Serbia and Albania move on from ‘drone' game but tensions still simmer
Maybe it was a dream after all. On Tuesday Uefa announced that the two countries would co-host its Under-21 Championship in 2027, confirming a decision effectively made last year after Belgium and Turkey withdrew their bids. There is justifiable contentment inside European football's governing body given the hurdles that needed to be overcome. The line, as repeated by the Albanian FA president and Uefa ExCo vice-president Armand Duka, is that the event will be 'a catalyst for breaking down barriers, enhancing mutual understanding and creating a more positive future for the people of Albania and Serbia'.
In truth the bidding process, such as it was, may have been the simple part. It was a surprise when, last May, they announced the joint initiative after Albania were advised a solo bid would not pass. They have the region's most modern stadium in Tirana's Arena Kombëtare, which held the Conference League final in 2022, but would have struggled to stage the entire event. Serbia's unexpected arrival on the scene offered a solution and was encouraged by political figures keen on demonstrating closer ties, not to mention a Uefa leadership keen to foreground football's role in bridging the unbridgeable. In 2014 the respective FAs had not even managed to agree on details for ticket sales to away fans; now they were in lockstep over sharing a major competition.
Others, though, are not so keen to play happy families. When Duka emphasised in September that 'I do not think and have never thought … that organising the European Championship can amnesty what has happened' he was referring, among other historical traumas, to Serbia's brutal war in the mainly ethnic Albanian Kosovo during the late 1990s. He was responding directly to protests from supporters' groups, who had made their feelings known when news of the bid emerged.
Members of Tifozat Kuq e Zi, an influential ultras association that claims to number more than 7,000, sprayed red paint outside the FA's headquarters and displayed photographs relating to atrocities committed in Kosovo. 'We oppose any collaboration with the murderers,' read part of a post on social media. In November's match against Ukraine at Arena Kombëtare, some supporters held up banners condemning the tournament and referring again to war crimes.
Lorik Cana, the Kosovo-born former Albania captain, described the co-hosting plan as 'not the proper step'. Although feelings are largely much less strong among Albanians who were not directly touched by the war in Kosovo, and dissent against Euro 2027 has been less pronounced in Serbia, there will remain a concern Uefa is playing with fire until the event has concluded successfully.
It is hardly as if everyone involved has rubbed along nicely since the fateful evening in Belgrade, which was awarded to Albania as a walkover by the court of arbitration for sport. Fans and players of either persuasion continue to give Uefa's disciplinary chiefs periodic headaches with breaches of conduct involving the other.
Albania were punished for a number of incidents at Euro 2024, including the striker Mirlind Daku's decision to shout 'fuck Serbia' and other nationalist chants down a megaphone after a match with Croatia. Serbia were fined in December after fans tried to set an Albania flag alight at a game against Switzerland. The list could go on and on. Level heads may well prevail but it is hard to think of a European competition in which tensions in the hosts' orbits have been so fresh.
Any nerves within Uefa will face an acid test during the 2026 World Cup qualifiers. Serbia and Albania were not barred from being paired in draws despite the disgrace of Belgrade; fate has put them back together this time in a group that also contains England, the first meeting taking place in Albania on 7 June before Serbia holds the rematch on 11 October.
Sign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotion
The sides faced each other a year after the drone fiasco, Serbia winning 2-0 in the Albanian city Elbasan amid smothering security. Much of the central boulevard in Tirana was closed when the Serbia team, staying in the capital, went for a pre-match walk, and snipers perched above the stadium during play. Everything went smoothly and the odds are it will again in June; the acid test may come four months later. Any major incidents would pose a flurry of awkward questions about the optimistic logic behind Euro 2027.
For now, those planning the event hope to lay a platform for its success. Uefa points out the potential tourism and infrastructure benefits for both and preaches the potential of football to help smooth out a troubled past. Maybe it is right, or maybe football again overstates its role as panacea. Should they pull it off, the events of 2014 may finally fade from memory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Man Utd transfer news: Jadon Sancho can secure reunion as £5m loan deal agreed
Manchester United outcast Jadon Sancho could have a fresh route out on Old Trafford whilst Rasmus Hojlund is closing in on a loan move back to Italy with AC Milan Manchester United's main summer target now is Carlos Baleba after the signing of Benjamin Sesko completed the reshape of their frontline. The Slovenian joining fellow new signings Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha. Ruben Amorim is keen to bolster his midfield ranks and the Brighton star has emerged as their leading candidate for that role. His price tag could prohibit any deal but those in Manchester believe Baleba, who has continued to impress, wants to join them. Gianluigi Donnarumma's availability is also going to alert those at Old Trafford but rivals Manchester City too have acted to land the PSG goalkeeper, who is poised to leave the European champions. United's final weeks of the window could centre around getting a number of their big names off their books with Alejandro Garnacho and Antony still looking for new homes. Here's the latest from the red side of Manchester. Sancho's Turkey exit route Besiktas are hoping to complete a deal to sign United outcast Jadon Sancho after several of his other exit routes appear to have closed. Sancho spent last season on loan with Chelsea, but they turned down the opportunity to sign him permanently, and despite agreeing terms with Fenerbahce and Juventus, those deals collapsed at the final hurdle. But Besiktas president Serdal Adali has come out and made his plans known after huge fan demand for his signature - a move that would also see Sancho reunite with Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, the man who bought him to Manchester. 'Just as much as the community wants him, I want him too,' he told Turkiye Today. 'What matters is not only our desire, but also if the player wants to come to Turkey. We have a budget, and we will do our best to bring him here. Players like Jadon Sancho usually prefer clubs playing in the Champions League. Whether it happens today or not, it is hard to say. If it is possible, we will get him. Besiktas fans can rest assured.' Hojlund's loan move Rasmus Hojund is edging closer to a loan move to AC Milan with his days at Manchester seemingly over despite his previous desire to stay and fight for his place. Reports claim that a loan deal worth £5.2m - with a buy option of £38.8m - has been discussed with the Italian side. The Milan outfit would also cover the entirety of Hojlund's wages, making the deal even more appealing to United as they undergo a complete change in the final third. The 22-year-old Dane has been cast aside by Ruben Amorim towards the end of pre-season and the arrival of new striker Benjamin Sesko has pushed him even further down the pecking order. It was in Italy with Atalanta that Hojlund first made his name. Rashford lays down the law Barcelona loanee hasn't been shy in speaking his mind about his parent club and claims the constant changing of manager's and strategies has been a major problem and urged them to stick by Amorim. A host of managers have been allowed to sign their own players to suit their own systems - and Marcus Rashford insists that has not been beneficial. He told The Rest is Football podcast: 'To start a transition you have to make a plan and stick to it. This is where I speak about being realistic about what your situation is. We've had that many different managers, ideas and strategies in order to win that you end up in no man's land.' Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Europe is giving up on free movement
Ten years ago on 31 August 2015, Angela Merkel told the German press what she was going to do about the swell of Syrian refugees heading to Europe. With the three fateful words 'Wir schaffen das' – 'We can handle it' – she ushered in a new era of uncontrolled mass migration, not just for Germany but for the rest of the European Union too. The then chancellor, so often described by her supporters in the press as the 'queen of Europe', was adamant that Germany was a 'strong country', which had the resources to support the sudden influx of migrants. 'We will provide protection to all those fleeing to us from wars,' she insisted. Whether or not other European leaders shared her confidence was immaterial. Thanks to the EU's porous internal borders and the freedom of movement, in practice her open-doors migration policy applied to every member state. 'In retrospect it was pretty much the most disastrous government policy of this century anywhere in Europe,' says one senior British diplomat. The inevitable surge of immigrants into Europe from Syria and North Africa, which began in 2015, helped swing the vote for Brexit the following year. It emboldened the people-trafficking industry and duly destabilised politics in almost every European country, as populist and anti-immigration parties thrived on public anger. Wir schaffen das will haunt Merkel for the rest of her life. Yet her other remarks that day have largely been forgotten. In the same press conference she warned: 'If Europe fails on the refugee question, this close relationship with universal citizen rights [for which the continent is known] will be broken. It will be destroyed and Europe will no longer be what we see it to be.' She was devastatingly wrong and right. Thanks to her decisions, Germany and the EU more generally manifestly failed to manage the migrant crisis. Yet she was correct that failure to deal with the 'refugee question' would change Europe beyond recognition. A decade later, that gleaming foundational principle of the EU – the freedom to move between member states uninhibited – has been put on hold, perhaps indefinitely. Nine EU countries – Poland, Slovenia, Italy, Austria, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany – have temporary border controls in operation. Since 2015, more than 7.5 million asylum claims have been made across the EU. The Willkommenskultur ('welcome culture') championed by Merkel is nothing more than a sour memory for many of Europe's governing parties. EU members from Poland to Spain are buckling under the political and social strain of illegal migration (euphemistically referred to as 'irregular migration'). Populist and nationalist parties are on the rise, and many of today's politicians would dispute that the EU should grant inalienable rights to whoever crosses its borders. The debate has moved on to how to remove illegal arrivals. The Tory government's plan to deport migrants to Rwanda was the subject of much derision; now European governments are considering following suit. Both Austria and Germany have in the past two years expressed interest in a similar 'Rwanda-style' scheme for processing asylum claims abroad. Last September, the former German migration commissioner Joachim Stamp went as far as to suggest that Berlin use the facilities which lie abandoned since Keir Starmer's government scrapped the Rwanda scheme. So far only Italy's Giorgia Meloni has managed to strike a third-country asylum processing agreement (with Albania in 2023), although it has yet to become operational, thanks to the interference of the European Court of Justice. But across the continent, politicians on the right are now echoing Donald Trump and becoming bolder in their calls for mass deportation. Before the summer of 2015, migrants seeking refuge in Europe were obliged to apply for asylum in the first member state of the bloc they entered under the rules of the EU's Dublin agreement. All that changed when Merkel's government suspended the rules for Syrian nationals, triggering a Europe-wide stampede, as Syrians, followed by Afghans, Iranians, Iraqis and more, scrambled to claim refuge in Germany. Their passage across Europe was eased by the Schengen Agreement, which had abolished internal border controls between EU member states, allowing people to pass between countries without paperwork checks. It didn't matter that, after just two weeks, on 13 September 2015, the German government introduced temporary border controls to stem the flow. The refugees kept coming: by the end of 2015, 1.1 million had made it to Germany. In the ensuing years, more than two million would follow. The Schengen zone of free movement, which turned 40 this year, is in a sorry state. Those temporary border controls Merkel brought in a decade ago are being used by a third of the EU's member states within the area. Under the rules governing the zone, member states can introduce the controls as a 'last resort' in the event of a 'serious threat to public policy or internal security' and renew them for up to six months at a time. According to the list drawn up by the European Commission, seven of the nine EU members which have imposed temporary border checks have done so in response to the pressure they are under from illegal migration. Austria, for example, which faces migrants entering the EU via the west Balkans, first closed its borders with Slovenia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Hungary in October 2023, citing threats associated with the high levels of 'irregular migration and migrant smuggling', as well as 'the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services'. France first shut its borders with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Spain and Italy last November. Among its reasons for doing so was 'the growing criminal networks facilitating irregular migration and smuggling, and irregular migration flows towards the Franco-British border that risk infiltration by radicalised individuals'. Emmanuel Macron's government is struggling to respond to the popularity of the right-wing National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, which is more than ten points ahead in the polls. In June, Le Pen derided the EU's new pact to establish a common asylum system – due to be operational by the middle of next year – as 'a deal with the devil to flood Europe with migrants, dilute the population and wipe out European culture'. Meloni became prime minister of Italy in large part because she had promised to restrict immigration and people believed her. Italy is the most commonly used entry point into Europe for illegal migrants from North Africa. It is also used as a transit country for those travelling from the west Balkans. Meloni shocked some of her right-wing admirers last month when she agreed to issue 500,000 work visas for non-EU applicants between 2026 and 2028. Nevertheless, she cannot be called a soft touch. She shut Italy's internal borders with Slovenia in October 2023 because of the 'continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows' and a 'high level of irregular migration including a strong presence of criminal smuggling and trafficking networks'. Rome has introduced additional passport checks for anyone travelling to 'migration sensitive' countries such as Germany, France or Sweden. The Netherlands also introduced temporary border controls with Germany and Belgium in December last year due to the 'overburdening of the migration system… as well as pressure on public services, including housing, health care and education'. The country is heading to the polls on 29 October, after the leader of the anti-Islam Freedom party, Geert Wilders, pulled out of the governing coalition in June in a row over immigration and asylum policy. The polls are tight, but Wilders, who launched his election campaign at a protest against a new asylum seekers' centre being built in the city of Helmond, is leading on 19 per cent. Germany went so far as to impose border controls along all nine of its shared EU borders in October 2023 after pressure was heaped on the government by the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. Following a series of terror attacks committed by failed asylum seekers last year, the AfD dominated February's federal election campaign with a fervent anti-immigrant message. The party's co-leader Alice Weidel repeatedly pushed the controversial, yet vague, policy of 'remigration' for an as-yet-undefined cohort of foreigners. In May, Germany's Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, introduced a new, tougher border regime, giving border guards the power to turn back anyone trying to enter without the correct paperwork. The federal police were also granted the power to reject asylum seekers at the border if they had grounds to do so. The measures were necessary, Merz said, because 'the protection of Europe's external borders is not sufficiently guaranteed'. Merz's new border checks have, however, worsened relations with Poland, which introduced temporary border checks last month. A presidential election campaign in June was won by the conservative Karol Nawrocki, who ran on the slogan 'Poland first, Poles first'. Self-styled 'citizen patrols' of far-right vigilantes have been gathering along the Polish-German border to protest and obstruct the German authorities' efforts to send migrants back across the border. David Cameron could be forgiven for watching all this with grim satisfaction, since the leaders of the EU are now going far further than the modest restrictions on freedom of movement he requested in 2015 and 2016, which Brussels rejected. The result has been not just the break-up of Britain from the EU but a fracturing within the EU itself. The breakdown in trust and new border controls being introduced by EU neighbours make the future of the Schengen area look doubtful. The EU plans to update its external border controls to make it harder to cross into the bloc illegally. From 12 October, the EU will roll out its new 'Entry-Exit System', requiring non-EU citizens to provide fingerprints and photographs when they cross the border. Towards the end of next year, the bloc also plans to introduce the 'European travel information and authorisation system', which will require travellers to apply for permission to enter ahead of arrival. In theory, most of the temporary border controls currently in force are due to expire in the coming months, but it would be political suicide to lift them. Sacrificing free movement under Schengen is a quick win for EU members unwilling or unable to do more to alleviate the concerns of their populations. As the diplomatic spat between Germany and Poland proves, until the EU can pull together on a cohesive migrant strategy, it's every state for itself. The irony is that Britain, which left the EU partly in order to take back control of its borders, is now an outlier: while irregular crossings into the EU are down 18 per cent in the first seven months of this year, attempted and successful illegal crossings into Britain via the Channel are up 26 per cent compared with last year, with nearly 42,000 migrants having made the journey so far this year. In these conditions, free movement cannot survive. Faced with a choice of protecting their political futures, or defending the EU's noble principles, Europe's leaders will always opt for the former. 'I have always advocated European solutions,' said Merkel, pointedly, after Merz's border regime was introduced. 'Otherwise, we could see Europe destroyed.' Yet European leaders increasingly see their job as salvaging their countries from the destruction she wrought.
Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Glenn Hoddle names 'team to beat' in Champions League and snubs PSG
Glenn Hoddle has named the 'team to beat' in the Champions League and overlooked holders Paris Saint-Germain. PSG clinched their first ever Champions League trophy last season, thrashing Inter Milan 5-0 in the final. The French champions secured more silverware on Wednesday night as they came from two goals down against Tottenham to win the UEFA Super Cup. Thomas Frank looked set for an immediate trophy at the start of his Spurs tenure after Micky van de Ven and Cristian Romero scored either side of half-time. But Lee Kang-in gave PSG hope with an 85th-minute goal and Goncalo Ramos' 95th-minute equaliser forced a penalty shootout. In The Mixer: Exclusive analysis, FPL tips and transfer talk sent straight to your inbox every week – sign up, it's an open goal. Luis Enrique's side held their nerve in the shootout to give PSG their first Super Cup trophy and deny Spurs a second European trophy in three months. PSG also impressed in the Club World Cup over the summer – losing to Chelsea in the final – and appear to be the favourites to win the Champions League this season. Hoddle insists PSG under Enrique are a 'serious team' but views Liverpool as the 'team to beat' in Europe, especially if Arne Slot gets a couple more transfer signings over the line. The Premier League champions have spent £250m so far this summer and remain interested in big-money moves for Alexander Isak and Marc Guehi. Asked who will emerge as PSG's biggest rival for the Champions League trophy this season, Hoddle told TNT Sports: 'For me, we're all hearing the same thing about Liverpool in the transfer market. 'If those deals so happen, wow, they will have some squad. So I would say Liverpool might be the ones to beat. 'If they get who they're tying to get, I think they will go very close in Europe. They're a very good sign now, never mind about the new signings. 'PSG are a serious team though and really well-balanced. That's why they will be one of the favourites to go back and win it but in any sport, winning a title is one thing but retaining it is very, very difficult.' Ex-England star Karen Carney, meanwhile, declared Barcelona as PSG's biggest rival in the Champions League. The La Liga champions reached the semi-finals of the Champions League last season before losing to Inter Milan in heartbreaking circumstances. 'Barcelona's Achilles heel was just the defensive mindset last season but going forward they had absolutely everything,' she said. 'PSG will respect that and Barcelona could push them. PSG are full of quality, they're only just come back from their summer break. 'They're the ones to beat for me. It would be great if the English teams can bridge the gap but I still have my eye on that Barcelona team because if they sort out the defence they could push these guys.' Despite watching his Tottenham team concede two late goals and then lose the penalty shootout, Frank was able to take a number of positives from the Super Cup defeat. The former Brentford boss took over at Spurs earlier in the summer after the sacking of Ange Postecoglou. 'I think we played a very good game against one of the best teams in the world, maybe the best at this moment in time,' Frank said. 'We had them exactly where we wanted them for 80-something minutes until the 2-1 goal, then of course the momentum shifted a little bit. More Trending 'The team, the players, the club, the fans, there is a lot to be happy with. It is a flip of the coin when you go to a penalty shootout. 'We showed that we can be adaptable and pragmatic, and we needed to be against a team like PSG. 'The way we wanted to defend, high pressure and low defending, was top, almost perfect, and also the set pieces were very good and dangerous.' Spurs face Burnley in their Premier League opener on Saturday while PSG begin their Ligue 1 title defence a day later against Nantes. For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Liverpool set to complete £30m transfer deal for 'tough guy' ahead of Bournemouth clash MORE: Paul Merson fears Liverpool have a 'major problem' ahead of Premier League title defence MORE: How Manchester United scuppered Barcelona's transfer plans with £74m signing
