logo
Deadly fungus in Tutankhamun's ‘cursed' tomb can help fight cancer

Deadly fungus in Tutankhamun's ‘cursed' tomb can help fight cancer

Telegraph23-06-2025
The toxic fungus behind the 'curse' of Tutankhamun's tomb can fight cancer, scientists have found.
Aspergillus flavus is a mould that often grows in long-sealed tombs and can trigger deadly breathing problems or allergic reactions in people with weakened immune systems.
It is thought to be partly responsible for the deaths of several people who entered tombs, including Tutankhamun's in 1923, and the 15th-century Polish king Casimir IV Jagiellon's in 1973.
Now scientists have found that its deadly spores are also lethal to leukaemia and are hoping to begin testing in animals, before eventually moving on to humans.
'Nature has given us this incredible pharmacy, it's up to us to uncover its secrets,' said Dr Sherry Gao, an associate professor in chemical and biomolecular engineering at the University of Pennsylvania.
'Fungi gave us penicillin. These results show that many more medicines derived from natural products remain to be found.'
Aspergillus flavus can lie dormant for centuries, only becoming active again once disturbed. It is known to grow on cereals, which were often sealed up as grave goods inside tombs.
After archaeologists opened Tutankhamun's tomb a series of untimely deaths among the excavation team - including those of British patron Lord Carnarvon, George Jay Gould, the financier, and Egyptologist Arthur Mace - fuelled rumours of a pharaoh's curse.
But experts later theorised that it could have been the fungus, which may have lain dormant for millennia.
In the 1970s, a dozen conservationists entered the tomb of Casimir IV in Poland and within weeks, 10 of them had died. Later investigations revealed the tomb contained Aspergillus flavus.
In the new study, scientists studied a dozen strains of Aspergillus to see if they produced anything that might be repurposed as a medicine. They discovered potent cancer-fighting molecules, which they named asperigimycins.
Even with no modification, the asperigimycins showed strong medical potential against leukaemia cells.
When researchers added a molecule found in the royal jelly - the substance that nourishes developing bees - the asperigimycins performed as well as cytarabine and daunorubicin, two drugs that have been used for decades to treat leukaemia.
Through further experimentation, the researchers discovered that asperigimycins seem to work by disrupting the process of cancer cell division.
'Cancer cells divide uncontrollably,' added Dr Gao. 'These compounds block the formation of microtubules, which are essential for cell division.'
The team also found that the cancer-fighting properties only seemed to work on leukaemia, and had little to no effect on other cancers such as breast, liver or lung cancer.
The researchers identified similar clusters of genes in other fungi, suggesting that more potential drugs from fungi remain to be discovered.
It suggests that natural remedies to individual cancers may be present already in nature and the scientists are keen to explore whether other fungi also produce similar molecules.
'Even though only a few have been found, almost all of them have strong bioactivity,' said Dr Qiuyue Nie, of the department of chemical and biomolecular engineering at the University of Pennsylvania.
'This is an unexplored region with tremendous potential.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could an ancient cow's tooth unlock the origins of Stonehenge?
Could an ancient cow's tooth unlock the origins of Stonehenge?

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Could an ancient cow's tooth unlock the origins of Stonehenge?

A cow's tooth from a jawbone deliberately placed beside the entrance to Stonehenge at the Neolithic monument's very beginning in 2995 to 2900 BCE could offer tantalising new evidence about how the stones were transported about 125 miles from Wales to Salisbury Plain. Analysis of the third molar tooth showed the animal began life in Wales, adding weight to a theory that cows were used as beasts of burden in hauling the enormous stones across the country. Since the jawbone was discovered a century ago historians have been intrigued about why it was placed there and where it had come from. Researchers from the British Geological Survey (BGS), Cardiff University and University College London found lead isotopes revealed composition spikes during the late winter to spring, pointing to a source that was older than the metal in the rest of the tooth. This was due to the cow, during pregnancy, drawing on lead already in its skeleton to create the calf, it is thought. That lead suggested the cow originated from an area with Palaeozoic rocks, such as the bluestones found in Wales, before moving to Stonehenge. 'It tells us that very early in its life it incorporated lead into its skeleton and that lead was from old Palaeozoic rocks, older than about 400m years old. Those types of rocks crop up primarily in Britain in Wales, which is the nearest supply, and also in the Lake District and Scotland,' said Prof Jane Evans, a BGS honorary research associate. 'Wales is the closest area from which you get those kind of lead compositions. That suggests this animal, found in Wiltshire, didn't start life in that kind of area. It must have been grazing at some time on older rocks, and the obvious conclusion, given its Stonehenge, is that Wales is the probable origin of the cow's early life.' She added: 'The jawbone was placed in a very specific part of the earliest ring structure of Stonehenge, which implies it was some kind of ritual, archeologists will say. So the question is, why? And then you come to the question: has this animal come with the people who were involved in the transportation of the stones, or at least the earliest migrations of the people bringing the stones, from Wales to England?'' Until recently archeologists had found no evidence of cattle as beasts of burden in Neolithic times, but a more recent paper suggested the structure of some cattle's feet indicated they could have been, said Evans. 'It feeds into that narrative quite well.' Even if cows were not used, associated oxen may have been. 'I don't know how long it takes to drag stones from Wales to Stonehenge, but you need to be able to feed yourself and so it's going to be a big process. You have got to have a huge support network to do it,' said Evans. Carbon isotopes showed the female cow's diet changed with the seasons: woodland fodder in winter and open pasture in summer. The strontium isotopes indicated the seasonal food sources came from different geological areas, suggesting the cow either moved seasonally or that winter fodder was imported. While the jaw was found buried at Stonehenge, what was unclear whether the cow travelled to the site alive or whether its remains were curated there, but that it was possible the animal held significance to the population during the earliest building of Stonehenge, said researchers. Michael Parker Pearson, a professor of British later prehistory at UCL, said it was 'yet more fascinating evidence for Stonehenge's link with south-west Wales' and raised 'the tantalising possibility that cattle helped to haul the stones'. Richard Madgwick, a professor of archaeological science at Cardiff, said: 'It provides unparalleled new detail on the distant origins of the animal and the arduous journey it was brought on. So often grand narratives dominate research on major archaeological sites, but this detailed biographical approach on a single animal provides a brand-new facet to the story of Stonehenge.' While archaeologists have long known some of the stones came from the Preseli Hills in Wales, and others were from Wiltshire, one central megaliths was recently identified as from north-east Scotland.

Boy's tooth find reveals bronze age burial mound on Lizard Point
Boy's tooth find reveals bronze age burial mound on Lizard Point

BBC News

time4 hours ago

  • BBC News

Boy's tooth find reveals bronze age burial mound on Lizard Point

A boy who found what he thought was a shark tooth has led to the discovery of a bronze age human burial aged seven, found the tooth when he visited Lizard Point and showed it to Ken Wallace, who volunteers for the National Trust at the Wallace, a retired dentist, recognised the tooth to be human which, after a police inquiry, was agreed to be an archaeological Trust archaeologist Jim Parry is carrying out work at the site - which the trust said was a prehistoric burial mound or "barrow" created some 4,450 years ago - and said he had found fragments of jaw bones, teeth and a skull of at least one individual. Mr Parry said the mound had already eroded because of man-made and natural processes and would continue to do so due to its coastal said: "In this case, we will record as much as we can before it's lost and, hopefully in the near future, return to the site to excavate a wider area to fully understand the scale and nature of the monument in which the remains were buried, with its glorious vistas from the southernmost point of the British mainland." The National Trust said the remains were due to be sent to an osteoarchaeologist, a specialist in human remains, for detailed analysis. A sample would also be sent for radiocarbon dating, the charity added.

Scholar makes bombshell claim about inscriptions found in desert
Scholar makes bombshell claim about inscriptions found in desert

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Scholar makes bombshell claim about inscriptions found in desert

An American - Israeli epigraphist, Michael S. Bar-Ron, claims two 3,800-year-old inscriptions found at a turquoise mine in the Egyptian desert could be the earliest written references to Moses. The Proto-Sinaitic etchings, discovered at the Serabit el-Khadim mining site in the Sinai Desert, date from 1800 to 1600 BC, predating the earliest biblical texts. Bar-Ron interprets the texts as 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe', potentially translating to 'This is from Moses' and 'Declaration of Moses', which would be the oldest non-biblical mentions of Moses. He also suggests the inscriptions, which refer to the deity El, contain warnings and rebukes against the ancient goddess Ba'alat cult, whose temple was at the site. Academic reception to Mr Bar-Ron's interpretation is mixed, with some Egyptologists like Thomas Schneider calling it 'completely unproven and misleading', though Mr Bar-Ron stresses his work is peer-reviewed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store