
Australia's Anzac Day Welcome to Country controversy is why I'm glad I don't live there
It was 5.30am on Anzac Day. The sky was still dark, but 50,000 people had gathered at the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne to honour those who served – including the estimated 5,000 Aboriginal soldiers who fought in the first and second world wars.
Draped in a traditional possum fur cloak, Bunurong elder Mark Brown stood in front of the podium to welcome the crowd to the land of his ancestors. As he began speaking, a small group of hecklers attempted to interrupt Brown with boos and negative comments. 'What about the Anzacs?' one of them shouted. 'Don't welcome me to my own country.' Despite the attempted interference, a defiant Brown continued with his welcome, being met with applause from others in the crowd.
That evening, local NRL team Melbourne Storm was set to play in a highly anticipated match in front of 26,000 fans at a sold-out AAMI Park. To start proceedings, Wurundjeri elder Joy Murphy Wandin had been invited to provide a Welcome to Country to start the Anzac Day ceremony.
However, following the morning's events and subsequent controversy, Murphy Wandin was told she would no longer be required as the Welcome to Country was cancelled. 'The board doesn't feel comfortable having a Welcome to Country because of what happened in regards to the booing of Uncle Mark Brown at the Anzac Dawn Service,' is what the Djirri Djirri dancers, who were meant to perform following the Welcome to Country, allege they were told. Murphy Wandin said the Storm then reversed its decision before its chief executive Justin Rodski allegedly cancelled it again. This was despite Murphy Wandin already being at the stadium and having completed her final rehearsal.
Subsequent reporting has revealed that Storm director Brett Ralph is a significant donor to right-wing lobby group Advance, which is actively campaigning to end the practice of Welcomes to Country around Australia. The Storm have since released a statement claiming the cancellation was due to a 'miscommunication of expectations regarding the use of Welcome to Country at Melbourne Storm events' between the club's board and management. It is alleged the board were unaware that a Welcome to Country was to be performed at Friday's game.
The Welcome to Country is not a new practice. As Aboriginal Australian education leader Jessa Rogers recently wrote, 'Welcome to Country is a sovereign Aboriginal protocol, grounded in the laws, customs and practices of First Nations that have existed on this continent for tens of thousands of years'. A Welcome to Country is conducted by an elder, a formally recognised traditional owner, or a custodian, to greet visitors to their ancestral land. The ceremony can vary in form, often featuring a speech, traditional dance and a smoking ceremony.
The practice saw a modern renaissance in the late 1970s, following a Welcome to Country performed by Yamtji men Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley, for a group of Aotearoa Māori and Cook Islands Māori attending the Perth Fringe Festival. It is widely believed to be one of the first recorded welcomes for a group of people not indigenous to Australia.
In 2008, the official opening of Australia's federal parliament began with a Welcome to Country for the first time. It has since become a standard feature. The day after, then prime minister Kevin Rudd gave a formal apology to indigenous Australians for the atrocities committed against them.
However, following the Anzac Day controversy over the weekend, the use of Welcomes to Country was thrust into the spotlight, highlighting deeper issues around race relations in Australia. On Sunday evening, during the final leaders' debate prior to the Australian election, opposition leader Peter Dutton claimed Welcome to Country ceremonies were 'overdone' and said their regular use 'cheapens the significance'. It was a cheap way for Dutton to score brownie points with the (probably small) sector of Australians that agree with him, much like the politicians here in Aotearoa who pander to a similarly small, yet vocal crowd.
The kerfuffle with the Welcomes to Country in Melbourne on Anzac Day made me sad. Sad for our indigenous brothers and sisters in Te Whenua Momoeā. Sad that they are still being met with such overt racism while practicing their cultural traditions, literally welcoming people to the whenua where they have lived for at least 65,000 years. Sad for my cousins, nieces and nephews who call Australia home. Sad that they are growing up and living in a land where some people still have such visibly little tolerance and respect for indigenous cultures.
While I am fully aware that racism is alive and well here in Aotearoa, I like to (perhaps ignorantly) believe that our race-relations are better than that of the country across the ditch. We don't have people attempting to stop others from singing the national anthem in te reo Māori, or running on the field to stop the All Blacks doing a haka.
However, we do have several recent instances of intolerance for indigenous practices and beliefs here in Aotearoa. One such case is that of Kaipara District mayor Craig Jepson, praised by many of his constituents for banning karakia before council meetings. I also vividly recall a group of Pākehā verbally expressing their dismay at a karanga being performed for Lani Daniels' entrance to her world heavyweight boxing title fight in 2023. 'Just get on with the fight,' one of them said as she tsked and rolled her eyes.
Although I believe we are slightly more tolerant of, and educated on, the importance of Māori cultural customs in Aotearoa, I also think the select group of our population that is against the growing normalisation of these practices is becoming more galvanised in their beliefs. With that comes a growing inclination and comfort in publicly and explicitly expressing those views – not just on social media, but in real life too. My only hope is that we are quick to call out this harmful behaviour and continue to foster an acceptance of all cultures among our youth – especially of the indigenous culture of this land. One of the most important things to remember from this whole fiasco is children don't invent racism, they learn it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Cook Islands opposition rejects independence, calls for greater self-sufficiency
Cook Islands leader of the opposition Tina Browne Photo: Caleb Fotheringham The leader of the Cook Islands opposition Tina Browne wants the country to be more self-sufficient, but says there is no desire to be independent from New Zealand. The Cook Islands marks 60 years of self-governance in free association with New Zealand on 4 August. Rarotonga has been flooded with high-profile visitors, including the Pacific Islands Forum secretary-general Baron Waqa and leaders from French Polynesia, Niue, Tonga, and Tuvalu. But New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters are not present . The Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro is representing New Zealand at the event instead. "The politicians recognise that it's sad that New Zealand's not here, but Cook Islanders are great at celebrating events and that's exactly what we're doing," Browne said. Peters has challenged Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown to hold an independence referendum. However, opposition leader Browne said it was not needed. "We don't need a referendum to say to New Zealand that we don't want independence, not now." She said she agrees with her government's direction in trying to be more self-sufficient. "I understand [the] government's decision to go out looking for development funds, and I agree with that direction. But I certainly don't agree to [severing] our relationship with New Zealand." Browne said she was concerned about the contents of the agreements, particularly the overarching Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with China . She said having China's support in maritime development, such as building ports in the Northern Group, or being involved in deep sea mining could undermine national security. "Just have a look around in the Pacific and how others are engaging with China and what the outcomes are. I certainly don't want us, the Cooks, to be in that situation." Another opposition MP Teariki Heather, who is the leader of Cook Islands United Party, said he wants Prime Minister Brown to apologise to the New Zealand government. He disagrees that New Zealand needed to consult with the Cook Islands, which Brown has suggested is a requirement under the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration. "We don't aid New Zealand, New Zealand aids the Cook Islands," Heather said, who led a protest against Brown's leadership in February. Heather said he had not read the agreements between China and the Cook Islands - which have been made public. Looking to the future, Heather wants a bigger focus on agriculture, so that eggs for example are farmed domestically, not imported from New Zealand or Samoa. Heather said he was also very concerned about depopulation. "We have nothing here at the moment to serve our people… we need our people to live and stay in our paradise." Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown declined a request for an interview. New Zealand Green MP and Cook Islander Teanau Tuiono in Rarotonga, collecting his scooter license Photo: Caleb Fotheringham Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson and fellow MP Teanau Tuiono are the only New Zealand MPs attending the celebrations. As a Cook Islander, Tuiono said it was important for him to be in Rarotonga. "But also, that relationship between New Zealand and the Cook Islands is something that should be celebrated. It's 60 years, so it's incredibly significant for the people here, but also for our communities back home in Aotearoa." Tuiono said it was important to remember the long-shared history of the Cook Islands, including family ties with Māori from Aotearoa and Cook Islands Māori, WWI participation, as well as the contribution Cook Islanders make in New Zealand society.


Otago Daily Times
5 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mayoral hopeful berates council chief executive
Wendy Baker. PHOTO: ODT FILES A Southland mayoral hopeful has taken shots at a council chief executive during a fiery public speech. On Wednesday, Wendy Baker presented to district councillors about the council's dog control policy and bylaw review. But her presentation began on an unrelated note when she read out a letter she had received from the minister of sports and recreation about her sporting accomplishments. "I wanted to bring that up because it's a positive letter of praise. And unfortunately, just recently, your CEO — who is extremely well paid — sent me a letter which was very upsetting to me," Ms Baker said. "This letter as you all know has gone to the ombudsman. A leader needs to build people up, and I will not be bullied when I do amazing amounts of volunteer work, which your council ignores formally, I feel." Ms Baker would not divulge the contents of the chief executive's letter, but confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting it was not related to the minister's letter. The letter was out of the blue, unnecessary and untimely, she said. "They should be praising the work I do and not sending a letter that upsets me." In response to questions, council chief executive Cameron McIntosh was tight-lipped. "We have raised some matters with Ms Baker. They are between council and Ms Baker," he said. "We will leave it with Ms Baker to decide if she wishes to share the contents of the letter with media." Ms Baker's presentation also took aim at the council over a perceived lack of dog control. She said a dog had come on to her property twice in three weeks — once on the eve of Anzac Day attacking a possum and once attacking a back fence at 4am. "I pay $4099.50 in rates to SDC ... and what do I get for it? Stuff all." The mayoral hopeful is one of three candidates in the running for the top job this October. At the 2022 election, she finished last out of six candidates with 211 votes. ■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Cook Islands celebrates 60 years of self-governance amid growing rift with NZ
The biggest event in the Cook Islands calendar is currently underway, marking 60 years of free association with New Zealand. It comes at a tense point in the relationship, or as New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters would put it, a "constitutional crisis", largely stemming from what Wellington viewed as a lack of consultation over agreements Prime Minister Mark Brown signed with China in February. The Cook Islands had been administered by New Zealand since 1901, and in 1965, the two entered into free association. This means the island nation is self-governing, although New Zealand is responsible for assistance with foreign affairs, disasters and defence. The Cook Islands is celebrating 60 years of self-governance. Photo: Caleb Fotheringham In 2001, New Zealand and the Cook Islands signed a Joint Centenary Declaration, which requires the two to "consult regularly on defence and security issues" - which is what the government has felt has been breached. But problems stem back further than the China deals. In October last year, Brown proposed a Cook Islands passport as part of the 60-year celebrations. He viewed it as an "internal matter", no different to how New Zealanders can carry dual passports. Wellington felt otherwise. The full extent was shown through documents released to 1News under the Official Information Act (OIA) which said the country can have its passport but at the cost of New Zealand citizenship. Brown dropped the idea and told Cook Islands News in December that New Zealand "bared its teeth". Shortly after on Christmas day 2024, the Cook Islands-registered vessel Eagle S was seized in the Baltic Sea by Finnish authorities, who believed the vessel severed the Estlink 2 submarine cable that carries electricity from Finland to Estonia. The vessel was thought to be linked to Russia's shadow fleet, which seeks to evade sanctions on the sale of Russian oil. OIA documents released to RNZ Pacific show high levels of concern from New Zealand surrounding the ship and the Cook Islands shipping registry. In the lead up to the Cook Islands signing the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with China and other agreements, Brown said there was "no need for New Zealand to sit in the room with us". He said New Zealand was advised on the agreements but did not need to be consulted to the level they were asking for. Brown returned home from China to a vote of no confidence - that failed - and protesters marching towards parliament, emotional that their leader was ruining their relationship with the nation's closest friend. But some in the country supported Brown, feeling the move was a natural progression of the country having more autonomy, which has been happening slowly since the Cook Islands first entered into free association. A recent example, in September 2023, the United States recognised the Cook Islands as a "sovereign and independent state". However, New Zealand has drawn red lines - United Nations membership is only available to fully independent and sovereign countries is one of the big ones. An issue that had been floated by Brown and previous prime ministers, including his predecessor, Henry Puna. In June, New Zealand paused $18.2m in development funding, citing the lack of consultation it received from China as the reason. Brown called the move "patronising" and "inconsistent with modern partnership". "The relationship between the Cook Islands and New Zealand is defined by partnership, not paternalism," he told his parliament in June. Last week Brown said if New Zealand could not afford to fund the country's national infrastructure investment plan - billed at $650 million - the Cook Islands would need to look elsewhere. Peters in return, has said Brown is making it harder to restore trust with each "mischaracterisation of the New Zealand approach". He also challenged Brown to hold a referendum on independence from New Zealand. Peters in an interview with RNZ Pacific this week, said the problems in the relationship are all from the Cook Islands side. "Members of parliament, people like me come and go, and governments come and go, and ministers of foreign affairs come and go, but the enduring relationship with the people of Cook Islands is what we are constitutionally required to maintain," Peters said. Brown has made several comments suggesting a double standard from Aotearoa and that the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration requires New Zealand to consult the Cook Islands on its dealings. Peters said that has never been the case. "That was never the arrangement, to construe it as being the arrangement now is done without any basis. If you're going to make a claim, you've got to lay down the foundations of that claim and that's the difference of opinion, and we're clearing it up," he said. The agreements the Cook Islands signed with China have been made public and Brown has maintained there is nothing in them that could cause concern. Geopolitical commentators have suggested that they could undermine New Zealand's national security by having China involved in maritime infrastructure like ports. But Peters said if he has any issues they were for "our private conversation with the Cook Islands government" and that "the value and the content and the dimension, the breadth and the depth of the agreements" was not what the issue is about, with the focus being on the lack of consultation. Some commentary from academics has been critical of aid being used as a bargaining chip and the pause could even push the Cook Islands closer to China, which Peters doesn't believe. "I am very confident that we have taken the right steps, after serious consideration," he said. "It is with the greatest regret, we find ourselves having [to pause funding] but I've got an obligation to the Cook Island people and to the New Zealand taxpayer." Peters said he was "not going to speculate" if there would be further funding pauses and labelled questions from RNZ Pacific as "defeatist" when he was asked what the consequences to the Cook Islands would be if the relationship was not mended. Te Maeva Nui celebrations are on now. Photo: Caleb Fotheringham The political turmoil feels far away at the current constitutional celebrations called Te Maeva Nui. "We're just celebrating us as a nation right now, so, yeah, none of that matters right now," said Teriimaevarua Marsters, who is leading the team from Palmerston Island. The small atoll is only accessible by boat and has a population of 28 people, 16 of them have made the trip to be in Rarotonga. "It's a huge deal, because once every ten years we come together as all, for us out there we get to come together with other islands, within the Cook Islands." Terry Piri who works at the Ministry of Finance, was setting up a stand that's selling special minted coins marking the big 60th. "You can see there's the turtle and the fish travelling together in the ocean, that's [because] we're people of the ocean," Piri said while showing the coin. Teriimaevarua Marsters is leading the team from Palmerston Island. Photo: Caleb Fotheringham Like Marsters, Piri is not interested in the government-to-government problems with New Zealand at the moment. "For me, I'm here celebrating, and people are here celebrating, so we're enjoying it. We don't worry about the political side. Let the politicians look after that side." Terry Piri holding special coins marking the big 60th Photo: Caleb Fotheringham At the hostel housing people from the Northern Group island Pukapuka, team leader Ruarau Iakobo has no interest in being fully independent. "We the people, we don't like that, we don't want to separate our relationship with New Zealand. We want to be with New Zealand because they've looked after us for 60 years." Team leader for Northern Group island Pukapuka Ruarau Iakobo does not want to leave the relationship with New Zealand. Photo: Caleb Fotheringham