logo
Mike Johnson and Russ Vought Continue to Lie About Medicaid Cuts

Mike Johnson and Russ Vought Continue to Lie About Medicaid Cuts

Yahoo2 days ago

Donald Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russ Vought, alleged without evidence that 'no one will lose [Medicaid] coverage as a result' of the House's proposed budget. House Speaker Mike Johnson similarly claimed 'People will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so.'
'There are no Medicaid cuts in the big, beautiful bill,' Johnson said Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press. 'We're not cutting Medicaid.'
'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more commonsense,' Vought said on CNN's State of the Union. 'Look, one out of every five or six dollars in Medicaid is improper. We have illegal immigrants on the program. We have able-bodied working adults that don't have a work requirement that they would have in TANF or even SNAP. And that's something that's very important to institute. That's what this bill does. No one will lose coverage as a result of this bill.'
There's a lot to unpack here. Vought, who was a major architect of Project 2025, said that between one fifth and one sixth of Medicaid spending is 'improper.' According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, in 2024, however, just 7.66 percent of payments were considered 'improper.' But 'improper' covers a lot of payments, including underpayments, overpayments, and payments where there is not enough information to determine if a payment was proper. In other words, improper is not a synonym for fraudulent.
Vought additionally claimed that undocumented immigrants are on Medicaid. Except for emergency room services in certain situations, federal Medicaid funds cannot be used to cover undocumented immigrants. Some states, however, have chosen to use their own funds to provide health coverage to undocumented immigrants, including children.
Lastly, Vought and Johnson said the bill will not cause people to lose coverage.
Several experts and organizations expose this for the lie that it is.
According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), if the Republican budget passes, it would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $723 billion, and 7.6 million people would lose Medicaid coverage by 2034, thanks in large part to new work requirements for those age 18-64. Other changes to the program, such as stricter and more frequent eligibility checks, will also likely lead to lost coverage.
Citing two states that have implemented similar work requirements on Medicaid recipients to those proposed in the GOP bill, Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the Program on Medicaid and the Uninsured and the director of State Health Policy and Data at Kaiser Family Foundation, said on PBS, 'These new rules pose barriers to people enrolling in coverage and lead to coverage loss. And this is loss of coverage among people who are eligible for the requirements, but who have difficulty navigating the reporting requirements and providing the documentation needed to verify that they in fact meet the requirement.'
The left-leaning Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, which estimated that up to 14.4 million people could lose coverage over the next 10 years, said, 'Research shows — and the CBO previously concluded — that work requirements do not increase employment. Instead, they lead enrollees who lose coverage to take on more medical debt, delay getting needed medical care, and delay taking medications.'
Losing coverage can lead to serious consequences. Having coverage saves lives. One study by the National Bureau of Economic research found that Medicaid expansions increased enrollment by 12 percent and reduced mortality among low-income adults by 2.5 percent, and new Medicaid enrollees were 21 percent less likely to die compared to before they had coverage.
More from Rolling Stone
Trump Spreads Bizarre Conspiracy Theory That Biden Was Executed and Replaced by a Robot Clone
How a Radical Ideology Infected the Supreme Court and Poisoned the Country
'Of Course I'm Going to Testify': Mike Lindell's Defamation Trial Is Going to Be Wild
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sine die for Texas Legislature while debate over THC ban continues
Sine die for Texas Legislature while debate over THC ban continues

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sine die for Texas Legislature while debate over THC ban continues

The Brief Monday was sine die for the Texas Legislature Judicial pay kept the legislature from an early end THC ban still awaits Gov. Abbott's signature AUSTIN, Texas - Day 140 of the 89th Texas Legislature's regular session wraps up another face-off between Democrats and the Republican majority. What we know A major accomplishment was the passage of education funding. The landmark bill was pushed through by state Rep. Brad Buckley (R-Salado). "I don't have any regrets. I feel like we dealt with everyone honestly and openly. Everybody knew what was coming, what my opinion was on issues. And as always, look forward to the interim to study more issues and come back next session and finish the job on some things," said Buckley. School choice passed by replacing the STARR Test was an unexpected failure, one of several missed opportunities, according to state Rep. Donna Howard (D-Austin). "I am pleased about the budget. I would have liked to have seen more done. I think we could have done more with our economic stabilization fund, which is busting at the seams," said Howard. What we know A lingering financial disagreement between the House and Senate put an early legislative exit on hold. Conferees from the two chambers met throughout the day trying to reach a deal on a judicial pay raise bill. The House did not want lawmakers' retirement pay to be linked to the six-figure amount for judges. An agreement was reached to separate the two calculations in 2030. What's next As lawmakers waited, several boxes were delivered to the governor's office. The items in the boxes could trigger a quick return by way of a special session. The boxes contained petitions that urged Gov. Greg Abbott to save the hemp industry by vetoing Senate Bill 3. The controversial bill would ban many products with THC. "I've rebuilt my life. I've become a better leader, a better husband, a better father, and ultimately a better man. But now Senate Bill 3 wants to turn this into contraband. It wants to me and thousands of other veterans into criminals for choosing an alternative that works for us," said Dave Walden, a ranking member with the VFW and a hemp industry advocate. Those who support SB3 urged the governor to let it become law. They argued that the hemp industry is filled with unregulated and dangerous products. "Senate Bill 3 does not ban hemp. It prohibits the manufacture, the sale of hemp-derived THC and its analogs, such as Delta-8-thc, which are synthetically produced by CBD. This bill is a correction bill to get rid of the poison that is synthetic THC," said Aubrey Adams with Citizens for a Safe and Healthy Texas. If there is a veto, lawmakers could be brought back for a special session to consider new regulations. Abbott could also let SB3 become law without his signature. He has until June 22nd to make a decision. The state medical marijuana law was expanded as a way to provide some political cover for lawmakers who voted for the ban and for the governor. Regardless of what Abbott does, hemp products could become an election year issue in 2026. The Source Information in this report comes from reporting/interviews by FOX 7 Austin's chief political reporter Rudy Koski.

Metro Atlanta student banned from MIT graduation ceremony after Palestine comments
Metro Atlanta student banned from MIT graduation ceremony after Palestine comments

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Metro Atlanta student banned from MIT graduation ceremony after Palestine comments

A metro Atlanta student, set to speak at her university's degree ceremony, was forced to sit it out. The decision came after she made comments in support of Palestine a day earlier. 'You showed the world that MIT wanted a free Palestine,' said Megha Vemuri while speaking at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology commencement ceremony last Thursday as the class president. It is where she made comments about not just Palestine, but also criticized the university. 'You stood in solidarity with the pro-Palestinian activists on campus, you faced threats, intimidation, and suppression coming from especially your own university officials,' added Vemuri, who is an Alpharetta High School alum. After her speech, MIT decided that Vemuri, who had a role in an undergraduate degree ceremony the next day, couldn't attend. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The speech wasn't the one Vemuri provided to officials beforehand. The university said in a statement, in part, 'the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading commencement organizers and leading a protest from the stage, disrupting an important Institute ceremony.' 'I stand by and agree with MIT in what their decision happened to be,' Rabbi Larry Sernovitz of the Hillels of Georgia told Channel 2's Candace McCowan. Sernovitz works with college students, and said this wasn't the time or place for the comments. 'Universities have a duty not just to their students but to the United States to make sure students don't feel intimidated, harassed, or oppressed on campus,' Sernovitz said. 'You want to protest, that's fine, but not at graduation. Give people the freedom to celebrate their academic achievements and not have to worry that when they sit there, excited and celebrating, they're going to have to hear anti-Israel, anti-Jewish propaganda.' While Vemuri wasn't allowed at the degree ceremony, she did receive her degree. Channel 2 reached out to Vemuri, but didn't hear back. TRENDING STORIES: Governor's office said it will start issuing special tax refund checks this week PHOTOS: 'Itsy-Bitsy, Teenie-Tiny' town is Georgia's third most visited Midtown Taco Mac abruptly closes, second location to do so in as many months [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

US growth likely to slow to 1.6% this year, hobbled by Trump's trade wars, OECD says
US growth likely to slow to 1.6% this year, hobbled by Trump's trade wars, OECD says

Washington Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

US growth likely to slow to 1.6% this year, hobbled by Trump's trade wars, OECD says

WASHINGTON — U.S. economic growth will slow to 1.6% this year from 2.8% last year as President Donald Trump's erratic trade wars disrupt global commerce, drive up costs and leave businesses and consumers paralyzed by uncertainty. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development forecast Tuesday that the U.S. economy — the world's largest — will slow further to just 1.5% in 2026. Trump's policies have raised average U.S. tariff rates from around 2.5% when he returned to the White House to 15.4%, highest since 1938, according to the OECD. Tariffs raise costs for consumers and American manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials and components.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store