Arkansas Senate bill would bring harsher penalties to violent criminals in US illegally
The bill, if signed into law, would enhance penalties for people in the U.S. illegally who commit violent felonies, ensure sheriff's offices and the Division of Corrections' involvement in the 'Warrant Service Officer Program,' and expand the state ban on sanctuary cities.
'Senate Bill 426 is a continued aim to keep our streets safe in the state of Arkansas,' said Arkansas Senate President Pro Tempore Bart Hester (R-Cave Springs), who is the lead sponsor on the bill.
He said that Arkansas is the number one state for inbound migration because it is seen as safe, which he believes discourages gangs of illegal immigrants within the country from coming to Arkansas to commit crimes.
'If you come here, if you are here illegally and you commit a violent crime, we're going to put you away for a very long time,' said Hester.
According to Hester, the bill's target is illegal immigrants within the state who commit violent crimes, not limited to crime with a gun, murder, rape, or physical abuse.
Those who fall into this category would receive an enhanced penalty for the crime.
'So, if you rape somebody, you're going to get an additional ten years that you're not eligible for parole,' said Hester.
The third and fourth section of the bill addresses county sheriff's offices and the Arkansas Division of Corrections' involvement in the 287(g) program.
According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the 287(g) program operates in three models: the task force model, the jail enforcement model and the warrant service officer program, the latter two being addressed within SB 426.
The Jail Enforcement Model is utilized to 'identify and process removable aliens' who have criminal or pending criminal charges and are arrested by state or local law enforcement agencies.
Bill to allocate $750 million for new Arkansas prison likely not returning to Senate after multiple failures
The Warrant Service Officer Program gives ICE the ability to 'train, certify and authorize state and local law enforcement officers' to carry out administrative warrants on people in the U.S. illegally within their jails.
Hester said the No. 1 thing to understand about the Warrant Service Officer Program is that it does not make local police officers and sheriff deputies part of ICE.
'Nothing changes with that at all. If you see them in the community, they are not part of the federal government. But if you are arrested, once you get into the in the jail because you've committed a crime, you are arrested, then we are requiring them to notify the federal government of your legal status,' said Hester.
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement website lists the Benton County Sheriff's Office as one of two Arkansas counties participating currently in the jail enforcement model.
Though the bill focuses on illegal immigrants who commit violent crimes, the organization Aire is speaking out against the bill, with Aire member Alexa Roldan saying the bill increases fear within the immigrant community.
'It would increase fear within the immigrant community. Towards law enforcement, which we don't want that either. We want them to feel safe in the community that they're in,' said Roldan.
According to Roldan, the bill not only impacts the immigrant communities' relationship with law enforcement but also creates what she believes is an unfair justice system.
'If it's the same crime, it's the same crime. The intent was still bad. It doesn't matter what your status is or who you are, what your color is, or what language you speak at home. A crime is a crime, period. So the fact that there's a different charge depending on literally who you are and where you stand as a person in the United States, that's just not fair,' said Roldan.
Hester said he believes immigration is what makes America great when acquired correctly and legally.
'We want everyone that wants to come here and follow the process. We want them to be here. We're very welcoming people of the state of Arkansas. But it says that you cannot have a local city create a place that is safe for people to be here illegally,' said Hester regarding Section 5 of the Senate Bill.
Section 5 states that local governments cannot enact or adopt sanctuary policies, and if they do, they are no longer eligible for 'discretionary money' provided by the state government, such as funds or grants.
Roldan said she has spent her entire life in Bentonville, but as a daughter of immigrants, she said she feels her family will be seen as criminals due to bills like SB 426.
'The concern about the immigrant community and how they're going to feel about it all, knowing that there's no one place where they can feel safe and feel like they can go about their lives, about just living like every other person here, and also just how it's going to impact the mental health of many other people,' said Roldan.
Hester said that he recognizes that the immigrant community is concerned with reporting crimes committed against them, especially with family members who may be here illegally.
'I really want to communicate that your local police officers, local sheriff's deputies, are not participating with the federal government unless you get arrested and are in prison. So we absolutely want everyone to know that you should be protected and safe while you're here in the state of Arkansas,' said Hester.
Sanders has five days to sign the bill once it crosses her desk.
Hester and Roldan believe that Sanders will sign the bill, which will pass it into law.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
35 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
Who is responsible for gerrymandering? In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How does a gerrymander work? Advertisement If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. Why is it called gerrymandering? The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Advertisement Is political gerrymandering illegal? Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Are there any limits on redistricting? Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. What does data show about gerrymandering? Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. Advertisement But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Online scam uses fake ICE raids at Target and Walmart to steal personal data
A new online scam is exploiting fears surrounding immigration raids. If your 'For You' page on TikTok has recently shown videos of alleged former Target or Walmart employees claiming they were fired—or even deported—by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), it's a scam. These viral clips, which often rack up millions of views, typically feature young people in retail uniforms and carry clickbait captions like 'ICE deportations at Target' and 'Fired from Walmart.' Others make similar claims about popular chains like Taco Bell, Lululemon, McDonald's, and Crumbl Cookies. However, a recent investigation by the Daily Dot revealed that these videos are part of a coordinated effort to harvest users' personal data. One post reads: 'Target really had ICE waiting after my shift. They just fired me like I was nothing.' The post continues: 'So here's everything I wasn't supposed to say.' What are the supposed 'secrets' these accounts are exposing? Many feature bizarre or nonsensical claims. One video says: 'We're forced to listen to Walmart Radio every shift. Most of us hide our AirPods, but if you get caught, you're in big trouble. Everyone knows about the 'Walmart Groove.' Look it up.' If you're confused, that's the point. The Daily Dot suggests these may be AI -generated hallucinations, possibly inspired by the 'Walmart Shuffle,' a song commissioned by Walmart in 2019. The scam doesn't stop at fabricated stories; it also involves stolen identities. Creator @mama_mia016, who regularly films her real-life shifts at Target, confirmed to the Daily Dot that she's still employed and not behind the viral video using her likeness. Upon closer inspection, many of these videos include voice-overs or captions promoting 'free products,' 'discounts,' or 'gift cards' in exchange for completing a 'customer survey' on a separate website. This is a classic phishing scam. The goal is to extract personal data—email addresses, phone numbers, home addresses, even payment information—often under the pretense of charging 'shipping fees.' Victims rarely receive the promised rewards and may instead face identity theft or unauthorized charges. There's no evidence to support the employment or deportation claims. Major retailers like Target and Walmart have issued no statements indicating mass firings or collaboration with ICE. By playing on fears about immigration enforcement, scammers are baiting concerned users with alarming viral content. While TikTok has removed many of the flagged links since the Daily Dot 's report, new ones continue to appear. (Fast Company has reached out to TikTok for comment.)
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Crowd draws boos as tensions erupt at GOP town hall
Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) was met with boos and jeers after his answer about funding for migrant detention facilities and ICE during a town hall in Lincoln, Nebraska.
