Kerala CM's daughter Veena diverted funds from CMRL to EICIPL to repay loan: SFIO
The SFIO's final complaint filed before a Special Court in Kochi early this month noted that the diversion of funds 'effectively transferred a ₹50 lakh liability from the private company EICIPL to the publicly held CMRL, causing financial loss to CMRL.'
The report pointed out that EICIPL had extended Exalogic a bank loan of ₹25 lakh on August 5, 2015. The payment was transferred to the account of Exalogic on August 6, 2015. The repayment was scheduled to begin on August 1, 2016 in 24 instalments with an interest rate of 12%.
'However, the Exalogic did not make any repayment as on 28/8/2016. Despite this, EICIPL sanctioned another loan of ₹25 lakh to Exalogic, which was disbursed on 29/8/2016. It was after the second loan that Exalogic repaid ₹4 lakh to EICIPL on 13/11/2016,' the SFIO reported.
The agency had reported that CMRL had made a monthly payment of ₹5 lakh to Ms. Veena and ₹3 lakh to her firm, Exalogic, as retainer for IT and marketing consultancy services. 'The bank records indicated that funds paid by CMRL to Exalogic were redirected to cover Exalogic's debt with EICIPL,' according to the complaint.
The 'investigations uncovered the collusion between T. Veena and Sasidharan Kartha to misappropriate funds.' The emails between the companies 'predominantly focused on invoice generation and payment processing rather than actual service provision, suggesting deliberate misuse of consultancy agreements for financial gains,' the SFIO alleged.
The 'financial manoeuvrings effectively transferred ₹50 lakh liability from EICIPL to CMRL without delivery of any consultancy services,' it charged.
Mr. Kartha is the first accused and Ms. Veena the 11th accused in the case booked under the Companies Act.
The SFIO has named both Ms. Veena and Mr. Kartha and the three firms, CMRL, Exalogic and EICIPL as the accused in the third charge in the case. The allegation is that they committed the offence of fraud, an offence under Section 447 of the Companies Act, which is defined as any 'act, omission, concealment, or abuse of position with the intent to deceive, gain undue advantage, or cause harm to the company or its stakeholders.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Board of Manappuram Finance approves change in Chairman
At meeting held on 08 August 2025The Board of Manappuram Finance at its meeting held on 08 August 2025 has approved appointment of V. P. Nandakumar being Managing Director of the Company, as the Chairman of the Board effective from 28 August 2025 following the retirement of current Chairman, Dr Shailesh Jayantilal Mehta. After completion of his second term as Independent Director of the Company (pursuant to Companies Act, 2013 read with Listing Regulations), Dr Mehta will take a well-deserved retirement on 27 August 2025 (end of business hours).Powered by Capital Market - Live News
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
50 per cent off on metro tickets booked via Uber app
CHENNAI: Uber has enabled booking metro tickets through its app, in an attempt to allow commuters to plan door-to-door public transport journeys and get access to real-time transit updates. As part of the launch, Uber is offering Chennai users a 50% discount on metro tickets throughout August. Additional incentives include 50% off (up to Rs20) on Uber Auto and Uber Moto rides that either begin or end at a metro station in the city. 'Our partnership with CMRL marks a significant milestone in our journey to make urban mobility more seamless, accessible, and efficient,' said Manikandan Thangarathnam, senior director of mobility and platforms at Uber. 'By integrating metro ticketing into the app, we're reinforcing our commitment to being a one-stop solution for urban transport.' 'Our AI systems can analyse commuting preferences to offer more personalised, efficient journeys,' an Uber spokesperson said. CMRL MD M A Siddique said the partnership would help improve connectivity and support CMRL's broader push toward tech-enabled, commuter-friendly solutions.
Hans India
3 days ago
- Hans India
Sebi mulls introducing activity-based rules for RTAs, common definition
New Delhi: Sebi on Thursday proposed introducing activity-based regulation for Registrars and Transfer Agents (RTAs), whereby services provided to listed companies would fall within its regulatory ambit and those for unlisted firms would be overseen by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). RTAs that cater to both listed and unlisted entities will be required to establish a Separate Business Unit (SBU) exclusively for unlisted services. These SBUs should be set up within 18 months from the date of implementation, Sebi said in its consultation paper. Also, RTAs are required to ensure complete operational separation between the listed and unlisted businesses. "While registrations shall continue to be granted by Sebi, services provided by RTAs to unlisted companies will be overseen by the MCA. The MCA will handle investor complaints pertaining to unlisted securities," the regulator said. Additionally, Sebi has also proposed merging the two existing categories -- Registrar to an Issue (RTI) and Share Transfer Agent (STA) -- into a single category called 'Registrar & Transfer Agent' with a common, updated definition. A uniform net worth requirement of Rs 50 lakh has been suggested for all RTAs. Currently, Category I RTAs perform both RTI and STA functions, while Category II handles either. This classification is now seen as outdated, given the near-complete phase-out of physical share transfers. To prevent frauds, Sebi has proposed an internal control and fraud prevention system within RTAs. This would include CEO/MD accountability, audit committee oversight, surveillance systems for fraud detection, a whistleblower policy with protection for complainants, and KYC-based monitoring of investor identity. Currently, there is no formal system within RTAs to detect or prevent fraud, and physical shareholding, though limited, still carries fraud risk. The regulator has also proposed to include securities premium in the net worth calculation for RTAs, aligning with net worth definitions in the Companies Act, 2013. Currently, only free reserves available for dividends are considered, while securities premium, though previously included under the Companies Act, 1956, is excluded under the existing rules. As per available data, Sebi-registered RTAs are currently providing services to around 35,000 unlisted companies, whereas they serve only about 4,000 listed companies. Moreover, Sebi's jurisdiction is limited to securities that are listed or proposed to be listed on a recognized stock exchange, it does not have the authority to oversee RTA activities related to unlisted companies. RTAs handle back-end operations for companies during IPOs and other share-related activities. Its role includes issuing allotment letters and certificates, managing investor records, and handling share transfers and redemptions. They act on behalf of companies-- that is, there exists a Principal-Agent relationship-- but companies remain responsible for compliance under the Companies Act, 2013. With dematerialization of shares becoming the norm, with less than 1 per cent of shares still in physical form, the RTA's role has notably shrunk, especially in the area of share transfers, Sebi noted. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has sought public comments till August 28 on the proposals.
