Trump targeted this museum. Many visitors question why.
Advertisement
'African Americans are a part of American history,' Bri'Anne Wright, a 35-year-old from California, said after exploring the museum with her mother. 'There's no way this is anti-American if it's showing everything we've been through and what our nation is founded on.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'How is it divisive to educate people on what happened?' Leisa Stoeckert, 56, said. 'This is a long neglected part of history.'
Maggie Wright and Bri'Anne Wright at the African American Museum in Washington on Saturday.
Shedrick Pelt/For The Washington Post
Trump's executive order, which has drawn widespread condemnation from Democrats, claims that the Smithsonian had in recent years promoted narratives that portray American values as 'harmful and oppressive.' It directs Vice President JD Vance to eliminate what he finds 'improper' from the Smithsonian Institution, including its museums, education and research centers, and the National Zoo.
'Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn - not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history,' it states.
While the order attacked the Smithsonian Institution broadly, it also singled out the National Museum of African American History and Culture for a post it made nearly five years ago.
In 2020, the museum posted an infographic on the education section of its website, listing 'aspects and assumptions about white culture.' The traits included 'rugged individualism,' hard work, respect of authority and 'the nuclear family.'
After conservatives such as Ben Shapiro and Donald Trump Jr. criticized the post on social media, the museum released a statement apologizing for the chart and removed it. The chart, or any references to it, does not seem to appear in the physical museum or its website today.
Advertisement
Several of the museum's visitors on Saturday had never heard about the infographic and pushed back against the idea that the museum perpetuated anti-American ideology.
Jonah Gutterman, right, and his parents outside the African American Museum on Saturday.
Shedrick Pelt/For The Washington Post
Jonah Gutterman, a 22-year-old American University student, had been to the museum a handful of times before and wanted to share the experience with his parents, who were visiting from New Jersey for the National Cherry Blossom Festival. The family spent most of their time in the museum's lowest level,
which
focuses on the history of slavery. Gutterman said that he appreciated learning about aspects of American history that weren't emphasized in his public school curriculum.
'I actually think it's incredible to look at these exhibits and see how far we've come as a society and progressed,' Gutterman said. 'But I think trying to censor or prevent people from seeing certain material, I think, can be super harmful and is not a good path to go down.'
A handful of museumgoers discussed the executive order as they perused the exhibits, but the vast majority - like old co-workers-turned-friends Arnetta Farrow, 74, and Elise Jackson, 60 - were cherry blossom tourists with no knowledge of the controversy. The former flight attendants flew from Chicago to D.C. to witness the nation's capital in bloom and decided to grab tickets inside the museum, a place that the two Black women had visited twice before. They learned of the executive order at the museum Saturday and reacted with dismay.
Advertisement
Derrick Braxton outside the African American Museum on Saturday.
Shedrick Pelt/For The Washington Post
Jackson immediately texted a group of fellow Black women the news, writing: 'This is a place where I can come to enjoy learning and reminiscing about my heritage.'
'That museum is a very special place for EVERYONE to learn about our history!!! HE BETTER NOT TOUCH IT!!!' one of her friends responded, referring to Trump.
When the National Museum of African American History and Culture opened in 2016, it was heralded as a 'dream come true' by those who spent years fighting for its existence. Advocates and lawmakers had spent more than a hundred years trying to establish Washington's first museum dedicated to African American history and culture before President George W. Bush signed a bill in 2003 authorizing the museum.
The museum is now one of the Smithsonian's most popular attractions, according to data from the institution, with more than 12 million visitors since it opened in September 2016. As one of the smaller museums on the mall, it's the only attraction to require timed-entry tickets due to high demand.
The scene on Saturday.
Shedrick Pelt/For The Washington Post
Trump's edict marks his latest attempt to mold Washington's cultural life, following his decision last month to purge the Kennedy Center board of his predecessor's appointees and install himself as chairman. Some at the museum Saturday were uncertain what increased government oversight of the museum would look like.
'What oversight can you have over it now?' Derrick Braxton, 35, said outside the museum Saturday. 'You've had millions of people come in and out of this building. The knowledge you're trying to contain and put back in the ground is already out there.'
Many Black visitors said the museum, which highlights the discrepancy between the freedom promised in America's founding and the injustices African Americans have faced for centuries, felt especially important to protect. Mother-daughter duo Maggie and Bri'Anne Wright said they left the museum reflecting on their heritage - both the parts they celebrate today and the parts that have been lost over the years.
Advertisement
'I feel like as a Black American,' Maggie Wright said, 'you erased enough already.'
A display inside the National Museum of African Art.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
6 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised
Donald Trump touts 55% tariffs and rare earth supply in pending China deal By News Desk Published on June 11, 2025, 17:56 IST Last updated June 11, 2025, 17:57 IST Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday announced via social media that a new deal with China has been reached, pending final approval from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to Trump, the agreement includes upfront Chinese supply of 'full magnets' and 'any necessary rare earths' to the U.S. In return, the U.S. will uphold previously agreed terms, which Trump said include allowing Chinese students to continue studying at American colleges and universities — a relationship he described as 'always been good with me!' Trump emphasized that under the new deal, the U.S. will receive a combined total of 55% in tariffs, while China will get 10%. 'Relationship is excellent!' Trump declared in the post, adding thanks for attention to the matter. The post, shared on June 11, 2025, at 8:04 AM, comes amid ongoing geopolitical and trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. No official confirmation has yet been released by Chinese authorities or the U.S. State Department. News desk at
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump
Elon Musk went into damage-control mode early Wednesday as he tried to mend fences with President Donald Trump after their spectacular falling-out last week. And his critics are mocking his public show of fealty on his own platform. Musk spent some $291 million during the 2024 election cycle, most notably to help Trump, according to and became a constant presence by his side. Once in office, Trump put Musk in charge of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency to cut government spending. But Musk left his role, attacked Trump's signature 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination,' and went scorched-earth against his one-time ally in a series of posts on X last week. Musk wrote that Trump won't release the files of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because the president is named in them, shared a post in support of impeaching Trump and replacing him with Vice President JD Vance, and floated the creation of a third political party. Trump, in turn, threatened repercussions for Musk's businesses and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats for office. But Musk blinked on Wednesday. He wrote that he regretted some of his posts about Trump and said some of them 'went too far.' He also deleted many of those messages. His critics fired back: 'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk Trump Mocked After Suffering Awkward Brain Fart While Trying To Insult Biden
Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says
The chairman of a key Senate panel is claiming victory against former President Joe Biden's student loan plans as part of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill." "The Biden administration was attempting to forgive student loans for people who willingly took on the loan and required the taxpayer, including people who never went to college and would never make what the person who took the loan would ever have the hope to make," Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, R-La., told Fox News Digital. "So we end that transfer of that student loan on the taxpayers, and that's probably our biggest savings." Cassidy's committee released its portion of the Trump agenda bill late on Tuesday. A press release for the legislation said it "ends Biden's student loan schemes that transfer debt onto the 87 percent of Americans who chose to not go to college or already paid off their loans" and "also prevents future Democrat administrations from implementing schemes." The bill specifically takes aim at Biden's expansion of Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations and Closed School Discharge regulations, which Republicans have held up as costly policies that shift federal student loan borrowers' burdens onto other taxpayers. Various versions of Biden's plans had previously been struck down in court. The bill would also eliminate federal Grad PLUS loans, a program used by graduate-level and professional students to pay for their studies, which can be used for graduate students' entire cost of attendance. It would instead keep in place a $20,500 annual limit for Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loans on graduate degrees, capped at $100,000 total, excluding undergraduate loans. For professional degrees, it keeps a $50,000 annual unsubsidized loan limit and a $200,000 total cap. The legislation is also aimed at cracking down on taxpayer funding subsidizing degrees from lower-performing universities. Colleges that see people with undergraduate degrees earn less than the typical high school graduate in their state, or graduate programs where attendees then earn less than the normal bachelor's recipient, would be blocked from federal student loan programs. "What we've got was a situation where people can borrow more money than they can effectively pay back, and that destroys their life, leaving them with a debt burden which keeps them unable to do other things in life. And there's at least some sense that universities offering these programs know that's the case. And so we attempt to fix that," Cassidy said. "So we have provisions that would say that if the degree being acquired does not end up paying more, the person receiving that degree doesn't get more on average than a person who did not get that degree, then the federal government is not going to lend them money." To encourage more people to pursue non-collegiate degrees, the bill would also establish a Workforce Pell Grant. Pell Grants are currently aimed at low-income students pursuing bachelor's degrees and are generally not repaid. "For example, a student gets a commercial driver's license. They're going to go out and make $100,000 a year after a couple of years of driving, I am told. And so we want to enable those people to accomplish that," Cassidy said. Foreign income would be taken into account when evaluating Pell Grants, while farm and small business assets would not, under the GOP bill. Those and several other measures in the legislation would add up to roughly $300 billion in taxpayer savings, Cassidy said. Senate Republicans are currently working through their version of Trump's massive agenda bill, which passed the House late last month. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to pass a sweeping bill advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt. They are also working to use it to bring down the national debt – nearing $37 trillion – with the aim of cutting $1.5 trillion in federal spending. Reconciliation allows the party in power to completely skirt the minority, in this case Democrats, by lowering the Senate's threshold to advance from 60 votes to 51. The legislation must adhere to a specific set of rules, however, including measures that deal with the budget, taxation, or the national debt. Both the House and Senate must agree to identical versions of the bill before it gets to Trump's desk for a signature. The House's version passed 215 to 214, and leaders there have implored the upper chamber to change as little as possible. Cassidy acknowledged there were some changes made but was optimistic about how they'll be met in the House. "There's several things, but one thing I think that they're going to like is that we do fully fund the Pell Grant program. You know, we address the shortfall there. And so I think they're going to like it," he said. "It's going to give low-income students access to career education. We need those kind of career type jobs to make sure that all this manufacturing and construction has a workforce to address it. And so we think it helps the needs of society. We think it helps the needs of the student." House and Senate GOP leaders had previously set a goal of having a bill on Trump's desk by the Fourth of July. Cassidy declined to comment on whether that was a feasible benchmark but argued that lawmakers should be ready to extend that timeline – and possibly shrink their summer recess – to get the final product. "As far as I'm concerned, the most important thing is to get it right. So if there is a delay, the president said it today – if there is a delay, that's not that big of a deal. The most important thing is we get it right," he said.
