‘The next critical conversation': chair of Just Transition Commission says it's essential climate action is fair to all
It is inherently, if unintentionally, unjust. And that's exactly what concerns the Just Transition Commission.
'We're very strong in Ireland on what we need to do in terms of climate action,' said commission chair Ali Sheridan.
'But how we're going to do it, who is going to be impacted, how are they going to be supported – that's the next critical conversation.'
The Commission is an independent advisory body established by the government last year with 11 members appointed for a three-year term beginning last October.
They come from a range of backgrounds, representing workers, farmers, business, academia, community organisations and children's rights.
Its forerunner was the one-man Just Transition Commissioner post, assigned to Kieran Mulvey in 2019 specifically to oversee the government's response to the loss of jobs in the Midlands when Bord na Móna announced it would be shutting down its industrial peat extraction operations as part of its 'brown to green' transformation.
But the concept of just transition originates with the international labour movement in the 1970s when employers in polluting industries shut up shop and left workers high and dry rather than bear the costs of new environmental regulations.
Regulations were a benefit to society at large but that was little comfort to unemployed workers who, trade unions argued, should be supported to build new livelihoods rather than be simply sacrificed for the greater good.
Around a decade ago, just transition became more closely associated with fossil fuel industries when countries such as Spain and Germany shut down coal mines to focus on developing renewable energy.
ADVERTISEMENT
And then the term entered public conversation in Ireland with the winding down of the peat industry.
Now it is recognised that it has much wider implications.
Whether it's determining which communities get flood protection first, what counties must host the most wind turbines, whose homes should be retrofitted for energy efficiency or where a new public transport service should be developed, Ms Sheridan says the principles of just transition must be central to decision-making.
Government policy supports this view. The Programme for Government states that the Coalition will: 'Support the Just Transition Commission's work to listen to communities, address their concerns and ensure they benefit from the green transition.'
The national Climate Action Plan has many references to just transition and its importance in implementing climate action measures.
Legislation underpins this. The Climate Act states that the Government 'shall have regard to the requirement for a just transition to a climate-neutral economy which endeavours, in so far as is practicable, to maximise employment opportunities, and support persons and communities that may be negatively affected by the transition'.
But Ms Sheridan has concerns around the strength of that wording.
'The current version being used in the Act and being used by Government is potentially very limited and very reactive in nature,' she said.
'Yes, it may soften the negative impacts of just transition, but it runs the risk of missing the much bigger opportunity we have to actually make just transition central to all our climate action going forward and all the co-benefits it can bring.'
In its first report, published today, the Commission stresses the need for a clearer definition and vision for what just transition means in an Irish context.
In meeting communities to prepare the report, the members found enthusiasm for the idea but also 'some level of scepticism and distrust' around it.
'If I was to ask you who is the most vulnerable to the climate transition, what sector, what type of person, what place, I don't think the answers to that are clear enough right now,' Ms Sheridan said.
To that end, the commission has begun 'deep dives' into various sectors – agriculture, transport and energy to start with – and will begin publishing their findings later this year.
Vulnerabilities can be wide-ranging, from the physical impacts of climate change on land and property to the financial burdens of trying to go green.
'We are going to be asking a huge amount of society in the very near coming years,' Ms Sheridan said.
'Every sector, every place, every person is going to be touched by this transition.
'We're only going to build the acceptance and appetite for what's to come if we put people and communities and places at the centre.
'So just transition is not a 'nice to have' – it's a critical part of delivering climate action.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 days ago
- RTÉ News
Academic row over 'temperature neutrality' vs 'climate neutrality'
Ireland's national climate objective is set out in the 2015 Climate Act. It is to "pursue and achieve" and make the transition to "a climate resilient, biodiversity rich, environmentally sustainable and climate neutral economy" by the year 2050. There are massive commitments packed into that single sentence, yet it is not really clear what precisely it means. Ireland's climate scientists are now fighting over that issue. The first bit is OK - climate resilience. We are going to have intense rain, more frequent and violent storms, bigger droughts and greater heat stress. Resilience means preparing to live with that. The biodiversity bit is OK too. Protecting nature is not hard to understand and most people would sign up for that. The third term – "environmentally sustainable". Some people think "sustainability" on its own is a bit of a wishy-washy term. But environmental sustainability is now commonly understood. Committees have been set up to focus on it in workplaces and communities all over the country. But that last phrase in the national climate objective, the commitment to a "climate neutral economy". That is a different ball game altogether. There is no agreement about what this entails, and a big academic row has now broken out among climate scientists about it. They are at loggerheads over what exactly climate neutrality is and how it should be measured. On one side is the Climate Change Advisory Council. This is the independent statutory body of climate experts that advises the Government about climate matters. It is their job to set Ireland's so-called "carbon budgets". This involves calculating how much cumulative greenhouse gas emissions need to be restricted to, every five years, if the country is to stay within its legally binding climate commitments. A huge amount of data and information, and some very important judgement calls, are needed for their calculations. The data and information parts are complicated but straightforward enough. Judgement calls however, are never straight forward and can be very controversial, as they are in this case. This week, a group of climate scientists took a major swipe at a most important judgement call recently made by the Climate Change Advisory Council when setting Ireland's carbon budget for the years 2031 to 2035. They accused the council of choosing to define climate neutrality in a way that confers a competitive advantage on Irish agriculture. Their complaint, which is a serious one, is that the Government's key climate advisers are choosing now, for the first time, to substitute "temperature neutrality" for "climate neutrality" when calculating Ireland's carbon budget. It means the Climate Change Advisory Council has told the Government it is OK to only ensure that by 2050 Ireland causes no additional warming to the earth's atmosphere. This is not the same as delivering "net zero" emissions from Ireland by 2050 which is much harder to achieve. The "net zero" approach puts the key emphasis on the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions. It requires, among other things, enormous changes in farming practices, forestry and land use to ensure that absolutely all greenhouse gases still coming out of Ireland by 2050 are re-absorb by natural processes here. Of course, the alternative "temperature neutrality" approach, now favoured by the Climate Change Advisory Council, aims to do everything possible to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But the difference with this approach is that the ultimate emphasis is to ensure the contribution Ireland is making to rising global temperatures is zero by 2050. The council explained that it considered multiple definitions of what climate neutrality means before deciding that, for Ireland in particular, it had to mean ensuring temperature neutrality. It also explained that in making this judgement call, it reflected on the national climate objective and was guided by the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It said the Paris Agreement's long-term temperature goal - which is to limit global warming to well below 2C and pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5˚C - was also key in its deliberations. Ireland produces nine times more beef and dairy output than it consumes. Because of this it has an unusual greenhouse gas emissions profile, with a far higher share of methane emissions than most other countries. New Zealand is similar. But there are not many other places in the developed world where agriculture is so dominant. Methane from agriculture is an enormously potent greenhouse gas. It is capable of trapping about 85 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a short time frame. After about 10 years however, methane dissipates. It breaks down and disappears from the atmosphere. So, its impact on global temperature ceases in a few short years while the warming effect of carbon dioxide carries on for several hundred years. All this means that a country with a huge agriculture sector can have an outsized impact in terms of limiting global warming by doing a relatively small amount of methane reduction. It gives it more wriggle room if the main aim is to eliminate a nation's contribution to rising global temperature. In some circumstances it could even enable a country to ease up on carbon emission efforts in sectors outside of agriculture and still ensure a lower contribution to the global warming potential of its national greenhouse gas mix. It turns out that this is precisely the impact the Climate Change Advisory Council's adaptation of the temperature neutrality target has for Ireland. The council itself has gone to some length to explain and document this impact. It calculated that aiming for temperature neutrality instead of net zero emissions will enable Ireland to emit an additional nine million tonnes of greenhouse gases during the first five years of the next decade. It also said it is entirely up to the Government to decide which sectors of the economy can share in that additional climate mitigation wriggle room, and by how much. Its carbon budget proposal document says all this will be fine "provided the rest of the world follows an emissions pathway that can be considered compliant with the Paris Agreement long term temperature goals". In essence what they are saying is that since most countries in the world do not have as large an agriculture sector as Ireland, or New Zealand, they are unlikely to choose the same temperature neutrality approach. That is because there is no advantage for them in doing so. And if that remains the case then all will be well. It is an approach that has startled the critics who have specifically highlighted the polar opposite argument – that it would be a disaster if every country followed Ireland and adopted temperature neutrality as their climate target. The dissenters insist it would seriously jeopardise the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5˚C. These criticisms are outlined in a paper published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, by Dr Colm Duffy and David Styles of University of Galway, Dr Róisín Moriarty and Professor Hannah Daly of University College Cork, and Carl Doedens and Malte Meinshausen of the University of Melbourne. They claim that Ireland's approach rewards modest cuts in methane emissions and serves to protect what they describe as "methane emissions privileges" at the expense of poorer nations. In doing so, they say it locks in current inequalities in the global food system. Their paper highlights that, by enabling Ireland to maintain a high share of global agriculture emissions, adopting the temperature neutrality target undermines the global transition to a sustainable and equitable food system. They note too that it dramatically reduces the level of ambition needed for overall greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Many might argue that the additional wriggle room it provides of nine million tonnes of emissions for Ireland spread out over a nine-year period does not sound particularly dramatic. However, if lots of countries were to benefit from the same approach the impact could become dramatic very quickly.
Irish Independent
5 days ago
- Irish Independent
Communications Minister announces €10m in funding for public interest journalism
The latest round of funding forms part of a Government scheme introduced in Budget 2025 that committed to supporting reporting on local authorities and local courts granted through Coimisiún na Meán. Speaking about the announcement, Mr O'Donovan, said: 'Building on the success of Round 1 of the Local Democracy and Courts Reporting Schemes, I am pleased to announce the allocation to Coimisiún na Meán of a further €6m for the continuation of these Schemes, which will enable media outlets to further strengthen their coverage of local authorities and the Courts. In addition to the €6 million announced, another €4 million is also to be invested in areas where some news stories are underreported, €3 million of which will be ring-fenced for commercial radio under the News Reporting Scheme. The €3 million ring-fenced funding will enable commercial radio services to provide additional high-quality news reporting on matters of public interest. 'I am pleased to announce a specific allocation of €3m to the commercial radio sector through the News Reporting Scheme,' Mr O'Donovan said. "The allocation recognises the important role of commercial radio services in providing high-quality, trustworthy and accurate news to the public. 'This allocation is in line with the Programme for Government commitment to provide accessible funding to support the provision of objective news and current affairs content and will complement the ongoing supports already provided to the commercial radio sector through the Sound and Vision Scheme. 'Commercial radio stations play an invaluable role in community engagement, cohesion and the promotion of social inclusion across the country and provide a crucial public service in the delivery of trusted information to our citizens. "The funding will enhance the provision of high-quality public service content to both local and national audiences.' This year, Mediahuis Ireland, which publishes the Irish Independent, Sunday Independent and 11 regional titles, has benefited from the scheme operated by the media regulator and has hired more than a dozen reporters around the country focused on local democracy and courts reporting.
The Journal
5 days ago
- The Journal
Public ethics watchdog decides against full investigation into comments made by TD Ken O'Flynn
THE PUBLIC ETHICS watchdog has decided against a full investigation into comments Independent Ireland TD Ken O'Flynn made during a 2021 radio interview in relation to a Traveller halting site. It has also decided against an investigation into posts and 'liked' comments on his Facebook page. In May, the Standards in Public Office Commission (SIPO) confirmed that it would examine whether social media use and remarks made by O'Flynn while serving as a Cork City councillor broke rules set out in the Local Government Act or the councillors' Code of Conduct. The interview, which aired on Cork's RedFM four years ago, focused on the Spring Lane halting site in Ballyvolane. A complaint was later lodged about O'Flynn's comments during the interview and about his social media use. SIPO is charged with carrying out investigations into public officials but O'Flynn contended that he was not speaking in his role as a local councillor when he made the comments on Red FM. SIPO received two complaints in relation to the interview which alleged the remarks exhibited a 'consistent preconceived negative attitude towards' Travellers. The complainants also pointed to O'Flynn's 'use of social media' in support of their complaint. It was alleged that O'Flynn's comments in the interview in relation to the Ballyvolane halting site were 'inaccurate, misleading and indicative of a biased view of the Traveller community'. O'Flynn was commenting on a report into the living conditions for Traveller children at the halting site and is alleged to have stated 'What are they now? An ethnic minority' in reference to the Traveller Community. However, SIPO said the audio provided could not confirm whether O'Flynn had made these comments. Regarding his social media use, O'Flynn is alleged to have 'published and/or authorised the publication of statements demonstrating a biased view of members of the Traveller Community'. It is further alleged that he 'failed to monitor and/or remove comments exhibiting bias towards the Traveller Community and other minority groups, including those of an inflammatory and derogatory nature made in reply to his statements'. It was also alleged that he 'expressly endorsed some such comments by using the 'like' feature available on Facebook'. Meanwhile, SIPO said O'Flynn failed to 'engage with the Commission's initial correspondence' and that this was 'most unhelpful and contributed to significant delay in the Commission's process'. SIPO said O'Flynn was 'initially unresponsive to correspondence' and only responded when the correspondence was hand-delivered to him. 'But even then no comment was made in respect of the substance of the allegations against him,' said SIPO. SIPO said this failure to engage 'incurred significant and avoidable costs'. Red FM interview O'Flynn said there was a 'discrepancy' between the transcript and the audio recording of the Red FM interview. It was alleged in a transcript of the Red FM interview that O'Flynn said 'what are they now? An ethnic minority'. However, in a legal submission he contended that he said: 'Cork City Council is doing its level best to accommodate people, to accommodate, what have now been declared an ethnic minority.' Advertisement SIPO said it spent 'significant time considering this one specific excerpt' and that once it had been 'professionally transcribed', this was the reading of the excerpt: 'Cork City Council is doing its level best to accommodate people, to accommodate what has been lauded as an ethnic minority.' SIPO concluded that the audio was 'not sufficiently clear in relation to the excerpt to make a finding' as to whether the wording contained in the allegation was correct. Meanwhile, O'Flynn also contended that he was not acting in his role as a councillor at the time , and that his comments were 'legitimate commentary' and therefore covered by freedom of expression. SIPO said it was 'not persuaded' that O'Flynn was not acting as a member of Cork City Council when he spoke on Red FM or in relation to his Facebook page. It noted that O'Flynn was invited onto Red FM to discuss issues relevant to Council business and that he was introduced as and referred to as a councillor. O'Flynn also discussed calls he has received from constituents and SIPO rejected claims that he wasn't speaking in his role as a councillor. As for whether his comments were a 'legitimate exercise of the right to freedom of expression', SIPO said it is 'satisfied that the existence of the right to freedom of expression does not prevent it from investigating' statements made by public officials. It added that while there is a responsibility on public officials to engage in a 'responsible manner', particularly in relation to protected groups such as the Traveller community, a 'broad margin of appreciation that must be afforded to politicians to discuss issues of local or national concern'. 'The Respondent's Red FM interview must be viewed through this prism,' said SIPO. SIPO said the comments complained of in the Red FM interview were a 'small proportion of the entire interview' and that it was not satisfied the comments were sufficiently clear to make a finding, and therefore no investigation should be carried out regarding the interview. Social media Regarding his social media use, O'Flynn said the allegations involved 'cherry picking' and were not a 'fair reflection of his attitude to members of the Traveller community'. He also contended that his Facebook posts were 'legitimate commentary' and were covered by a 'constitutional right to freedom of expression'. SIPO said it was not satisfied that free speech considerations would prevent it from investigating this social media use. O'Flynn meanwhile noted that he does not have sole access to the Facebook page but accepted that he retains responsibility for it. O'Flynn also committed to 'unliking' or removing any Facebook posts at the direction of SIPO. SIPO said an investigation is only justified where the matter is of 'significant public importance' and that the Facebook posts are not such a matter. SIPO said the decision to not investigate the Facebook posts was in part due to O'Flynn's commitment to remove posts and 'likes' if instructed to do so and that this decision does not prevent a fresh complaint being made. 'Next steps' In a statement to The Journal , O'Flynn welcomed the decision and noted that SIPO found there was 'insufficient evidence to support the most serious claims, and that the remaining matters did not warrant any further action'. He thanked his legal team for their 'unwavering commitment' and he also thanked his family and added that it has been a 'prolonged and challenging time' for them. 'I have not yet met with my legal team to consider the next steps, and I am reviewing all options available to me in respect of those who made and promoted these allegations,' added O'Flynn. He said he was 'elected to speak truthfully, to confront difficult issues directly, and, when necessary, to stand alone'. 'That is precisely what I will continue to do, without fear, without compromise, and without apology,' he added. He said that 'public office requires resolve' and that he will not be 'silenced, intimidated, or diverted from my duty to represent my constituents with clarity, principle, and an unshakeable commitment to the truth'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
