logo
Inquest hears mum 'desperate' after benefits cut

Inquest hears mum 'desperate' after benefits cut

Yahoo4 days ago

A new inquest into the death of disabled mum of nine, who took her own life after her benefits were stopped, has heard she was ''shocked, distressed and desperate''.
Jodey Whiting, from Stockton-on-Tees, who had numerous physical and mental health issues, was found dead in 2017, two weeks after being denied Employment Support Allowance (ESA) because she had been deemed fit to work.
The 42-year-old's mother, Joy Dove, has spent years campaigning for a fresh hearing after the original lasted 37 minutes and did not include information from the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).
Ms Dove, 71, said as a result of the DWP's decision, her daughter "lost hope". The inquest in Middlesbrough continues.
In 2016, Ms Whiting missed a benefits assessment after being admitted to hospital with pneumonia, the inquest heard, which was followed by doctors finding a cyst on her brain.
It was only after being finally discharged that a letter from the DWP was found among the unopened mail at her flat asking why she had not attended a recent medical assessment.
A subsequent letter then arrived telling her she was "fit to work".
Giving evidence at Teesside Coroner's Court, Ms Dove said she could see a change in her daughter from that moment on.
She said: "Jodey said, 'I can't breathe, I can't walk, I can't walk out of the door. What am I going to do?'
''She lost hope, she worried she wouldn't be able to pay her bills and have nothing to live on."
In the letters she left for her children following her death, Ms Whiting wrote: "I've had enough, I want peace."
The coroner at the original inquest in May 2017 recorded a verdict of suicide.
An Independent Case Examiner (ICE) concluded in 2019 there had been a number of serious failings in the DWP's handling of Ms Whiting's application.
At the end of her evidence, Ms Dove said: ''It was the DWP that caused it. There's no way it was anything other."
A representative from the DWP is due to give evidence at the inquest, which is expected to last three days.
If you have been affected by any issues in this report, help and support is available on the BBC Action Line.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Wait almost over for mum who fought for inquest
Second inquest opens into benefits-cut death
HM Courts and Tribunals Service

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jonathan Joss Gunman "Laughed As He Died," Husband Says
Jonathan Joss Gunman "Laughed As He Died," Husband Says

Buzz Feed

time30 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Jonathan Joss Gunman "Laughed As He Died," Husband Says

On Monday, the sad news broke that actor Jonathan Joss had died at age 59 years old after he was shot and killed in what his husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, alleged was an anti-gay hate crime on Sunday, June 1. People previously reported that the couple's neighbor Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, 56, confessed to shooting Jonathan as he was detained and has been charged with first-degree murder. He was released from police custody under full house arrest on a $200,000 bond on June that same day, Tristan posted a statement to Jonathan's official Facebook page where he alleged that Jonathan had been killed because of his sexuality. He added that he and Jonathan had been 'harassed regularly' by their neighbors in San Antonio, Texas, for being a gay couple, and that their home had recently burned down after repeated threats. Tristan, 32, said that the shooting occurred when he and Jonathan returned to the remains of their home to check for mail and became distressed when they found their dog's skull at the site, which had been 'placed in clear view.' 'My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done,' the statement began.'Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic,' Tristan went on. 'When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw.''While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired,' he alleged. 'Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life.' And Tristan has bravely shared some more details from his husband's death in a devastating new interview with People, where he alleged that the gunman was 'laughing' at them as Jonathan died. He also opened up about immediately knowing that 'there was no hope of saving' Jonathan due to the severe damage caused by the 'really, really close range' shot to his head. 'He was struggling so hard, trying to stay alive,' Tristan recalled. 'I held my husband's face together as best I could, and I told him how much I loved him, and that none of this was his fault. I told him he needed to cross over easy. He didn't need to keep fighting.''I told him that no matter what, and in some way, shape, or form, we'll always be together, and he'll always be my husband,' Tristan continued. He also claimed that the alleged gunman 'still had the gun pointed over' him while his husband lay dying, adding: 'He was laughing. He mocked me for telling my husband that I loved him and used the same homophobic slurs.' Tristan told the publication that he finds it hurtful 'whenever people try to say that it wasn't a hate crime,' which is no doubt a reference to the San Antonio Police Department saying that they had 'found no evidence to indicate that Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation' just one day after his murder. On Thursday, SAPD police chief William McManus admitted that he regretted making this statement, and said that it was 'way too soon' for a hate crime to be ruled out. 'That was way, way, way, premature,' he said. 'We shouldn't have done it. It was way too soon before we had any real information. And I will own that… I want to apologize to the LGBTQ+ community for the tragic loss of Mr. Joss, which has been heavily felt."'Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in this case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss,' McManus added during a press also addressed Tristan's claims that their home was burnt down in an anti-gay hate crime, saying that they were 'working closely' with the fire department's arson investigators, and that 'the investigation is still active.'He went on to confirm that law enforcement had received 'approximately 70 calls over the past two years' from both Jonathan and his neighbors over 'neighborhood-type disturbances.'

Englishtown police chief pleads guilty, barred from public employment
Englishtown police chief pleads guilty, barred from public employment

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Englishtown police chief pleads guilty, barred from public employment

ENGLISHTOWN -- Police chief Peter S. Cooke has resigned after pleading guilty to illegally accessing a law enforcement database for non-law enforcement purposes. He will enter the state's Pretrial Intervention Program, which provides first-time offenders a path to dismiss all charges if the offenders complete a list of conditions set by the court. Cooke was arrested on November 1, 2024, according to the complaint. On May 19, Cooke submitted his resignation through his attorney. It came after a 'Public Employment Forfeiture Order' by Judge Natalie Watson, according to the May 28 Englishtown resolution. Christopher Swendeman, Monmouth County Public Information Officer, wrote that as part of the order, Cooke is 'forever disqualified from holding any other office or position of honor, trust, or profit under this State or any of its administrative or political subdivisions.' Howell: SWAT operation turns into a death investigation Neither Cooke nor his attorney responded to requests for comment. According to the accusation, Cooke was charged with 'one count of third-degree Computer Criminal Activity.' On August 24, 2023, he accessed the Spillman Flex Law Enforcement Database 'for a non-law enforcement purpose, contrary to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-25(a),' a state law that prohibits such actions. According to the complaint, Cooke looked up individuals by the initials of 'M.M. and/or M.A.' between February 14, 2019 and August 24, 2023. In April 2024, Cooke was placed on paid administrative leave. Between August and September 2024, Cooke agreed to help another person 'M.M.' shoplift in Marlboro, according to the complaint. Stolen groceries were found during the investigation. Cooke was arrested in November 2024 and Englishtown suspended him without pay. Point Pleasant Beach: Municipal judge suspended for 2 months over 'biased' Facebook posts In May, he pleaded guilty to the computer crimes. When asked if the shoplifting charges were dropped, the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office did not address those charges, pointing only to the charge of computer crime activity. Cooke has been involved in a lawsuit filed by former borough clerk Gretchen McCarthy. According to that lawsuit, McCarthy claimed she was fired for raising questions about borough activity – in particular, the police department's finances. In a response to the complaint, Cooke denied the allegations of unlawful conduct and retaliation. Olivia Liu is a reporter covering transportation, Red Bank and western Monmouth County. She can be reached at oliu@ This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: New Jersey town's police chief pleads guilty, resigns from office

Silicon Beach exec alleges ‘shake down' by investor ousted during #MeToo era
Silicon Beach exec alleges ‘shake down' by investor ousted during #MeToo era

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Silicon Beach exec alleges ‘shake down' by investor ousted during #MeToo era

A Silicon Beach entrepreneur and her investor are suing each other — part of a growing legal brawl that includes a dispute over a private jet, claims of a lesbian workplace affair and allegations of a sexual assault in a West Hollywood hotel. On May 14, Mahway founder Jessica Mah sued D Global Ventures Chief Executive Justin Caldbeck in Los Angeles Superior Court, saying he groped her and repeatedly solicited her for sex, then attempted extortion and defamed her to other investors when she rejected him. Hours after Mah's claim was docketed, Caldbeck filed his own suit, saying Mah 'seduced investors' with false promises and used money she raised to prop up her 'ersatz glamorous lifestyle' — including spending company cash on a private jet. 'Justin Caldbeck's claims collapse under the weight of the very documents he read, approved, and signed,' a spokesman for Mah said. 'Jessica Mah will not be intimidated. We expect the court to deliver a penalty to Caldbeck as substantial as his gross misconduct.' A spokesperson for Caldbeck, Sallie Hofmeister, countered with a statement that called Mah's lawsuit 'nothing more than a calculated effort ... to distract from credible accusations that they have misused millions of dollars of investor funds.' 'Nearly a year ago, she explicitly threatened to weaponize past allegations against Mr. Caldbeck if he pursued legal claims related to fraud and embezzlement against her,' Hofmeister said. Mah has maintained a jet-piloting, Lamborghini-racing, party-DJ persona on Instagram and tech industry podcasts. Caldbeck became an early face of Silicon Valley's #MeToo reckoning when he issued a public apology and left the company he co-founded after multiple Asian American entrepreneurs accused him of sexual misconduct in 2017. Their court battle — one of the ugliest to hit L.A.'s tech scene in years — erupted at a moment of cultural crisis for the industry. Many companies have abandoned efforts to root out 'bro culture,' with polarizing figures such as Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg embracing President Trump's anti-woke agenda. At the same time, economic uncertainty has led to mass layoffs and forced companies to do away with luxurious perks for employees. How Mah spends her company's money and treats her team is the focus of other ongoing litigation. On May 15, two former Mahway employees — ex-President Walter Delph and William Mulholland, who served as chief financial officer — sued her for wrongful termination and whistleblower retaliation. Both are represented by Caldbeck's longtime lawyer, Ivo Labar. All three of the lawsuits filed against Mah allege that she 'holds herself out as a 'unicorn breeder,'' using an industry term for companies valued at more than $1 billion. 'In reality, Mah is a charlatan living on investors funds intended for Mahway's portfolio of startup companies, the majority of which are only 'unicorns' in the sense that they are also imaginary,' Caldbeck and Mulholland's suits both claim. The men's complaints accuse Mah of using company funds for personal expenses and structuring investment payouts to unfairly benefit her. Mahway is operated out of her rented West Hollywood mansion, with the company footing the bill, the suits allege. Mah said on a recent podcast appearance that the rental cost is $16,500 per month. Delph additionally accused Mah of age discrimination and sexual harassment, claiming she called him an 'old man' and carried on a public affair with Mahway founding partner Andrea Barrica — a relationship both women deny. According to Delph's suit, Mah 'would rub Barrica's upper inner thighs' during company meetings. That allegation is similar to one Mah leveled against Caldbeck. In her May 14 lawsuit, she alleged he 'touched the upper-most part of [her] thigh and put his hand next to her genitalia,' during a business meeting at the Pendry Hotel in 2022. Caldbeck's spokeswoman Hofmeister, who also represents Delph, called Mah's claims 'nothing more than a smokescreen to deflect attention' from the fraud allegations being leveled against her. 'Ms. Mah's lawsuit is meritless and the latest example of her bullying tactics,' Hofmeister said. Mah fired back at Delph on May 15 with a raft of civil conspiracy charges, filing a suit that alleged he colluded with Caldbeck and Mulholland to smear her and 'shake down' the company. The three men say their suits were filed independently of one another. Mulholland said he was forced to resign this year 'in order to avoid engaging in illegal activities at Mah's direction,' according to his May 15 suit. Barrica has also jumped into the fray, accusing Caldbeck of sexual harassment and extortion in a lawsuit filed May 20. Barrica claims he repeatedly tried to climb on top of her and kiss her in an Uber after a business meeting in Paris. The Mahway executive says Caldbeck tried to 'leverage his repulsive behavior by threatening to spread objectively false allegations that Ms. Barrica was in a sexual and romantic relationship' with Mah. Barrica alleges Caldbeck pressured her to join his 'unhinged and baseless campaign to destroy Ms. Mah.' According to Barrica's complaint — filed by Mah's longtime lawyer— when Mah learned of the alleged incident, she confided about her own experiences with Caldbeck. The two women agreed to try to maintain a professional relationship with the investor while limiting contact, Barrica's suit said. That seemed to work until a blowup over executive payouts in September. Days before the first complaints were filed in the spring, Barrica reached out to Caldbeck 'to make one last appeal for peace,' according to her complaint. By Barrica's account, the truce offer didn't go over well. 'Even if Jess said that I raped her, I wouldn't care,' Caldbeck said, according to Barrica's suit. 'My investors wouldn't care either.' According to Mulholland's and Delph's suits, Caldbeck's spat with Mah over payouts led the executives to probe the company's operations. Both said in their claims they concluded she was bilking investors. Delph contends in his complaint that he was fired after raising those concerns to his boss. Mulholland felt forced to resign amid growing fear he would be left holding the bag for Mah's misdeeds, per his suit. Caldbeck's suit said his investment company has 'suffered millions of dollars in damages' from Mahway's mismanagement. His spokeswoman said he looks forward to setting the record straight. 'Mr. Caldbeck is confident the truth will continue to emerge and Ms. Mah's allegations will be shown for what they are,' Hofmeister said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store