The US Wind Controversy In Maryland: Project Survival At Stake
US Wind Project Delayed Through Litigation
The latest skirmish comes from Ocean City and Worcester County. In early July, Ocean City and Worcester County jointly filed two legal appeals against US Wind's air permit, claiming that the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), a state agency, issued the permit without following proper procedures. One appeal was filed with the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board on July 8, and the other in the Worcester County Circuit Court on July 11. Jurisdiction over the permit is unclear, so both a federal and a state agency were petitioned. Prior to that, another federal regulator, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, had already approved the project's Environmental Impact Statement, complete with mitigation measures.
Many objections to US Wind's air permit are procedural, such as failure to provide public notice on permit provisions or failure to issue a permit within a year after the application was deemed complete. However, two complaints were more substantive. One referred to the failure to conduct a required alternatives analysis. The other was the failure to calculate boat emissions from the vessels shuttling workers out to turbines located 11 miles offshore, a distance so far that the turbines are barely visible from land. Given the number of commercial and recreational boats currently active in the region, it is interesting that the service boats for a wind project were singled out as a topic for complaint.
As for the required alternatives analysis, the city and county do not seem to see the bigger picture. The question is not whether there will be a wind project in coastal waters or not. The question is how the region is going to secure its electricity supply if projects like US Wind keep being delayed.
Local Electricity Production Helps Electric Grid
Electricity markets across the country are facing growing challenges in reliably meeting demand. The Delmarva region is part of PJM, a regional transmission organization that manages the high-voltage power grid and wholesale electricity markets across 13 states and Washington, D.C. In PJM's most recent capacity auction, the clearing price hit a record high of $329 per megawatt-day. This signals a long-term need for more available power sources to keep the grid stable.
While capacity markets were originally designed with on-demand, dispatchable power plants in mind, like natural gas or coal, renewables and batteries can and do participate. Capacity markets provide payments to energy producers in exchange for committing to be available during times of peak electricity demand.
Wind energy offers another key benefit: it can help strengthen the local power supply. With electricity demand rising across the PJM region, especially from data centers, every new power project built within a county helps reduce pressure on the grid and stabilize prices. This electricity is not being transmitted from hundreds of miles away. It is generated locally. US Wind would bring 114 turbines to the grid.
Offshore wind, in particular, has an advantage. Thanks to stronger and more consistent winds over the ocean, offshore turbines can generate electricity more reliably throughout the year than turbines on land. That makes them a promising part of the solution for meeting growing energy needs. If they are built, of course.
CVOW Success in Virginia
The history of offshore wind development seems to have many such examples when projects were never built. The earliest example is from 2001, when Jim Gordon began the development of Cape Wind with 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound off the coast of Cape Cod. After spending over $100 million and obtaining necessary permits, the project was cancelled in December 2017 due to issues with power purchase agreements, construction financing, and a mounting local opposition funded by Senator Ted Kennedy and William Koch, who liked vacationing on Cape Cod.
Successful offshore wind developments are much rarer. Virginia's Dominion Energy seems to have pulled it off with their 2.6 GW planned project 24 nautical miles off the coast of Virginia Beach. Once completed, the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (CVOW) project will be one of the largest offshore wind farms in the world, consisting of 176 Siemens turbines. While the construction is still ongoing, the company announced that 78 monopile foundations, which hold wind turbines, have been installed. In addition to wind turbines, Dominion Energy needs to install substations that handle the flow of electrons from the new source to the existing grid. In January 2025, the first of three offshore substations arrived, weighing 4,000 tonnes, becoming the heaviest piece of equipment ever handled by the Port of Virginia.
Dominion Energy built its offshore project due to hard work of their teams, as well as existing institutional backing and thousands of stakeholder meetings to address opposition over the years. As a state-regulated monopoly with a state Renewable Portfolio Standard to meet, Dominion Energy had the political alignment to get the project done. It seems like US Wind is not so lucky. US Wind, as a private developer, is being whipsawed between state courts and federal agencies. The result is procedural chaos and mounting delays, which are jeopardizing a private upfront investment.
A Nation That Forgot How to Build
The tragedy here is not the lawsuit. It is the lost learning of building large offshore wind projects. Given that installing each turbine is a modular task: once one turbine is installed, you kind of know how to install the next one. The book How Big Things Get Done explains that this is how big infrastructure scales. This is a reason why modular projects like solar and wind farms are less likely to experience cost and time overruns, once legal hurdles are cleared. We can learn and get better at it over time. Instead, in the U.S., projects are litigated and delayed, often to make the project economics untenable and the investment unrecoverable.
China, meanwhile, has installed the world's largest turbine off the coast of Taiwan and is building the largest hydropower plant in Tibet, which will make the famous Three Gorges Dam pale in comparison. If energy dominance is still the goal, then we should seek to dominate in something beyond long development timelines.
Contrary to the opposition's narrative, most people support offshore wind. Peer-reviewed studies of offshore residents, as well as opinion polls among Americans, show that support for wind energy remains strong. But the silent majority often gets drowned out by highly organized opponents who dominate the narrative. There is no evidence that wind turbines kill whales or cause dolphin strandings. However, there is certainty that due to ocean acidification and overfishing, apex species are in danger of starving. This happened because we disturbed the marine food chains, not because wind developers are using sonar. If marine life was the concern, wind projects would be seen as something to fight for, not against.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Judge blocks Trump administration guidance targeting DEI programs in schools, universities
A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all "race-based decision-making" or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were "good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair." Gallagher, who was appointed by President Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. "It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished," Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. "Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won," said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. The Education Department did not immediately comment on Thursday. The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding "race-based preferences" of any kind. "Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices," wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using "illegal DEI practices." Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing "unclear and highly subjective" limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to "choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution."
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Judge Blocks White House Effort to Defund Schools With D.E.I. Programs
A federal judge dealt a sweeping setback on Thursday to President Trump's education agenda, declaring that the administration cannot move forward with its plans to cut off federal funding from schools and colleges with diversity and equity programs. The case related to a memo the administration had sent to states in April asking them to certify that their schools did not practice 'illegal D.E.I.,' which stands for diversity, equity and inclusion. The administration has threatened to cut off billions in federal dollars from education institutions that did not comply. In a strongly worded ruling, Judge Stephanie Gallagher of the Federal District Court in Maryland wrote that the administration had not followed proper procedure and said its plan was unconstitutional, in part because it risked constraining educators' free speech rights in the classroom. 'The regulation of speech cannot be done casually,' Judge Gallagher wrote. The case was brought by the American Federation of Teachers, the nation's second largest teachers union; the American Sociological Association; and a school district in Eugene, Ore. The Education Department and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Buffalo Township supervisors move forward with controversial solar farm project
A heated debate over renewable energy has come to a head in Butler County. On Wednesday night, Buffalo Township supervisors voted to move forward with a controversial solar farm project despite strong opposition from many homeowners. "It's not going to do me be a bit of good," Buffalo Township resident Norm Gray said. Gray is in the majority. He said he's resisted the proposed solar panel farms in his community since the onset. But despite his and his neighbors' disapproval, the once beautiful view off his back porch, he says, will soon be gone. "They're going to cover all these fields, cover a corn field, a soy bean field and naturally no one wants to look at that. I just can't picture that corn field over there with all these green panels just covering the entire field," Gray said. Moreover, Gray says, allowing Atlanta-based SolAmerica Energy to install the solar arrays on an 81-acre spot off Bear Creek Road and a 19-acre parcel along Grimm Road will do nothing for him except lower his property value and potentially present health risks if there were a fire. "It's not going to have any effect on us at all. In other words, I'm not going to get a cut on my electric bill because it's right in my backyard," Gray said. On the other side of the debate, you'll find the minority, which includes township homeowner Beth Cribbs, who believes the positives outweigh the concerns. She said she can't understand why some of her neighbors are against the project and points to landscaping and screening requirements to reduce the visual impact. "I think that's very selfish. Maybe it's not directly helping me with my bills, but it's helping the environment. I'm all for renewable energy. I'm glad that they're doing this," Cribbs. The next phase will be to iron out the exact construction details with further input from the township planning commission and the supervisors.
