' Is it rude to smack while eating? 'Yes.' Is it rude to ask for a plus one to a wedding? 'Yes.' Is it rude to recline on a plane? 'It's rude to recline for the entire flight.' But everyone's idea of what is normal, acceptable behavior differs. People learn what is kosher from those around them: parents, extended family, friends, culture writ large, Post says. You may have grown up in a family where eating in front of the TV was customary, but your romantic partner might find the idea horrifying. While age often gets blamed for rudeness — the classic 'kids these days' knock — generational differences in incivility can be attributed to the culture in which you grew up. Younger people who grew up alongside technology may find it appropriate to scroll TikTok in social settings. Those who were exposed to tech later in life could be offended by even the presence of a phone in a one-on-one hangout. In a study of Australian millennials, Gen Xers and boomers, Loh found younger participants consider it good manners to respond to a text immediately. 'Whereas for the older generation,' she says, 'not responding straight away doesn't seem to worry them too much because they don't think it's actually rude.' Your present social context also plays a role in whether you consider an act rude, Irwin notes. Burping loudly in a bar is more widely accepted than burping in the middle of a meeting. 'You can take exactly the same behavior,' she says, 'put it in a different context, and it's viewed completely differently by the same person.' And the closer you are to the offender, the more likely you are to excuse their behavior, anyway. More broadly, each culture has its own social niceties, so while it might be acceptable for you to scarf down a snack while walking on the street in the US, you might get a few confused glances in Japan. Breaking the cycle of rudeness When instances of impropriety abound, Post says it's crucial to be aware of the behavior you're modeling, both to peers and the kids in your life, and explain why courtesy is so important — that it isn't just to police others' behavior, but to provide a framework of respect. 'Taking the time when you're at the dinner table to talk about why we don't chew with our mouth wide open,' she says. Leaders at work, coaches, and teachers can set expectations for what behavior is appropriate for the office, the field, the classroom, and hold people accountable, Porath says. Reflect on how you interact with others: Are you constantly on your phone at the dinner table? Do you cut off colleagues in meetings? Do you leave your shopping cart in the middle of the grocery store parking lot? How do you speak to waiters and other service workers? If there were recent moments where you fell short — maybe you were a little terse with a barista — consider where you went wrong, Post says. Moving forward, try to be more mindful of the impact you have on others. It can help to start noticing polite behaviors all around you: The guy at the doctor's office who held the door open for another patient; someone appropriately covering their mouth when they sneeze in public. They're not as few and far between as you might think. 'It's important to recognize that the positive can have such a big impact,' Post says. 'Looking for the good moments of behavior that you see out in the world, starts to remind you that they're there, that you can participate in too.' Solve the daily Crossword


CBS News
8 hours ago
- CBS News
Powerball jackpot grows to $643 million after no winners in Monday drawing
The Powerball lottery jackpot — the biggest of the year — is swelling after nobody won in Monday night's drawing. The jackpot is now $643 million, with the next drawing set for Wednesday night. Although no one took home the full prize, two Powerball players won $1 million each, according to Powerball. A single Powerball ticket costs $2. The rules of the game are as follows: Players choose five numbers from 1 to 69, and one number between 1 and 26, to be their "Powerball." To win the jackpot a player must match all six numbers on their ticket to the drawn six-number combination. The odds of winning the top prize are 1 in 292 million, according to Powerball. But these chances don't stop Americans from spending roughly $103 billion on lottery tickets annually, according to data from Motley Fool. Powerball is played in 45 states plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Drawings are held every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday at 11 p.m. Eastern time, with the results broadcast live from Florida Lottery draw studio in Tallahassee, Fla., and streamed on The first Powerball drawing was in 1992.


Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Our Communications Have A Credibility Problem
Jennifer Best is the head of marketing for AmICredible, the smart platform where credibility starts with you. If the potential for misinformation makes you not want to read anything online, you aren't alone. A 2024 Pew Research report noted that 40% of Americans who get their information online say inaccuracy is the aspect they dislike the most, a number that's increased nearly 31% over the past five years. For the better part of a decade, we're increasingly aware that misinformation and disinformation exist, yet few understand the difference. Misinformation, or the inadvertent spreading of false or misleading information, is typically when people don't realize they are sharing something false. Its more sinister counterpart is disinformation, when a blatant and coordinated attempt to confuse and mislead is malicious and intentional. These challenges are leading to an erosion of our trust in media and online news platforms. A 2023 study from the University of Southern California found that frequent, habitual users on Facebook forwarded six times more fake news than occasional or new users. Once false information spreads, it's much harder to control or limit. The Online Credibility Conundrum The internet thrives on sensationalism, not credibility. Online platforms prioritize content that gets a lot of engagement (clicks, shares and comments) regardless of how factually accurate it might be. After all, doing so is good for business; it keeps users engaged, stock prices climbing and board members happy. But it does little to stem the spread of misinformation, not to mention that it's not always easy to differentiate legitimate news from clickbait. You might be asking yourself, 'Is everything I read online false or misleading?' No, but based on the research, odds are that there is misinformation in your news and social feeds right now. Nearly 80% of Americans are concerned that the information they see online is fake, false or a deliberate attempt to confuse people. You're definitely not alone. While some may be quick to blame recent advancements with artificial intelligence (and there are plenty of challenges there to choose from), the reality is this: The Internet Age democratized the sharing of content, giving writers the opportunity to create and publish what they believe is an authoritative piece of content and maximize its visibility, regardless of factuality or truth. The internet leveled the playing field for online content creators. This is when the sharing of misinformation online began—not with the launch of social media or recent advancements with AI, although both of these have perpetuated the spread of misinformation. The problem has now become too large to ignore. Communications In The Era Of Misinformation As communications professionals, we know much of our professional value lies in our ability to be influential. Our corporate reputation becomes our personal brand, and it's how we present ourselves in public, speak to the media and make the case for investment when budgets are tight. When we speak publicly either for ourselves or our organizations, we need to do so with great authenticity, empathy and credibility. What we say demonstrates our values and contributes to the larger narrative. Getting it right can make a career; getting it wrong can send stock prices tumbling. Trust is the new currency of the workplace. It's won and lost, and you always have room for more. You can't be successful without it, especially in corporate communications. Changing The Narrative More professionals are taking notice of the importance of the quality of and credibility in communications. The Oxford-GlobeScan Global Corporate Affairs 2025 Survey Report reflects its increased importance. Whether you are speaking on behalf of an organization or for your personal brand, here's how to start changing the status quo and to bring trust back to the table. • If it seems too outrageous to be true, be skeptical. Question everything. Before sharing, check several reputable sources and use tools and platforms to help you identify potential blind spots and verify factuality and credibility. • Stop, look and listen. Stop and take a moment before you do anything. There is great power in the pause. Firing off one reactive and rushed comment on social media can sideline a career. Look closely at what you're posting and read it through before you even consider sharing. Even the majority of influencers don't verify what they share. Verify your claims and content with reputable sites. • If you spot misinformation, report it. Whether you choose to question or inform the person who posted it, or report misinformation to the online platform directly, you have an opportunity to help solve this challenge. The only way we bring trust and credibility back to our online conversations is by making small, incremental changes. Rather than ignoring the problem, we each need to become part of the solution. Nothing changes if nothing changes. The next time you read something that seems too good to be true, you know what to do. Forbes Communications Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?