There Are Limits to Republican Lawmakers' Reach, Even in Texas
For weeks, Republicans lawmakers in Texas had promised that they would require proof of citizenship to vote in most elections, hoping the 2025 Legislature would be a vanguard for other conservative states considering similar measures.
Voting rights groups cried foul. An analysis showed that the bill could disproportionately harm Republicans, who were less likely than Democrats to have the required documents. Then, as the Texas legislative session ended on Monday, the bill died.
Its failure was one of the many surprising results of this year's legislative session, which was among the most conservative in recent memory. The Legislature passed measures requiring the Ten Commandments in every classroom and creating publicly funded vouchers for private-school tuition.
But the session also revealed the limits of right-wing governance, even in a state that President Trump won decisively and that is controlled by Republicans at every level of power. Lawmakers failed to pass strict curbs on wind and solar energy, and a tightened ban on abortion pills from out of state.
Texas was a particularly good test case for the G.O.P.'s reach because for the first time in years, Republicans in the Legislature were not actively warring. Gone were the internal fights between House and Senate Republicans that had marred the last several sessions, which occur every two years.
Instead, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who controls the State Senate with a firm hand, got mostly what he wanted, a more compliant Texas House.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' losing momentum in Senate
The sprawling bill to enact President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda is losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk and outspoken opposition from conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes against the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation, according to a senator who attended the meeting. 'Crapo just said, 'I think [there] are two of us who are pretty definite no's,' which means we can't lose anybody else,' the source said. Crapo did not name names, but colleagues assumed he was talking about conservative Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Paul says he will vote against the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, extending the federal government's borrowing authority past the 2026 midterm election. Johnson, meanwhile, has called for Senate GOP colleagues to scrap the House-passed bill and move a smaller measure that would focus on extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, securing the border and banking on the spending cuts identified by House committee chairs. 'What I am rock-solid on is that I can't accept this as the new normal,' he said of projections that the annual federal deficit will reach $2.2 trillion in 2025 and grow to $2.7 trillion by 2035. 'We have our chance to reverse this,' he said of growing deficits. 'I will not be responsible for continuing this.' Paul and Johnson are stepping up their criticism of the bill just as Musk is urging lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, warning it will blow up the deficit. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk posted on his social platform X. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the 1,116-page bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. But some GOP lawmakers say that's looking increasingly unlikely because of a battle between Republican senators over cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the repeal of renewable energy tax incentives. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said. 'The sooner President Trump recognizes the reality of the situation, the sooner we can work on a smaller version of the bill, do the things that have to be done: Extend current tax law, increase the debt ceiling, provide border funding,' he said. He said the package could include spending cuts already passed by the House, such as a proposal to reduce federal subsidies to Medicaid by $698 billion and reduce SNAP spending by $267 billion. The expectation that Paul and Johnson will vote against the bill could give more leverage to Republicans who want to make other changes, further delaying the effort. Those moderates include Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who are warning against Medicaid spending cuts that would affect benefits. Senate Republicans control 53 seats, which means they could only afford three defections and still pass the bill. Collins, Murkowski, Hawley and Moran say they are closely following the proposed reforms to Medicaid. 'I am evaluating those provisions,' Collins said of the changes to Medicaid. She said it's difficult to fully assess the bill until the Senate parliamentarian weighs in on what policy changes can remain in the legislation and which need to be stripped out for it to qualify for fast-track consideration on the floor. She said some of the most controversial provisions 'may fall out.' 'We still don't know exactly what we're looking at,' she said. Collins, who is up for reelection in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, said she's concerned about changes to the SNAP program that would require Maine to shoulder more of its costs. She said the bill 'switches a lot of the administrative costs' for SNAP 'onto the state.' Murkowski said it will be 'hard' to meet Trump's deadline of passing the bill by July 4, noting that even after Republican senators reach a deal, many of the provisions will need to be vetted by the Senate parliamentarian. Moran said he's 'waiting for where we end up in the Ag [Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry] Committee' on reforms to SNAP. 'What we do will be different from the House. I'm analyzing and participating in the discussion,' he said. He said the negotiations over the nutrition program for low-income Americans are 'taking time.' Republicans at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon discussed expanding their search for savings to Medicaid, despite Trump's warning to House lawmakers last month not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' And, notably, they raised the possibility of changes to Medicare. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill. Cramer said senators talked about also examining waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to further reduce future deficits. 'There was a lot of presentation and then debate, people throwing out other ideas, like, 'What about waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare?'' he said. But tackling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare would be a time-consuming task and likely generate a lot of anxiety among GOP senators who are balking at cuts to Medicaid that they worry could impact benefits. 'Some people are making that case, other people are wringing their hands,' Cramer said of the internal debate. Updated at 8:37 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Democrat: Trump travel ban a distraction from GOP policy package
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said late Wednesday that President Trump's revived travel ban is meant to 'distract' the nation from what he described as 'super unpopular' aspects of the massive GOP policy package working its way through Congress. During an interview on MSNBC's 'The Briefing with Jen Psaki,' the Senate Democrat said that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' will 'steal from regular Americans in order to pad the rich.' 'Nobody wants that. That's super unpopular. So how do you get that done?' he continued. 'You distract people by making them think that they're at war with other Americans — making them think that they have something to fear from people who look different from them or speak a different language.' Murphy described the strategy as something 'demagogues have done all throughout time… while, on the side, they're stealing from us.' Trump earlier Wednesday signed a proclamation banning travel to the United States for individuals from 12 countries, citing national security concerns. He also announced new restrictions for entry into the U.S. for travelers from an additional seven countries. The proclamation, which echoes a travel ban Trump instituted in his first term, takes effect Monday. Trump, in another move on Wednesday, ordered a probe of former President Biden's mental state and executive actions his predecessor took while in office. The actions come as Trump's agenda faces new roadblocks in the Senate, with tech billionaire Elon Musk vocalizing criticism of the massive bill and calling on lawmakers to block it from passing. Murphy said Trump's moves are 'chiefly in service' of changing the focus of the national conversation. 'This is important, you know, anytime you ban people coming to the United States from other countries, it has a real impact,' Murphy told Psaki. 'But it is chiefly in service of trying to get us all talking about that — or talking about the Biden investigation they launched today — instead of talking about the centerpiece of this story, which is this bill to make the rich even richer at the expense of everybody else.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for a response to Murphy's remarks. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vought grilled over DOGE, spending cuts in House hearing
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought was grilled by both sides of the aisle over the administration's sweeping cost-cutting plans as he testified before House appropriators Wednesday afternoon. Vought faced a wide-ranging list of questions during a budget hearing, as lawmakers pressed him over President Trump's latest spending cut requests, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), along with a major tax package of the president's priorities making its way through Congress. One area of bipartisan interest was leadership at DOGE, an effort Trump previously tapped tech billionaire Elon Musk for. Vought said the administration was 'in the midst of, with the last week or so, of establishing the leadership on an ongoing basis' following the exit of Musk. Other top officials at the department have also departed in recent days, including Steve Davids, whom Vought noted previously led the effort. He added that he partly thinks 'the vision for DOGE' is that it 'go and be far more institutionalized' at actual agencies and working 'almost as in-house consultants as a part of the agency's leadership. The OMB chief also faced questions over the president's budget request for fiscal 2026, which lawmakers have noted is incomplete. 'Where's the budget?' Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), a spending cardinal asked him. 'We believe you have the budget,' Vought responded, after the White House released a 1,000-page budget document last Friday detailing more of its demands. 'We have a skinny budget,' Womack said. 'You have the skinny budget, discretionary budget in full,' the OMB director replied, which he said allows the House' funding 'to get the appropriations process moving forward.' Vought added that the administration has been focused at the same time on getting the president's tax plan to his desk, after it recently passed the House and faces changes in the Senate. He also faced heat from Democrats over other components of that plan, including reforms to Medicaid that Republicans have attached to the proposed tax cuts as an effort to save hundreds of billions of federal dollars over the next decade. 'The bill that you just said the White House supports is going to add, depending [on] who you talk to, 2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the national debt,' Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said. 'It's going to make somewhere between 11 and 16 million people lose their health care. 'I know you said on a Sunday morning show, no one will lose coverage as a result of this bill is that still your standing?' the lawmaker asked. Vought responded that the bill does 'not lead to less coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries.' They both went back and forth over the bill's impact on the program before Pocan needled Vought on the fiscal impact of the bill. The budget chief said, 'the bill will not increase the debt,' however, federal budget analysts estimate it would add more than $2 trillion to the nation's deficits in roughly a decade. Another notable moment from the hearing came when Vought was questioned by a Republican about proposed cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) pursued as part of the Trump administration's latest rescissions request. He defended the reductions as targeting items like 'teaching young children how to make environmentally friendly reproductive health decisions' and efforts he claimed were aimed at strengthening 'the resilience of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer global movements.' Rep. Mark Alford (R-Mo.) raised the question of PEPFAR cuts, later pressed Vought about whether prevention efforts would be impacted by the proposed reductions. 'Aside from the crazy woke programs, which I agree should be stripped,' Alford asked, 'is there any other prevention program, not treatment, but prevention program listed in this rescission package which is not of a woke nature?' Vought said in response that the administration seeks to scale 'down the program as it pertains to the types of organizations that are providing the examples of the waste, fraud and abuse.' But, he added, 'the prevention itself is where an analytical look needs to be done.' 'There's life saving treatment after you already have HIV, but there are prevention programs that PEPFAR does, which are not of the woke nature, which can prevent someone from getting HIV,' Alford countered. 'Are those programs going to survive?' 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on because we believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared toward the viewpoints of the administration, and we're $37 trillion in debt,' Vought said. 'So, at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this healthcare.' Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, additionally grilled the budget chief at one point over the administration's takedown of a public website that showed how funding is apportioned to federal agencies. 'Your predecessor did comply with the law for over two years, and you followed this law for two months. What happened?' DeLauro asked Vought. 'Why did the website come down? Why do we not know what is happening? Why are we going back to those days of secret decisions being made by you and whomever else in terms of the spending of the dollars that we constitutionally enacted?' Vought responded that the administration 'had constitutional concerns with the provision' and 'it's something that degraded our ability to manage taxpayer resources.' DeLauro told the OMB director shortly after that she thought the 'level of your honesty on your claims [really] shines through on this topic' and accused him of making 'up constitutional issues.' 'We have no way of knowing if you are carrying out what we have lawfully required the executive branch to do,' the Connecticut Democrat said. 'That is our responsibility, and your responsibility is to carry out what it is that we have appropriated here.' 'You just can't pick and choose whatever the hell you want,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
