logo
NC House budget has big pay increase for new teachers, modest state employee raises

NC House budget has big pay increase for new teachers, modest state employee raises

Yahoo19-05-2025

North Carolina Rep. Destin Hall (R-Caldwell) speaks with reporters at the legislative building on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024. The House will begin moving its budget proposal through the chamber this week. (Photo: Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline)
North Carolina House Republicans' budget proposal includes 2.5% raises for state employees and an increase to beginning teachers' base pay.
The state House will vote on its spending plan this week, with Appropriations and Finance committee meetings Tuesday and possible floor votes to follow Wednesday and Thursday.
After the House passes its budget, House and Senate negotiators will meet to reconcile their differences, including differences over how to compensate state employees.
The Senate budget proposal approved last month included 1.25% raises and $3,000 in bonuses spread over two years for most state employees. Law enforcement officers would receive bigger raises under the Senate plan.
Both the House and Senate budget proposals would eliminate vacant jobs. The House budget says it is using money from eliminating positions to fund employee raises.
The House budget includes 'one time' supplements for retirees of 1% in the first budget year and 2% in the second year.
The House budget increases starting teacher base pay from $41,000 to $48,000 in 2025-26, and to $50,000 the following year. The House budget would also restore salary supplements for teachers with advanced degrees.
'The NC House budget delivers some of the largest teacher pay raises in state history – because we're serious about investing in our classrooms not just talking about it,' Rep. Brenden Jones (R-Columbus) wrote on social media.
While beginning teacher salaries would rise dramatically, teachers with 25 years' experience and more would see only 2.1% raises.
Tamika Walker Kelly, president of the NC Association of Educators, said that while her organization appreciates the attention to beginning teacher pay, experienced teachers deserve more.
'We appreciate lawmakers' recognition of the urgent need to raise starting teacher pay and restore master's pay to help address the teacher shortage faced by our public schools,' Kelly said in a statement. 'Attracting new and highly qualified educators into the profession is essential, but if we want our schools to be the best in the Southeast, we need to do more for veteran teachers, who are the backbone of our public schools.
'A minor 2.1% raise for our most experienced teachers doesn't send the signal that we value long-time education professionals, despite the scientific evidence that veteran teachers help students learn and grow more, and the reality that new teachers depend on the experience of their colleagues.'
On taxes, the House budget increases the standard deduction by $500 for tax filers who are single and by $1,000 for married people filing jointly.
A tax deduction on tips of up to $5,000 would begin in the 2026 tax year.
The budget also revives back-to-school sales tax holiday for the first weekend in August starting next year.
Lawmakers in both the House and Senate are having to budget more carefully this year to deal with the massive rebuilding effort in the western part of the state. Gov. Josh Stein asked state lawmakers Monday to approve an additional $891 million in post-Helene funding, amid concerns that federal aid was slow and uncertain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Politicians, scared of truly open primaries, offer ‘limited' alternative for nonpartisan voters
Politicians, scared of truly open primaries, offer ‘limited' alternative for nonpartisan voters

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Politicians, scared of truly open primaries, offer ‘limited' alternative for nonpartisan voters

Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager (Photo: Richard Bednarski/Nevada Current) A ballot measure to establish an open-primary, ranked-choice voting system in Nevada may have been rejected by voters last November, but its underlying message of voter disenfranchisement clearly struck a chord with Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager. The Assembly's top Democrat, who opposed that ballot measure, said he suspects changes to Nevada's closed primary system are coming whether the political establishment wants it or not: 'The dam is going to break one way or another. The question is: Are we going to be part of the process?' To that end, Yeager is proposing Assembly Bill 597, which would allow nonpartisan voters to participate in either the Republican or Democratic primary. He introduced the bill as an emergency measure on Monday, a week before the end of the session, and presented it to the Senate and Assembly committees on legislative operations and elections during a joint meeting Thursday. Yeager described his bill as a 'pushing back' to Question 3, the election reform proposal approved by voters in 2022 but rejected by voters in 2024. That ballot measure, which needed to pass twice because it proposed amending the state constitution, was heavily funded by out-of-state election reform groups. Those groups viewed Nevada as 'a playground in which they can experiment,' Yeager said. 'We know they will continue to attempt to exploit this issue' of closed primaries 'to fool around with our elections.' AB 597 is 'much simpler' than Question 3. There would still be Republican and Democratic primaries. The only change would be that a registered nonpartisan voter could cast a ballot in one of them. (Question 3 proposed putting all candidates on the primary ballot regardless of political party, with the top five finishers appearing on the general election for voters to rank in order of preference.) Yeager described AB 597 as a common sense solution that addresses the growing number of nonpartisan voters in the state. As of April 2025, 34.9% of registered voters in Nevada are nonpartisan, 29% are Republican and 29% are Democrats, according to the Secretary of State's Office. The remaining 7% of registered voters are members of minor parties like the Independent American or Libertarian parties. That means nonpartisan and third-party voters are the biggest voting bloc in the state. Yet they are unable to participate in the primary elections their tax dollars pay for unless they agree to temporarily affiliate with a major political party. The Nevada State Democratic Party, which opposed Question 3, has not expressed support or opposition for AB 597. But Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar, a Democrat and the state's top election official, spoke in support of the bill. The Nevada State Republican Party is strongly opposed to AB 597, as they were to Question 3. Representatives from the state party and affiliated local party groups argued that allowing nonpartisans to participate in party primaries would dilute party values and invite interference from outsiders. Opponents also argued the bill is unnecessary because nonpartisan voters can already participate in a primary by temporarily registering to a political party. Nevada offers same-day voter registration, which means nonpartisan voters have that option all the way through election day. 'I think that practically that just doesn't happen,' Yeager countered. 'People are not going to change party registration and then change back. They're not partisan for a reason or not affiliated for a reason.' Some election advocates worry nonpartisan voters may similarly be turned off by the process laid out in AB 597. Yeager plans to introduce an amendment to require nonpartisan voters request a political party primary ballot by 'the 7th Monday before the election day.' (In real terms: That would have been April 23 for last year's June 11 primary.) Nonpartisans after that date would have to vote in person. Yeager's proposed amendment would also keep the state-run presidential preference primary closed. Doug Goodman, the founder of Nevadans for Election Reform, has pushed for fully open primaries for more than a decade. He took a neutral position on AB 597, saying the bill is 'far from ideal' and only 'a small start.' The bill doesn't address disenfranchisement of voters registered to minor parties, who still would be unable to participate in a major political party primary without leaving their preferred party. It also doesn't address the issue of voters not being able to cast ballots in the significant number of races decided in competitive primaries where the winner goes on to run unopposed in a general election. That is a particularly common occurrence in districts that lean heavily toward one party. Sondra Cosgrove, another outspoken advocate for election reform in Nevada, took a similar position as Goodman, though she described herself as 'reluctantly in support' of AB 597. 'In America elections belong to the people, not the political parties,' she said in a statement to the Current. 'So, I plan to run a ballot question in 2026 to adopt a fully open primary so that the people of Nevada can discuss how we would like our primary election to be managed. Many political commentators believe major election reform will only come to Nevada through a ballot measure backed by outsiders because the existing political establishment benefits from the current system. The Legislature must adjourn Monday, leaving lawmakers only a few days to pass Yeager's bill. If they do, it could still be vetoed by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, who has already vetoed one election bill this session.

Letters to the Editor: Battle over transgender athletes in school sports is only hurting the kids
Letters to the Editor: Battle over transgender athletes in school sports is only hurting the kids

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: Battle over transgender athletes in school sports is only hurting the kids

To the editor: Not only is Chino Valley Unified school board President Sonja Shaw spreading misinformation and division, she's doing incredible harm to transgender girls who are trying to live their lives peacefully and productively ('Justice Department investigates California over allowing transgender athletes in girls' sports,' May 28). She calls them boys. They are not boys. Her lies only hurt these girls psychologically, and what they are going through is not easy. Her despicable narrative is a distraction for the harm felon President Trump and the MAGA Republicans are doing to Americans. Gerald Orcholski, Pasadena .. To the editor: Trump rants about transgender women competing in women's sports. Why does he never mention transgender men competing in men's sports? In any case, it has not been proved that transgender women necessarily have an advantage over cisgender women. In the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, a transgender woman weight lifter registered a 'did not finish' result after three failed lifts, while cisgender women won medals. David E. Ross, Oak Park This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

What to know about Trump's pardon of ex-Cincinnati City Councilman PG Sittenfeld
What to know about Trump's pardon of ex-Cincinnati City Councilman PG Sittenfeld

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What to know about Trump's pardon of ex-Cincinnati City Councilman PG Sittenfeld

Former Cincinnati City Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld, who was convicted of federal bribery and attempted extortion charges, was pardoned May 28 by President Donald Trump. Sittenfeld's convictions derailed a promising political career, in which he had once been the frontrunner for mayor. He was arrested months after announcing his campaign for Cincinnati mayor in 2020. The president's decision to grant clemency to Sittenfeld came as an unexpected move, considering the ex-councilman had voiced disapproval of Trump. Here's what we know and don't know about Sittenfeld's pardon. Trump signed an "executive grant of clemency" directing the U.S. Attorney General to sign and grant a "full and unconditional pardon" to Sittenfeld. "The Attorney General shall declare that her action is the act of the President, being performed at my direction," it reads. However, the document does not list any specific reasons why Trump would grant such a pardon. The case against Sittenfeld centered on donations to his political action committee, which prosecutors said he solicited from an informant for the FBI and FBI agents posing as developers of a downtown Cincinnati project. Prosecutors said Sittenfeld's actions went beyond campaign fundraising and crossed the line into bribery. A jury found him guilty in 2022. After a lengthy post-conviction legal battle, Sittenfeld was sentenced to 16 months in prison, although he only served about four and a half months at a facility in Ashland, Kentucky. In May 2024, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals released him while his appeal was pending. Earlier this year, the 6th Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, upheld the convictions. At that time, all three Trump-appointed judges appeared to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. Sittenfeld has taken his case to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn his convictions. It's not clear if Sittenfeld will continue to challenge his convictions. It remains unclear how Sittenfeld, a Democrat who once called Trump a 'buffoonish carnival barker," was able to garner favor with the Republicn president's administration. More: Trump's pardon of Sittenfeld stunned many in Cincinnati, but the move fits a pattern Trump has complained repeatedly about what he describes as the 'weaponization' of the legal system against him and others. He's also granted clemency to other public officials convicted of corruption charges, although most of those pardons have gone to Republicans or to people who've publicly praised Trump. Ultimately, the president doesn't have to explain his reasons for pardoning anyone, including Sittenfeld. The pardon power requires no Congressional oversight and no judicial review. Sittenfeld wasn't the only person Trump deemed fit to grant clemency for federal convictions. The moves were part of a fresh wave of pardons by Trump on May 28, according to USA TODAY. Other prominent people who received a pardon from Trump include: Former Connecticut Gov. John Rowland, who pleaded guilty in late 2004 to one count of conspiring to commit tax fraud and depriving the public of honest service. Louisiana-born rapper NBA YoungBoy, whose real name is Kentrell Gaulden, who pleaded guilty to a federal gun charge in 2024. Larry Hoover, a Chicago gang leader who co-founded the Gangster Disciples and was convicted of murder in 1973. Hoover is still serving state sentences. Former New York Rep. Michael Grimm, a Republican who resigned after being convicted of tax fraud. Former 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw, who was discharged from the U.S. Army after his 2022 conviction at a special court martial for refusing to follow COVID-19 safety measures. Reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley of "Chrisley Knows Best" fame, who were found guilty in 2022 of conspiring to commit tax evasion and defraud Atlanta banks, as well as the IRS. Enquirer staff writers Kevin Grasha, Dan Horn and Scott Wartman contributed to this report. USA TODAY also contributed. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: PG Sittenfeld pardon: What to know about Trump's order to grant clemency

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store