logo
Trump's slash-and-burn agenda hits DOD's cyber workforce

Trump's slash-and-burn agenda hits DOD's cyber workforce

Politico27-05-2025

With help from Maggie Miller and John Sakellariadis
Driving the day
— The Defense Department is bulldozing through its cyber workforce, and former Pentagon officials and experts warn it could cause irreparable damage to the nation's cyber defenses.
HAPPY TUESDAY, and welcome to MORNING CYBERSECURITY! I hope everyone enjoyed the long weekend! I spent most of the time outdoors, but I'm happy to be back in your inboxes today. Drop me a line at dnickel@politico.com.
Follow POLITICO's cybersecurity team on X at @RosiePerper, @johnnysaks130, @delizanickel and @magmill95, or reach out via email or text for tips. You can also follow @POLITICOPro on X.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Happening This Week
On Wednesday: The House Homeland Security Committee holds a field hearing on 'Innovation Nation: Leveraging Technology to Secure Cyberspace and Streamline Compliance' at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. 5 p.m.
At the Agencies
CUTS AT THE PENTAGON — The Defense Department's cybersecurity workforce is preparing to take a hit as the Trump administration continues its workforce blitz across agencies. At the DOD, cyber agencies — including the Defense Information Systems Agency and U.S. Cyber Command — have faced staffing cuts within the last month that worry lawmakers, former Pentagon officials and cyber experts alike.
Last week, Maggie reported that Lt. Gen. Paul Stanton, head of DISA, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee's cyber subcommittee that the agency will lose around 10 percent of its staff to cuts and resignations. Between 5 percent and 8 percent of the U.S. Cyber Command personnel also took the Trump administration's offer of deferred resignation this month.
While the scope of the Pentagon workforce reduction remains unclear, former DOD officials and cyber experts warn that sweeping cuts across the board may leave certain areas severely understaffed and could destabilize cyber operations.
— Back-and-forth: President Donald Trump and his administration have drawn sharp criticism for ousting officials who don't align with his agenda — including Gen. Timothy Haugh, the former head of the NSA and Cyber Command, and Chris Krebs, the former head of CISA in Trump's first term. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has faced similar backlash over his removal of high-ranking officers across the military.
Former DOD officials are concerned that removals at the top are creating a ripple effect throughout the workforce and weakening the nation's ability to fight back effectively.
'You lost a person, and that expertise is lost to the government forever,' said one former Defense Department official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the cuts. 'The people who remain don't have the institutional knowledge base.'
Patrick Johnson, director of the DOD chief information officer's Workforce Innovation Directorate, pushed back against concerns of a haphazard hatchet of the cyber workforce, saying on Thursday that the office is aligning itself with the DOD's broader personnel strategy of reducing the federal civilian workforce. He added that the department is working to curb the potential blowback through selective staffing cuts and is focused on opportunities to teach remaining staff new skills on the job.
But Pentagon officials are already talking about bringing back ousted staff. When testifying before Congress last week, Stanton told lawmakers that the personnel changes give the agency 'an opportunity to ruthlessly realign and operationalize what is an evolving mission,' but added that some of the vacated roles will likely be reinstated.
'We need to rehire the right people into the right positions to then lead us forward,' Stanton testified.
A second former DOD official, also granted anonymity to speak candidly, said there are ways to make precision cuts while minimizing long-term damage to cyber operations, including giving operational commanders oversight over where staff reductions are made.
— Clearing house as threats circle in: While Pentagon staff continue to weigh whether to take employment deferment offers or potentially face layoffs, the Defense Department has seen an injection of funds to enhance cyber offensive measures for Indo-Pacific Command through the budget reconciliation bill passed by the House late last week.
Experts say this funding to boost cyber offensive measures is a step in the right direction, though workforce cuts could undermine the success of these efforts.
'China and Russia are increasing the scope and complexity of their attacks against U.S. military networks and vital critical infrastructure,' said retired Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery, senior director of the Center for Cyber and Technology at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, adding that the Pentagon's cyber workforce needs 'resource and personnel plus ups not cuts.'
On The Hill
WEST COAST HEARING — The House Homeland Security Committee is decamping to Silicon Valley this week for a field hearing at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
The hearing, scheduled for Wednesday, was set so lawmakers could get a closer look at where the U.S. stands in cyberspace. Witnesses are set to include representatives from cyber and tech giants Google and Palo Alto Networks, and committee members plan to discuss how to better secure U.S. critical infrastructure networks.
'This hearing is an opportunity to hear directly from technology leaders, innovators and researchers about what's working and what isn't,' Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), chair of the panel's cyber subcommittee, told Axios when the hearing was announced.
The International Scene
ENCRYPTION ON THE LINE — The Center for Democracy and Technology Europe is joining 88 other advocacy groups, cybersecurity experts and companies to urge the European Commission to consider how the European Internal Security Strategy, also known as ProtectEU, could hurt the future of end-to-end encryption in the EU.
In a letter sent to the European Commission on Monday, the groups said that ProtectEU's proposed Technology Roadmap on Encryption — which would enable law enforcement authorities to lawfully access encrypted data — could harm cybersecurity and privacy protections for EU citizens.
The European Commission has recently focused on end-to-end encryption to crack down on the distribution of child sex abuse material by requiring messaging platforms to conduct blanket scans on content, even if the platforms offer end-to-end encryption.
The efforts have been met with backlash from digital advocates and the tech industry over the risks posed to EU citizens' data privacy and their devices' cybersecurity.
The groups called on the European Commission to acknowledge that strong encryption tools won't hinder EU security, edit the proposed Technology Roadmap to include the benefits of encryption and consult with private companies, digital advocates and cybersecurity experts to add 'credibility' to the document.
Quick Bytes
A FAN, THIS AGENCY IS — A seemingly ordinary Star Wars fan website from the early 2010s was built by the CIA to covertly communicate with its informants around the world, Joseph Cox writes for 404 Media.
AI CHIPS — Nvidia will launch a newer — and cheaper — AI chipset for China after recent U.S. export restrictions on the company's H20 chips, Liam Mo and Fanny Potkin report for Reuters.
DOWNSIZING YOUR DIGITAL FOOTPRINT — Wired's Matt Burgess, Sophie Johal and Michaela Neville prepared a guide on the basics of keeping your digital footprint locked down.
Chat soon.
Stay in touch with the whole team: Rosie Perper (rperper@politico.com); John Sakellariadis (jsakellariadis@politico.com); Maggie Miller (mmiller@politico.com), and Dana Nickel (dnickel@politico.com).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin. cancels Moderna bird fu vaccine contract
Trump admin. cancels Moderna bird fu vaccine contract

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump admin. cancels Moderna bird fu vaccine contract

The Trump administration has canceled a contract with Moderna (MRNA) worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The contract was supposed to help Moderna develop a vaccine for humans to defend against bird flu. Yahoo Finance Senior Health Care Reporter Anjalee Khemlani reports the details in the video above. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Trump administration canceling more than $700 million awarded to drug maker Moderna to develop the vaccine against potential pandemic viruses. For more we're bringing in here Yahoo Finance Senior Health Reporter, Angeli Kamani. Ange. Yeah, like you mentioned, the NIH canceled more than $750, a million dollars, rather, in funding for Moderna. And this is something that the company found out just based on a notification to themselves, even though they were really expecting that to get into late stage development. They said in a statement, Moderna received notice that the Health and Human Services Department, remember led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy will terminate the award for the late stage development and rights to purchase the pre-pandemic influenza vaccines. Now, we went out to HHS to understand what their rationale was behind this. And among other things they mentioned that the MRNA technology remains quote, "under tested" and we are not going to spend taxpayer dollars repeating the mistakes of the last administration which concealed legitimate safety concerns from the public. And in that they're referring to the myocarditis that was evident in some males and some younger individuals. So, this is really just the latest setback for the company. We know it's been pummeled, the stock is down more than 30% on the year. This is one of the latest. So, we know that they pulled their filing of a combination flu and COVID vaccine earlier last week. Then we've got the NIH funding that's cutting the pandemic and bird flu. And then we've also got missing the Q1 estimates earlier this year. So, just really telling a really hard story for this company. We know it's been under pressure because of the waning COVID revenues, and these are just some of those areas that were supposed to sort of plug that hole. And now, without those in the way, it's a question on what Moderna's viability is. Now, on the flip side, you do have some good news, right? The company's still working on a number of clinical trials with Merck on cancer vaccine. It also has a partnership with Vertex on cystic fibrosis. So, they do have a few other things going for them, but this is really a longer play for the company rather than any near term that they would have otherwise been able to take advantage of. All right. Thanks, Angeli. Appreciate it. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'
Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Slams Trump's Spending Bill: ‘A Disgusting Abomination'

A serious rift has erupted between Elon Musk and President Trump over the massive government spending bill the president has urged Congress to pass. Musk, who donated nearly $275 million toward Trump's 2024 election campaign, on Tuesday posted on X an unambiguous denunciation of the bill, which is called the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act. More from Variety London Mayor Sadiq Khan Hails 'Adolescence' for Having 'Mainstreamed' Conversation About 'Epidemic' of Violence Against Women Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Elon Musk Says New York Times Is 'Lying Their Ass Off' About His Alleged Drug Use; Newspaper Defends Coverage 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The tech mogul wrote that the bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Musk, the world's richest person, also posted a warning that voters would 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in the 2026 midterm elections. On May 28, Musk announced the he would end his tenure as a 'special government employee' — leading the White House's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE — after 128 days. Per the U.S. Department of the Interior, a person cannot serve in such a role for more than 130 days in a consecutive year. Sen. Ran Paul (R-Kentucky) was among those chiming in to agree with Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better,' he wrote, quoting Musk's post. Trump, on Truth Social, earlier in the day slammed Paul, writing 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' At a White House press briefing, Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked press secretary Karoline Leavitt 'how mad do you think President Trump is going to be' about Musk's comments? Leavitt responded that Trump 'already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act passed the Republican-controlled House but has yet to clear the Senate. The legislation would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent (with wealthy Americans benefiting the most) and increase funding for the U.S. military and immigration enforcement. In addition, the version that passed the House cuts funding for health, nutrition, education and clean energy programs. Musk has criticized the 'Big Beautiful Bill' before, but using tamer terminology. Last week, for example, Musk criticized Trump's 'massive spending bill' in an interview with CBS's 'Sunday Morning,' saying the legislation 'undermines the work' of DOGE. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?

There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas
There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas

New York Times

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Times

There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas

For weeks, Republicans lawmakers in Texas had promised that they would require proof of citizenship to vote in most elections, hoping the 2025 Legislature would be a vanguard for other conservative states considering similar measures. Voting rights groups cried foul. An analysis showed that the bill could disproportionately harm Republicans, who were less likely than Democrats to have the required documents. Then, as the Texas legislative session ended on Monday, the bill died. Its failure was one of the many surprising results of this year's legislative session, which was among the most conservative in recent memory. The Legislature passed measures requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom and creating publicly funded vouchers for private-school tuition. But the session also revealed the limits of right-wing governance, even in a state that President Trump won decisively and that is controlled by Republicans at every level of power. Lawmakers failed to pass strict curbs on wind and solar energy, and a tightened ban on abortion pills from out of state. Texas was a particularly good test case for the G.O.P.'s reach because for the first time in years, Republicans in the Legislature were not actively warring. Gone were the internal fights between House and Senate Republicans that had marred the last several sessions, which occur every two years. Instead, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who controls the State Senate with a firm hand, got mostly what he wanted, a more compliant Texas House. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store