US museum says Trump admin did not compel impeachment display removal
WASHINGTON : The recent removal of a placard at the National Museum of American History that detailed Donald Trump's two impeachments did not come after White House pressure, the museum's parent organization said Saturday.
The placard was meant to be temporary and 'did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation,' the Smithsonian Institution said in a statement on X.
'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard.
'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit.'
The Smithsonian statement came after The Washington Post reported Thursday that the museum last month removed the placard describing Trump's impeachments and reverted to old signage that said 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal' – Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.
The Post said the removal stemmed from a Smithsonian content review after the White House pressured the organisation to remove a director of one of its art museums.
Trump is the only American president to have been impeached twice – first in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, then in 2021 for inciting an insurrection. He was acquitted by the Senate both times.
Since starting his second term in January, the Republican has moved to control major cultural institutions, while slashing arts and humanities funding.
In March, Trump signed an executive order to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness' and 'remove improper ideology'.
The order accused the institution of having 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centred ideology' and argued the shift has promoted narratives that portray American values as 'inherently harmful and oppressive'.
The impeachment exhibit 'will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the Smithsonian said in its statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he and Apple CEO Tim Cook present Apple's announcement of a $100 billion investment in U.S. manufacturing, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 6, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File photo (Reuters) -Global technology stocks advanced on Thursday in a relief rally after the latest tariff salvo from U.S. President Donald Trump largely exempted industry heavyweights from his threat to impose 100% levy on chips and semiconductors. Trump said the new tariff rate would apply to "all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States," but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the U.S. or were in the process of doing so. Apple's stock rose 3.3% in premarket trading after Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the company will invest an additional $100 billion in the U.S., a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. U.S.-listed chipmakers advanced broadly, with Advanced Micro Devices up 2.5%, Intel gaining 2.1% and Nvidia up 1.1%. "A major uncertainty has been removed and investors can finally move on," UBS analysts said in a note. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries and Broadcom - Apple's partners in the investment effort - climbed between 0.8% and 10.1%. European chipmakers also joined the rally, with ASML, ASMI and BE Semiconductor Industries climbing about 3% each. Germany's Infineon said it could not speculate on possible semiconductor tariffs, as no details have been disclosed yet. Its shares were up 0.6%. Trump's latest on semiconductor tariffs seemingly rules out Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC, which makes chips for most U.S. companies, including Nvidia, as it has factories in the U.S. "The market remains keen to buy TSMC on dips. Investors also believe they need to remain positioned in AI - with or without tariffs," UBS analysts said. TSMC shares closed almost 5% higher to hit all-time highs, while Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix climbed 2.5% and 1.4%, respectively. South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix will also not be subjected to 100% tariffs on chips, the country's top trade envoy said. Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, while SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and research and development facility for artificial intelligence products in Indiana. Since stepping into the White House in January, Donald Trump has made several tariff threats, specifically on semiconductors, aimed at reshaping the supply chain of the industry and spurring domestic production. "The (100% tariff) figure fits Trump's approach of 'open high, negotiate down' and the final figure could be similar to reciprocal tariffs to limit inflation in consumer goods, given that many have chips," said Phelix Lee, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. Not everyone has come out of the latest blitz on the right side, with the Philippines and Malaysia looking to find out more details about the tariff rate. Dan Lachica, the president of the trade body for the Philippine semiconductor industry, said 70% of its electronics exports are semiconductors and the new tariff rate would be "devastating". Philippine stocks were down 0.1% after falling as much as 0.9% during the day. Malaysia's trade minister said the country has reached out to U.S. counterparts for clarity on the tariffs. (Reporting by Ankur Banerjee and Rae Wee in Singapore and Shashwat Chauhan in Bengaluru; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and Arun Koyyur)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Philippines Speaker to Senate: Impeach bid seeks answers Sara Duterte never gave
MANILA: The impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte was not motivated by politics but by a desire to hear answers she failed to provide, House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez told the Senate on Thursday (Aug 7). In a statement issued a day after the Senate voted 19-4 to archive the articles of impeachment, Romualdez said there should be no rush to bury the complaints, stressing that the House acted in good faith and not out of spite toward Duterte. 'Yesterday, the Senate—not sitting as an impeachment court—moved swiftly to archive the complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte, despite the case still pending before the Supreme Court (SC),' he said. 'Why the rush?' Romualdez asked. 'The Constitution is clear: Only the House has the exclusive power to initiate impeachment. That power is final within its sphere. We exercised that power lawfully, transparently, and in good faith—not out of spite, but out of duty. Not to attack, but to ask for answers—answers the Vice President never gave.' According to Romualdez, the House acted in pursuit of accountability, believing the prosecution team had strong evidence against Duterte. However, he lamented that the impeachment move was met with personal attacks instead of recognition that the House holds the sole power to initiate impeachment. 'This was never about political maneuvering. It was about accountability—pananagutan—anchored on verified facts and sworn documents,' he said. 'Yet we have been met with personal attacks, sweeping accusations, and a narrative that seeks to reduce a solemn constitutional duty to mere power play. That's not just unfair—it's dangerous. It undermines public trust in the very tools of democratic checks and balances,' he added. Romualdez also said the case should not be considered dead as the House has filed a motion for reconsideration, meaning the Supreme Court has not yet issued a final decision on the petitions against the impeachment. 'To archive is, in effect, to bury the Articles of Impeachment. Yet the ruling of the Supreme Court is not final. On August 5, the House of Representatives filed a Motion for Reconsideration. The Court found our arguments serious enough to require the respondents, including the Vice President, to submit their comment. The case is active,' he said. 'More than one-third of House Members signed the verified complaint. Under the Constitution, that triggered the automatic transmittal of the Articles of Impeachment. No referral to committee was needed. No further plenary action was required. The process was complete,' he added. During the Senate session on Wednesday night, senators explained their votes on the motion to archive the impeachment complaint. Senator Alan Peter Cayetano said he voted to archive the complaint, arguing that impeachment should not be used by political opponents as a tool for revenge. Cayetano added that those opposing Duterte's possible presidential bid in 2028 should challenge her at the polls. 'Isn't what the Supreme Court said correct? There can be an impeachment, but this should not be used by political opponents. If we do not want Vice President Sara to be elected president, beat her in 2028,' he said. Senate President Francis Escudero, who also voted to archive the impeachment, questioned whether proponents were genuinely pursuing accountability or simply opposed to the Dutertes. 'Today, Mr. President, the very supremacy of the Supreme Court is being called into question, and with it, the very foundation of the rule of law. As Senate President, a member of this chamber, and a member of the Bar, I will not sit idly by and allow this,' Escudero said. 'To those seeking to disregard the Supreme Court's decision, I ask this simple question: Are you truly for accountability or simply anti-Duterte? Do you truly respect and want to preserve the Constitution, or do you simply hate the Vice President? Are you serving the nation's interest or protecting and pursuing your own personal ambitions or agenda?' he asked. Romualdez's name was brought up during the Senate discussions. Escudero noted that critics of the Supreme Court decision, such as the Philippine Constitution Association, are associated with Romualdez. Senator Imee Marcos—a known Duterte ally and Romualdez's cousin—also called on House members to consider replacing the Speaker. Romualdez insisted they were not challenging the Senate, but merely speaking on behalf of people seeking truth and accountability. 'Let's be clear: The filing of the complaint was not rushed. What was rushed—remarkably—was its burial. This moment will be remembered. And when it is, we hope it will be said: That the House stood its ground. That we honored our constitutional duty. That we acted not for ourselves, but for the Filipino people,' he said. 'We do not rise against the Senate. We rise for the Republic. Tuloy ang laban. For the Constitution. For the rule of law. And for the enduring truth that no public office is ever beyond the reach of accountability,' he added. On February 5, 215 members of the House filed and signed a fourth impeachment complaint against Duterte. It was based on alleged misuse of confidential funds, threats against ranking officials, and possible violations of the 1987 Constitution. The articles of impeachment were immediately transmitted to the Senate on the same day, in line with the constitutional provision requiring a trial once at least one-third of House members—102 of 306—endorse the complaint. In February, two petitions were filed before the Supreme Court seeking to stop the impeachment. One was from Mindanao-based lawyers who said the House failed to act on the complaints within the 10-session-day rule. Duterte, represented by lawyers including her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, also petitioned the SC, arguing that the complaint violated the one-year bar on initiating impeachment against the same official. On July 25, SC spokesperson Camille Ting announced that the justices had unanimously declared the House's transmittal of the complaint to the Senate unconstitutional for violating the one-year bar rule. This prompted the Senate to deliberate on whether to proceed with the impeachment trial. Meanwhile, Duterte faces several allegations, including the improper use of confidential funds. The House committee on good government and public accountability investigated irregularities involving both her offices: the Office of the Vice President and the Department of Education. One discovery involved acknowledgment receipts (ARs) for confidential expenses that appeared to be signed by people with unusual names. Antipolo Rep. Romeo Acop flagged the name 'Mary Grace Piattos,' which resembled a potato chip brand and restaurant. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Trump announces 100 pct chip tariff, pressuring Asian producers
An employee works at a semiconductor chips factory in Huai'an, in eastern China's Jiangsu province on April 29, 2024. – AFP photo TOKYO (Aug 7): Donald Trump has announced a 100 per cent tariff on semiconductors from firms that do not invest in the United States — sparking volatility in Asian chipmaker shares today. The US president unveiled the levy at the White House on Wednesday ahead of the imposition of sweeping tariffs on goods from dozens of countries, with chips so far exempt. It comes with the United States and China locked in a high-stakes race to develop the high-end semiconductors used to power artificial intelligence systems. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100 per cent on chips and semiconductors, but if you're building in the United States… there's no charge,' Trump said. He did not give a timetable for the new levy, which he has repeatedly threatened in the past, to be enacted. Arisa Liu, senior semiconductor researcher at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, said it would impact the 'strategic direction of global semiconductor companies'. 'Since the United States is the world's largest player in AI and related high-performance computing, this will have a relatively greater impact on companies involved in advanced processes,' she said. 'The highest-end semiconductors will be excluded,' Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis, told AFP. But 'this kills producers of low-end chips', including those based in Malaysia or China, she warned. Today, shares in Taiwan's TSMC — world's largest contract maker of chips, which counts Nvidia and Apple among its clients — soared nearly five per cent after the government said the company would not be affected. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in semiconductor manufacturing, with more than half of the world's chips and nearly all of the high-end ones made there. 'Fight for Malaysia' Trump has previously accused Taiwan of having stolen the US chip industry, and earlier this year, TSMC unveiled a plan to invest an extra US$100 billion in the United States. Samsung Electronics, which is pumping billions into the United States, rose more than two per cent in Seoul, but a range of Japanese chip-making shares sank on the news. Apple is also investing an additional US$100 billion in the United States, Trump and the US tech giant's CEO Tim Cook announced Wednesday, with Cook calling it 'the largest investment Apple has made in America'. Malaysian trade minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz told parliament today that the country, a key chip manufacturing hub, was seeking an explanation from the US side. 'We will continue to fight for Malaysia to ensure that any policy changes or exemption criteria are communicated and negotiated in advance, and that Malaysia's position as a strategic partner is preserved,' he said. Chiang Min-yen, a non-resident fellow at the Research Institute for Democracy, Society, and Emerging Technology, said the tariff would hit legacy chipmakers who don't have the deep pockets to invest in the United States. 'Most of the legacy chip manufacturers in Taiwan, in the US, even in Japan… all face very serious, unfair market competition from Chinese competitors,' he said. If US policies undermine these companies' production efficiency, the Chinese competitors 'will be able to more easily enter the global market' and come to dominate the field in the future, Chiang told AFP. That 'would be very harmful for US industrialisation policies', he warned. 'In the end, we may have to rely more on the Chinese legacy chips, and it would hurt our cybersecurity or even national security.' – AFP Asian semiconductors tariffs trump us
