logo
Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

The Age16 hours ago

In 2016, on a whim, American woman Dani Shapiro submitted her DNA for analysis through a genealogy website. Weeks later she received the results: her 'beloved father' was, in fact, not her biological father, a revelation that shook Shapiro to the core.
In her bestselling 2019 memoir, Inheritance: A Memoir of Genealogy, Paternity, and Love, Shapiro documents her experience opening Pandora's genealogy box and explores the personal and profound impacts that DNA tests can reveal.
But Shapiro is far from alone, with 2021 figures showing more than 30 million people have submitted their DNA via commercial tests such as 23andMe, AncestryDNA, CircleDNA, GenoPalate and MyHeritage.
While there are numerous motivations for people to undertake a DNA test – from genealogy, gaining health information, and locating a biological relative, to plain curiosity – the results can often reveal more than anticipated.
'DNA testing is an interesting phenomenon because of the 'big unknown' that could be revealed in the results,' says clinical psychologist and author, Dr Rebecca Ray. 'Sometimes, unexpected results can bring confusion or emotional distress if they uncover family secrets or challenge personal beliefs, leading to a complex set of feelings.'
And sometimes, Ray adds, the results can have the opposite effect. 'The tests can also bring clarity, healing and connection, especially for those searching for identity or lost family members.'
Here's what happened when three women with very different stories tried a commercial DNA test.
'I had a longing to find my genetic family': Caitlin Leishman, 18
'I'm double-donor conceived. This means that while my mum was pregnant with me, I am not biologically related to her. When I was born, I had no idea who my genetic parents or family were.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise
Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

The Age

time16 hours ago

  • The Age

Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

In 2016, on a whim, American woman Dani Shapiro submitted her DNA for analysis through a genealogy website. Weeks later she received the results: her 'beloved father' was, in fact, not her biological father, a revelation that shook Shapiro to the core. In her bestselling 2019 memoir, Inheritance: A Memoir of Genealogy, Paternity, and Love, Shapiro documents her experience opening Pandora's genealogy box and explores the personal and profound impacts that DNA tests can reveal. But Shapiro is far from alone, with 2021 figures showing more than 30 million people have submitted their DNA via commercial tests such as 23andMe, AncestryDNA, CircleDNA, GenoPalate and MyHeritage. While there are numerous motivations for people to undertake a DNA test – from genealogy, gaining health information, and locating a biological relative, to plain curiosity – the results can often reveal more than anticipated. 'DNA testing is an interesting phenomenon because of the 'big unknown' that could be revealed in the results,' says clinical psychologist and author, Dr Rebecca Ray. 'Sometimes, unexpected results can bring confusion or emotional distress if they uncover family secrets or challenge personal beliefs, leading to a complex set of feelings.' And sometimes, Ray adds, the results can have the opposite effect. 'The tests can also bring clarity, healing and connection, especially for those searching for identity or lost family members.' Here's what happened when three women with very different stories tried a commercial DNA test. 'I had a longing to find my genetic family': Caitlin Leishman, 18 'I'm double-donor conceived. This means that while my mum was pregnant with me, I am not biologically related to her. When I was born, I had no idea who my genetic parents or family were.

Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise
Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

Sydney Morning Herald

time16 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Caitlin longed to find her genetic family. What she learnt about her mother was a surprise

In 2016, on a whim, American woman Dani Shapiro submitted her DNA for analysis through a genealogy website. Weeks later she received the results: her 'beloved father' was, in fact, not her biological father, a revelation that shook Shapiro to the core. In her bestselling 2019 memoir, Inheritance: A Memoir of Genealogy, Paternity, and Love, Shapiro documents her experience opening Pandora's genealogy box and explores the personal and profound impacts that DNA tests can reveal. But Shapiro is far from alone, with 2021 figures showing more than 30 million people have submitted their DNA via commercial tests such as 23andMe, AncestryDNA, CircleDNA, GenoPalate and MyHeritage. While there are numerous motivations for people to undertake a DNA test – from genealogy, gaining health information, and locating a biological relative, to plain curiosity – the results can often reveal more than anticipated. 'DNA testing is an interesting phenomenon because of the 'big unknown' that could be revealed in the results,' says clinical psychologist and author, Dr Rebecca Ray. 'Sometimes, unexpected results can bring confusion or emotional distress if they uncover family secrets or challenge personal beliefs, leading to a complex set of feelings.' And sometimes, Ray adds, the results can have the opposite effect. 'The tests can also bring clarity, healing and connection, especially for those searching for identity or lost family members.' Here's what happened when three women with very different stories tried a commercial DNA test. 'I had a longing to find my genetic family': Caitlin Leishman, 18 'I'm double-donor conceived. This means that while my mum was pregnant with me, I am not biologically related to her. When I was born, I had no idea who my genetic parents or family were.

Al Pacino tests credibility as a priestly exorcist in this horror outing
Al Pacino tests credibility as a priestly exorcist in this horror outing

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Al Pacino tests credibility as a priestly exorcist in this horror outing

THE RITUAL ★ ½ (MA) 98 minutes Exorcism movies are as much rituals as the exorcisms themselves, rarely intended to teach us anything new. The writer-director David Midell settles for going through the motions in his lacklustre The Ritual, the only real novelty being the presence of Al Pacino as the exorcist, despite the potential of the subject matter, a 'real' case that occurred in an Iowa nunnery in 1928 and was written up in Time a few years on. 'Real' has been put in quotation marks for obvious reasons, and in theory the film leaves the question open: the exorcism was real, but whether any demons were expelled is for the viewer to decide. For dramatic purposes Midell skews the balance in favour of belief, presenting Father Joseph Steiger (Dan Stevens), the film's representative of sceptical reason, as a weakling unable to face the truth confronting him. In any case, the film's claim to historical accuracy is not to be taken too seriously. Emma Schmidt, the possessed woman who is brought to the nunnery, is played by 27-year-old Abigail Cowen, although the real Schmidt was 46 at the time. I can only suppose this has been done for commercial reasons, meaning someone has decided that on balance the audience would prefer to see a younger woman tied to a bed while she writhes, sweats and makes guttural noises. The tying-down happens a fair way into the film, after the matter has been debated at length by Steiger, in his capacity as the parish priest, and Father Theophilus Riesinger, the elderly German-American exorcist played by Pacino, whose judgement is vindicated at every turn. Less prominently featured is the Mother Superior (Patricia Heaton), who complains at one point about a lifetime spent obeying the orders of men, a nod to feminism which under the circumstances is less than convincing. Nor does the film convincingly feel as if it's taking place in the US Midwest in the 1920s. The handheld camerawork is somewhat jarring in a period piece, but the bigger problem is that none of the actors seem to belong. Cowen is up for what's required of her physically, but lacks a character to play other than 'woman possessed by demons'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store