logo
Bracing for budget crisis, Metra agreed to pay lobbyist as much as $4.65M for work on transit fiscal cliff

Bracing for budget crisis, Metra agreed to pay lobbyist as much as $4.65M for work on transit fiscal cliff

Chicago Tribune20-03-2025
Metra agreed to pay its lobbyist as much as $4.65 million in part for work related to a looming transit budget crisis, even as agency leaders brace for a potential shortage of cash caused by the same crisis.
The five-year lobbying contract is in effect as the the region's four transit agencies, including Metra, stare down a $771 million budget gap when federal COVID-19 relief funding runs out next year. Agency heads and advocates have warned that steep service cuts and fare hikes are at stake unless transit gets additional state money.
Yet last year alone, Metra spent more than $602,000 on lobbyists for help with the budget cliff, along with work on Metra's transition to a less commuter-focused service and advancing other Metra interests at the federal, state and regional level, according to public expense data and a copy of the lobbying contract, which took effect about a year ago.
Such spending on lobbyists is, perhaps, expected, but fails to follow the best interests of taxpayers and riders, said Justin Marlowe, director of the Center for Municipal Finance at the University of Chicago. The spending also makes the case for reform of the way transit is overseen, he said, as two proposals are debated in Springfield that call for either consolidating the region's four transit agencies or boosting coordination among them.
'What you have is an intergovernance structure where it is, in effect, a free-for-all,' Marlowe said. 'You have money being spent on lobbying to go advance the interests of one agency that may be completely at odds with other agencies.'
The spending was OK'd as part of Metra's latest agreement with Washington, D.C.-based Tai Ginsberg and Associates, a five-year contract that began in April 2024. One of the firm's principals, Jason Tai, is a former Illinois Department of Transportation official and U.S. House Transportation Committee staffer who worked for former Illinois congressmen William and Dan Lipinski, a father and son who were instrumental in bringing infrastructure funding for transportation back to Chicago. William Lipinski later turned to a career in transportation lobbying.
Working with Tai Ginsberg is lobbying firm Raucci and Sullivan, headed by former Republican state senator Dave Sullivan.
For their work, Tai Ginsberg bills a monthly retainer of $45,000, plus another $10,000 a month for Raucci and Sullivan. The firm can bill up to another $22,500 a month if specialty Black and Hispanic caucus advocacy firms or public affairs firms are used.
For those prices, the transit fiscal cliff has become a focus of the lobbyists.
'The looming fiscal cliff will take a major effort at both the federal and state levels in order to be solved,' the firm's contract with Metra noted, adding that it would work to 'engage groups to form a consensus around addressing the transit fiscal cliff with a focus toward Metra.'
Metra spokesman Michael Gillis said despite the most recent contract, Metra had scaled back its lobbying. The rail agency used to rely on several firms and now has one contract, and also scaled back its internal legislative affairs staff, he said.
In 2017, for example, Metra renewed contracts with six politically connected lobbying firms, including a previous firm Tai worked with, the Tribune reported at the time. The total for all the firms came to nearly $2.7 million — less than Tai Ginsberg's 2024 contract.
Since April, Gillis said, Tai Ginsberg has billed only the monthly retainer and not charged extra for specialty firms.
'Set aside whether the fiscal cliff is going on, we still think we need federal and state lobbyists,' Gillis said. 'And obviously the fiscal cliff is the biggest thing probably facing us since that contract started, so it shouldn't be too surprising that we'd want them to assist us with that.'
Discussions about the fiscal cliff and future of Chicago-area transit have gained steam in Springfield this year, as transit agencies push to boost funding and lawmakers focus on the way transit is overseen. The Regional Transportation Authority has warned that failure to fill the budget gap could lead to a 40% cut in service across the CTA, Metra and Pace, which would mean a Metra line that once had 90 trains per day would be down to 54.
'Unless the legislature solves the fiscal cliff that's looming in our 2026 budget, we may look back on the 2025 version as the calm before the storm,' Metra CEO Jim Derwinski said in a statement in October as he unveiled Metra's 2025 budget.
With much of the discussion in Springfield so far focusing on oversight of transit, Marlowe, from the University of Chicago, said the fact that Metra feels it needs to spend so much money on lobbying makes a strong case for reform.
Spending to convey Metra's message makes sense, given the current setup that has multiple transit agencies vying for resources. But a more effective option would be for all of the transit agencies to make a unified case in Springfield, he said.
'Right now, in the absence of a coherent strategy and so many different incentives and people working at cross purposes, that's exactly what you'd expect is for Metra to spend (about) $5 million lobbying Springfield on behalf of its own interests,' he said.
Gillis said Metra has unique challenges, such as issues involving freight railroads that share tracks and sometimes operations with Metra, so it is helpful to have its own lobbyists.
'We are still a separate agency, and we do have concerns that do not involve the CTA, RTA or Pace,' he said.
Keeping lawmakers informed about Metra needs and maintaining communication with D.C. and Springfield helped Metra secure $105.8 million in competitive grants in 2024, Gillis said, describing the lobbyists' work on those fronts as 'contributing factors.'
Tai said the lobbyists spend a 'significant portion of time' on the transit fiscal cliff, but it isn't the only issue they work on. His firm and Raucci and Sullivan coordinate approaches at the federal and state level, he said.
Tai Ginsberg is also working on advocating for Metra funding in a major federal transportation bill up for reauthorization in 2026, he said. The lobbyists work on quick responses to federal funding decisions or changes being made by the Trump administration, and Tai highlighted federal competitive grants that have been awarded to Metra.
Much of the fiscal cliff work is focused on Springfield lawmakers, he said, pointing to a recent visit by several state legislators to a Metra facility to learn about the agency and issues relating to the budget gap. But, although it will likely be an uphill battle, his firm is continuing to work on the budget gap issue at the federal level.
'All the so-called wins, they're really the result of the leadership, the people at Metra, the congressional delegation,' he said. 'We're here to just kind of advise and navigate the sometimes not-that-exciting policies that go behind this.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Adani to build India's biggest privately funded coal power plant in a decade
Adani to build India's biggest privately funded coal power plant in a decade

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Adani to build India's biggest privately funded coal power plant in a decade

By Sethuraman N R (Reuters) -Indian billionaire Gautam Adani's group will build and operate a $3 billion coal-fired power plant in Bihar state with a 2.4 gigawatt capacity, it said on Thursday, the biggest coal plant constructed in India via private investment in a decade. The first of three units at the plant will be commissioned within four years, with the last expected to come online in five years' time, Adani Power said. The move marks a return of private investment to India's greenfield coal-based power projects after more than a decade of absence. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government is targeting increasing the country's coal-based capacity by 80 GW, or more than a third, by 2032 to more than 290 GW, saying it was necessary to ensure reliable, round-the-clock power. Coal's share in India's power mix is starting to significantly decline due to a quick buildout of renewables, following rapid growth in coal use after the COVID-19 pandemic. The world's second largest coal producer and consumer still generates about three quarters of its electricity from coal annually, however, unlike top coal user China which has progressively reduced its dependence on the polluting fuel. The project in Pirpainti, eastern Bihar, will be Adani Power's largest new plant since its 3.3 GW Tiroda project was fully commissioned in 2014. The company will supply power at just over 6 Indian rupees ($0.0684) per kilowatt hour to Bihar's state-run distribution companies from the Pirpainti plant, it said in a statement. Adani currently operates 18.1 GW of coal-fired power capacity in eight states and 12 plants across the country, and won bids to build and operate a 1.5 GW plant in the northern Uttar Pradesh state in May and a 1.6 GW capacity facility in Maharashtra in September 2024. ($1 = 87.6975 Indian rupees)

Vice President JD Vance to visit Indiana as Trump pressures GOP states to redistrict
Vice President JD Vance to visit Indiana as Trump pressures GOP states to redistrict

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Vice President JD Vance to visit Indiana as Trump pressures GOP states to redistrict

Vice President JD Vance visits Indiana on Thursday to discuss redistricting with Republican leaders as President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on GOP states to redraw congressional boundaries and give the party more winnable seats in the 2026 midterm elections. Vance is scheduled to hold private meetings with Gov. Mike Braun and others before attending a GOP fundraiser Thursday night in the solidly Republican state. Braun told reporters Tuesday he expects to discuss several matters with the vice president — including redistricting — but said no commitments have been made. 'It looks like it's going to happen across many Republican states,' Braun said. Vance's visit comes after Texas Democrats successfully stalled a vote there this week on a redrawn congressional map, part of a bid to secure five more GOP-leaning congressional seats at the expense of Democrats before the midterms. The White House's goal is to give Republicans an easier path to maintaining control of the House. Indiana is staunchly Republican, but opponents of any redistricting attempt are planning to make their objections known Thursday with protests and a news conference by the two Democratic members of the state's congressional delegation. Braun would have to call a special session if he chooses to start the redistricting process, but lawmakers have the sole power to draw up new maps. Braun's office has not responded to multiple emailed requests seeking more details about Vance's visit. Indiana lawmakers have been wary of the national spotlight in recent years, especially after a special session in 2022 resulted in lawmakers enacting a strict ban on abortions. Braun is a staunch ally of Trump in a state with a strong base of loyalists to the president. But Indiana is also home to Mike Pence, the former vice president and a past governor whose more measured approach to partisan politics still holds sway among many state lawmakers. The GOP would likely target Indiana's 1st Congressional District, a longtime Democratic stronghold that encompasses Gary and other cities near Chicago in the state's northwest corner. The seat held by third-term Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan has been seen as a possible pickup in recent years as manufacturing union jobs have left the area, said Laura Merrifield Wilson, a professor of political science at the University of Indianapolis. Lawmakers in Indiana redrew the borders of the district to be slightly more favorable towards Republicans in the 2022 election, but did not entirely split it up. The new maps were not challenged in court after they were approved in 2021, not even by Democrats and allies who had opposed the changes that also gave a boost to the GOP in the suburbs north of Indianapolis. Mrvan won reelection in 2022 by a respectable margin and easily retained his seat again in 2024. In a statement Tuesday, Mrvan said the Trump administration knows its policies are 'wildly unpopular.' 'They know that their only hope to maintain control is to pressure the Indiana General Assembly to violate the Indiana Constitution and redistrict U.S. House of Representative(s) seats mid-decade,' he added. The more dramatic option would be to zero in on Indiana's 7th Congressional District, composed entirely of Marion County and the Democratic stronghold of Indianapolis. Indiana's legislative leaders, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, held their same positions four years ago when the Legislature finalized the new maps. Both expressed approval of the final product and said the borders fairly reflected the makeup of the state. 'I believe these maps reflect feedback from the public and will serve Hoosiers well for the next decade,' Bray said at the time. Both leaders have been quiet on the possibility of a special session. Bray and Huston's offices did not respond to multiple messages left over the phone and email Wednesday. Republicans hold a supermajority in the Indiana House and Senate, meaning Democrats could not stop a special session by refusing to attend. Julia Vaughn, director of Common Cause Indiana, said a costly redistricting process will not look good for Republicans who tightened the belt on the state budget this past legislative session due to revenue forecasts. Common Cause is one of the leading groups nationally opposing Trump's push to redistrict. 'I don't think there is any way they could rationalize spending taxpayer dollars to come back to Indianapolis to redraw maps that were just drawn four years ago for purely partisan purposes,' Vaughn said.

RFK Jr. defunds mRNA vaccine research. His anti-vax policies will kill people.
RFK Jr. defunds mRNA vaccine research. His anti-vax policies will kill people.

USA Today

timea minute ago

  • USA Today

RFK Jr. defunds mRNA vaccine research. His anti-vax policies will kill people.

It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious. In his ongoing crusade to make America sicker and dumber, Health and Human Services Secretary (I bristle every time I type that title) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has axed about $500 million in vital mRNA vaccine research funding. It's the latest salvo in Kennedy's war against science, and it's about as predictably stupid as any of the Neanderthal-brained things he has done since President Donald Trump foisted him on the American public. (My apologies to any Neanderthals offended by the comparison.) You might recall being fortunate beyond measure to receive mRNA vaccine shots during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Nobel Prize-winning vaccine development saved millions of lives globally and was hailed by Trump himself as a 'medical miracle.' 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen' Messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines are far more nimble and easier to produce and alter than traditional vaccines, so continued development is seen as crucial ‒ not just for future pandemics but for everything from responding to bioterrorism attacks to cancer prevention. Michael Osterholm, head of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told NPR this when asked about Kennedy's mRNA funding decision: 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen in my 50 years in this business. ... It is baseless, and we will pay a tremendous price in terms of illnesses and deaths.' Every day RFK Jr. is in charge is a bad day for science In a New York Times report, University of Pennsylvania immunologist Scott Hensley, who has been researching an mRNA flu vaccine, said: 'This is a bad day for science.' That can be said about every day as long as we have a wholly unqualified anti-vaccine nutter like Kennedy in charge of America's health. And remember, as with all things RFK Jr., his 'concerns' and 'fears' about mRNA vaccines are wholly unfounded and not supported by science. They are safe and have been studied for decades. It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious, and they're often cloaked by the daily insanity spun up by Trump himself, from tariffs to migrant cruelty to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Out go the smart people, in come the vaccine skeptics In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced them with people he handpicked (that's a red flag if I've ever seen one), including several vaccine skeptics. Now they're reexamining your children's vaccine schedule and echoing baseless fears heard in anti-vax circles for years. Kennedy is also reportedly considering getting rid of all members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which gives guidance to doctors and health insurers on preventive medicine. Dr. Thomas Lew, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and frequent contributor for USA TODAY Opinion, told CBS News: "This will greatly damage all the work we've done in preventative care, making people sicker, and driving up costs and premiums. To put it mildly, this is extremely concerning ‒ and doing the opposite of making America healthy.' Kennedy is so bad for health that he's being sued by major medical groups Kennedy has removed the COVID-19 vaccine from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, prompting a lawsuit from leading medical groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians. At the end of March, the highly respected top vaccine regulator at the Food and Drug Administration was forced out, and wrote in his resignation letter: 'It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.' Food inspections? Hand washing? What's next to come under RFK Jr.'s ax? Whether through Trump's magical branding skills or Republican malpractice or both, Kennedy was able to take on enough of a veneer of credibility to become health secretary. But he is still the same raw-milk-guzzling, roadkill-eating, vaccine-alarmist dipstick he was for all those years when his gibberish was nothing more than a punchline for jokes about conspiracy-addled loons. And he is now doing things that are making us fundamentally less safe, whether by sowing doubt about vaccines, derailing medical research or curbing food safety inspections. Kennedy's policies are almost certainly going to kill people A year ago, if you asked me and many other sane people to come up with the most irresponsible public figure to put in charge of America's health, we would have said RFK Jr. And here we are, staring down radical changes inspired not by science but by suspicion and opportunistic hearsay. The ineptitude and absurdity of the Trump administration can be almost laughable at times. But I'm convinced people will die because of Kennedy's policies, weirdo worldviews and actions. And I'm not laughing a bit. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store