Palestine Action supporters defiant as group faces ban
"Whether I do something or not - I'm a terrorist," she said.
Eleanor had come to support the group at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square.
She had just heard a statement from Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who said Palestine Action will be banned following "a nationwide campaign of direct criminal action".
It means not just the core members, but anyone coming out to support them in protests such as this one would be committing an offence punishable of up to 14 years in prison.
Eleanor said she started supporting the group ever after the previous home secretary Suella Braverman dubbed the pro-Palestinian protests hate marches.
Eleanor added that this latest move by the government won't stop her supporting Palestine Action, but she worries what would happen to her children if she was prosecuted.
There are other, legal, pro-Palestinian groups that people can support, but those at Monday's rally believe their group was the one having the biggest impact.
"They are scared of us," said another protester, Frieda. "Now they will make our lives hell and I don't know how anyone in this country can stand for that."
Air of defiance palpable
She was carrying a banner that read "Free Political Prisoners" and said several of her friends had been arrested for activities related to Palestine Action (PA).
She added: "We won't be intimidated by this, and we will come out in bigger numbers now."
This air of defiance was palpable as protesters sat in the road blocking traffic around a section of Trafalgar Square chanting: "We are all Palestine Action!"
1:33
Many interpreted the home secretary's statement as a blatant move to shut them up, by a government embarrassed by last week's security breach at RAF Brize Norton where PA activists sprayed paint on two RAF planes.
A placard at the demonstration read: "Oh I spilled some paint - does that make me a terrorist?"
Ms Cooper made it clear that her actions were not the result of an isolated incident. In her statement, she referred to repeated criminal action "against businesses and institutions, including key national infrastructure and defence firms".
She added that Palestine Action's activity had "increased in frequency and severity" since 2024 and "become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence".
She made reference to an attack against the Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, where she said "the group caused over a million pounds of damage, including to parts essential to submarines".
In this case, several members were prosecuted. But protesters claim this makes their point.
Wearing a Free Palestine T-shirt, protester Robert said: "If you don't agree with those things, there are laws that can be used - but acts of terrorism have not been committed."
Another protester, Mia, said: "It would feel farcical if it wasn't so scary." Her banner read: "Yvette Cooper - if you are anti anti-genocide you are pro-genocide."
'Sinister development'
No doubt there were many at the protest who simply want an end to the violence in Gaza and feel the government is complicit in its support for Israel.
In that sense, it feels like a sinister development for their right to protest to be curtailed.
Palestine Action has stated that its mission is to "break the tools used to commit" genocide - an allegation Israel denies.
The problem is that PA appears to have identified UK defence firms and military hardware, as part of those tools - things that are actually used to defend this country.
In the view of the home secretary, this has crossed the line from simply criminal to extremist - and a threat to national security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government must stop children using VPNs to dodge age checks on porn sites, commissioner demands
England's children's commissioner has demanded that the government stop children from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to get around age verification on porn sites. Calling for change, Dame Rachel de Souza warned it is "absolutely a loophole that needs closing" as she released a new report, which found the proportion of children saying they have seen pornography online has risen in the past two years, with most likely to have stumbled upon it accidentally. VPNs are tools that connect internet users to websites via remote servers, enabling them to hide their real IP address and location, which includes allowing them to look as if they are online but in another country. This means the Online Safety Act, which now forces platforms to check users' ages if attempting to access some adult content, can be dodged. After sites such as PornHub, Reddit and X introduced age verifcation requirements last month, VPNs became the most downloaded apps, according to the BBC. A government spokesperson told the broadcaster that there are no plans to ban VPNs as they are legal tools for adults. Dame Rachel told Newsnight: "Of course, we need age verification on VPNs – it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations." She called on ministers to look at requiring VPNs 'to implement highly effective age assurances to stop underage users from accessing pornography'. More than half (58 per cent) of respondents to the commissioner's survey said that, as children, they had seen pornography involving strangulation, while 44 per cent reported seeing a depiction of rape – specifically someone who was asleep. Made up of responses from 1,020 people aged between 16 and 21 years old, the report also found that while children were on average aged 13 when they first saw pornography, more than a quarter (27 per cent) said they were 11, and some reported being aged 'six or younger'. The research suggested four in 10 respondents felt girls can be 'persuaded' to have sex even if they say no at first, and that young people who had watched pornography were more likely to think this way. The report, a follow-on from research by the Children's Commissioner's office in 2023, found a higher proportion (70 per cent) of people saying they had seen online pornography before turning 18, up from 64 per cent of respondents two years ago. Boys (73 per cent) were more likely than girls (65 per cent) to report seeing online pornography. A majority (59 per cent) of children and young people said they had seen pornography online by accident – a rise from 38 per cent in 2023. Dame Rachel said her research is evidence that harmful content is being presented to children through dangerous algorithms, rather than them seeking it out. She described the content young people are seeing as 'violent, extreme and degrading' and often illegal, and said her office's findings must be seen as a 'snapshot of what rock bottom looks like'. Dame Rachel said: 'This report must act as a line in the sand. The findings set out the extent to which the technology industry will need to change for their platforms to ever keep children safe. 'Take, for example, the vast number of children seeing pornography by accident. This tells us how much of the problem is about the design of platforms, algorithms and recommendation systems that put harmful content in front of children who never sought it out.' The research was done in May, ahead of new online safety measures coming into effect last month, including age checks to prevent children accessing pornography and other harmful content. A Department of Science, Innovation and Technology spokesperson told the BBC that "children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long" and "the Online Safety Act is changing that'. However, responding to Dame Rachel's remarks on VPNs, they added that there are no plans to ban them, "but if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines'.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gareth Thomas reveals he's been spat at in the street as he recalls the horrific abuse he gets for being gay
Ex-rugby star Gareth Thomas says he has been spat at in the street as he details some of the horrific homophobic abuse he has dealt with. Thomas, speaking on the Mail's Life of Bryony podcast, recalled coming face-to-face with people giving him abuse and how he was able to 'kill it' and shut down the exchange. Click to watch the interview above.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trans Met Police volunteer, 27, 'posed as 16-year-old girl online before raping woman' court hears
A trans Metropolitan Police volunteer posed as a 16-year-old girl when he first began talking to the woman he is accused of raping, a court has heard. James Bubb, 27, who now identifies as a woman named Gwyn Samuels, allegedly raped the woman he was in an on-off relationship with over a five-year period. A trial at Amersham Law Courts on Monday heard that the pair had met on the online chat site, Omegle, while Bubb was posing as a teenage girl and that they had spoken about a sexual practice known as BDSM. Jurors previously heard the woman had told police Bubb, of High Street, Chesham, Buckinghamshire, went on to use 'BDSM and kink as a way of creating control' throughout their relationship. The complainant, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told the court on Monday: 'When I met James on Omegle, I didn't know that it was James at first, they introduced themselves as a teenage girl so I was more concerned than anything else, and then kind of just talking to them about maybe this isn't what they should want to look at at their age.' She said: 'As I said, James first presented themselves as a 16-year-old girl.' Jurors previously heard the pair started talking when the complainant had 'just turned 18' and that she had been 'terrified' after Bubb had suggested 'knife-play' during their relationship. In her police interview, she said: 'When a guy is trailing a knife down you telling you the things he could do with it and you are terrified and you don't trust he would stop - the safe word means nothing.' Adrian Amer, defending Bubb, asked: 'All the BDSM you had with James was completely consensual wasn't it?' 'No,' the alleged victim replied. Mr Amer said: 'Did you introduce knife-play?' 'I did not introduce knife-play,' the woman replied. Mr Amer asked: 'In your knife-play, sometimes you were blindfolded weren't you?' 'Yes,' the witness said. 'And James would use a blunt butter knife to run along your body, a blunt butter knife that's correct, isn't it?' Mr Amer asked. 'I have no way of knowing if it was a blunt butter knife, I was blindfolded,' the alleged victim said. Asked to describe the knife that Bubb would use during times where the alleged victim was not blindfolded, she said it was a 'large-ish knife' like the type 'used to cut vegetables'. Regarding the size of the knife, the woman indicated it was shorter than the length of an A4 piece of paper. Bubb has denied one count of rape in relation to the complainant, and two counts of rape, two counts of sexual activity with a child, one count of assault of a child under 13 by penetration, one count of rape of a child under 13 and one count of assault by penetration in relation to another complainant. A not guilty verdict on one of the rape charges in relation to the second complainant was returned on Wednesday after the prosecution offered no evidence. All charges are alleged to have taken place between January 1, 2018 and April 2, 2024. The defendant denies all charges. The trial continues.
