
I drove 3 hours to buy Ed Sheeran's pants in a charity shop for £20 – I found a red hair but trolls say I ‘need therapy'
SHEER-ING IS CARING I drove 3 hours to buy Ed Sheeran's pants in a charity shop for £20 – I found a red hair but trolls say I 'need therapy'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A WOMAN has revealed that she drove three hours to a charity shop to find clothes previously owned and worn by Ed Sheeran.
Just days ago, news hit the headlines that the Thinking Out Loud singer had donated numerous items, including Ipswich Town merchandise, boxers and a bathmat, to a charity shop ahead of his homecoming gigs.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
A woman has revealed that she drove three hours to Suffolk, desperate to get her hands on a pair of Ed Sheeran's pants
Credit: TikTok/@lola_amuah
3
Lola Amuah paid £20 for the boxers and also got a pair of the singer's socks too
Credit: TikTok/@lola_amuah
3
And this isn't the first time Ed Sheeran has donated his belongings to charity
Credit: PA
And Lola Amuah, a mother and bargain hunter from the UK, who 'seeks treasure in people's trash', was desperate to get her hands on some of Ed's pre-loved items.
The Ed Sheeran superfan headed to East Anglia's Children's Hospices (EACH) in Framlingham, Suffolk, in search of the 361 items that had been donated.
Posting on social media, upon arriving at the charity shop, Lola gave her followers a close-up look at the rails of items and beamed: 'I drove three hours for Ed Sheeran's pants.'
As she picked up a black pair of his undies, which were being flogged for £20, Lola gasped: 'There's a red hair on it, d'you reckon it's his hair?'
Lola even spotted T-shirts, shoelaces and socks owned by the singer, as she explained: 'I don't know what to get, there's so much choice.'
The savvy saver proceeded to sniff a pair of Ed's socks, as she stressed: 'I've gotta get these.'
Lola then headed to the till, thrilled with her haul of goodies, as she told fans: 'You get a certificate of authentication with them…My life is made.'
Scott Campbell, EACH e-commerce manager, said: "With Ed-mania sweeping through Suffolk, this is a perfect opportunity to maximise funds and raise as much as possible for our charity, while also getting in the spirit and having fun at the same time."
Not only can Ed's fans buy his items from the charity shop in Suffolk, but they will even find items he has donated on the charity's online eBay page.
Scott Campbell claimed it is going to be "fascinating" to see how much the items sell for, as he recognised: "Once again, Ed has come up trumps with an incredible, eye-catching assortment of clothing and items - from boxer shorts and bongo drums to jeans and jewellery.
I spotted a gorgeous LBD in a charity shop for a fiver - when I Googled it I realised I'd bagged a £375 designer frock
"Hopefully the momentum, interest and bidding will rumble on throughout the summer - with every pound raised making a difference and helping us continue our vital work supporting families and caring for children across East Anglia."
And this isn't the first time Ed has donated his items to charity - he previously donated donated 450 items to the charity in 2022, which raised £30,000.
My life is made
Lola Amuah
Also, when he became an ambassador for the charity in 2014, the musician raised £7,500 after donating 21 items, including a camouflage hoodie and pair of Adidas trainers.
Genie Woodcock, retail central support manager, beamed: "What better time or place to snap us one of Ed's donations than in his hometown of Framlingham.
"We're seizing the moment, and [are] excited to see what happens when these items go on sale."
Top charity shop tips for bagging a bargain
Ross Dutton has been a manager for Crisis's charity shops for four years and currently runs the charity's Finsbury Park shop in London.
Choose your area - As a rule of thumb, the posher the area, the better quality the clothes that are donated.
Don't hang around - If you see something you like, buy it, as it'll likely be gone when you come back
Look out for cut-off labels - Some of your favourite high street stores will have deals with local charity shops to donate stock that isn't sold during their own sales. Often part of the deal is that they need to cut the labels off the clothes.
Stay at home - While some charities have their own site, like Oxfam and Crisis. many also sell from dedicated eBay stores, such as British Heart Foundation and Scope. You won't get the range of bargains that you would get in a physical store, but if you're looking for something specific it may be worth checking online too.
Social media users react
But Lola's TikTok clip, which was posted under the username @lola_amuah, has clearly left many open-mouthed, as it has quickly racked up 126,400 views.
Social media users were gobsmacked by Lola's clip - but while some thought she needed 'therapy' for smelling his socks, others described buying Ed's previously owned pants as 'rotten.'
Stalker behaviour
TikTok user
One person said: 'If you are serious then you need therapy. Why on earth would you want someone's used undies? Think about this. You are an adult.'
Another added: 'As much as I love Ed Sheeran, I don't think I could buy his pants.'
A third commented: 'That's f*****g rotten.'
Meanwhile, someone else described Lola's actions as 'such weird behaviour,' whilst another agreed and wrote: 'Stalker behaviour.'
Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Love Island USA: Yulissa speaks out about her elimination over racial slurs
Love Island USA contestant Yulissa Escobar was removed from the seventh season in episode two after videos of her using racial slurs resurfaced online. Her departure was handled discreetly on the program, with the narrator simply stating she had left the villa without further explanation. Escobar has since shared her account in a TikTok video, explaining that producers informed her of a resurfaced video but did not initially show her its content. She was taken to a hotel and left without her phone for two days before she could see the controversial clips. Escobar has apologized for her past language, acknowledging the impact of her words and expressing regret for using the racial slur.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Only those with a high IQ can spot hiding elephant in 15 seconds
A mind-boggling optical illusion challenges Brits to find a huge elephant hiding in plain-sigh. However, it's so difficult that 99 per cent of people fail to ever solve it A mind-twisting puzzle sweeping through social media has left swathes of Brits scratching their heads. Brainteasers like this might seem like a bit of fun - or a mere tactic to get the kids quiet for a couple of minutes - but they're actually a great form of mental exercise. In fact, research has shown that regularly solving puzzles can have a positive impact on our central nervous system, which in turn benefits our cognitive abilities including our attention span and concentration levels. However, not all brainteasers are a walk in the park. In fact, this deceptively difficult jungle-themed puzzle is so tricky that only one per cent of people can actually solve it. Seriously, you'll need a high IQ, great attention to detail, and rapid reaction times to crack this one. READ MORE: You've got eyes of a sniper if you can spot hidden error in family picture The image above depicts an elephant hunter and his gun, but lurking in the very same picture is actually an elephant playing a game of hide and seek. You have just 15 seconds to find the animal - or you can kiss goodbye to that Mensa membership! If time is running out and you're still none the wiser, puzzle enthusiast Hectic Nick, who shared the brainteaser on TikTok, has a handy clue. "It's not easy, but try flipping your phone over and you might be able to find it," he said. Still feeling a little stumped? Don't worry, take your time and ignore the 15-second rule. Or, if you give up completely - scroll down to the bottom of the article to find the answer. If that illusion was no match for a boffin like yourself, don't worry - it's time to ramp things up with yet another tricky puzzle. Below are five seemingly-simple questions that you'd expect to hear down at your local pub quiz. However, all of these questions have been strategically designed to trip you up - so get too cocky and you'll likely fail. You'll need to score five out of five to prove you're a modern day genius. You can check your answers here once you're done. Oh, and you can only spend three seconds on each question - so good luck! How many pairs of animals did Moses take on the Ark? You're in a race and pass the person in 3rd place. So, what place are you in now? John's father had three sons: Snap, Crackle, and...? If a plan crashes right in between France and Spain. Where do you bury the survivors? If it takes seven people seven minutes to eat seven burgers, how long will it take 30 people to eat 30 burgers? ANSWER: Only part of the elephant is visible in the frame. The two towering trees are its legs while the small sapling acts as its trunk. Up for another mental workout? Check out our collection of tricky brainteasers, riddles, and puzzles here. Or, learn more about your hidden personality traits with these mind-boggling optical illusions.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Is ‘princess treatment' a harmless trend – or yet more fuel for misogyny?
Do you wish you were a princess? Do you crave being cosseted and showered with gifts, having every door opened and every chair pulled out? Perhaps you'd rather not pay for your clothes; maybe you're sick of deciding what to eat and where. Courtney Palmer can help. The self-proclaimed housewife princess has a series of TikTok videos on 'princess treatment' and how to get it. It's a matter of accepting compliments graciously, dressing the part, being unapologetically good to yourself (disappointingly, this seems to mean exercising and drinking water) but mostly ministering to your partner, who is treated as a weirdly needy and highly suggestible man-baby. Would-be princesses should create a calm, frictionless domestic paradise for their provider prince, 'speaking in a feminine way – we're not screaming, yelling; we're not cursing', thanking him for picking up his dirty underwear. Princess treatment is the reward and it comes in the form of diamond earrings, Chanel flats, flowers and old-school chivalry. It's emetic and, in a recent TikTok that catapulted Palmer into a more critical spotlight, disturbing. Explaining what princess treatment looks like at a restaurant, Palmer said: 'I do not interact with the waitress; I do not open any doors and I do not order my own food … You do not need to talk unless you are spoken to … You're not going to be laughing loudly, speaking loudly, demanding the attention of the restaurant.' Yikes. Palmer called it 'letting your husband lead and be masculine' and 'a fun princess treatment thing'. Commenters found it cult-like, concerning and bizarre. 'As a former waitress, I would have slipped you a note and asked if you're OK or if I should call the police,' one said. I do wonder how real any of this is. Does 'princess treatment' exist beyond its social-media shop window? Tradwives aren't tradwives, after all – they are content creators, and winding people up with jaw-droppingly regressive gender messaging generates revenue: outrage drives eyeballs and eyeballs mean dollars. Nara Smith, famed for wearing OTT dresses while making her own bubblegum and breakfast cereal, was recently reported by Cosmopolitan to be earning an estimated $200,000 a month on TikTok. Most relationships are nothing like what Palmer presents, or like other pearly-toothed, wholesome TikTok couples who jokily quiz each other on what constitutes princess treatment or a relationship 'bare minimum'. My own husband occasionally gives me 'goose treatment' – a careful wide berth – but our marriage is not a transactional game. Couples of all varieties mostly muddle through, trying to be decent to each other. But Palmer et al are servicing a real aspiration, or at least a relatable fantasy. I get it, kind of – it would be nice if every day were like my birthday (but not nice enough to spend my life cooking and cleaning while wearing broderie anglaise to achieve it). And I suppose that in a time of global turmoil, having a 'provider' can feel like security. But it's the opposite: relinquishing autonomy – bodily, financial, intellectual – leaves women dangerously vulnerable. And this stuff isn't anodyne: it confirms the manosphere's misogynistic assumptions about 'alphas' and 'high-value females', and empowers rollers-back of reproductive rights, reinforcing the idea that it's OK to take decisions on women's behalf (they don't even want to order a side of fries for themselves!). The 'princess' label is pretty accurate. Historically, princesses provided beauty and babies, and were largely powerless; royal marriages were transactional arrangements. And as Hilary Mantel was unfairly criticised for writing about the then-Duchess of Cambridge, princess life is still stultifying, mostly about projecting irreproachable, mute perfection. There's definitely no 'cursing'. Maybe some women enjoy imagining a life of calm, cared-for passivity – but could content at least get more creative? How about 'goddess treatment': demand offerings and sacrifices, keep people on their toes with the prospect of being turned into something nasty? If that's not passive enough, how about 'pet treatment'? Imagine being treated like a house cat: loved unconditionally and lavished with gifts for nothing more than napping, shedding hair, eating, demanding strokes and occasionally lashing out for no reason. If a TikToker could tell me how to get 'cat treatment', I'd definitely like and follow. Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.