San Francisco ranks in 4th in AI jobs
San Francisco ranks in the top five metro areas in the U.S. with the largest number of job postings requiring AI skills.
Why it matters: Despite mounting concern over AI job automation and displacement, some people are finding new roles working with the emerging technology.
Driving the news: San Francisco came in fourth, with 1,188 postings, according to the most recent data from January from UMD-LinkUp AI Maps, a collaboration between the University of Maryland, job listings platform LinkUp and Outrigger Group, a consultancy and executive firm.
New York leads with nearly 2,000 postings, followed by Seattle and San Jose.
How it works: The researchers used AI to analyze job postings for roles requiring AI skills.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Employers want to hire Gen Z workers who have knowledge of AI: ‘You were born into this shift'
The most valuable skill an employee can have in the digital age is… the ability to ask AI? Titans of the tech industry have taken to social media and other public speaking engagements to reassure Gen-Z, the newest members of the workforce, that AI won't be detrimental to job availability — in fact, it might be able to aid in their employment. 'AI is changing everything, faster than most institutions, companies or curriculums can keep pace with. But no, that doesn't mean your education or potential is obsolete. It means we have to think differently about what growth and opportunity look like,' wrote LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman in a recent post on the platform. 'You were born into this shift. You're native to these tools in a way that older generations aren't. Lean into it. Teach others.' 'You don't have to become an engineer to use AI powerfully,' Hoffman advised. 'Think about how to apply it creatively, how to solve real problems with it, how to collaborate with it. One of your first reactions to any challenge should be 'How can I use AI to help me here?'' Hoffman isn't the only one at his level who is optimistic about AI's influence on the workforce — other high-level tech execs offered similar thoughts about the future landscape of the job market. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy shared that the implementation of generative AI will likely 'reduce' the company's corporate workforce. AI 'should change the way our work is done,' wrote Jassy in a memo distributed to employees and posted publicly. 'Those who embrace this change, become conversant in AI, help us build and improve our AI capabilities internally and deliver for customers, will be well-positioned to have high impact and help us reinvent the company,' he added. Overall, the message coming from industry leaders is that being adaptive and willing to incorporate AI into current professional practices is the real key to being well-positioned for the future job market — but this idea is being obscured under encouraging niceties that are fed to Gen-Z. 'Whilst they may be at an advantage with their AI skills more so than previous generations, they will still need the practical, world-wise experience to flush out any AI inconsistencies and errors that older workers will possess,' Keith Arundale, a visiting fellow at the UK's Henley Business School, told Newsweek. 'Comfort without mastery can backfire. Gen Z's early exposure is an advantage, but it isn't a golden ticket,' agreed Fabian Stephany, assistant professor for AI and Work at the University of Oxford, in an interview with Newsweek. Despite the positive packaging that this potential employment crisis tends to be wrapped up in, some top tech figures remain skeptical. Automation and increased usage of AI by large companies is 'going to happen in a small amount of time — as little as a couple of years or less,' Dario Amodei, CEO of AI company Anthropic, told Axios. 'We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming. I don't think this is on people's radar,' Amodei continued. In reality, Gen-Z isn't necessarily better equipped to handle the demands of modern-day jobs just because of a generational familiarity with AI. They still need soft skills and the social abilities to properly navigate dilemmas that professional environments often pose — employers and industry leaders just tend to leave that part out.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Losing Our Voice: The Human Cost of AI-Driven Language
Losing Our Voice: The Human Cost of AI-Driven Language originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Not only is AI influencing our written communication, but it is also altering our verbal interactions. The Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin has conducted research on the impact of ChatGPT on human speech by analyzing 280,000 academic YouTube videos. Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, certain words have become more prevalent in everyday vocabulary, with terms such as 'delve,' 'meticulous,' 'realm,' and 'adept' being used 51% more frequently. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development confirmed that ChatGPT favors these words to a greater extent than humans, as seen in a previous study comparing human- to AI-edited texts. The word 'delve' has proven to be a front runner in determining how speakers 'internalize this virtual vocabulary into daily communication,' according to Hiromu Yakura, the study's lead author and a are unaware of the shift in their language, but what's more concerning is how we sound. Despite research being primarily focused on vocabulary, there are suspicions that AI is beginning to shape our tone, with people speaking with more structure and less emotional expression. AI, a tool that seemingly improves our grammatical and structured communication, creates a divide in our collaborative communication through the suspicion it arouses. Mor Naaman, professor of Information Science at Cornell Tech has outlined three levels of human detachment caused by the adoption of virtual vocabulary. The first level is the loss of authenticity and vulnerability in our speech that proves our availability as human beings. The second level involves lessened attention and effort in our communication, relating to our level of care. The final level consists of our ability to show our real selves: our humor, our competence, or our regret. Naaman uses an example of texting someone, 'I'm sorry you're upset' versus 'Hey, sorry I freaked at dinner, I probably shouldn't have skipped therapy this week.' The distinction between a structured apology versus a personal explanation makes all the difference between ChatGPT and a real human being. We are losing the autonomy of our speech and the trust in our communication with others, and soon, we may lose agency over our thinking. 'Instead of articulating our own thoughts, we articulate whatever AI helps us to articulate…we become more persuaded,' Naaman says. Ultimately, our personhood is at stake. ChatGPT creates stereotypes about communities and what 'correct' English is. But, instead of adopting a homogeneous vocabulary and a 'correct' method of communication, we must self-regulate and celebrate the imperfections that build trust and make us human. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 23, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: BigBear.ai vs. C3.ai
Nations are ramping up artificial intelligence capabilities, and the U.S. is determined to lead the world in AI. and are helping the U.S. government with its AI goals. Though both and are experiencing year-over-year sales growth, neither company is profitable. 10 stocks we like better than › Nations are rushing to embrace artificial intelligence (AI), and for good reason. As Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang explained, "Countries around the world are recognizing AI as essential infrastructure -- just like electricity and the internet." The Trump administration has signaled that the U.S. intends to lead the world in AI. Two businesses helping the government achieve this goal are (NYSE: BBAI) and (NYSE: AI). Both companies have delivered AI solutions to the likes of the U.S. Army and Department of Defense. But if you had to choose between the two, which stock is the better AI investment for the long haul? Here's a look at each business to answer that question. delivers various AI solutions that focus on national security and infrastructure. For example, it provides facial recognition software to many airports to screen passengers for security risks, and it's helping the U.S. Navy construct submarines with its AI-enhanced shipbuilding software. business delivered $34.8 million in the first quarter, a 5% year-over-year increase. It also benefited from the exercise of 2024 warrants to the tune of $64.7 million in gross proceeds. The company experienced leadership changes this year. Its CFO departed in June, and it gained a new CEO, Kevin McAleenan, in January. McAleenan served as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security during the first Trump administration, so his experience could prove beneficial to government business. That said, the company faces some challenges. is not profitable. Its Q1 net loss totaled $62 million, as some of its operating expenses increased year over year. also possesses substantial debt. Its Q1 total liabilities of $198.5 million included long-term debt of $100.6 million, and that was after the amount was reduced by $58 million through voluntary conversions of its 2029 convertible notes. Q1 assets totaled $396.3 million. offers ready-made and custom AI solutions. Government customers include the U.S. Air Force, the Marine Corps, and the National Science Foundation. It also boasts a sizable non-government business with clients such as ExxonMobil and Dow. The company leverages partnerships to expand its sales reach. Partners closed 193 agreements in 2025 fiscal year, ended April 30. This represented 68% year-over-year growth and 73% of total agreements. As a result, sales rose 25% year over year to $389.1 million in fiscal 2025. The company anticipates that its 2026 fiscal year will kick off with at least $100 million in Q1 sales, which would represent 15% year-over-year growth compared to the prior year's $87.2 million. Like is not profitable. It ended the 2025 fiscal year with a net loss of $288.7 million. However, its balance sheet was healthy. Fiscal Q4 assets totaled $1 billion, while total liabilities were $187.6 million. Although both companies saw sales growth to start the year, the rest of 2025 could be a different story. The U.S. government is cutting budgets. The budget cuts could be damaging to business. The company stated: "The majority of our revenue is derived from federal government contracts." The picture is different with Its federal government bookings represented 26% of the total for its 2025 fiscal year. Consequently, while budget cuts could hurt their effect on its business would be less than their effects on diversified revenue is a plus over but in deciding which is the better investment, another factor to look at is share price valuation. This can be determined with a review of each company's price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue. As the chart shows, both businesses possess P/S multiples that are far more reasonable now compared to their peaks over the past year. For comparison, AI leader Nvidia's P/S ratio is 24 as of June 18, which indicates that and shares are attractively priced. That said, P/S ratio remains higher than it was a year ago, while is lower. This suggests that stock is a good value, while its AI rival isn't the bargain it was in 2024. When stacked against compelling valuation, superior sales growth, and strong balance sheet make it the better artificial intelligence investment for the long term. Before you buy stock in consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has positions in and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: vs. was originally published by The Motley Fool
