'Crisis of trust': Epstein furore to hurt Republicans
Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system.
"This is going to hurt Republicans in the mid-terms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable," Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's Meet the Press program.
Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the US political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections.
The Washington Post reported that Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furore around Epstein.
Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a "bigger spectacle" as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources.
Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered "a crisis of trust" by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Trump's MAGA base.
"This is about trust in government," the California Democrat told Meet the Press.
"This is about being a reform agent of transparency."
President Donald Trump has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison.
Massie and Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break.
Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, said he favours a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of "credible" evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors.
"The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented," Johnson said. "It does not adequately include those protections."
Massie dismissed Johnson's claim as "a straw man" excuse.
"Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted," he said. "They're hiding behind that."
Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term.
On Saturday, Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton.
Last week he accused former president Barack Obama of "treason" over how his administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in US elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson.
1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)
National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Treasury secretary calls new Trump accounts 'a backdoor' way to privatize Social Security
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday likened the Trump accounts created by Republicans' massive new domestic policy law to 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' Democrats are already launching political attacks. Bessent was discussing the Trump accounts at a Breitbart policy panel. The federal government will contribute $1,000 into these new tax-deferred investment accounts for US citizen children born between 2025 and 2028, while parents and others can contribute up to $5,000 annually. The funds are intended to be used for higher education, buying a home or starting a small business. The accounts can also be used to help Americans better understand investing and serve as a way to save for retirement, Bessent said. Then he threw out a comment that had Democrats immediately up in arms. 'In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security,' he said. 'Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out. To the extent that if, all of a sudden, these accounts grow and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement, then that's a game changer, too.' Democrats have long accused Republicans of wanting to privatize Social Security — a topic that sparks intense reactions from Americans who are suspicious of plans to harm the program after they've paid into it for years — and have resurfaced the issue during President Donald Trump's second term. 'Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said the quiet part out loud: The administration is scheming to privatize Social Security,' Tim Hogan, the Democratic National Committee's senior adviser for messaging, mobilization and strategy, said in a statement. 'Trump is now coming after American seniors with a 'backdoor' scam to take away the benefits they earned.' Privatizing Social Security would also enrich Wall Street, said Massachusetts Rep. Richard Neal, ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee. 'Republicans' ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security, and there isn't a backdoor they won't try to make Wall Street's dream a reality,' Neal said in a statement. 'For everyone else though, it's yet another warning sign that they cannot be trusted to safeguard the program millions rely on and have paid into over a lifetime of work.' The Treasury Department did not return a request for comment. Republicans in Congress last made a major effort to establish private Social Security accounts in 2005, during George W. Bush's second term. It proved unsuccessful after sparking heavy blowback. Bessent also said Wednesday that the Trump accounts would help address people who are disillusioned with 'the system,' referencing New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's unexpected win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. Mamdani is a democratic socialist. 'When you do this, you make everyone a shareholder,' Bessent said. 'People who are part of the system do not want to bring down the system.'
a few seconds ago
Trump's comments on Epstein raise new questions about when and why they fell out
President Donald Trump this week spoke at length about his relationship with accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, but his accounts raise new questions about when exactly the two fell out and why. Trump said on Monday that his relationship with Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of trafficking young girls and women, soured because Epstein poached some employees after he explicitly warned him not to do so. Trump on Tuesday went on to say that Epstein "stole" young women who worked at the spa at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. "People were taken out of the spa, hired by him. In other words, gone," Trump told reporters on Air Force One. One of those workers, Trump said, was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein accuser who said she was recruited by his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, when Giuffre was an underage teenager working as a locker-room attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000. Maxwell, convicted of sex trafficking minors and now serving a 20-year prison sentence, has denied the allegations. Giuffre died by suicide this past April at age 41. "I don't know. I think she worked at the spa, I think so, I think that was one of the people," Trump first said when asked about Giuffre before going on to say more definitively, "Yeah, he stole her. And by the way, she had no complaints about us, none whatsoever." According to Social Security records submitted to the court during Giuffre's defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell, Giuffre was employed at Mar-a-Lago Club LLC in 2000 and earned $1,866.50 during that calendar year. The duration and precise dates of her employment at Trump's club remained in dispute when the lawsuit settled in 2017. Giuffre -- then known as Virginia Roberts -- subsequently went on to travel extensively around the world with Epstein and Maxwell over the next two years, according to flight logs kept by one of Epstein's pilots that have been entered into court records in civil and criminal cases. Trump's comments came after the White House last week said Epstein was kicked out of Mar-a-Lago for being a "creep." Asked about the discrepancy between the White House's reasoning for his split with Epstein and his own that it was over Epstein stealing his employees, Trump said on Tuesday "it's sort of a little bit of the same thing." As he told reporters that Epstein poached young female staff, Trump said "people would come and complain, 'this guy is taking people from the spa.' I didn't know that." "And then when I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa.' I don't want him taking people. And he was fine. And then not too long after that, he did it again and I said, 'Out of here,'" Trump said. But previous comments from Trump suggested his falling out with Epstein occurred several years later than that. In 2002, Trump praised Epstein in a New York magazine profile of the now-deceased financier and convicted sex offender. "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy," Trump told the magazine. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Then in 2004, the two men were rivals over a property in Florida as reported by the Washington Post. Trump ultimately won the property at auction. In 2019, when Epstein was arrested on federal charges, Trump said he hadn't spoken with Epstein in 15 years. "I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach," Trump said in the Oval Office. "I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. I was not, yeah, a long time ago, I'd say maybe 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you. I was not a fan of his." Asked at the time for the reason behind their falling out and why Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago, Trump responded: "The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly."
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Why Talent And Resources Are The Backbone Of Education R&D
The Supreme Court in mid-July cleared the path for the Trump Administration to implement a significant restructuring of the U.S. Department of Education that will, by some estimates, cause the elimination of nearly 1,400 federal education staff. This includes roughly 90% of the professionals at the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the agency responsible for overseeing national education research and data systems. Good policy starts with good people. Lose them, and the system breaks down. Following the ruling, Education Secretary Linda McMahon stated the department would 'continue to perform all statutory duties.' But early signals suggest this will be an uphill climb. Just days later, the delayed release of the 2025 national science scores underscored the challenge of executing important federal functions without the experienced professionals to deliver them. Meanwhile, state and district leaders scrambled to adjust to another curveball: the withholding of nearly $7 billion in federal education funds for the 2025-26 school year. These funds, authorized by Congress and integral to local budgets, supported everything from academic enrichment to professional development. The money was eventually released on July 25; however, the confusion and chaos caused by the surprise delay were enough for even some of Trump's supporters to question what the Administration was doing. Ten Republican senators sent a letter to OMB Director Russell Vought on July 16, urging him to release the funds, writing: 'The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump's goal of returning K-12 education to the states. This funding goes directly to states and local school districts, where local leaders decide how this funding is spent.' Alabama state superintendent Eric Makey told POLITICO, 'This is not about political philosophy, this is about reliability and consistency. None of us were worrying about this.' And there are more reports of a potential rescissions package that would target the Department of Education. These are reminders that strong systems require steady support. Talent Is The First Ingredient In Effective R&D When the Alliance for Learning Innovation (ALI), which I lead as executive director, convened over 150 education leaders and stakeholders to develop our Blueprint for the Future of Federal Education R&D, one theme stood out: skilled professionals are required to drive effective research and innovation. Recent firings and buyouts at the U.S. Department of Education are disrupting the work of specialists who conduct large-scale federal education research, analyze critical assessments like the Nation's Report Card, and translate complex data into practical guidance for schools. These staff departures threaten to sever essential connections between researchers, educators, and ed tech developers just when evidence-based decision-making is most crucial for student outcomes. Without the talent to run these systems, even well-intentioned priorities can stall. The need for sound, actionable education research transcends partisan divides. ALI's spring survey of K-12 parents revealed strong bipartisan support for federal education R&D funding, with 79% of all parents and 73% of Republican and right-leaning parents favoring continued investment. Across the political spectrum, families agree that the federal government should play a leading role in helping schools identify effective practices and scale successful interventions. Parents want public investments in evidence-based tools that help students succeed, whether through improved literacy instruction, stronger math supports, or responsible classroom AI integration. What A Reimagined Federal R&D Structure Could Look Like Rebuilding the federal education workforce overnight isn't feasible; it will be a Herculean task. But this moment presents an opportunity to rethink how we structure and support federal education R&D for the long term. ALI's Blueprint outlines a modern approach that harnesses talent both inside and outside government through strategic public-private partnerships to deliver what schools need and parents expect. This dual strategy would expand the education R&D talent pipeline by investing in career pathways for external researchers, developers, and data scientists while simultaneously building interdisciplinary teams within federal agencies, combining experts in learning science, education policy, implementation, and user-centered design. Such integrated expertise, assembled through civil service recruitment and partnership mechanisms like the Intergovernmental Personnel Act and cooperative agreements, would ensure that critical federal initiatives like the Nation's Report Card have the sophisticated analytical capacity needed to generate actionable insights for educators. This is not about growing the government for its own sake. It's about ensuring that the tools and innovations educators need are rigorously developed, tested, and deployed in a way that serves students. We Need to Rebuild, Not Retreat Secretary McMahon reiterated her commitment to ensuring that the Department of Education continues to 'perform all statutory duties' and that, as she said during her confirmation hearing, federal education funding would not be reduced. These are important commitments, and ones that millions of educators, families, and state leaders are counting on. Now is the time to outline how those duties will be met in light of the staffing reductions and the hold on funding. Education R&D is not about compliance; it's about capacity. And that capacity is only possible when the federal government acts as the reliable partner that schools need to plan, adapt, and improve. ALI and many others in the education research and innovation community are committed to working with policymakers across the political spectrum to ensure the federal education R&D ecosystem remains strong, nimble, and aligned to real-world needs. Whether it's evaluating AI tools, supporting early literacy programs, or scaling successful tutoring models, the backbone of these efforts is talent and investment. Because when we lose the people and resources behind education R&D, we don't just slow innovation, we leave schools without the support they need to serve students well. Follow Sara Schapiro on LinkedIn
