'The threat was real': Palm Beach County School board to end DEI programs over objections
Board member Edwin Ferguson blasted the push for anti-DEI changes, calling the administration's actions "child-like" and "bullying" and castigating as an "idiot" those who might unwittingly back threats forcing the district to scrap policies that help women as well as minorities.
Because the changes were approved on an emergency basis, they will go into effect immediately and remain so for 90 days. During that time, the district will get input from the public and from district staff, which can suggest alterations. Board members would need to take a second, final vote before the changes become permanent.
Staff recommended the emergency changes because the Trump administration demanded that state education leaders across the country have school districts in their state sign a "reminder of legal obligations" acknowledging that some DEI programs could — in the view of Trump administration officials — violate anti-discrimination laws and subject a district to the loss of tens of millions in federal funding. Florida Education Commissioner Manny Diaz forwarded that reminder to the Palm Beach County School District on April 10, and Superintendent Mike Burke signed it a week later.
The district got $300 million from the federal government in fiscal year 2025 and is using the money to recruit, train and retain teachers working in schools with a high percentage of poor students. The money is also being used for student meals and to educate special needs students as well as those still learning English.
In addition to the threatened loss of federal funding, the district could have its fiscal year 2026 state funding cut by as much as $47 million, which would make it more difficult for high schools to continue offering AP, IB and AICE programs.
Ferguson was alone in opposition during a series of 6-1 votes Wednesday night as the board repealed district language calling for racial diversity in hiring and promotion and business utilization. He launched an impassioned, prolonged verbal assault on repealing the provisions, repeatedly likening the Trump administration's threats to "children leading the adults."
"My 7-year-old comports herself in a much more forward-thinking and professional manner than some of our leaders in D.C.," Ferguson said.
None of the board members spoke at length in support of the anti-DEI changes, though Gloria Branch told Ferguson she thought that scrapping the district's policy on diversity in business practices was a good idea. And she rejected the notion that she was only voting in favor of the anti-DEI changes because of the threat to the district's federal funding.
"I just want to be clear," she said. "I'm not voting in fear on any of these policies."
Board members were otherwise silent as Ferguson continued to blast away at the proposed changes and urged his colleagues to shrug off fear and call the administration's bluff. Burke said he understood the difficulty of voting for what his staff was recommending.
"I respect your position as a board member," Burke told Ferguson. "I know this is a tough vote for everyone. We're trying to navigate this to the best of our ability. I'm not a real fearful person myself, but I can't look at just my own personal situation. I need to look at the district and their finances. I felt like the threat was real."
The Trump administration has already withheld billions in federal funding from some universities, actions that are being challenged in court along with attention-grabbing administration moves in the areas of immigration, staffing and law. Many of the early court rulings in those cases have gone against the administration, and it is possible — likely even — that some school districts, following the lead of Harvard University, will contest the threat to their federal funding.
Jane Tierney, a board member for the Coalition for Black Student Excellence, urged school board members to delay the implementation of any changes "until such time as the legal questions are resolved."
Tierney said the policies the district had in place "did not create excellence or equity."
"Black students are still disporportionately undereducated," she said. "Black educators do not have an equal chance at promotion. Black businesses still do not get their fair share of contracts from the school district."
The district, the largest employer in the county, has had a program in place to certify and track contract work awarded to businesses owned by women and minorities. Unlike other local governments, the district does not require large firms to share some of the work with firms owned by women or minorities. The district moved away from that program in 2017 in favor of one aimed at helping small businesses, many of which are owned by women and minorities.
The district said it "will be evaluating over the next few weeks" whether to continue with the certification of women- and minority-owned fims and the tracking of contract work awarded to them.
"We acknowledge that continuing to track this information is important for the district and the public to know," a district spokesman said.
While much of the focus of DEI programs is on their benefit to racial and ethnic minorities, they are often a boon to women.
Ferguson said those who oppose DEI programs and are happy to see the Trump administration push for their demise "will soon realize, 'Oh, shoot. That was something that could have benefited my daughter. I have dreams and aspirations for my daughter. You mean I'm stopping that from happening?' Yeah, idiot, you are. Yes, you are."
Trump and other Republicans have described DEI programs as as a form of reverse discrimination against whites that put minorities in positions of authority without merit. They also argue that the programs violate federal laws against discrimination. Democrats counter that the programs are a necessary tool to ensure that women and minorities are included in job candidate pools and that the views of people in marginalized communities are taken into account as policy is crafted.
Ferguson told his colleagues that the administration's threat to pull the district's federal funding over DEI is an empty one.
"If you're fool enough to pull our federal funding, guess what's going to happen?" he said. "Those same persons who put you in office are going to see you out of office because — guess what? — they have a fair number of people who are receiving (federal) funds. All those monies that we rely on to make this machine hum? A lot of their children are going to be suffering if you pull that $300 million."
Ferguson's faith in electoral consequences for Trump if he pulls federal funding from school districts doesn't square with the president's political history. Many of Trump's most ardent supporters are low- and middle-income workers who back him and other Republicans despite their opposition to unions, expanded access to Medicaid and a higher minimum wage.
Still, Ferguson told board members they should not fear the administration's threat to pull the district's federal funding.
"We should let them do it and see what happens," he said. "I promise you they'll flip flop just like the silly tariffs that are implemented one day and then flipped off the next. It's the exact same thing. You know who you're dealing with."
Many of those who have spoken out against Trump have subsequently faced political and physical threats from the president and his supporters. Ferguson indicated he understood that reality.
"I'm willing to stand on the line in this regard," he said. "I may be making a target of myself, but I didn't expect to be here forever anyway. I'm going to do what I was asked to do by my constituents while I can do it. This foolishness that we're having to capitulate to, I can't tacitly support."
Wayne Washington is a journalist covering education for The Palm Beach Post. You can reach him at wwashington@pbpost.com. Help support our work; subscribe today.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Palm Beach County School Board to end DEI programs heeds Trump threat

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump called Orban to win his support for Ukraine joining EU: Report
President Trump called Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Monday to win his support for Ukraine to join the European Union (EU), a conversation that came after discussions with European leaders who were at the White House, Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. The talk with Orban, one of the staunchest Trump allies in Europe, resulted from the president's Monday deliberations with European leaders who were in Washington, along with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky. The top European officials asked if the president could utilize his sway over the Hungarian prime minister to force the nationalist leader to do away with his opposition to Ukraine's joining the EU, a goal Kyiv has long sought, the outlet reported. Hungary expressed willingness to host the next summit, featuring both Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has backed the idea of a Putin-Zelensky summit, after which a trilateral meeting would take place between the two leaders and the U.S. president. The location and timing for the meeting are unclear. The White House is eyeing a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky in Budapest, Politico reported on Tuesday, citing a White House official and another person close to the administration. Orban, who has a warm relationship with Putin, has tried to block or delay the EU's attempts to send weapons to Ukraine in the past, along with, at times, objecting to sanctions against the Kremlin. Neither the White House nor Orban's office has commented on the call. Orban said on Tuesday on Facebook that Ukraine's membership in the EU 'does not provide any security guarantees,' therefore, 'linking membership with security guarantees is unnecessary and dangerous.' Trump's call with Orban came the same day as the president's discussion with Putin, which lasted about 40 minutes and took place without European leaders or Zelensky being in the room with the commander-in-chief. The gathering of European officials and Zelensky in Washington on Monday came just days after Trump, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, met with Putin, alongside two other Russian officials, on Friday in Alaska. Rubio now leads the recently formed joint commission that will work on drafting a security guarantees proposal for Ukraine. The commission is made up of U.S., European, Ukrainian and NATO officials. Trump, who has pushed to end the Russia-Ukraine war, the conflict that has raged for about three-and-a-half years, signaled openness to providing air support for Ukraine as part of security guarantees. 'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air because nobody has stuff we have,' the president said Tuesday.

Wall Street Journal
5 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Backs Giant Arizona Copper Project After Court Setback
President Trump signaled support for a giant copper mine in Arizona following a meeting with the heads of two of the world's biggest mining companies, a day after the project was delayed by a court injunction. The project, called Resolution Copper, has been under development by mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP Group BHP -0.55%decrease; red down pointing triangle for roughly two decades, but it has faced legal challenges from Native American people, religious groups and others who say the planned mine will turn a sacred area into a crater.


Fox News
5 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trace Gallagher: It's obvious CNN is not a fan of President Trump…
'Common Sense' Department: It's pretty obvious that CNN is not a fan of President Trump, but there is a big difference between TDS and TDS. One is Trump derangement syndrome and the other is saying truly dumb stuff!