
Four Things to know about the New York Prison System's ruling family
— This story first appeared in New York Focus, a non-profit news publication investigating New York state politics. Sign up for their stories at nysfocus.com/newsletter.
New York's state prison commissioner, Daniel Martuscello III, is catching flak from every direction.
Since December, when the state attorney general released video of prison guards beating an incarcerated man to death, Martsucello has faced calls for resignation from prisoners' rights activists and corrections officers alike. Some of the former see him as the kingpin of a brutally violent system; the latter as a gutless reformer who doesn't have their backs. He's faced protests, national outrage, aggressive inquiries from horrified legislators — and, most recently, a wildcat strike from his guards. Through mediated talks with the officers' union on one hand and promises for reform on the other, he's been working around the clock to keep both his commissionership and the state prison system itself from falling apart.
How did Martuscello find himself here? While his tenure as prison chief is less than two years old, he's no stranger to New York's Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, or DOCCS. He came of age in the agency, and knows its ugly side better than anyone.
This week, New York Focus published an in-depth investigation into Martuscello's ascent. The result of a year and a half of reporting, the article reveals his role as scion of a state prison dynasty. It details not only the commissioner's rise to power, but his father's, brother's, siblings', in-laws', and that of his family's friends across the system.
Thousands of pages of previously unreleased documents and testimony from incarcerated people, advocates, officials, and over a dozen current and former DOCCS staff tell the story of a man who's found himself at the center of a firestorm, torn between his professed progressivism and his background in a shadowy system.
Here's what you need to know.
Daniel Martuscello III is the eldest child of a New York prison dynasty.
Dan Martuscello is second-generation DOCCS. His father started as a guard in the late 1960s and rose through the security ranks, eventually becoming superintendent of a maximum security prison.
The elder Martuscello was an old school prison boss — simultaneously aggressive and savvy — with deep connections throughout the agency. He was such a DOCCS institution that some contemporaries simply referred to him as 'the Old Man.'
The Old Man raised six children, all but one of whom launched careers in the prison agency. Three worked under their father's watch at his prison, as did three of the Old Man's sons-in-law.
Dan, the Old Man's eldest, is the family's suave politician. 'He's very astute politically,' said Jennifer Scaife, executive director of the Correctional Association of New York, a nonprofit that the state tasks with overseeing prison conditions. He's won over key elected officials in the state government's Democratic majority, as well as some prisoners' rights advocates, who say he's as accessible and humanitarian as one can hope from the head of a sprawling 42-facility carceral system. Before his confirmation as permanent prison commissioner, sources described him as long destined to take over.
Dan's brother Chris has also spent his years seeking power; he's shot up the ranks of DOCCS's internal investigations office. In contrast to Dan, Chris inherited his father's rough edges. Former staff describe him as a hot-headed tyrant whose main mode of leadership is intimidation.
The dynasty is the center of a patronage network. Its main hub is the prison agency's internal accountability office.
The Martuscello prison family functions as the focal point of a patronage network, according to former staff and documents. It has taken advantage of DOCCS's culture of favoritism, wherein employees in sought-after posts often have benefactors who helped secure their cushy or lucrative assignments. The network is so embedded in DOCCS that staff have dubbed it the 'friends and family' program.
The friends and family network spans across the prison agency, from its nursing corps to administration to security ranks to its training and education programs — though its main hub is Chris's internal investigations office.
That office — now called the Office of Special Investigations, or OSI — is responsible for digging into wrongdoing against both incarcerated people and prison employees. Traditionally staffed by former corrections officers, OSI allows the prison agency to police itself. Incarcerated people and advocates describe it as a black box, quick to absolve officers and adept at keeping DOCCS wrongdoing out of the public eye. It closes at least hundreds of unresolved officer abuse cases a year.
A former head of the office was an old friend of the Martuscellos (until a state investigation found him covering for one his beneficiaries, an alleged serial harasser, and he retired). The Old Man used that connection to ensure that his family could get plum posts in OSI, per former staff and documents. Chris transferred to the office and quickly ascended its hierarchy, as did a buddy from Chris and Dan's corrections officer days, the Old Man's closest friend, the eldest Martuscello daughter's then-husband, and others.
The Old Man even directed one of his sons-in-law to a specific post within the office, steering him away from an unpopular 'rat' unit responsible for digging into complaints of officer abuse.
Around the time Dan became commissioner in 2023, other Martuscellos and members of their network also ascended. Chris became an assistant commissioner — and second-in-command of OSI — as did Chris and Dan's eldest sister, a longtime DOCCS nurse. One of the brothers' friends had risen to OSI's third-in-command, while their brother-in-law and family friend had become higher-ups within OSI's specialized investigative units.
'The Martuscellos — they all get hooked up,' an OSI staffer told state authorities. 'They got this juice.'
Consequences of alleged nepotism have reverberated across the prison system.
The friends and family network has made enemies on its path to power. Chris has been particularly aggressive about forcing people out of positions he wants for his favorites, former staff allege. That has not only led to internal DOCCS controversy, but contributed to some of the agency's biggest scandals of the last decade.
Case in point is the story of Al Montegari. In 2014, Montegari was named head of OSI's sex crimes unit. According to court documents, he quickly called attention to problems in OSI, particularly within the unit Chris Martuscello was leading at the time.
Roughly a year into Montegari's tenure, Chris and Dan worked to remove him from office, with Chris spearheading a seemingly bogus disciplinary investigation into him. Even though a hearing officer found him not guilty of most disciplinary charges, Dan, then a deputy commissioner, stripped Montegari of his OSI title — leaving the spot open for the brothers' friend, who was soon hired into it.
The Montegari incident resulted in double blowback for the Martuscellos. Montegari sued over the alleged retaliation, and a jury eventually awarded him $500,000. (DOCCS is appealing.)
His ouster from OSI also left a temporary vacancy atop the sex crimes unit. That forced Montegari's former deputies — whose abilities he'd said he doubted, according to court records — to sign off on investigators' work.
While Montegari was suspended, his unit was digging into a complaint regarding rumors of an inappropriate relationship between a civilian employee and an incarcerated person. The investigator closed the case as 'unfounded,' and unit deputies signed off on it, even though the investigator didn't search the incarcerated person's cell, which would have been standard, former staff said. If he did, he may have found tools — and a hole behind the man's bed.
Three weeks later, the incarcerated person and his friend escaped. The civilian employee had smuggled them the tools. and she'd been sending love notes to one and having sex with the other. The 2015 escape from Clinton Correctional Facility was a national scandal: It became the subject of a Lifetime movie, a Showtime miniseries, and an episode of Law & Order: SVU.
The future of New York's state prison system hangs in the balance
New York Focus's investigation into the Martuscello family illustrates how the state prison commissioner came up through a corrupt system. It also shows that he's a complex figure, delicately balancing his liberal persona with his status as a corrections lifer.
Dan Martuscello's standing among prison staff is in the tank. Striking officers laughed off his initial demands that they return to work, forcing DOCCS to agree to recently announced concessions. Some have called for his resignation. His unpopularity is partly a result of what online materials circulating among officers describe as his family's 'nauseating' nepotism.
That unpopularity also stems from the fact that guards associate him with forces trying to alter the dynamics undergirding the prison system's brutality. He has heeded some calls for reform after Brooks's killing. (Elected officials are calling for further scrutiny after guards at a prison across the street from where Brooks was killed reportedly beat another man to death over the weekend.)
Guards have also railed against his willingness — however reluctant — to implement a statewide solitary confinement reform law, which they've tried to overturn since before it went into effect. That law not only shielded incarcerated people from the torture of indefinite isolation, but stripped guards of some of their power to punish incarcerated people arbitrarily.
Meanwhile, incarcerated people and their family members are up in arms over continued abuse, they've told New York Focus.
How Martuscello balances the demands of the 14,000 guards who work for him and the welfare of the 33,000 people in his custody will determine the future of a system that's shown itself to be a powder keg. As his past becomes clearer, the future of the agency he leads becomes more uncertain.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
30 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Missouri approves stadium aid for Kansas City Chiefs and Royals and disaster relief for St. Louis
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri lawmakers on Wednesday approved hundreds of millions of dollars of financial aid to try to persuade the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals to remain in the state and help the St. Louis area recover from a devastating tornado. House passage sends the legislative package to Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe, who called lawmakers into special session with a plea for urgent action. Kehoe is expected to sign the measures into law. Missouri's session paired two otherwise unrelated national trends — a movement for new taxpayer-funded sports stadiums and a reevaluation of states' roles in natural disasters as President Donald Trump's administration reassess federal aid programs. The stadium subsidies already were a top concern in Missouri when a deadly tornado struck St. Louis on May 16, causing an estimated $1.6 billion of damage a day after lawmakers had wrapped up work in their annual regular session. The disaster relief had widespread support. Lawmakers listened attentively on Wednesday as Democratic state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins described with a cracking voice how she witnessed the tornado rip the roof off her house and damage her St. Louis neighborhood. Collins said she has no home insurance, slept in her car for days and has accepted food from others. 'Homes are crumbled and leveled,' said Collins, adding: 'It hurts me to my core to see the families that have worked so hard, the businesses that have worked so hard, to see them ripped apart.' Lawmakers approved $100 million of open-ended aid for St. Louis and $25 million for emergency housing assistance in any areas covered under requests for presidential disaster declarations. They also authorized a $5,000 income tax credit to offset insurance policy deductibles for homeowners and renters hit by this year's storms — a provision that state budget director Dan Haug said could eventually cost up to $600 million. The Chiefs and Royals currently play football and baseball in side-by-side stadiums in Jackson County, Missouri, under leases that expire in January 2031. Jackson County voters last year defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. That prompted lawmakers in neighboring Kansas last year to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in Kansas to lure the teams to their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The Kansas offer is scheduled to expire June 30, creating urgency for Missouri to approve a counter-offer. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs plan a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. Though they have no specific plans in the works, the St. Louis Cardinals also would be eligible for stadium aid if they undertake a project of at least $500 million. Many economists contend public funding for stadiums isn't worth it, because sports tend to divert discretionary spending away from other forms of entertainment rather than generate new income. But supporters said Missouri stands to lose millions of dollars of tax revenue if Kansas City's most prominent professional sports teams move to Kansas. They said Missouri's reputation also would take a hit, particularly if it loses the Chiefs, which have won three of the past six Super Bowls. 'We have the chance to maybe save what is the symbol of this state,' Rep. Jim Murphy, a Republican from St. Louis County, said while illustrating cross-state support for the measure. The legislation faced some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy sports team owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely.


The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP approves ‘technical changes' to Trump agenda bill
House Republicans on Wednesday greenlit a series of 'technical changes' to the party's tax cut and spending package, removing language that would have thrown their effort off course in the Senate. The chamber approved the tweaks — which were tucked inside a procedural rule for a separate measure — in a 213-207 vote, weeks after Republicans passed the sprawling package full of President Trump's legislative priorities. The adopted rule also tees up a final vote on the White House's bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending. House GOP leaders moved to make the changes after the Senate parliamentarian scrubbed through the legislation — a procedure known as the 'Byrd bath' — and identified provisions and language that do not comply with the strict rules for the budget reconciliation process, which the GOP trifecta is using to circumvent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate and approve the bill by a simple majority. Leaving the legislation as it was risked the parliamentarian ruling that it was not compliant, which would have resulted in the threshold for passage in the Senate increasing from a simple majority to 60 votes — allowing Democratic opposition to block it. The changes to the Trump agenda bill — officially titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act — pertain to defense funding, energy policy and changes to Medicaid. For defense, Republicans nixed $2 billion for the enhancement of military intelligence programs; $500 million for the development, procurement and integration of maritime mines; and $62 million to convert Ohio-class submarine tubes to accept additional missiles. On the energy front, meanwhile, the changes removed a provision that would have reinstated leases for a proposed copper and nickel mine that had been renewed under the first Trump administration but revoked under Biden. The mine would have been located near an area known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, a nature preserve that contains canoe routes and species including black bears, moose and foxes. While leaders moved to strike some portions of the bill, they still plan to fight for those provisions when the package hits the Senate floor. 'We disagree; ultimately we're going to try it again on the Senate floor,' House Majority Leadere Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Tuesday. ' We disagree with the parliamentarian. … But you can't take the risk on any of them. You cannot take the risk because if any one of them is ruled on the Senate floor to be fatal, it's a 60-vote bill. The whole bill is a 60-vote bill — you can't take that risk.' With the changes made, the House is now expected to formally send the package to the Senate, where Republicans are mapping out their own changes to the behemoth bill. Some GOP senators want to decrease the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, others are pushing to increase the spending cuts in the bill, and a subset are pressing for a smaller rollback of the green energy tax credits that Democrats approved in 2022. Any changes to the House bill in the Senate, however, risks party leadership losing support in the lower chamber, which will have to approve the Senate's tweaks before the bill can head to Trump's desk for signature. Party leaders are still hoping to enact the package by July 4, but that timeline is coming into serious question as Republicans remain at odds over a series of high-stakes issues. Rachel Frazin contributed.


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing
Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pressed Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) driving home the point later in the hearing; Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Senate appropriator, scolded the Pentagon's delays with budget information; and Sen. Lisa Murkowski closed out the hearing by questioning the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. McConnell, one of three Republicans who opposed Hegseth's confirmation, gaveled in the hearing by calling out the Trump administration for what he views as a flat base-line defense budget. He then launched into strong warnings against the U.S. cozying up to Russia in its bid to end its war in Ukraine. McConnell said Washington's allies are 'wondering whether we're in the middle of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory. I think victory is defined by the people who have to live there — the Ukrainians.' The former Senate majority leader who now chairs the subcommittee, McConnell asked Hegseth which side he wanted to win the war. The Defense chief said the Trump administration wanted the killing to end but would not choose a side. 'America's reputation is on the line,' McConnell said. 'Will we defend Democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' Later in the hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) asked Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine Caine if Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to stop at Ukraine. 'I don't believe he is,' Caine replied. Hegseth, meanwhile, said it 'remains to be seen. Graham fired back, referring to his previous allusion to appeasement of Adolph Hitler: 'Well, he says he's not. This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen.' The line of questioning laid bare the ideological divide within the GOP as to how the U.S. should confront Russia, seen by defense hawks as a global threat that must be countered with military assistance to prop up Ukraine and assert U.S. force in the European theater. But many in the Trump administration, including Hegseth, have taken a more ambivalent tone, arguing for an America First approach that could see American troops rotated out of bases in Europe and an end to the flow of military aid from Washington to Kyiv. 'We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses,' McConnell told Hegseth. The hearing had a far more adversarial tone compared to Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee a day prior, in which the Pentagon chief emerged largely unscathed, particularly at the hands of GOP members. Democratic and Republican senators grilled Hegseth over a sparsely outlined defense budget for next fiscal year, echoing rare bipartisan criticism during the House hearing. Collins reprimanded the Pentagon for being 'unacceptably slow' in submitting a detailed Pentagon spending request for the fiscal year 2026. Congress is waiting on the information as the GOP struggles to agree on Trump's reconciliation package. She also told Hegseth that Trump's budget request represented a reduction in buying power compared to the 2025 military budget, when inflation is taken into account, but suggested the Senate might correct that. McConnell earlier was also critical of the administration's defense spending plan, pushing back at Hegseth's argument that the U.S. would be making the largest investment in the military in 20 years via Trump's reconciliation package. McConnell said putting funneling defense dollars into that package while declining to increase military spending in the regular budget 'may well end up functioning as a shell game to avoid making the most significant annual investments that we spent years urging the Biden administration to make.' There was also no shortage of criticism from the panel's Democrats. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), bashed the Pentagon for cutting military medical research while spending $45 million for a grand military parade marking the Army's 250th birthday, set for Saturday 'This is not consistent with what the men and women in uniform deserve,' Durbin said. Others, including Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) berated Hegseth for the Trump administration's decision to send National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles this week, calling the actions a wildly out-of-proportion response to sometimes violent protests against Trump's escalating immigration crackdowns. 'Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented, it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American,' Murray said, noting that the actions were undermining the readiness of the U.S. military. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) pressed Hegseth to reveal the cost or timeline of refurbishing Trump's luxury jet from the Qatari government, meant to become Air Force One. 'You have signed a contract with a company to reconfigure the Qatari aircraft. What is the price of that contract?' Reed asked. Hegseth replied that the information 'cannot be revealed in this setting,' prompting Reed to fire back. 'Why can't it be revealed? This is the appropriation committee of the United States Senate. We appropriate the money that you will spend,' Reed said.