Cape Town ratepayers push back against ‘unfair' budget as City promises expanded relief measures
The City of Cape Town has been criticised over their budget plans
Image: Unsplash
As the City of Cape Town prepares to table its 2025/26 municipal budget, the Cape Town Central Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) has accused it of sidelining residential stakeholders and pressing ahead with what they call steep and disproportionate rates hikes—despite a petition signed by over 10,000 residents opposing the move.
CTCRA Chairperson Bas Zuidberg said the public participation process was undermined from the start. 'We requested an extension of 14 days to allow for broader public input, which was denied. To date, we have had no direct engagement with the City—only through ward councillors and the press,' he said.
Zuidberg warned that many residents—particularly those with properties valued between R3 million and R7 million—face increases in the high double-digit percentages, depending on their utility usage. 'What's deeply frustrating is that the City made significant last-minute changes to the draft budget just three days before the deadline for comment, without any explanation or consultation. Ratepayers had no opportunity to respond to the full scope of these changes,' he said.
A major sticking point has been the introduction and structure of fixed service charges, especially the cleaning tariff. 'The City has chosen a paternalistic approach: 'we know what's best for you'. But the reality is that 25% of properties are now paying for 60% of services. That is neither proportional nor fair,' said Zuidberg.
CTCRA argues that alternative revenue options, such as a modest overnight tourist tax, should be explored to offset the need for sharp increases in residential rates. 'The City didn't do its homework. It didn't consider spreading investments over a longer term, or cutting fat in the system before turning to ratepayers for more money,' Zuidberg said.
The association warns that many long-time residents, including pensioners, are now being priced out of their homes. 'People are being told they're living above their means and should simply move. That's not a 'budget of hope' for them,' said Zuidberg.
Civic activist Sandra Dickson, founder of Stop COCT, echoed the frustration. 'The range of increases to our total municipal bills currently ranges from 5–24%. This is multiples of the current inflation rate,' she said. 'The City persists with the four Fixed Charges (two new) without proportionally reducing the consumptive portions of the tariffs.'
'This link to property values to determine Fixed Charges is not a true reflection of the City's costs to provide the services. This budget is a disaster in the making as it is not balanced, it is out of proportion, not linked to inflation and purely designed to extort money from already struggling ratepayers.'
In response to the growing backlash, the City issued a statement outlining upcoming changes to the budget and public participation process.
Mayor of Cape Town, Geordin Hill-Lewis said balancing the national Budget should not come at the expense of municipal infrastructure grants or service delivery allocations.
Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers
'The City of Cape Town will next week table expanded rates relief measures and other changes to the budget. The public will have an opportunity to comment on changes to the City's proposed budget for 2025/26 following the tabling at the City Council's sitting on Wednesday, 28 May. Amendments resulting from the latest National Budget tabled this week will also be adopted before the start of the new financial year."
The public will be able to comment from 28 May to 13 June on proposed changes to the City's Invested in Hope budget for 2025/26.
"Cape Town has tabled a South African-record R40bn infrastructure budget, the widest social relief net of any city, and next week we'll table measures for even further relief on monthly bills, which are already the lowest of SA's cities, despite Cape Town delivering better services and public value compared to other metros.
'We've listened carefully to Capetonians and will propose expanded relief measures to further soften monthly bill increases in addition to the major electricity price relief for all households," the City said.
The City's Mayoral Committee this week considered a report on public participation, including a petition calling for the raising of residential electricity prices instead of a City-wide cleaning charge. Our modelling shows this will negatively impact households and that it is better to pursue other relief measures.
The City said it is also not feasible to phase out critical and urgent infrastructure upgrades as the petition requests.
"Cape Town will not follow the path of decline seen in other cities, and there are no non-urgent major infrastructure projects in our capital budget.
'We've thoroughly examined the budget to find innovative means to further soften the impact on monthly bills and will table these amendments at Council for public comment from 28 May – 13 June. Amendments to commercial tariff structures will also be tabled,' said Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis.'
[email protected]
Weekend Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
New rules mandate energy-efficient motors — a win for SA's strained power grid
As of June 2025, South Africa has activated mandatory regulations that affect a R3-billion industry and will result in annual energy savings of 840 gigawatt hours — enough to power a city the size of Polokwane or approximately 140,000 households for a year. Electric motors might not sound exciting — but they're everywhere. They power conveyor belts in factories, water pumps on farms, fans in cooling systems, and crushers in mines. And as of June 2025, every new motor sold in South Africa will have to meet higher energy efficiency standards. That's because South Africa has officially implemented its Minimum Energy Performance Standards (Meps) for electric motors, bringing the country in line with global standards. The change affects a R3-billion industry, with the goal of saving up to 10% of energy per low voltage motor — which is significant in a country where demand exceeds supply. The new rule requires that most three-phase, low-voltage electric motors sold in South Africa meet IE3 (International Efficiency) standards. Less efficient IE1 and IE2 motors will be phased out over time, as old ones reach their end of life. Regulated by the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications, this shift applies to motors rated between 0.75 kW and 375 kW with two, four, six, or eight poles — the kind you'd find in factories, farms, and commercial buildings. According to the International Energy Agency, electric motors and motor systems are responsible for about 53% of the world's total electricity consumption. And standards like MEPs offer the potential to reduce the energy demand of motor systems by 20 to 30% with short payback periods. Fanie Steyn, Executive of the Electric Motor Division at WEG Africa, a leading motor manufacturer, said that about 250,000 IE1 motors were imported into South Africa each year, representing a R3-billion value chain. Currently, there's a 3:1 ratio of IE1 to IE3 motors entering the country. 'From now, that's all about to change,' said Steyn. Those motors now need to be replaced with IE3 models, which are typically 4 to 10% more efficient. This might not sound like much — but considering that all electric motors account for around 65% of industrial energy use, and industry accounts for about 60% of the country's total energy demand, these efficiency gains are not negligent. 'Electric motors are the prime mover for all industry — almost everything that moves is driven by an electric motor. 'If you go to where a cold drink is bottled, the pump that pumps it, the conveyor that moves the bottles, where bread is made, or where mielies are crushed to make flour — it's all powered by motors,' he said. 'Almost everything that moves is by a motor.' Efficiency standard So starting this year, the new rules will require that all new motors meet the IE3 efficiency standard, which means they use electricity more efficiently and last longer. While the rules don't force businesses to replace existing motors immediately, over time, as older motors wear out, they will be replaced with these more efficient models. Dr Theo Covary, the lead researcher of the cost benefit analysis undertaken to inform these new regulations, estimates that this change will save South Africa 474 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity in the first year alone — enough to power about 44,000 homes for a year. Over the next decade, the savings will add up to 5,763 GWh, roughly the annual electricity use of a major South African city. 'The new IE3 regulation is expected to reduce electricity demand by approximately 0.25% in year one, which is reducing electricity by 0.25% in one year, 'which may seem small and insignificant but is material given the high net economic benefit to the economy', said Covary. The total cumulative energy savings of 5,763 GWh after 10 years is equivalent to the electricity used by Nelson Mandela Bay in one year. This is because as more and more older, less efficient motors reach their end of life and get replaced by more efficient models, the savings increase. In addition to energy savings, this reduction would prevent about 5 million tons of CO₂ emissions. To put this in perspective, offsetting that amount of carbon would require planting spekboom — an indigenous South African plant known for its carbon sequestration ability — over an area of approximately 3,333 square kilometres, which is about twice the size of the Western Cape's Garden Route District. Energy efficiency adds up If you consider that Eskom generated about 200 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in the financial year ending March 2024, the estimated 840 GWh saved (or 0.84 TWh) from this new standard represents 0.25% of the power the country uses in a year. ' It might not sound like much, but believe me — 0.25% is a lot, and it all adds up,' said Chris Yellend, an electrical engineer and energy analyst from Business EE Intelligence. 'It's good that South Africa is following suit and becoming more energy efficient.' He added that energy efficiency measures like this offer the best returns in terms of cost. 'Instead of spending billions on new generation infrastructure, the economy can invest in efficiency — it's a no-brainer. Improving energy efficiency is the most cost-effective way of 'building' new electricity supply. It's not as insignificant as it might seem.' Steyn echoed these sentiments, saying: 'What do you do if you don't have energy? You have to build more power stations, maybe solar or wind farms — but all those options are massive projects with huge capital outlay. And it takes time and long periods of investment and installations before you can do that. 'We have an energy crisis, so in the short term one of the quickest or easiest ways to overcome that is to increase efficiency of products.' Steyn added: 'South Africa has done a phenomenal job over the years with labelling programmes — for fridges, TVs, lights. But now, finally, we're targeting the big energy consumers: electric motors.' According to a 2022 cost-benefit analysis by Covary and economist Linton Reddy of DNA Economics — which informed the regulation — these seemingly small savings are actually substantial, especially given the poor performance of Eskom's generation fleet. Despite the modest efficiency improvements, the long operating hours of motors translate into significant overall savings. To put it into context, Yelland said: 'If you value electricity at around R2.00 per kilowatt-hour, that's a saving — or a reduction in revenue to Eskom — of about R1.68-billion.' Tax breaks and rebates for motor upgrades Companies that upgrade to the new IE3 motors can tap into financial incentives. Zadok Olinga, a former president of the Southern Africa Energy Efficiency Confederation and director of resource management consultancy Oelinga, said the new minimum standards aligned with South Africa's broader push for energy efficiency — and opened the door to claiming Section 12L tax deductions and Eskom rebates. Under Section 12L, businesses can claim 95 cents per kilowatt-hour of verified energy saved as a tax deduction. Eskom also offers a 41c/kWh rebate for projects that cut electricity use — including motor upgrades — as long as minimum savings and demand reduction targets are met. Phase in Manufacturers and Original Equipment Manufacturers can still sell off their existing IE1 and IE2 stock until May 2026. End-users — such as factories or farms — aren't required to immediately replace older motors, but must buy energy-efficient ones when they do. 'Motors are built to last around 20 years,' said Van Niekerk from WEG.'But in reality, many reach end-of-life within seven to 10 years, especially in demanding environments.' For businesses that run motors 24/7, the higher upfront cost of an IE3 motor is often recovered in a matter of months through lower electricity bills. For others — say, a bakery or a workshop that runs motors eight hours a day — the payback period might be two to three years. DM
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
eThekwini Municipality has five-day deadline to pay R53 million to company after dismissed Concourt case
The eThekwini Municipality will have to pay R53 million to a company after a contractual dispute. Image: File Picture: KHAYA NGWENYA Independent Newspapers The eThekwini Municipality has been given five days to pay R53 million to a service provider or face having its assets attached by the Sheriff of the Court. Lawyers representing the service provider, Daily Double Trading, have stated they will not tolerate any further delays in this matter. This situation follows the Constitutional Court's dismissal of the municipality's application for leave to appeal. The city is embroiled in a protracted battle with Daily Double Trading 479, trading as Pholobas Projects. At the centre of the dispute is an agreement reached between representatives of the City and those of the company. The company was contracted to do work for the City however the municipality decided to terminate the contract. When the company challenged the cancellation of the contract in court, an out of court settlement was struck. In terms of the agreement, which was dealt with by a lawyer representing the City, the company would be paid R30 million. However, the City later disowned the agreement, arguing that the lawyer had no authority to enter into such an agreement on its behalf. The municipality fought the matter in court and lost; its final appeal to seek the right to appeal the earlier judgments was denied by the Constitutional Court. The City now finds itself obligated to pay the original R30 million plus millions of rand in interest. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Anusha Ganas, the attorney for Daily Double Trading, said the Constitutional Court has brought finality to the dispute that has dragged on since 2018. 'The current amount owed is now R53 million.' A letter of demand sent to the municipality stated, 'The said calculation is as per the judgment of Pitman AJ amounting to a total sum due of R53,120,136.99. You will further note from the schedule that the increase escalates currently at the amount of R8,630.14 per day. 'We demand on behalf of our client that your client immediately effects payment of the total within five calendar days from the date hereof. Kindly ensure that this payment also provides for the additional daily interest accruing from 6 June 2025 to the date of payment. We reiterate that our client will not permit any further dilatory steps to delay justice. 'Should your client not effect payment into our trust bank account within the stated period, the Sheriff of the High Court will be instructed to immediately attach and remove assets to the value of the amount specified,' the letter concluded. Councillors in the City have urged the municipality to comply with the court judgment and pay the service provider. DA councillor Thabani Mthethwa stated: 'It is very unfortunate that the municipality has had to incur that expenditure. We encourage the mayor to table the report. We urge the municipality to comply with the court order while the council addresses the internal matters. We will have to review the court judgments and assess the reasons that led the judges to reach their decision, and we will determine if anyone should be held accountable for this. It is very unfortunate that the ratepayers will now have to bear the cost of this fruitless and wasteful expenditure.' IFP councillor Mdu Nkosi stated that the city has no option but to comply with the judgment. 'We believe that we will be called by the mayor soon to engage us on this matter. Remember that the decision to challenge the matter in court was taken; the officials briefed us on their reasons at the time. But seeing that the judgment has been issued in this manner, we now have to engage with them again. This judgment is coming from the Constitutional Court; there is no other court beyond this one, so the council has to comply. What is very painful is that ratepayers' money will now be spent on this matter,' Nkosi said.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
EThekwini Mayor urged to take action against top city official after Concourt ruling
EThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba has received a legal letter, urging him to act against City Manager Musa Mbhele. Image: Thuli Dlamini / eThekwini Municipality Pressure is mounting on eThekwini Municipality mayor Cyril Xaba to act against the City Manager Musa Mbhele following the Constitutional Court's dismissal of the City's appeal to overturn a lower order, which ruled that it must pay a service provider R30 million for the work the company had done. On Wednesday, the Constitutional Court dismissed the City's leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal's decision after that court in February also upheld the earlier Durban High Court's ruling that the City must pay the service provider. The City is also expected to fork out more than R20 million in interest as the debt has accumulated interest since the high court ruling in 2022. The City also incurred legal fees as the appeal was dismissed with costs - now the case has drawn the attention of a former deputy city manager who was charged with misconduct after the city incurred legal costs in a separate matter. On Thursday, Sibusiso Makhanya instructed his law firm, Macgregor Erasmus Attorneys INC to write a letter of demand to the mayor to table the letter to the council within seven days. Makhanya, then the deputy city manager for trading services had been charged for misconduct for causing the City to incur R6 million in interest after it was taken to court by a service provider had not been paid R63.5 million. The City blamed Makhanya for failing to respond to emails from the Chief Financial Officer as there were allegations that the service provider had overcharged the City. The City argued that had Makhanya cooperated, the municipality would have avoided the R6 million in interest. Makhanya eventually left his job. Through his lawyers, Makhanya is now demanding that City management need to be consistent and hold Mbhele accountable for the cost the City will incur as a result of this week's Constitutional Court ruling. 'We brought to your attention then, as we do now, that one of the issues our client raised at his disciplinary hearing was the inconsistent application of the disciplinary code vis a vie himself and Mbhele. Mbhele was the person responsible for eThekwini having the default judgment granted against it and therefore incurring wasteful expenditure. "No further indulgences or communications will be forthcoming from our client and should you fail to act as you are obliged to, then we hold instructions to approach an appropriate forum for the necessary relief,' concludes the letter. Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi has joined calls for the mayor to act against officials responsible for the costs. In a statement the MEC called on the City to recover the money from officials that were responsible for the loss. In a short response, the City's spokesperson Gugu Sisilana said the municipality has accepted the court order, however, the mayor is yet to respond to the calls for action against for those responsible. Mbhele declined to discussing the letter of demand and referred questions to the mayor's office. [email protected]
