Spain's Nostrum Seeks to Sell Stakes in Its Data Center Projects
Nostrum expects to receive non-binding offers for as much as 60% of its overall data center business by the end of July, Chief Executive Officer Gabriel Nebreda said in an interview in Madrid. Investors are being invited to bid for stakes in Nostrum's portfolio, which is formed by six data center projects of various sizes and has a total capacity of 400 megawatts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Google should 'walk away' from Waymo
Needham & Company senior media and internet analyst Laura Martin joins Market Domination with Josh Lipton to explain why Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) should ditch Waymo and focus on generative artificial intelligence (AI) instead. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. Related videos The £70bn pension tax raid Reeves may not be able to resist 10 shares I wouldn't want to hold in a stock market crash After falling 16% in a day, this stock's on my list of shares to buy in August This FTSE 250 trust is easily beating the global index in 2025. Time to buy? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pfizer (PFE) Receives CHMP Recommendation For Adapted COVID-19 Vaccine COMIRNATY
BioNTech SE and Pfizer recently received a positive recommendation from the European Medicines Agency for marketing authorization of their COVID-19 vaccine, which likely contributed to Pfizer's share price increase of 8% in the last quarter. The company's advancements in COVID-19 vaccine development, alongside other product-related announcements like the XTANDI and BRAFTOVI trial results, added weight to this upward movement. Despite legal challenges and declining earnings, Pfizer's focus on innovation and strategic partnerships like the one with XtalPi possibly countered broader market moves, which saw a smaller 1% increase in the same period. We've identified 3 warning signs for Pfizer that you should be aware of. Trump's oil boom is here — pipelines are primed to profit. Discover the 22 US stocks riding the wave. The recent positive recommendation from the European Medicines Agency for the COVID-19 vaccine developed by BioNTech SE and Pfizer has contributed to an 8% increase in Pfizer's share price over the last quarter. This news may provide a temporary boost to Pfizer's revenue and earnings forecasts, especially as the company continues to innovate amidst legal challenges and declining earnings. The authorization could enhance immediate market confidence in Pfizer's product pipeline, impacting future revenue projections positively. Over the past year, Pfizer experienced a total return of 13.78% including dividends, reflecting a challenging period for shareholders. When compared to the broader US market's return of 17.2% over the same period, Pfizer has underperformed, highlighting investor concerns over competitive pressures and revenue growth prospects. The current share price movement toward the analyst consensus price target of $29.23 suggests a cautiously optimistic outlook among some market participants. Analysts' revenue forecasts reflect potential declines due to increased competition for existing products, yet others anticipate that strategic shifts in research focus, especially in oncology, might mitigate future earnings risks. With a modest increase of 8% in shares largely tied to vaccine authorization, it underscores the uncertainty surrounding longer-term performance relative to bearish analyst expectations. Understand Pfizer's track record by examining our performance history report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include PFE. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tech companies building massive AI data centers should pay to power them
The projected growth in artificial intelligence and its unprecedented demand for electricity to power enormous data centers present a serious challenge to the financial and technical capacity of the U.S. utility system. Appreciation for the sheer magnitude of that challenge has gotten lost as forecast after forecast projects massive growth in electric demand over the coming decade. The idea of building a data center that will draw 1 gigawatt of power or more, an amount sufficient to serve over 875,000 homes, is in the plans of so many data center developers and so routinely discussed that it no longer seems extraordinary. The challenge, when viewed in the aggregate, may be overwhelming. A recent Wood Mackenzie report identified 64 gigawatts of confirmed data center related power projects currently on the books with another 132 gigawatts potentially to be developed. 64 gigawatts are enough to power 56 million homes — more than twice the population of the 15 largest cities in America. The U.S. electric utility system is struggling to meet the projected energy needs of the AI industry. The problem is that many utilities do not have the financial and organizational resources to build new generating and transmission facilities at the scale and on the data center developers' desired timeline. The public policy question now on the table is who should pay for and bear the risk for these massive mega-energy projects. Will it be the AI developers such as Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet — whose combined market value is seven times that of the entire S&P 500 Utility Sector — or the residential and other customers of local electric utilities? The process to answer this and related questions is underway in the hallways of the U.S. Congress, at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other federal agencies, in tariff proceedings before state regulatory authorities and in public debate at the national, state and local levels. Whether they are developed at the federal, state or local level, the following values and objectives should form the core of public policy in this area: Data centers developers that require massive amounts of electric power (e.g. above 500MW or another specified level) should be required to pay for building new generating and transmission facilities. The State of Texas recently enacted legislation that requires data centers and other new large users to fund the infrastructure necessary to serve their needs. Although it is customary to spread the cost of new facilities across the user base of a utility, the demands that data center developers are placing on utility systems across the country are sufficiently extraordinary to justify allocating the costs of new facilities to those developers. Moreover, data center developers have the financial resources to cover those costs and incorporate them into the rates charged to users of their AI services. The developers of large data centers should bear the risk associated with new utility-built generating and transmission facilities, not the utility. As an example of such a policy, the Public Utility Commission of Ohio just approved a compromise proposed by American Electric Power of Ohio that would require data centers with loads greater than 1 gigawatt and mobile data centers over 25 megawatts to commit to 10-year electric service contracts and pay minimum demand charges based on 85 percent of their contract capacity, up from 60 percent under the utility's current general service tariff. Another option included in the Texas legislation requires significant up-front payments early in the planning process and mandates that data center developers disclose where they may have simultaneously placed demands for power. It is not unusual for data center requests for service to be withdrawn once they decide on the best location and package of incentives. Data center developers have the financial capacity and ability to manage this risk, utilities do not. Generating facilities that are co-located at large data centers should be integrated with the local utility electric grid, with appropriate cost allocation. Although a few projects have examined the option of a co-located power generation 'island' fully independent of the grid, most projects intend to interconnect with the grid system for back-up power and related purposes. Properly managed, this interconnection could be advantageous for both the data center and the utility system, provided that costs are appropriately allocated across the system. The U.S. government should continue to support the development of nuclear technology, including small modular reactors. U.S. utilities do not have the financial resources to assume the risk of building new nuclear-powered generating facilities. The emergence of a new set of customers, data center developers with enormous needs for electric power and deep pockets, changes the equation. The U.S. government has provided billions of dollars of support for new nuclear technologies and should continue to do so for the purpose of bringing their costs down. The U.S. government should continue to support energy efficiency improvements at data centers. Data centers use massive amounts of power for running servers, cooling systems, storage systems, networking equipment, backup systems, security systems and lighting. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has developed a 'handbook' of measures that data centers can implement to reduce energy usage and achieve savings. In addition, there now are strong market forces to develop new super-efficient chips that will lower the unit costs of training and using AI models. The U.S. government should help accelerate the development of these chips given their leverage on U.S. electricity demand. The stakes in this public policy debate over our energy future could not be higher. If we get these policies right, AI has the potential to remake the U.S. economy and the energy infrastructure of this country. If we get it wrong, the push to build new generating and transmission facilities to provide gigawatts of power has the potential to overwhelm the financial and operational capacity our electric utility system, impose burdensome rate increases on homeowners and businesses, undercut efforts to reduce the use of fossil fuels to meet climate-related goals and compromise the reliability of our electricity grid for years to come. David M. Klaus is a consultant on energy issues who served as deputy undersecretary of the U.S. Department of Energy during the Obama administration and as a political appointee to two other Democratic presidents. Mark MacCarthy is the author of 'Regulating Digital Industries' (Brookings, 2023), an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Communication, Culture & Technology Program, a nonresident senior fellow at the Institute for Technology Law and Policy at Georgetown Law and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
