logo
Promise of ‘a little rebate' suddenly becomes Trump's latest gimmick to distract Americans from the Epstein fallout

Promise of ‘a little rebate' suddenly becomes Trump's latest gimmick to distract Americans from the Epstein fallout

Yahoo7 days ago
In the months after the 2024 presidential election — and understanding what happened with Latino voters and why they shifted to Donald Trump — I called a Democratic operative in Webb County, right in the heart of the Rio Grande Valley of Texas.
She told told me that when asking why one voter would back the once and future president, put simply, the voter told them in Spanish, 'I voted for Trump because he's going to give me money.'
Famously, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, Trump signed an economic rescue package that included a $1,200 check. Moreover, Trump sent letters telling people he was the person responsible for it.
For many working-class families, the stimulus checks were a lifeline and Trump's approval rating slightly ticked up after sending out the checks, even as he would proceed to make careless mistakes that caused unnecessary deaths in the midst of the pandemic.
That conversation came to mind when on Friday, Trump suddenly floated the idea of sending out 'a little rebate' to Americans.
'We're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt, but we're thinking about a rebate,' he told a reporter before boarding Marine One on his way to a five-day trip to Scotland.
'We're thinking about a rebate because we have so much money coming in from tariffs, that a little rebate for people of a certain income level might be very nice.'
Unsurprisingly, Trump's comments come when voters are souring on the president. On Friday, as he departed, he vehemently denied that he visited the late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein's island. During that same gaggle, he said that he could pardon Epstein's convicted accomplice and occasional girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.
Fewer than 30 percent of independents approve of him, according to a new Gallup poll and he has an overall approval rating of 37 percent. His approval among men, a central part of his 2024 victory, now sits below 50 percent.
And no matter how much he tries to deflect, blame the Democrats for 'the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM,' he has been unable to escape the stench of it. Trump has denied any knowledge of Epstein's wrongdoing and crimes, whihc came to light after he had a falling out with the financier and ended their friendship.
This week, House Speaker Mike Johnson had to dismiss the chamber a day early for the summer recess to prevent enough MAGA Republicans from teaming up with the Democrats to sign a discharge petition to force a vote to release the Epstein files.
Even some of Trump's most devoted supporters like Reps. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Nancy Mace of South Carolina joined with Democrats in a subcommittee to subpoena the Department of Justice to hand over documents related to Epstein.
In the Senate, Democrats smell blood in the water, as Sens. Cory Booker of New Jersey and Ruben Gallego of Arizona attempted to force the release of files related to Epstein. Both men obviously see themselves as potential Oval Office occupants and see this as an opportunity to gain points with the base and the American public.
Manosphere podcasters like Theo Von and Andrew Schulz's Flagrant with Akaash Singh who played a key role with non-college educated sports-loving dudes breaking for Trump are turning on him.
But this will likely not happen for a number of reasons. For one, the stimulus checks in 2020 came during a once-in-a-century pandemic that required people to stay home and therefore lose their jobs. The checks made sure people had enough to meet their basic needs while keeping demand steady enough.
Pumping money into the economy now when unemployment is relatively low — and Trump frequently touts how 'hot' the country is right now — would do nothing but overheat the economy, drive up demand and cause inflation to spike, the very formula that killed killed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris' White House runs and allowed Trump to return to Washington.
This is to say nothing of his desite for the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, which could drive up inflation and his 'reciprocal tariffs.'
None of that matters though, Trump is trying to rekindle the same tricks that helped him in the past. It's the same rationale for Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's saying that Barack Obama staged a 'coup' and his rage against Joe Biden's autopen. Trump is in a position of his own creation and trying to dig himself out with the old tricks.
But this time it might not work. Even now, some people might take his stimulus checks and then still not like him. After all, that happened in 2020.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas GOP's new map would move Rep. Crockett's home out of her district, slash Dem seats
Texas GOP's new map would move Rep. Crockett's home out of her district, slash Dem seats

Fox News

time15 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Texas GOP's new map would move Rep. Crockett's home out of her district, slash Dem seats

A gerrymandered map proposed by the Texas GOP would kick firebrand Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett out of her own district and likely add more House seats to the Lone Star's Republican delegation. Last week, Texas House Republicans introduced a redistricting proposal that could net five new GOP seats. The draft congressional map, which is likely to change before approval by both state legislative chambers, aims to redraw district lines to include more Republican-leaning areas in Democratic strongholds like Dallas and Houston. Crockett, who serves Texas's 30th Congressional District, which represents a large part of Dallas, has called the redistricting effort "a power grab to silence voters." She has claims that before Republicans unveiled the map, she was asked to verify her address alongside other incumbent Democrat members of Congress. The rare mid-decade redistricting effort may also force some Democratic lawmakers into primary battles against fellow incumbents as seats become more limited. For example, if the map were adopted, Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who currently represents Texas' 37th Congressional District in the Austin area, would be placed in the same district as Rep. Greg Casar, who serves the neighboring 35th District, also anchored in Austin. Last week, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries called fighting the proposed map an "all-hands-on-deck moment." "We will fight them politically. We will fight them governmentally. We will fight them in court. We will fight them in terms of winning the hearts and minds of the people of Texas and beyond," Jeffries said last week during a press conference in Austin. Jeffries said that while corporations and universities fall in line with Trump, "Texas Democrats will not bend the knee." Standing alongside Jeffries, Texas Democratic Rep. Lizzie Fletcher warned that redistricting efforts like those in the Lone Star State could spread nationwide as part of a broader push to bolster Republican power. "People across the country are watching what we are doing in Texas," Fletcher said.

Hitler's Germany, Netanyahu's Israel, Trump's America: Terrifying parallels
Hitler's Germany, Netanyahu's Israel, Trump's America: Terrifying parallels

News24

time27 minutes ago

  • News24

Hitler's Germany, Netanyahu's Israel, Trump's America: Terrifying parallels

History, when forgotten or distorted, often returns – not as memory but as repetition. The dehumanising machinery of fascist regimes begins not in death camps, but in the use of denigrating, inflammatory language. In Nazi Germany, it began with the labelling of Jews, Roma (Gypsies) and other non-Aryans as 'Ausländers' – outsiders, unworthy of national inclusion. In 21st-century America, President Donald Trump's labelling of black and brown immigrants as 'illegals', 'animals' and 'invaders' echoes this extremely dangerous rhetoric. These parallels demand not only remembrance but immediate action. The use of language in pursuing an agenda of exclusion and oppression is more than adequately defined by Professor Edward Said in his book Covering Islam. In Adolf Hitler's Germany, for example, the SS (Schutzstaffel) was a feared state paramilitary apparatus responsible for enforcing racial purity, rounding up Jews in particular, and orchestrating deportations and genocide. Their targets were first demonised through massive propaganda campaigns, as Iran is today, then criminalised through law and finally liquidated under state policy. In modern-day America, immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) has similarly operated as a tool of ideological enforcement. Under the Trump administration, ICE raids are tearing through communities, workplaces, schools and homes. Immigrants, many of them long-time residents, workers and parents, are being detained and jailed in substandard conditions, herded on to flights in handcuffs, and deported without due process. Jeenah Moon / Reuters The comparison lies not in methods of extermination in this instance, but in the political and legal mechanisms of dehumanisation. The SS was, and now ICE is, empowered by legislation, normalised by political rhetoric by supposedly sane legislators and sustained by a large part of mainly white society willing to turn away from this reality. In occupied Palestine, we continue to witness a third iteration of the Ausländer doctrine. Zionist Israeli propaganda continues to cast Palestinians, especially in Gaza, as an alien threat to the Jewish state. Under the pretext of defence and divine entitlement, Israel has destroyed homes, restricted movement, detained children and killed thousands of civilians in operations that bear a stark resemblance to collective punishment. READ: Netanyahu slams French proposal to recognise Palestinian state as 'launch pad to annihilate Israel' The ongoing siege and massacre of innocents in Gaza – and now the terror on civilians in the West Bank – is not a spontaneous response to violence; it is a systematised policy of domination and de-Arabisation designed as Plan Dalet by David Ben Gurion in 1947/8. Just as Hitler used the language of 'lebensraum' (living room) to justify expansion, Zionism invokes biblical claims to deny Palestinian sovereignty and existence. Palestinians are vilified in the media, denied the right of return, labelled 'terrorists' by default and kept in ghettos behind walls. The echoes of Jewish suffering in Europe should not have been a shield for Israeli policy. It should have been a cautionary tale – a lesson to be learnt and not to be repeated. During Hitler's rise, many ordinary Germans supported or tolerated discriminatory policies. Anti-Jewish laws were passed with little opposition. When the trains to Auschwitz ran, the silence of the public enabled genocide – as is the silence or complicity of most 'civilised' western nations and Arab oligarchs seeking to protect and enhance their control of resource-rich nations. In the US today, congressional support for anti-immigrant enforcement has bipartisan roots. Approved budgets are funding mass deportations, detention camps and border militarisation. While outrage flares on social media, legislative support for these actions continues unabated. An ever-growing military machine continues to get billions more to remain the chief hegemon – a deeply debt-ridden 'superpower'. Even more disturbing is how many American Jews, who once experienced the sharp edge of exclusion and extermination, now back a state that echoes those same exclusionary ideologies driven by powerful lobby groups – chief among which is the well-funded American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Support for Zionist aggression in Gaza and the West Bank often comes from precisely those people whose ancestors were themselves cast as outsiders. What ties these histories together is the dangerous process of labelling human beings as others. Whether called 'Ausländers', 'illegals' or 'threats', the language opens the door to policies that strip people of dignity, rights and, ultimately, life. The lesson is not that all oppressors are the same, but that the structure of oppression is terrifyingly repeatable. Refusing to see these signs opens the doors to allow the cycle to continue. If state violence is excused based on race, religion or national identity, this legitimises the very ideologies once condemned. ICE is not the SS. Gaza is not Auschwitz. But the immoral architecture, use of fear, division and silence are very familiar and concerning. The question is not whether history is repeating itself. The question is whether the world is brave enough to stop it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store