
Scotland's fire service 999 response times hit 10-year high
The Scottish government has increased the SFRS capital budget to £47m but there are calls for this to be increased to resolve issues with the ageing fleet and estate issues.
READ MORE:
A firefighters' union has also warned the service is "already on its knees" as proposals to close more than a dozen stations in Scotland is currently being considered.
The latest data outlines that responses to 999 calls have slowed almost every consecutive year between 2014 and 2024, including for calls where it was considered there was a high risk of casualty.
In 2014, it took an average of six minutes and 51 seconds for a 999 call to result in the fire service arriving on site. By 2024, this had increased to a median of eight minutes and 20 seconds – an increase of 21%.
There was a similar increase among cases classified as 'possible life risk incidents', meaning there was a high risk of encountering a casualty.
In 2014, it took a median of 7 minutes and 13 seconds for a 999 call to result in the fire service arriving on site. By 2024, this had increased to 8 minutes and 42 seconds – a 20% increase.
Scottish Tory MSP Sharon Dowey condemned the SNP's 'continual contempt' for the fire service and public safety, describing their cuts as 'an abject dereliction of duty'.
The party's community Safety spokesperson Ms Dowey MSP said: 'Our firefighters do an incredible job, but the SNP's savage and sustained budget cuts are putting public safety in jeopardy.
'It's little wonder that emergency response times have hit their slowest rate in ten years, when the nationalists have imposed a real terms cut of £57million and the number of firefighters has dropped by one thousand within a decade.
'On the SNP's watch, 18 fire stations have no running water, most fire engines are over 10 years old, and many stations are in poor condition with several set to be closed.
'Their continual contempt for our fire service and failure to maintain crucial firefighter numbers is an abject dereliction of duty which will almost certainly have resulted in lives being lost.
'It is crucial that SNP ministers step in now and urgently protect the public by giving the fire service the resources they desperately need.'
House fires have fallen to an all-time low and over the last two decades, deaths caused by fire have fallen from 89 to 42. The casualty rate has also dropped from 1,951 to 815.
However, in contrast, firefighters are dealing with more floods, wildfires and rescues.
Wildfire incident in Scotland. (Image: Peter Jolly) A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We continue to support the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) with substantial year-on-year budget increases that enable our firefighters to deliver a high standard of services and keep our communities safe.
"This year's Budget includes £412.2 million for SFRS – an increase of £18.8 million and Scotland continues to have more firefighters per capita than other parts of the UK.
'Whilst the deployment of SFRS resources is an operational matter for the Chief Fire Officer, their targeted approach to risk and allocation of resource overtook the focus given to response times some years ago - and the service continues to respond to every emergency incident with the appropriate level of resource.'
The SFRS has been contacted for comment.
The figures come as the SFRS is proposing the closure of up to 13 stations across Scotland, new arrangements for night and weekend cover at others and the permanent withdrawal of 10 appliances nationwide.
Five stations in Dundee, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Musselburgh could be shut down or merged.
The 23 options, being published on Wednesday, involve more than 30 fire stations in 14 local authority areas, and the service has warned that more change is likely in years to come.
The consultation will remain open for 10 weeks, with the SFRS saying it wants 'as many people as possible' to submit their views on the proposed changes.
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) says the service is 'already on its knees' after a decade of what it calls real-terms cuts.
Responding to the proposals, FBU Scottish secretary John McKenzie previously said: 'Our members and the Scottish public have suffered more than enough cuts to the fire service.
'For over a decade, real-terms budget cuts have increased risks to public safety, with firefighter numbers slashed and response times increasing as a result.
'The service is already on its knees because of these cuts. That has led to increases in response times and when this time is lost, tragically lives will also be lost.
'This is unacceptable and any proposals to further compromise our service and public safety must be rejected."
The SFRS has said any changes would only be made if they ensured safety.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
32 minutes ago
- Scotsman
How Keir Starmer has just signed up to UN 'commitment' that goes against everything Brexit was about
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is often the small things, the details, that trip politicians up and turn the people against them. Few understood and probably fewer cared about Nicola Sturgeon's zeal for relaxing the process of changing gender in Scotland. Then, once the reality of what it actually meant was illustrated by the ability of a male charged with two rapes to then decide 'he' should become the 'she' called Isla Bryson and thereby be located in a female prison, the public appreciated what the changes could mean. Sturgeon's deputy, John Swinney, and her replacement, Humza Yousaf, both carried on defending the policy even after it became clear the UK Government would stand in their way. Thank you to the then Scottish Secretary of State, Alister Jack, for having the cojones to stand up to the SNP government, and indeed the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, who had also backed the policy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It was telling to see how those advocating gender recognition reform pointed to some similar laws in a few other countries. It is a common enough approach, to say a certain country does something without harm or even to its benefit, as a reason to advocate our country doing the same. Another country's experience can be used as an evidence base – but when the evidence is misrepresented or actually ignored it weakens the case for the change being advocated and for the practice of looking abroad for answers. Keir Starmer, with Foreign Secretary David Lammy sitting behind him, addresses the United Nations Security Council in September last year (Picture: Leon Neal/WPA pool) | Getty Images Higher taxes loom? More worrying than misrepresenting overseas experience is when policies are manufactured not from the ground up but from the gatherings of international political leaders taking top-down decisions in unison. We now learn our Prime Minister has signed up to an agreement formulated by the United Nations that supports further personal and corporate tax rises and the introduction of particular taxes on alcohol, tobacco, vapes and sugar, amongst other things. As if this contracting out of policy to people we did not elect was not bad enough, the UK encouraged and agreed to various 'side-deals' that introduce a commitment to advocate additional or higher taxes in specific areas not covered by the broader agreement. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It all happened in Seville, Spain, last week and is known as the Sevilla Commitment – the result of 192 countries attending a five-day summit, where there would be much arm-twisting and self-serving deals – all out of reach of public accountability. The final text of the deal contains 42 references to taxation. When questioned about the UK's support, a government spokesperson sought to play the matter down by saying that the Sevilla Commitment was not legally binding but simply a general consensus. What utter disingenuous cowardice. Brexit an act of democratic pushback It's a commitment, made with our money but without any consultation or our consent. Surely if politicians are not accountable to the public then their tax rises become legalised theft? If it did not matter to our political elite who attend these summits and conclaves, why agree to the outcome? If there was no intention to act upon the declarations, why even attend? It is having politicians who love the limelight and self-importance of summits and who commit to policies never once considered in the domestic debate that explains how Brexit came about and also the rise of so-called populist parties around the world. Such reactions are democratic pushback against our own political class that seeks solace and support at junkets and jollies then wrapping up objectionable policies in candy floss. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What we are witnessing in parliamentary elections across Europe (and beyond) is a rejection of the patrician disdain and arrogance of our elected betters who have shown time and again they are unfit to take decisions on our behalf. Having worked as an advisor in the field of international development, the idea we should continue with the unfiltered use of development aid – to quote the late Anglo-Hungarian economist Peter Bauer, 'the process by which the poor in rich countries subsidise the rich in poor countries' – is flawed and no amount of special pleading can alter the fact that this well-intentioned but naïve policy has repeatedly failed. Globalisation of democracy This is how globalisation of political action – as opposed to meaning the free trade of goods and services – has taken its grip on democratic parliaments the world over. Take a step back and what we find is there is a concerted effort by a caste of politicians across Europe and around the world who believe our lives should be decided not by accountable democratic processes that work from the bottom up, but from impossibly accountable decisions taken at summits and 'expert' gatherings of multilateral bureaucracies that work top down. The World Health Organisation – a China-influenced multinational body that has a great deal to answer for during the Covid pandemic – is one such example. Not only did it invent new policy that directly contradicted its earlier pronouncements on the efficacy of public health approaches (such its stance on masks) – it influenced directly the actions of governments that felt they had to be seen to be taking the WHO policies seriously. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If we want to understand why Keir Starmer makes easy concessions to Mauritius on Chagos without the consent of Chagossians, never mind UK citizens – and does the same over Gibraltar and Spain – it is his love of international law that is free of any accountability to the people it purports to serve that provides the answer. The solution is to bring back domestic accountability so politicians are responsible for the consequences of their actions. Fortunately there is hope that we can repatriate our political control from the politicians who willingly work to give away our personal and national sovereignty, but it first requires recognising what we are dealing with the loss of sovereign decision making. Ensuring our politicians become fully accountable is the only disinfectant that will remove this poison from our system.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Unison union members accept two-year Scotland pay offer
Members of the trade union Unison have voted to accept a two-year pay deal. Cosla offered staff an increase of 4% this year and 3.5% next year, with 83% of Unison members voting in a ballot to accept the offer. Unison Scotland's local government committee chairwoman Suzanne Gens said: 'This pay deal is a crucial step in turning round cuts to council staff pay. 'It gives local government workers some financial security now they know their pay will be higher than inflation over the next couple of years. Read More: 'This has only been achieved because of the determination of council workers to demand better.' The union's co-lead for local government David O'Connor said there was 'no room for complacency', despite the offer being accepted. 'Local government has suffered over a decade of cuts,' he added. 'This pay deal shows what can be done when people stand together. Our campaign to protect council services continues.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison welcomed the news, urging other unions to also accept the offer. 'I am delighted that Unison members have voted to accept this improved pay offer, which will see valued local government workers receive pay increases of 4% in 2025-26 and 3.5% in 2026-27,' she said. 'Although the Scottish Government has no formal role in local government pay negotiations, we recognise the importance of an agreement being reached by Cosla – as the employer – and trade unions. 'I would urge members of Unite and GMB to join Unison members in recognising the clear benefit of this offer so that all workers can get the pay they deserve without delay.'

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Unison members accept two-year council pay deal
Cosla offered staff an increase of 4% this year and 3.5% next year, with 83% of Unison members voting in a ballot to accept the offer. Unison Scotland's local government committee chairwoman Suzanne Gens said: 'This pay deal is a crucial step in turning round cuts to council staff pay. 'It gives local government workers some financial security now they know their pay will be higher than inflation over the next couple of years. 'This has only been achieved because of the determination of council workers to demand better.' The union's co-lead for local government David O'Connor said there was 'no room for complacency', despite the offer being accepted. 'Local government has suffered over a decade of cuts,' he added. 'This pay deal shows what can be done when people stand together. Our campaign to protect council services continues.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison welcomed the news, urging other unions to also accept the offer. 'I am delighted that Unison members have voted to accept this improved pay offer, which will see valued local government workers receive pay increases of 4% in 2025-26 and 3.5% in 2026-27,' she said. 'Although the Scottish Government has no formal role in local government pay negotiations, we recognise the importance of an agreement being reached by Cosla – as the employer – and trade unions. 'I would urge members of Unite and GMB to join Unison members in recognising the clear benefit of this offer so that all workers can get the pay they deserve without delay.'