Bangladesh Army chief rejects Rakhine corridor, demands December elections
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tensions have heightened between Bangladesh Army chief General Waqar-uz-Zaman and the Muhammad Yunus-led interim regime over the creation of Rakhine corridor to Myanmar, elections and law and order situation, among other issues.Addressing a meeting of army officers in Dhaka on Wednesday, Gen Waqar rejected any notion of a "corridor" and declared it completely unacceptable, ET has learnt. It is understood that he expressed concerns about the interim regime making key decisions while keeping the armed forces in the dark. He firmly stated that the parliamentary elections must be held by this December and that only an elected government should determine the nation's course and not an unelected administration, it has been further learnt.His strong views came in the backdrop of the move to ban the Awami League and India's decision to ban certain Bangladeshi exports to northeast India. During Wednesday's meeting, some of the officers emphasised that the 'Liberation war' legacy and national prestige were non-negotiable and must not be compromised under any circumstances. There are concerns within the army over efforts to undermine the legacy of Sheikh Mujib and the Liberation war.The army also decided that it will no longer tolerate mob violence or lawlessness, signaling a shift toward stricter enforcement of order. The officers appeared to rally behind Gen Waqar as of now. While there is no imminent move by him to take over the reins of the nation, Bangladesh watchers do not rule out stringent steps by the army chief.Hours after the strong message, interim regime NSA Khalilur Rahman, who was allegedly instrumental in pushing the proposal for the Rakhine corridor, went on the backfoot and claimed that Dhaka has not talked about any corridor. Rahman said he is on the same page as the army and the foreign ministry on the issue. It is widely believed that certain external powers have been influencing Rahman to create a corridor to weaken China and the junta. But the move would also adversely impact India's interests in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Assam CM orders shoot-at-sight in restive Dhubri
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Friday (June 13, 2025) gave a shoot-at-sight order to check communal tension in Dhubri town, about 290 km west of Guwahati. The town, headquarters of the Dhubri district, has been on edge since the severed head of a cow was found in front of a Hanuman Temple on June 8, a day after Id-ul-Azha (Bakrid) was observed. 'The matter was resolved as leaders from both communities met, but the head of another cow was placed at the same spot the very next day, escalating tension,' Mr. Sarma told journalists after visiting Dhubri to assess the law-and-order situation there. 'I have ordered a shoot-at-sight in Dhubri if any kind of untoward situation happens. The order is applicable for any illegal activities, including stone-pelting,' he said. The Chief Minister also issued a directive to immediately arrest all known criminals in the district, which he said has been targeted by fundamentalist forces in Bangladesh for a long time. 'Central security forces have been deployed in the communally sensitive areas to maintain peace and order,' he said. He also said there was an organised attempt to incite communal unrest through a campaign to make Dhubri a part of Bangladesh. He said secessionist posters attributed to a group named 'Nabin Bangla' were pasted in parts of the district – one even on an Army Signals infrastructure – calling for a fight to make Dhubri a part of Bangladesh. 'A series of events aimed at stoking communal violence indicates a Bangladeshi force is at work in Dhubri,' he said. Mr. Sarma further said that a new network of cattle smugglers has increased its activities over the past few months, bringing in cattle in large numbers from West Bengal. 'We will investigate who is behind this network,' he said, asserting the government's commitment to enforcing law and order and defeating all communal forces. Muslims, mostly Bengali speakers, are in the majority in the Dhubri district. According to the 2011 Census, Muslims account for almost 74% of the district's population.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
How Bangladesh elections without the Awami League will be a democratic farce
Without the Awami League, the upcoming elections will not be a celebration of democracy but a cautionary tale of how 'revolutions', even though born in the name of reform, can lose their way read more The boat is the political symbol of the Awami League, which is the largest and the founding party of Bangladesh. Image: AFP The political future of Bangladesh hangs in the balance, and not because elections have been announced. Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel laureate turned interim leader, declared during his Eid-ul-Azha address that national elections will take place in the first half of April 2026. On the surface, it sounds like a democratic milestone in a country recovering from mass protests and a regime change. But scratch beneath the surface, and a far more troubling picture emerges—one in which the absence of the Awami League, Bangladesh's most historically significant party, raises urgent questions about the legitimacy and intent behind this proposed democratic exercise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Shadow of 1971 The Awami League is more than just a political party. It is inseparable from the very founding of Bangladesh. It was under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, its founding leader, that Bangladesh was born in 1971 after a brutal liberation war against Pakistan. To ban such a party outright—no matter how controversial its recent leadership—undermines the entire premise of inclusive democratic politics in the country. When Yunus's interim government invoked the Anti-Terrorism Act to outlaw the Awami League and cited the deaths of over 1,400 people during the 2024 protests as justification, the move drew international condemnation and domestic concern. Even more troubling is the expansion of the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act (ICT Act) to allow entire political entities to be held collectively accountable. Such legal overreach sets a dangerous precedent and calls into question whether the rule of law is being used for justice—or for political vengeance. Yunus's Promises vs Political Realities Yunus came to power in August 2024 amidst chaos: the ouster of long-serving Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, violent crackdowns on student-led protests, and public fury over a job reservation system perceived as nepotistic. Initially hailed as a technocrat with integrity, Yunus promised a three-point agenda—reform, justice, and elections. He accused past governments of running 'fascist regimes' and declared that flawed elections were responsible for Bangladesh's cyclical crises since independence. But his critics argue that these high-minded goals are being used to mask a consolidation of power. There has been a consistent delay in announcing a clear electoral roadmap, and his administration has taken controversial foreign policy positions—such as backing the Chittagong-to-Rakhine corridor project, opposed by the army and most major parties. These distractions seem to deviate from what should be the interim government's singular mission: holding credible, timely elections and transferring power. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Army's Red Line and Political Fracturing Pressure is mounting from all sides, especially the military. In an unprecedented move, Army Chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman issued a public ultimatum, demanding elections be held by December 2025. He accused Yunus of interfering in military matters, attempting to engineer leadership changes within the armed forces, and delaying elections for personal or external agendas. Tensions boiled over during a Durbar meeting where Waker, flanked by officers in combat uniform, questioned Yunus's democratic mandate and commitment to national security. The military's growing impatience is echoed by almost all major political players. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), seen as the frontrunner if elections are held soon, has accused Yunus of stalling. Even the Communist Party of Bangladesh (CPB) and the newly formed National Citizens Party (NCP)—despite its proximity to the interim regime—expressed conditional support for the April 2026 timeline, contingent on the implementation of key reforms outlined in the 'July Charter' and 'July Declaration'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Risk of a 'King's Party' The rise of the National Citizens Party, a student-led movement that was at the forefront of Hasina's ouster, initially energised youth politics. But its close alignment with the interim regime has earned it the label of 'king's party'. Tensions between the BNP and NCP have already resulted in dozens of deaths in street clashes. Moreover, the NCP's willingness to cooperate with the government even as the Awami League remains banned raises concerns about selective inclusivity and manufactured consent. Furthermore, the NCP's alliance with radical Islamist student groups and its push to replace Bangladesh's secular 1972 Constitution have alarmed the military and moderate political actors alike. The army, which identifies deeply with the legacy of the Liberation War, has made clear that any deviation toward Islamist or authoritarian rule is a red line. Foreign Policy Missteps and Internal Discontent Yunus's foreign policy gaffes have only compounded his domestic troubles. His comment in China suggesting that Northeast India is 'landlocked' and that Bangladesh serves as its 'guardian of the ocean' provoked a diplomatic backlash. His support for Chinese investment and controversial infrastructure projects like the Rakhine Corridor have further alienated India and emboldened internal critics who accuse him of compromising national sovereignty. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even more awkward was his personal request to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to prevent Sheikh Hasina from speaking publicly while in exile—a request Modi reportedly declined. His subsequent comments attacking Indian media for allegedly spreading 'fake news' have not helped ease tensions. Legitimacy in Question For any election to be legitimate, it must be inclusive, transparent, and timely. The announced April 2026 timeline fails on at least two of those fronts. It is not timely—dozens of parties, including the BNP and CPB, have demanded elections by December 2025. And it is not inclusive—the exclusion of the Awami League renders the entire process questionable at best, a sham at worst. Yunus's promise of holding 'the most beautiful election ever' rings hollow in the face of these exclusions and delays. The notion that the Awami League is no longer a 'political party' but a criminal organisation, as Yunus claims, is not a legal or moral argument—it is a political one, and a dangerous one at that. It shuts the door on reconciliation, pluralism, and democratic norms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What Lies Ahead Bangladesh stands at a crossroads. Either the interim government course-corrects and ensures an inclusive, fair election before the military's deadline of December 2025, or the country risks a deeper descent into instability. If Yunus persists in sidelining key political players, alienating the military, and engaging in geopolitical adventurism, he may find himself not the harbinger of reform but the architect of yet another failed transition. A truly democratic Bangladesh cannot be built on the exclusion of its founding political party, however flawed its recent leadership might appear to be. Legitimacy cannot be proclaimed—it must be earned through action, transparency, and inclusion. Without the Awami League, the upcoming elections will not be a celebration of democracy but a cautionary tale of how 'revolutions', even though born in the name of reform, can lose their way. The author is Associate Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies & Analyses (MP-IDSA). Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
8th Pay Commission: What to expect? Will salary hike miss January 2026 timeline? What we know about Pay Band this time
8th Pay Commission News: Around 1 crore central government employees and pensioners are eagerly waiting for the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the 8th Pay Commission, which will serve as the basis for the revisions of salaries and pensions among other things. The 8th Pay Commission, which is expected to be set up soon, will revise the salaries, pensions and allowances of government employees and pensioners. But when will the 8th Pay Commission be set up? Will there be delays? How will a delay affect fitment factor? Read on to know the answers. As per a report by The Economic Times, the 8th Pay Commission may be delayed beyond the expected timeline of January 2026. The 7th Pay Commission, which was announced in February 2014, came into effect almost two years later in January 2016. That timeline was given to accommodate the time required for submission of reports, approval from the cabinet and subsequent rollout. However, as of mid-2025, there is no report of the 8th Pay Commission being formed, and the ToRs have not been finalised either. While there are reports of discussions about the commission being underway, the rollout of the 8th Pay Commission may miss the January 2026 timeline. According to the ET report, the implementation may only be done in late 2026 or early 2027. Over the three decades of pay commissions, the government has experimented with its structure – Grade Pay, Pay Bands, and the Pay Matrix. Each of them have set a norm for how salaries have been revised through the decades. Before 6th CPC, there were over 4,000 disparate pay scales across roles, which complicated salary calculations. The 6th Pay Commission introduced Pay Bands and Grade Pay, simplifying the payment process for each role. The 7th CPC brought the real gamechanger – the Pay Matrix. The commission created a 24-level Pay Matrix, with each cell representing unique salaries. Under the 7th CPC, the fitment factor was revised at 2.57. While there have been no word on how the 8th Pay Commission will revise salary structures of lakhs of central government employees and pensioners, experts have said that the fitment factor will be kept between 2.5 to 2.8. However, since there is no clarity on even the formation of the commission, nothing can be confirmed as of now.
