Tobacco Transparency Bill ‘will benefit all'
Aspire Aotearoa Research Centre co-director Professor Janet Hoek. PHOTO: SUPPLIED
When the government repealed smokefree legislation last year, questions were raised in the health and research sectors about why it was done, and if parties in the coalition government benefited from it.
Opposition health spokeswoman Dr Ayesha Verrall's new Tobacco Transparency Bill, launched yesterday, aims to increase transparency, improve policy making, and stop the government from supporting, endorsing or advocating for the tobacco industry's interests.
University of Otago researcher and Aspire Aotearoa co-director Prof Janet Hoek said the Bill was long overdue.
"What the Bill is trying to do is to bring to light the evidence that would enable us to find out whether the [coalition] parties were benefiting from it.
"At the moment, we don't know."
The Bill was partly inspired by the actions of Associate Health Minister Casey Costello, who led the repeal of the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act 2022.
It effectively scrapped laws aimed at slashing tobacco retailers from 6000 to 600, removing 95% of the nicotine from cigarettes and creating a smokefree generation by banning sales to those born after 2009.
Prof Hoek and Radio New Zealand sought information under the Official Information Act (OIA) to see what justification the ministry used to repeal the Act.
Initially, Ms Costello refused to release any documents, citing a clause in the OIA legislation protecting confidential advice tendered by ministers and officials.
So Prof Hoek and RNZ referred their OIA requests to chief ombudsman Peter Boshier, who ordered Ms Costello to release the information.
Prof Hoek said they eventually received "a flood" of emails and documents, which had been heavily redacted by the ministry.
"It's very difficult when a lot of the material is being heavily redacted because obviously you don't know what you don't know and it makes it difficult to undertake any kind of rigorous analysis.
"All we do know is that we've seen a move towards decisions that align with the tobacco industry's interests.
"And that's not just the repeal of the smokefree measures.
"There were tax reductions on heated tobacco products, and there have been proposals to introduce oral nicotine products, which the tobacco industry has been pushing."
Prof Hoek said it left many in the health and research sectors asking questions.
"Does this new direction align with the research evidence? The answer to that is no.
"Does it follow the expert advice from the Ministry of Health or from people like me working in the area? The answer to that is no.
"Is there really resounding public support for this new direction of travel? Again, the answer to that is quite clearly no.
"You end up thinking, who is going to benefit from these decisions and I think that's where you inevitably have to start considering the tobacco industry and what influence they've had."
Under the Tobacco Transparency Bill, the prime minister would have to issue policies requiring ministers to declare any interests they have in tobacco companies; the minister of health would provide guidance for public officials explaining the potential for tobacco industry influence; and the public service commissioner would set standards for officials involved in developing tobacco control policies.
Prof Hoek said the Bill would stop the government from supporting, endorsing or advocating for the tobacco industry's interests, and promote stronger compliance with Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which calls on parties to protect "policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry".
The Bill would also prevent people with interests in the tobacco industry from working on tobacco policy, and limit officials' ability to move directly from government roles to positions in tobacco companies.
"If politicians have got nothing to hide, that would be really obvious, and I think the net effect would be that some of the trust that's been lost in the government could potentially be regained.
"The repeal of measures that would have seen New Zealand realise the Smokefree 2025 goal appalled the public health community.
"This Bill will protect policies that promote wellbeing and equity, and that will benefit all New Zealanders," she said.
john.lewis@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Couple sent off in joint funeral
Bill and Lavenia Gerken died within 10 days of each other and had a combined funeral in Gore on Tuesday. Photo: supplied A Gore couple who were married for more than 65 years died within 10 days of each other and had a rare combined funeral in the town earlier this week. The double funeral of Bill and Lavenia Gerken took place mainly because the surging interest in country music had booked out every venue in Gore last week. Mr Gerken was first to die, of natural causes on May 23. Daughter Kerry Gerken said her father did not want to go but he just slipped away. "And as soon as he went, Mum just gave up the ghost. She went downhill quite fast," she said. Both were 88. A funeral could not be held for Mr Gerken in Gore last week as all venues were booked out for the Tussock Music Festival which led into the Gold Guitars awards. "There was just no venues available, so we had to wait until the music was finished." Mrs Gerken was moved into hospital last Friday and by then it was not looking good for her. "It was like Mum went downhill so fast so she could be with Dad. She didn't like being without him." The idea of a combined funeral was discussed at the weekend by the family if Mrs Gerken died before the Tuesday ceremony. Mrs Gerken died on Monday night. The funeral then took place in front of a big crowd at the RSA rooms in Gore, with a mix of humour and sadness. Aurora Funeral Services had swung into action and seamlessly changed the funeral for one Gerken to two. Mrs Gerken was born in Australia but moved across the Ditch when she was 17 and met her future husband through friends. They had three children, six grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. "They had a great sense of humour, the two of them, they loved to laugh." Ms Gerken quipped at the funeral that her father would be loving the double funeral. "Two for the price of one, he would say."
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Oxford scholarship follows career ‘punt'
University of Otago master's graduate Joseph Balfe has received a University of Oxford scholarship. PHOTO: SUPPLIED From musician to neuroscientist, an Oamaru man's career change has paid off. Former Waitaki Boys' High School student Joseph Balfe has been awarded the prestigious Clarendon Scholarship at the University of Oxford in England. About 38,000 graduates apply each year for the fully funded scholarship at the collegiate research university. Mr Balfe was one of only 200 people selected worldwide. Mr Balfe, 25, attended WBHS from 2012-16, and achieved his master's of science (with distinction) in neuroscience at the University of Otago last year. He will undertake his PhD in psychiatry at Oxford. Mr Balfe said he was astounded to receive the scholarship. "I'm very surprised but absolutely grateful at the same time because it was definitely a lot of work to get to this point. "I'm really looking forward to being surrounded by very like-minded people who are working very hard and excited and passionate about what they do." After completing his bachelor's degree in music he was "at a bit of a crossroads" and said he "kind of fell into neuroscience". "It was a bit of a punt because I wasn't really a science person, but I just gave it my best shot and now it's gone pretty far obviously, and my life has gone in a completely different direction." WBHS rector Darryl Paterson said the school community was "incredibly proud of Joseph" as they were of "many old boys who are changing the world". "To be recognised for such a prestigious scholarship is an amazing achievement and a tribute to his talents." Being a prefect, Mr Balfe was an outstanding student as well as a talented musician, public speaker and sportsman, Mr Paterson said. "Speaking with many of his former teachers, and having met him in 2017, he is a most humble and hardworking young man, highly respected by all." After graduating, Mr Balfe completed an internship in cancer diagnostics at Pacific Edge Ltd, where he now works as a clinical trials associate in the Centre for Innovation. He is also a part-time research assistant at the University of Otago. Over the past two and a-half years, Mr Balfe has been working on developing a novel wearable smart device to detect and relieve asthma attacks by harnessing the interconnectivity of the nervous system. "A lot of what has driven me forward academically has been what I've done with Otago through this device that I'm developing with my supervisor, Associate Prof Yusuf Cakmak, called the VentiMate," he said. Mr Balfe will join Oxford's Translational NeuroStimulation Laboratory, where he will investigate a novel form of brain stimulation for the treatment of depression. His concern for mental health sparked his initial curiosity for neuroscience, after he worked in a support role in residential colleges and met many young people with mental health issues. He said it was a tremendous advantage to continue to work on novel technology that had the potential to make a difference for people who were suffering daily. "That's an enormous privilege and I'm quite humbled to be a part of such an important mission." Born in Portsmouth, England, Mr Balfe moved to Oamaru with his Filipina mother and British father at the age of 6. He "owes everything" to his parents, who were excited for him to attend Oxford. Mr Balfe said music would always be a part of his life. He had a couple of "cool shows" coming up in Dunedin, before he moved to Oxford in mid-September to begin his scholarship course in October.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Rights Aotearoa Demands Urgent Re-evaluation Of Regulatory Standards Bill's Human Rights Impact
Press Release – Rights Aotearoa Leading Human Rights NGO Calls Ministry of Justice Assessment 'Dangerously Superficial' and 'Constitutionally Incoherent' WELLINGTON, 4 June 2025 – Rights Aotearoa, New Zealand's leading NGO devoted to promoting and defending universal human rights, today called on Attorney-General Judith Collins KC to urgently instruct the Ministry of Justice to comprehensively re-evaluate its advice on the Regulatory Standards Bill's consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The Ministry's advice concluded that the Bill 'appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.' Rights Aotearoa has delivered a detailed letter to the Attorney-General demonstrating that this conclusion represents a grave failure of constitutional analysis that ignores the Bill's fundamental threat to human rights, democracy, and Te Tiriti o Waitangi. 'The Ministry of Justice has failed in its constitutional duty to assess this Bill's impact on human rights properly,' said Paul Thistoll, CEO of Rights Aotearoa. 'Their analysis acknowledges that the Bill departs from how rights and freedoms are expressed in the Bill of Rights Act, yet inexplicably concludes it has no impact on those rights. This is constitutionally incoherent.' Rights Aotearoa's analysis identifies multiple critical failures in the Ministry's assessment. The Ministry examined only one right superficially—freedom of expression—while ignoring clear conflicts with electoral rights, freedom from discrimination, minority rights, and the right to life. The advice fails entirely to consider how the Bill's mechanisms will create 'regulatory chill,' deterring future governments from enacting essential protections. Of particular concern is the Ministry's failure to analyse the Bill's complete exclusion of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, despite the Waitangi Tribunal's findings that the Crown breached Treaty principles through inadequate consultation with Māori and its recommendation for an 'immediate halt' to the Bill's progress. The organisation highlighted how the Bill's emphasis on property rights and narrow economic efficiency will systematically undermine anti-discrimination protections. Essential measures like disability accommodations, pay equity legislation, and protections against discrimination could be challenged as 'impairing' property rights. 'This Bill creates a competing quasi-constitutional framework that elevates property rights above all other human rights,' the letter states. 'It attempts to lock in a narrow ideological worldview that will bind future Parliaments.' Rights Aotearoa has committed to filing an action in the High Court, should the Bill pass in its current form, seeking a declaration that it is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act. The organisation calls on the Attorney-General to instruct the Ministry of Justice to conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation that accurately analyses the Bill's downstream effects on all rights, considers its practical operation, examines the constitutional implications of creating a parallel rights framework, evaluates the exclusion of Te Tiriti, and assesses the impacts on anti-discrimination protections. 'At this critical constitutional moment, New Zealanders deserve rigorous, honest analysis of how this Bill will affect their fundamental rights,' said Thistoll. 'The current advice is not merely inadequate—it's dangerously misleading.' About Rights Aotearoa Rights Aotearoa is Aotearoa New Zealand's leading non-governmental organisation dedicated to promoting and defending universal human rights. Although we have a focus on transgender, non-binary and intersex rights, we work to ensure that all people in New Zealand enjoy the full range of human rights and fundamental freedoms recognised in domestic and international law.
