
Ultra-fit man, 32, on the brink of death after taking steroids
A bodybuilder was left fighting for his life after abusing a drug which experts warn more young men are turning to, unaware of its devastating side effects.
Zak Wilkinson, 32, spent more than two years using steroids, splashing over $46,000 on the performance-enhancing drugs, injecting himself up to three times daily.
The avid gym goer, like a growing number of young men, turned to anabolic steroids, a type of image and performance drug taken, to increase his muscle growth.
The drugs mimic testosterone - one of the hormones responsible for boosting muscle mass - but can have devastating side effects, including an increased risk of suffering a heart attack.
And experts warn there has been a concerning rise in their use fueled by social media triggering body image issues.
Now, Zak hopes to do his part in raising the alarm about the potentially life-changing effects of the drug.
On March 23, 2022, the father of one's grueling steroid regime finally caught up with him when he started having seizures, vomiting and sweating profusely.
He was rushed to intensive care unit at James Cook University Hospital, in Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, England, after his sister, Chelsea, 37, called an ambulance.
At first, doctors thought he could be suffering from meningitis, but quickly realized the fits were caused by his steroid use.
Doctors said Zak was fortunate to avoid suffering long-term neurological damage after being left non-verbal for days.
He was put into a medically-induced coma for a week, with his medical team saying it was a 'miracle' he survived.
Zak, a scaffolder, said: 'I thought I'd never be able to play with my son again, that I'd never see him again.
'After the coma had ended, one doctor said that he couldn't believe I was speaking with him because he thought I'd have brain complications for the rest of my life.
'I was so frightened that that could be the end of me.'
Zak said steroids had 'just got hold of him' and warned that gym goers need to be aware of the risks.
'It was an all or nothing approach - it's frightening. It just gets hold of you. I thought I was the fittest, strongest, healthiest person, but on the inside I wasn't.
'It's sad because I see a lot of young lads becoming affected by it. And that's why a lot of the bodybuilders are dying prematurely, because it's not healthy.'
Doctors have warned Zak that he will likely have medical issues for the rest of his life.
He has a meeting with his treatment team twice a week, and also has to take anxiety, sleeping, and epilepsy medication, as well as attend frequent appointments for brain scans and blood tests.
'It could still all affect me later on, and I'm probably going to be on constant medication for the rest of my life,' he said.
'I now have PTSD, body dysmorphia, a diagnosed eating disorder, regular flashbacks, and I'm having rehabilitation for trauma. I've also now become epileptic due to the coma.'
Anabolic-androgenic steroids are the most common type of 'image and performance enhancing drug'.
They are typically injected directly into the muscle, though can also be taken orally in tablet form or even as a cream.
Anabolic-androgenic steroids work by mimicking the effects of the male sex hormone testosterone, tricking the body into producing more muscular tissue.
But this comes at a cost. Common side effects include: severe acne, kidney failure, high cholesterol, and even stroke.
A landmark study published last year by Danish researchers found steroid users have an almost 300 per cent increased risk of death within two decades.
Zak said he started taking steroids at 16 after struggling with body dysmorphia - a mental health condition where a person spends a lot of time worrying about perceived flaws in their appearance.
He said: 'The drugs were very accessible and I was weighing everything - even down to the sugar-free syrups in my coffees.
'It started as a hobby and then it became body dysmorphia. I could barely look in the mirror, and I would put jumpers and hoodies on to avoid showing my body.
'And that explains the tattoos. I'm so body conscious. I've tried every diet out there, I've tried protein diet, meat and eggs diet, weight loss diets, the lot.
'It's because social media creates competition and you're constantly comparing yourself to others and looking at others trying to emulate them. It's a vicious circle.'
He said: 'The steroids were selfish, I didn't care about my son, my friends, or my family.
'But it happens ever so slowly, you start taking steroids, and the benefits you see on the outside make you want to take more, but it isolates you from your friendships and bonds with people.
'I didn't want to socialize and spend time with my partner. I was just striving for perfection in the bodybuilding game when everything around me was falling apart.
'My family nearly lost someone who was important in their lives - it was a tough time for them.
'There's a real taboo around men and steroid use. There's AA for alcoholics, GA for gamblers, but not really a lot on steroid use and the gym.
'I want to show people who are struggling what I've been through, that these muscles are not worth the comas, seizures, constant brain scans, tubes out your mouth, possibly losing a member of your family - all because you want to look good and compare yourself on social media.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
12 minutes ago
- Times
Brydon Carse: I wanted toe amputated, but doctors said I need it to balance
Brydon Carse, the England all-rounder, says he became so frustrated with a persistent toe injury that he contemplated having it amputated. One of England's success stories of the winter, the Durham fast bowler was ruled out after the first game of the Champions Trophy in February, having attempted to manage an injury to the second toe on his left foot for several months of a breakthrough period. He was back in action in a County Championship match for Durham last month, followed by a return to international cricket in the three-match one-day series against West Indies, but he spoke on Thursday of just how big an issue the injury to the toe on his landing foot had become. 'It ended up being quite a severe wound, which I was playing with for the majority of the winter,' Carse, 29, said. 'The wound became infected a couple of times and for a period of about six to eight weeks I was on three or four different courses of antibiotics. Eventually the wound was so deep that it ultimately needed a period of time just to heal and close up.'


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lancashire: £10m boost for council drug and alcohol support services
Lancashire County Council has been handed more than £10m by the government to prevent drug and alcohol-related deaths and help those with addiction authority said the cash, which has been put together by consolidating other grants for services like recovery programs and housing schemes for vulnerable people, was one of the largest amounts allocated across England. A council spokesperson said it would be used to pay for services like mental health support for those with substance abuse problems and drug education in Councillor Daniel Matchett, who works as a mental health nurse, said the funding was welcome as he had seen the "devastation" caused by drugs first-hand. Councillors have approved the allocation of the £10m grant by the Department of Health and Social is aimed at funding improved treatment, cutting crime and preventing drug and alcohol-related said: "It is a significant amount of funding. "There is a real focus on improving the quality of treatment and making sure more people can access this, which will help prevent drug and alcohol-related deaths in the county."Among the services that will be supported by the grant are addiction recovery help out-of-hours as well as additional weekend support, and inpatient detox also includes funding for training to professionals in schools and improved support for those in the criminal justice system. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Free school meals for more children in England is a positive thing, but there's a catch
Good news. Free school meals for all children in England on universal credit is rightly being celebrated by schools, nurseries, further education colleges and children's charities. There may only be 500,000 extra recipients estimated by the government now, but in the long run 1.7 million children will be eligible, says the Institute for Fiscal Studies. 'Fantastic news,' says the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), as 100,000 children will be lifted out of poverty by this annual £500 put back in parents' pockets. Food matters. Hungry children can't learn, and many miss school to avoid the public embarrassment of no dinner money and no packed lunch, according to CPAG's Priced Out of School report. Strong evidence shows a rise in attainment and attendance if you feed children. The Feed the Future campaign finds not just academic achievement but health, happiness, reduced obesity and lifetime earnings improve if children don't go hungry. Surely that can't surprise anyone. The universal breakfast clubs being rolled out now represent real progress. Strict rules stopping schools from demanding absurdly expensive uniforms, sometimes a not-so-subtle way to exclude poorer families, is another part of a developing anti-poverty strategy. But it's complicated. Nothing in poverty numbers is easy. So while celebrating more meals for more children, we should question the total number of children lifted out of poverty. The government says it's 100,000 and the IFS agrees. But look what happens when you factor in the dire effect of the upcoming £5bn disability and Pip cuts. Turn to the government's own paper on the impact. Look at Annex B: 'It is estimated that there will be an additional 250,000 people (including 50,000 children) in relative poverty after housing costs in financial year ending 2030 as a result of the modelled changes to social security.' As those receiving support from sources such as Pip lose their benefit, the family gets poorer. Some may find this offset by the addition of free school meals, but not all will qualify, and many families will still find themselves worse off once what they gain from having free school meals is set against benefit losses. The vote on disability benefit cuts is coming up shortly, with up to 170 Labour MPs reportedly ready to rebel. As the Department for Work and Pensions scurries to amend the proposal in time for the vote, it needs to take into account the danger of sending more children below the poverty threshold. Of the many severe critiques of the government's Pathways to Work plan for these disability cuts, one of the most authoritative is the Citizens Advice response, Pathways to Poverty. It opens: 'By refusing to properly consult on its plan to cut billions from disability benefits, the government is choosing not to ask questions it doesn't want the answers to. The cuts will have a devastating impact on disabled people (and their children), sending hundreds of thousands into poverty, and many more into deeper poverty. This will result from a series of arbitrary reforms that have been designed around savings targets rather than improving outcomes, inflicting hardship on people in ways that the government doesn't yet fully understand.' Few would doubt the need for the government to take action on the growing numbers of working-age people off sick with mental and physical ailments. Good plans to provide work coaches to help, not bully, them back into working life with an array of supports are unfolding. But the dash for cash suddenly and unexpectedly imposed on the DWP at the last moment when the Office for Budget Responsibility found a gap in Reeves's proposed £5bn in savings has thrust more brutal cuts forward, regardless of circumstance. In 1997, New Labour's New Deal to help people into work was a great success: money saved came from finding people jobs, not cutting their benefits in advance, something that was likely to reduce their work capability. The welcome new free school meals policy shines a light on the depths of poverty. How could the appallingly low family income of £7,400 have been the qualifier until now? In Northern Ireland the benchmark is twice as high. Wales and London have universal free meals for primary children; in Scotland, all pupils are eligible for the first five years of primary school. Labour inherited a tax and benefits system that had, since 2010, cut entitlements among families with children by £2,200 a year on average, with those out-of-work losing £5,500 a year, reports the IFS. Reversing that is an uphill task. Many children now getting free meals won't be lifted out of poverty: it would take a lot more than £500 a year. Lifting the two-child cap would cost less than meals, in terms of freeing children from poverty. That estimated £3.5bn to abolish it will have to be found by Liz Kendall and Bridget Phillipson's child poverty taskforce, which will report at budget time in the autumn. There just is no way round it for a government that pledged to take more children out of poverty. Note that they call this free school meals announcement just a 'down payment'. The best had better be yet to come. A final thought: for all the panic about disability claims, total working-age benefits as a proportion of government spending have not risen in the past 20 years. What has happened is cuts for children have been offset by increases for triple-locked pensioners. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist