At last – mineral sunscreens that don't make you look like a ghost
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
But all this goodness comes with a short but significant cons list: minerals are heavier, greasier and leave a trace, ranging from a fine, chalky veil to a ghostly white cast. It isn't pleasant for anyone, but is particularly intolerable on deeper skin tones.
Nowhere near as many consumers enjoy using mineral sunscreen as they do modern, light, fluid, invisible synthetic alternatives, and I don't blame them. But they now have cause to reconsider. Ultra Violette's Future Fluid SPF50+ (£38) is, without question, the best mineral sunscreen I've ever used.
It's unlike any I've tested before and is damn near perfect. It has a light, fluid texture that, while dewy and moisturising, is without the suffocating feel of traditional minerals (and thanks to the use of the somehow ungreasy oil squalane, it's suitable for combination and moderately oily skins). It's fragrance-free, and gentle enough for me to use all around my eyes – no stinging, itching or streaming. But best of all, it is almost clear, leaving zero white cast, even when applied lavishly enough that I can skip moisturiser altogether.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
It is a feat of product development that has essentially delivered a mineral sunscreen for people who hate mineral sunscreens, and further fuelled my belief that the best SPFs in the world are now Australian.
That said, US teen brand Bubble is also upping the mineral SPF game. Its Solar Mate Daily Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 (£19) is designed for adolescents but can be used by anyone and is very good. It's a tad heavier than the Ultra Violette, but comfortable and ungreasy, and although the cream is near-opaque, it sheers out almost imperceptibly. This pump dispensing tube is great for keeping in your handbag and well priced for a mineral.
Kate Somerville's new HydraKate Illuminating SPF50+ Drops (£39) are also very impressive, giving visible glow without the telltale floury tinge and leaving skin well hydrated and ready to accept makeup.
I can't help feeling that mineral sunscreens are about to change for ever. It's about time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
'Failings' in care for cricket legend in the months before he took his own life
There were 'failings' in the care for former England cricketer Graham Thorpe in the months before he took his own life, a coroner has said. The 55-year-oldwas not seen by care professionals in person for over four months, despite them knowing that Thorpe was 'constantly asking for help to end his life'. The cricket star died on the morning of August 4, 2024, after being struck by a train at a railway station in Surrey. Coroner Jonathan Stevens recorded a conclusion of suicide at the inquest but said there had been 'shortcomings' in Thorpe's care. Thorpe 'spiralled into depression' after losing his job as a batting coach in 2022 and had tried to take his own life on another occasion. The coroner said the cricketer was last seen by healthcare professionals in person on March 26, 2024. He missed an appointment with the community mental health team on June 28 that year. That is when the care coordinator, Katie Johnson, spoke to Thorpe's wife Amanda, who reported that her husband was 'constantly asking for help to end his life'. Thorpe later told Johnson himself that he 'didn't see the point of being here' but did not plan on acting on suicidal thoughts. The coroner said 'someone should have gone to see' the 55-year-old to assess him after it was clear he 'found it hard to attend' appointments offered to him. 'Come see me in two weeks' was 'not an appropriate response,' he added. Stevens said that 'protective measures' should have been introduced in June 2024, similar to when Thorpe was given in-patient treatment over suicidal thoughts in May 2023. The inquest heard that those responsible for Thorpe's care judged he was in a 'crisis situation' after learning he had asked his wife 'for help to end his life'. The coroner rejected that, saying: 'I don't accept that when Graham was constantly asking his wife to help him end his life, which was a new presentation… that he was not at that point in crisis.' Stevens added: 'In my judgment there were shortcomings in the care that should have been provided to Graham in the last four months or so of his life.' However the coroner said the evidence did not point to the 'failings' in Thorpe's care being gross, so could not conclude Thorpe would not have died if not for the failings. He added there was no evidence for a finding of neglect. Thorpe's family said they hope the coroner will 'address concerns' regarding the cricketer's care before his death. Their representative said they hope coroner will address the 'shortcomings' so that such a loss 'never happens again'. Thorpe's wife Amanda spoke outside Surrey Coroner's Court with a message to the loved ones of others who struggle with their mental health. She said: 'Reach out for help, and you are not alone. There is help out there. Keep going. Things will get better.' More Trending The inquest heard previously that a leaked video of Tasmanian police breaking up a drinking session between England and Australian cricket players in 2022 was 'blown out of all proportion' and the fallout left Graham 'distraught'. Amanda said it was a 'horrible' time, and the later termination of his employment with the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) was 'the 'start of the decline of his mental health'. Thorpe was a mainstay in the England set-up for many years, first as a batter between 1993 and 2005 before spending 12 years in coaching roles. During a distinguished international career, he struck 16 Test hundreds for England, including a debut century against Australia at Trent Bridge in 1993, and represented his country 182 times in all formats. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Coroner rules what really happened to Jay Slater when he died in Tenerife MORE: Ashes drinking video leak caused Graham Thorpe to 'spiral into depression' MORE: Ben Stokes is the leading man as classic England v India Test series produces compelling drama
Times
3 days ago
- Times
How much do NHS doctors really earn? Here are the facts
Any British tourists unfortunate enough to be admitted to hospital in Australia will find themselves comforted by the sound of familiar accents. Thousands of doctors have fled the NHS for life down under in recent years, lured by the promise of better pay and year-round sunshine, meaning Brits outnumber Australian doctors on some wards. The British Medical Association has warned Wes Streeting that without action to improve pay and working conditions this exodus of doctors from the UK will continue. Last year a survey by the General Medical Council (GMC) found that more than one in ten NHS doctors were planning to move abroad in the next 12 months. Australia is by far the most popular destination, favoured by half, followed by Canada, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. • Who is on the BMA committee behind junior doctors' strike? While they will definitely get more sunshine, can resident doctors — formerly known as junior doctors — really expect to earn more if they leave the NHS for the other side of the world? According to BMA figures, a resident doctor in the NHS who is fresh out of medical school earns a base salary of £36,616. With overtime and on-call shifts, this rises to about £45,000. Doctors earn more the greater their experience: a second-year doctor starts on a salary of £42,008, while resident doctors with several years' experience earn £70,425 — again, topped up by evenings and weekends. A first-year doctor in Australia earns about £47,530, according to the BMA's calculations. The most highly qualified resident doctors in Australia earn £83,532 — 23 per cent higher than they could earn in the NHS. • Loosening strike rules could cause havoc for employers However, while English doctors are worse off in take-home pay than Australians, those working in the NHS have much more generous pensions. Doctors receive a 23.7 per cent pension contribution from the NHS. They are among the few workers who still have salary-linked defined benefit pensions, which pay a guaranteed and inflation-proof income. These pensions are often worth about 75 per cent of doctors' salaries in retirement. Someone who started as a foundation doctor (their first year of training after medical school) eight years ago, when the basic salary was £27,146, will have already built up a guaranteed annual pension income of £8,084, according to the wealth manager Quilter, which is significantly more generous than private sector equivalents. Medicine is a career path where you can quickly progress onto a higher salary. After going through specialty training — which takes about six years — and qualifying as a consultant, doctors earn a basic salary starting at £109,725. The latest NHS figures show the average consultant in the NHS earns £145,000 a year. • Why furious health bosses are braced for painful battle with BMA If doctors opt to become a GP, they earn an average of £140,200 as a GP partner, and £69,200 as a salaried GP. The Nuffield Trust shows that progression means doctors' pay rapidly escalates, despite real-terms cuts in base salaries. A report by the think tank said: 'The trend in average salaries for resident doctors does not reflect the experience of individuals, whose pay will also typically benefit from career progression. 'As a way to demonstrate this, if a newly qualified first-year foundation doctor in 2017 (with a starting salary of £26,614) continued straight through to core/specialty training then their pay would have nearly doubled to £50,017 within four years, representing a 75 per cent real-terms increase. Within eight years, by 2025, their basic salary could have been over four times higher (£109,725), or more than doubled (211 per cent) in real terms.' Senior doctors are among the best paid workers in Britain. 'Specialty registrars' average NHS earnings were higher than the salaries of nearly nine in ten of the wider workforce, while GP partner and consultants' NHS earnings sat between the 98th and 99th percentiles,' the Nuffield Trust report said. However, the BMA argues that consultant pay on the NHS is still significantly below other countries, including the Republic of Ireland, meaning consultants are moving abroad for better pay.
Metro
4 days ago
- Metro
Just 7,000 steps a day could be enough to improve your health
Hiyah Zaidi Published July 24, 2025 11:30am Link is copied Comments Think 10,000 steps is too much? Try 7,000 steps a day instead, as new research has suggested that could be enough to boost your brainpower and help protect against a range of different diseases, such as heart disease, dementia, depression and cancer. The target of 10,000 steps a day is thought to have begun as a campaign promoting pedometers in Japan, however research has suggested it could do some good for your health, too. So, what is recommended by experts? (Picture: Getty) The NHS recommends a brisk 10-minute walk a day, which they say has a lot of health benefits. However, the World Health Organisation says we need at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week (2 hours 30 minutes) or 75 minutes (one hour 15 minutes) of vigorous intensity activity a week, which should at least be spread evenly over 4 to 5 days a week. So, 7,000 steps a day may be a realistic and manageable way of hitting those targets and getting the health benefits of walking. Plus, it's free (Picture: Getty) The researchers looked at data from more than 160,000 adults from 57 studies conducted between 2014 to 2025. This type of study is known as a meta-analysis, which analyses different studies to come to an overall conclusion about a topic. The studies were conducted in more than 10 countries, including Australia, UK, US and Japan. The aim was to look at the impact that different daily step counts have on the chance of dying from cardiovascular disease and cancer, as well as the chance of developing diseases such as cancer, type 2 diabetes, dementia and depression (Picture: Getty) The researchers found that walking 7,000 steps a day, compared to just 2,000 steps, reduced the risk of death by 47%, which was almost the same benefit as walking 10,000 steps per day. They also found that dementia risk dropped by 38% from walking 7,000 steps a day, and a further 7% from walking 10,000 steps. Risk of type 2 diabetes fell by 22% from walking 10,000 steps a day and reduced to 27% at 12,000 steps. Compared to walking 2,000 steps a day, 7,000 steps reduced the risk of cancer by 6% and depression by 22% (Picture: Getty) Lead author Professor Melody Ding said: 'Aiming for 7,000 steps is a realistic goal based on our findings, which assessed health outcomes in a range of areas that hadn't been looked at before. However, for those who cannot yet achieve 7,000 steps a day, even small increases in step counts, such as increasing from 2000 to 4000 steps a day, are associated with significant health gain. We know daily step count is linked to living longer, but we now also have evidence that walking at least 7,000 steps a day can significantly improve eight major health outcomes - including reducing risk of cardiovascular disease, dementia and depressive symptoms' (Picture: Getty) Now, the researchers are working with the Australian government to use the evidence from this study to inform future updates to physical activity guidelines. Professor Ding said: 'Our research helps to shift the focus from perfection to progress. Even small increases in daily movement can lead to meaningful health improvements.' Experts are calling for future studies to explore how step goals should vary based on age, health status and region, and to include diverse populations and longer-term data to strengthen the evidence (Picture: Getty) This obviously depends on how fast you walk. According to if you walk at an average speed of 3.2mph, or 5.1 km/h, which is around the average speed people walk, 7,000 steps should take around 1 hour and 4 minutes. Someone a little slower, at 2.5 mph will take around 1 hour and 21 minutes, and someone faster who walks at 4mph will take around 50 minutes (Picture: Getty) Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
