logo
David Kaity: Should you feel guilty for making profit on a property sale?

David Kaity: Should you feel guilty for making profit on a property sale?

West Australian19-05-2025

Policies tackling housing affordability were front and centre of the recent Federal campaign, and while the major parties proposed various solutions, both acknowledged house prices will continue to rise. The policies from the winning Labor Government, which focused on first home buyers, including a 5 per cent deposit plan, will largely serve to increase demand and prices will keep heading north.
Those already on the property ladder will continue to make profits on their sales. But is there a problem with that?
A billboard by real estate agency White Fox stirred controversy earlier this year with its slogan: 'Making homes more expensive since 2017'. It angered some who claimed that the message was tone deaf in the middle of Australia's current housing crisis. And its location here in Perth bit hard for some, given five-year median home values have risen an astronomical 75 per cent since 2020 and are tipped to be close to the magic $1 million mark by year's end.
The backlash against the billboard also highlights the divide between those who are already on the property ladder and those who are finding it difficult to get a foothold.
So, while the billboard certainly raised eyebrows, it poses several simple questions. Should sellers feel guilty for wanting to get the best possible return, and in doing so set street and suburb records with stratospheric sale prices? And should agents also feel some guilt for facilitating those sales?
First, we need to remember that sale prices are not determined by sellers. Market forces of supply and demand determine final sale prices. Buyers and sellers are at the whim of these forces, and it's my view, that we shouldn't blame either sellers or their agents for the high prices homes are fetching.
We can argue about what is behind the current market forces, which have led to such unaffordable housing for many in this country. The reality is that there isn't just one cause. A large portion of the blame can be attributed to planning and policy failures by governments at the local, State and Federal levels that have been decades in the making.
Regardless of the causes, everyone — even sellers — empathise with the difficulties faced by would-be home buyers who are looking to enter the property market. But if you are a seller, you shouldn't feel guilty about achieving the highest possible sale price, and here's why I believe that's the case.
First let's consider retirees, or senior empty-nesters who need to downsize. If you're like most Australians, your single most significant asset will be your home. The sale price when downsizing will often determine how long you can maintain a comfortable lifestyle in retirement. You will want the highest sale price, and rightly so.
If you have a growing family, you may be selling to upgrade to a larger home. How much you sell for could determine whether your family will have that extra bedroom to accommodate another child or if you can move to a better school catchment.
I will even defend the 'greedy', profit chasing developers here. Without profits, there would be no developers and without developers, we would have an even greater shortage of housing in this country, leading to even higher prices that would worsen the housing crisis.
There are some important things worth keeping in mind about developers. Firstly, private developers are responsible for about 97 per cent of Australia's housing stock. Second, 85 per cent of these private developers are small to medium size businesses, and not the large corporations many would assume.
Next, most development is about carving up existing, larger properties and creating several smaller ones. Smaller properties tend to be more affordable than large ones and so, it can be argued that developers are creating more affordable homes than would otherwise exist.
Lastly, developing property is risky. Many property developers have and will continue to fail and there are mums and dads — human stories — behind many of these failures. Profit is the reward for risk.
If you are a current buyer of a home, we all empathise with you and understand your pain and frustration. At the same time, let's not blame sellers or their agents for achieving prices that buyers are willing and able to pay — regardless of how crazy or unaffordable these prices appear.
If you are a seller, you shouldn't feel guilty at all about achieving the highest possible sale price. And buyers, when you do eventually buy, it is likely that at some stage, you will want to sell. When you do, I can guarantee that, you too, will want the highest sale price, and rightly so.
David Kaity is a property marketing strategist

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese refuses to give ADF a ‘dollar more than promised' amid US calls to spend more
Albanese refuses to give ADF a ‘dollar more than promised' amid US calls to spend more

Sky News AU

time5 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Albanese refuses to give ADF a ‘dollar more than promised' amid US calls to spend more

Sky News host Andrew Bolt slams Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for his stance on not upgrading the ADF budget. 'We Australians must be so lucky, either that or we actually have a dangerously arrogant and ignorant prime minister,' Mr Bolt said. 'Apparently it is just Anthony Albanese, alone, who reckons there is no real danger of war and there is no need to give our Australian Defence Force a dollar more than is already promised.'

Alarmist content in Australia's National Curriculum is causing an ‘epidemic of climate anxiety' among kids, report warns
Alarmist content in Australia's National Curriculum is causing an ‘epidemic of climate anxiety' among kids, report warns

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Alarmist content in Australia's National Curriculum is causing an ‘epidemic of climate anxiety' among kids, report warns

Alarmist content in Australia's National Curriculum is causing an 'epidemic of climate anxiety' that is robbing kids of their childhood, a new report has warned. Kids in all of Australia's states and territories are taught content from the national curriculum from the beginning of primary school, but leading educational and developmental psychologist Clare Rowe argued it is causing 'real damage to the mental health of young Australians'. In a new report on climate anxiety in pre-adolescent children, Ms Rowe argues climate change content being taught to young kids is 'developmentally inappropriate', and should, at the very least, be postponed until secondary school. 'As a clinician, it is alarming to see so many children in my practice who are fearful and feel hopeless due to the climate education they receive at school,' Ms Rowe told In the report, published by the Institute of Public Affairs, Ms Rowe says educational and developmental psychologists like her were seeing more and more patients suffering from 'eco-anxiety' – persistent worry about the future of the planet, often linked to chronic stress, reduced psychological well-being and a sense of helplessness. 'In recent years, I have witnessed an alarming trend: more and more young children entering my clinic, gripped by fear that they will not live to see adulthood. They tell me with absolute certainty that the world is ending, that the government doesn't care and that the adults around them have failed,' she states. 'These are not isolated incidents. My colleagues and I have seen a marked rise in children experiencing anxiety linked to the way climate change is taught in schools.' According to a 2021 study with 10,000 participants across ten countries, 59 per of cent of people aged 16 to 25 were very or extremely worried about climate change. While there is less data about the level of eco-anxiety among primary school aged children, surveys have found that almost a third of Australians aged 10-13 are worried about the state of the environment. Since it was established, the National Curriculum has included 'sustainability' as one of its three cross-curriculum priorities. This means content about the environment and climate change is present in all subjects, ranging from science to English and even maths. The report explains that in order to fulfil their teaching requirements, many schools utilise third-party education resources, some of which are developed by activist groups. 'The framing of these materials often leans towards an urgent and alarmist narrative, often emphasising children's role in taking action against climate change,' the report states. The examples listed include a lesson aimed at nine-year-olds and developed by Scootle which teaches that climate change is 'threatening humankind and pushing people into poverty'. The report also points to a resource developed by ABC's 'Behind the News' program. Aimed at kids aged eight and above, the resource 'educates young children by showing them emotive video footage of raging bushfires, floods, cyclones and melting ice caps'. 'These images are displayed with a backdrop of dramatic music and an overlay of children's testimonies about how worried they are for their future,' the report states. According to Ms Rowe, it is 'developmentally inappropriate' to be teaching primary school-aged children about climate change, since it 'exposes young minds to allegedly existential threats that they cannot meaningfully understand or act upon'. 'Young children lack the cognitive capacity to process abstract, multifactorial problems such as global climate change. Without the necessary reasoning skills, they are prone to misinterpreting information in ways that fuel excessive fear, helplessness, and anxiety,' the report states. 'For example, a child who hears that climate change is a risk to coastal communities, health and food security may internalise these statements literally, believing that complete environmental collapse is imminent within their lifetime. 'This misinterpretation can lead to excessive fear, confusion and distress, rather than constructive engagement with environmental issues.' The developmental psychologist also argued the heightened state of stress this causes can rob kids of their childhood. 'When young brains are routinely pulled into a heightened state of stress, their ability to engage in age-appropriate developmental tasks such as play, exploration and social learning is significantly diminished,' the report states. Ms Rowe argues that in order to reduce the growing prevalence of eco-anxiety, climate change education should at the very least be delayed until secondary school. The leading psychologist is also calling for the National Curriculum to be rebalanced. 'We must also abolish the National Curriculum Cross-Curriculum Priority of Sustainability, which sounds nice, but is causing untold damage,' she told 'Our children should be focused on core competencies of literacy and numeracy in primary education. These are the foundational skills upon which all future learning depends.'

Single ticket scoops entire mammoth $70m Oz Lotto pool
Single ticket scoops entire mammoth $70m Oz Lotto pool

West Australian

time6 hours ago

  • West Australian

Single ticket scoops entire mammoth $70m Oz Lotto pool

A single winner has claimed Tuesday night's mammoth $70m Oz Lotto draw, with their life changed in an instant. The $70 million first division prize is the second-richest of any Australian lottery game this year, and Oz Lotto's fourth richest prize ever. The winning numbers for draw 1633 are 44, 34, 45, 1, 46, 25 and 21. The supplementary numbers are 9, 14 and 16. Gaming authorities predicted one in five Australians would snap up a ticket for the chance to secure a slice of — if not all — of the huge jackpot. 'If one person takes home the entire $70 million prize, they'll be crowned the second-biggest Australian lottery winner so far in 2025 and Oz Lotto's second-biggest individual lottery winner ever,' The Lott spokesperson Matt Hart said this week. 'Previous big Oz Lotto winners have greeted their multimillion-dollar prizes with stunned silence, hysterical laughter and tears of joy. Who knows how someone might react on Tuesday night if they win the entire $70 million jackpot.' Three Oz Lotto division one wins totalling $185 million had been written into the books already this year. A $70 million Oz Lotto jackpot was won earlier this year by a 15-share syndicate in Queensland , with each taking home a $4.7 million slice. A western Sydney woman made history with a $100 million win in February , the game's most lucrative prize ever. 'Who is this? Why are you calling this late?' the winner told The Lotto when contacted after the draw. 'What the hell! Can you repeat that? Oh my god! Don't lie to me!' Just a few weeks later, $15 million was claimed by a North Queensland man. If you're concerned about your gambling or the gambling of a friend or family member, log on to Gambling Help Online or make contact via phone on 1800 858 858. You can access online counselling as well as services in your state or territory and support for family and friends .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store